{ "artifact_kind": "events", "schema_version": "civic_events_v1", "generation_version": "events_v1", "status": "complete", "meeting": "k8lqjgxruce.stephenson_county_il_public_works_committee_meeting_2-12-26", "meeting_date": "2026-02-12", "source_records_artifact": "./data/us_il_stephenson_county_board/intel_gemma4_e4b/records/k8lqjgxruce.stephenson_county_il_public_works_committee_meeting_2-12-26/k8lqjgxruce.stephenson_county_il_public_works_committee_meeting_2-12-26.records.json", "source_transcript": "./data/us_il_stephenson_county_board/normalized/k8lqjgxruce.stephenson_county_il_public_works_committee_meeting_2-12-26.txt", "source_sha256": "94ffdb36fa18c51e16c86d62c4fe615a8d9c0056936657a7c686b572c7616382", "meeting_type": "public_works_committee", "job_profile": "civic", "source_model": "gemma4:e4b", "source_record_count": 43, "event_count": 42, "decision_event_count": 9, "multi_record_event_count": 1, "duplicate_record_count": 0, "review_flag_counts": { "unattached_second": 1, "unattached_motion_request": 1 }, "events": [ { "event_id": "event_0001", "event_type": "discussion", "subject": "Road maintenance and clearing activities", "summary": "Work included plowing and spreading roads after light snow, cutting brush (using a new boom mower), working on Orangeville Road for summer redo by clearing everything from fence to fence all the way in Vermont, fixing potholes, and managing debris removal.", "grouping": { "method": "single_record", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 1 ], "source_chunks": [ 1 ], "components": {}, "evidence": [ { "text": "The last month, there was a couple of times we plowed and spread the roads. It was real light snow, not a whole lot. And then most of it's been, we've been cutting a lot of brush. And if you recall, we got that new boom mower last year. That's worked out real well. We've done a lot of smaller stuff with that. So, and we've been working on Orangeville Road because that gets redone this summer. So we're cutting everything from fence to fence, clearing everything that we can. So all the way in Vermont. So fixed a few potholes, fence a little cold that they don't bother a lot. So other than that, that's about brush.", "source_record_indices": [ 1 ] } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "discussion", "subject": "Road maintenance and clearing activities", "summary": "Work included plowing and spreading roads after light snow, cutting brush (using a new boom mower), working on Orangeville Road for summer redo by clearing everything from fence to fence all the way in Vermont, fixing potholes, and managing debris removal.", "evidence": "The last month, there was a couple of times we plowed and spread the roads. It was real light snow, not a whole lot. And then most of it's been, we've been cutting a lot of brush. And if you recall, we got that new boom mower last year. That's worked out real well. We've done a lot of smaller stuff with that. So, and we've been working on Orangeville Road because that gets redone this summer. So we're cutting everything from fence to fence, clearing everything that we can. So all the way in Vermont. So fixed a few potholes, fence a little cold that they don't bother a lot. So other than that, that's about brush.", "source_chunks": [ 1 ], "record_index": 1 } ] }, { "event_id": "event_0002", "event_type": "discussion", "subject": "Brush burning restrictions and debris removal", "summary": "Burning brush is restricted to when the wind is west or south due to proximity of houses; some dirt, rocks, and drywall from a demolished building corner need removal.", "grouping": { "method": "single_record", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 2 ], "source_chunks": [ 1 ], "components": {}, "evidence": [ { "text": "So I only burn when there's a west, south, or I'm used to wind, but mostly, mostly west or south, because I don't want this stuff flowing in their houses. So I try to be good to them about that. I don't, I wouldn't want to sit there and read smoke all night long. Yeah, so yeah, there's not, there's not a whole lot left there. There's a little bit, there's a pile of stuff that I want to get out of there, but it's froze. So one of those, we'll get that. It's mainly dirt, rocks and dirt. I wouldn't say garbage, but like just stuff from when we tore the building down in the corner. They had like, I would say like drywall piled up in the area there.", "source_record_indices": [ 2 ], "timestamp": 136.77, "end_timestamp": 136.77, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "discussion", "subject": "Brush burning restrictions and debris removal", "summary": "Burning brush is restricted to when the wind is west or south due to proximity of houses; some dirt, rocks, and drywall from a demolished building corner need removal.", "evidence": "So I only burn when there's a west, south, or I'm used to wind, but mostly, mostly west or south, because I don't want this stuff flowing in their houses. So I try to be good to them about that. I don't, I wouldn't want to sit there and read smoke all night long. Yeah, so yeah, there's not, there's not a whole lot left there. There's a little bit, there's a pile of stuff that I want to get out of there, but it's froze. So one of those, we'll get that. It's mainly dirt, rocks and dirt. I wouldn't say garbage, but like just stuff from when we tore the building down in the corner. They had like, I would say like drywall piled up in the area there.", "source_chunks": [ 1 ], "timestamp": 136.77, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 2 } ], "timestamp": 136.77, "end_timestamp": 136.77, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" }, { "event_id": "event_0003", "event_type": "presentation", "subject": "Super letting schedule delay for projects", "summary": "The super letting originally planned for March 3rd must be delayed to April 6th because final approval on three projects from IDOT is pending, and delays were caused by clearing a right of way from one highway commissioner and awaiting joint agreement approval from IDOT.", "grouping": { "method": "single_record", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 3 ], "source_chunks": [ 1 ], "components": {}, "evidence": [ { "text": "I plan on having a super letting on March 3rd, the second, third, fourth, and fifth project we're going to be letting on March 3rd, but I don't have final approval on three of the projects from the IDOT yet. So our super letting is going to have to be delayed about a month. So I think I've got it set up for April 6th, I think. And it wasn't all IDOT's fault. One, it took a while to get a right of way cleared from one of the highway commissioners and the other one, well the joint agreement that's on the agenda that has to be approved by IDOT first before we can go to letting.", "source_record_indices": [ 3 ], "timestamp": 191.53, "end_timestamp": 191.53, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "presentation", "subject": "Super letting schedule delay for projects", "summary": "The super letting originally planned for March 3rd must be delayed to April 6th because final approval on three projects from IDOT is pending, and delays were caused by clearing a right of way from one highway commissioner and awaiting joint agreement approval from IDOT.", "evidence": "I plan on having a super letting on March 3rd, the second, third, fourth, and fifth project we're going to be letting on March 3rd, but I don't have final approval on three of the projects from the IDOT yet. So our super letting is going to have to be delayed about a month. So I think I've got it set up for April 6th, I think. And it wasn't all IDOT's fault. One, it took a while to get a right of way cleared from one of the highway commissioners and the other one, well the joint agreement that's on the agenda that has to be approved by IDOT first before we can go to letting.", "source_chunks": [ 1 ], "timestamp": 191.53, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 3 } ], "timestamp": 191.53, "end_timestamp": 191.53, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" }, { "event_id": "event_0004", "event_type": "presentation", "subject": "Personnel change for Alan McNutt", "summary": "Alan McNutt is changing his retirement date from February to mid-April; he plans to work for Willow Healthman after retiring from the county, and the county will then hire him for construction work.", "grouping": { "method": "single_record", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 4 ], "source_chunks": [ 1 ], "components": {}, "evidence": [ { "text": "The only other thing is Alan McNutt, originally said he was going to retire in February, he's changing it to mid-April now. So there was some misunderstanding about working for, he talked to IMRF and he said he couldn't work for anybody for another 60 days after he retires, but it's only for IMRF employees. So he plans on working for Willow Healthman when he retires from us, and then we'll hire him to do construction for us.", "source_record_indices": [ 4 ], "timestamp": 240.65, "end_timestamp": 240.65, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "presentation", "subject": "Personnel change for Alan McNutt", "summary": "Alan McNutt is changing his retirement date from February to mid-April; he plans to work for Willow Healthman after retiring from the county, and the county will then hire him for construction work.", "evidence": "The only other thing is Alan McNutt, originally said he was going to retire in February, he's changing it to mid-April now. So there was some misunderstanding about working for, he talked to IMRF and he said he couldn't work for anybody for another 60 days after he retires, but it's only for IMRF employees. So he plans on working for Willow Healthman when he retires from us, and then we'll hire him to do construction for us.", "source_chunks": [ 1 ], "timestamp": 240.65, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 4 } ], "timestamp": 240.65, "end_timestamp": 240.65, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" }, { "event_id": "event_0005", "event_type": "discussion", "subject": "Budget status review (HVAC)", "summary": "Replacing all four HVAC units is estimated to cost around $30,000 to $35,000, compared to about $15,000 if only one was replaced; zoning assistance is expected to help with the budget.", "grouping": { "method": "single_record", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 5 ], "source_chunks": [ 1 ], "components": {}, "evidence": [ { "text": "if we replace all four of them, and two of them are, one's actually not working at all right now. There's two other ones that we've had quite a bit of work into it. But if we replace all four of them, it was going to be like around 30 to 35,000. So we'll see if you guys approve to go out for proposal, we'll see where they come in at.", "source_record_indices": [ 5 ], "timestamp": 328.17, "end_timestamp": 328.17, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "discussion", "subject": "Budget status review (HVAC)", "summary": "Replacing all four HVAC units is estimated to cost around $30,000 to $35,000, compared to about $15,000 if only one was replaced; zoning assistance is expected to help with the budget.", "evidence": "if we replace all four of them, and two of them are, one's actually not working at all right now. There's two other ones that we've had quite a bit of work into it. But if we replace all four of them, it was going to be like around 30 to 35,000. So we'll see if you guys approve to go out for proposal, we'll see where they come in at.", "source_chunks": [ 1 ], "timestamp": 328.17, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 5 } ], "timestamp": 328.17, "end_timestamp": 328.17, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" }, { "event_id": "event_0006", "event_type": "discussion", "subject": "Budget status review (Excess Sick Time)", "summary": "The budget for excess sick time is noted as a one-time annual expense, which is why the current figure is at 50%.", "grouping": { "method": "single_record", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 6 ], "source_chunks": [ 1 ], "components": {}, "evidence": [ { "text": "So other than that on the excess sick time, that's a one time a year. So that's why it's like at 50% right now.", "source_record_indices": [ 6 ], "timestamp": 374.649, "end_timestamp": 374.649, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "discussion", "subject": "Budget status review (Excess Sick Time)", "summary": "The budget for excess sick time is noted as a one-time annual expense, which is why the current figure is at 50%.", "evidence": "So other than that on the excess sick time, that's a one time a year. So that's why it's like at 50% right now.", "source_chunks": [ 1 ], "timestamp": 374.649, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 6 } ], "timestamp": 374.649, "end_timestamp": 374.649, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" }, { "event_id": "event_0007", "event_type": "project", "subject": "Local funding project for Vance Cerville Road", "summary": "A grant secured for local funded funding is 100% funded, but a dollar value was included in the budget to cover potential overruns.", "grouping": { "method": "single_record", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 7 ], "source_chunks": [ 1 ], "components": {}, "evidence": [ { "text": "Yeah, this is for Cerville. Well, this is one of the grants we got for local funded funding. It's a hundred percent funding, but we have put a dollar value in there in case it goes over budget.", "source_record_indices": [ 7 ], "timestamp": 406.18, "end_timestamp": 406.18, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "project", "subject": "Local funding project for Vance Cerville Road", "summary": "A grant secured for local funded funding is 100% funded, but a dollar value was included in the budget to cover potential overruns.", "evidence": "Yeah, this is for Cerville. Well, this is one of the grants we got for local funded funding. It's a hundred percent funding, but we have put a dollar value in there in case it goes over budget.", "source_chunks": [ 1 ], "timestamp": 406.18, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 7 } ], "timestamp": 406.18, "end_timestamp": 406.18, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" }, { "event_id": "event_0008", "event_type": "discussion", "subject": "Future plans for intersection improvement on project road", "summary": "The last section of the project (1.64 mile before Billena Road) is noted; funding is unavailable for turning the intersection into a roundabout, though reapplying for HSIP funds and applying for rural and tribal assistance grants are planned.", "grouping": { "method": "single_record", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 8 ], "source_chunks": [ 1 ], "components": {}, "evidence": [ { "text": "So this 1.64 mile that's right before Billena Road or? It'll be the end of the project, the last section, other than the intersection. So the intersection, I don't have funding. My plan is to turn it into a roundabout, but I don't have funding for that yet. If it never happens, it won't happen. We have a grant out there right now looking for funding for the Engineering Forum. We submitted HSIP funds for the roundabout, got rejected, but you can reapply every year, so I'm going to reapply next year for HSIP funds for it.", "source_record_indices": [ 8 ], "timestamp": 438.42, "end_timestamp": 438.42, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "discussion", "subject": "Future plans for intersection improvement on project road", "summary": "The last section of the project (1.64 mile before Billena Road) is noted; funding is unavailable for turning the intersection into a roundabout, though reapplying for HSIP funds and applying for rural and tribal assistance grants are planned.", "evidence": "So this 1.64 mile that's right before Billena Road or? It'll be the end of the project, the last section, other than the intersection. So the intersection, I don't have funding. My plan is to turn it into a roundabout, but I don't have funding for that yet. If it never happens, it won't happen. We have a grant out there right now looking for funding for the Engineering Forum. We submitted HSIP funds for the roundabout, got rejected, but you can reapply every year, so I'm going to reapply next year for HSIP funds for it.", "source_chunks": [ 1 ], "timestamp": 438.42, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 8 } ], "timestamp": 438.42, "end_timestamp": 438.42, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" }, { "event_id": "event_0009", "event_type": "decision", "subject": "Acceptance of local funding project documentation", "summary": "Motion made to accept and send documents related to the Vance Cerville Road project.", "grouping": { "method": "decision_sequence", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 9, 10 ], "source_chunks": [ 1 ], "components": { "motion": [ 9 ], "vote": [ 10 ] }, "evidence": [ { "text": "So I have a motion to accept and the HG26123.", "source_record_indices": [ 9 ], "timestamp": 422.819, "end_timestamp": 422.819, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" }, { "text": "Motion is approved.", "source_record_indices": [ 10 ], "timestamp": 497.66, "end_timestamp": 497.66, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "motion", "subject": "Acceptance of local funding project documentation", "summary": "Motion made to accept and send documents related to the Vance Cerville Road project.", "evidence": "So I have a motion to accept and the HG26123.", "source_chunks": [ 1 ], "timestamp": 422.819, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 9 }, { "record_type": "vote", "subject": "Acceptance of local funding project documentation", "summary": "The motion was approved.", "evidence": "Motion is approved.", "source_chunks": [ 1 ], "timestamp": 497.66, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 10 } ], "outcome": "approved", "timestamp": 422.819, "end_timestamp": 497.66, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" }, { "event_id": "event_0010", "event_type": "procedural_action", "subject": "Agenda item 8.2 status", "summary": "The RFP for four HV students was cancelled because the committee's approval was required before sending out the RFP.", "grouping": { "method": "single_record", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 11 ], "source_chunks": [ 1 ], "components": {}, "evidence": [ { "text": "Moving on to 8.2, the RFP for four HV students. That was my mistake. Before we sent out the RFP already, we had to get this committee's approval before we sent the RFP out, so we cancelled it.", "source_record_indices": [ 11 ], "timestamp": 599.679, "end_timestamp": 599.679, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "procedural_action", "subject": "Agenda item 8.2 status", "summary": "The RFP for four HV students was cancelled because the committee's approval was required before sending out the RFP.", "evidence": "Moving on to 8.2, the RFP for four HV students. That was my mistake. Before we sent out the RFP already, we had to get this committee's approval before we sent the RFP out, so we cancelled it.", "source_chunks": [ 1 ], "timestamp": 599.679, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 11 } ], "timestamp": 599.679, "end_timestamp": 599.679, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" }, { "event_id": "event_0011", "event_type": "discussion", "subject": "Rural and tribal assistance grant for engineering", "summary": "A previously applied rural and tribal assistance grant was only designated for engineering, not construction.", "grouping": { "method": "single_record", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 12 ], "source_chunks": [ 2 ], "components": {}, "evidence": [ { "text": "Now there's a rural and tribal assistance grant out there that we applied over the engineering for. And that was a grant was only for engineering, not any construction itself.", "source_record_indices": [ 12 ], "timestamp": 478.42, "end_timestamp": 478.42, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "discussion", "subject": "Rural and tribal assistance grant for engineering", "summary": "A previously applied rural and tribal assistance grant was only designated for engineering, not construction.", "evidence": "Now there's a rural and tribal assistance grant out there that we applied over the engineering for. And that was a grant was only for engineering, not any construction itself.", "source_chunks": [ 2 ], "timestamp": 478.42, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 12 } ], "timestamp": 478.42, "end_timestamp": 478.42, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" }, { "event_id": "event_0012", "event_type": "decision", "subject": "Approval of previous action", "summary": "The motion was approved.", "grouping": { "method": "single_record", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 13 ], "source_chunks": [ 2 ], "components": { "outcome": [ 13 ] }, "evidence": [ { "text": "Motion is approved.", "source_record_indices": [ 13 ], "timestamp": 497.66, "end_timestamp": 497.66, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "procedural_action", "subject": "Approval of previous action", "summary": "The motion was approved.", "evidence": "Motion is approved.", "source_chunks": [ 2 ], "timestamp": 497.66, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 13 } ], "outcome": "approved", "timestamp": 497.66, "end_timestamp": 497.66, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" }, { "event_id": "event_0013", "event_type": "discussion", "subject": "RFP for four HV students", "summary": "The RFP for four HV students was cancelled because the committee needed to approve it before sending it out, and several people had viewed it.", "grouping": { "method": "single_record", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 14 ], "source_chunks": [ 2 ], "components": {}, "evidence": [ { "text": "Moving on to 8.2, the RFP for four HV students. That was my mistake. Before we sent out the RFP already, we had to get this committee's approval before we sent the RFP out, so we cancelled it. How many did we get? How many came out and looked at us? There's been like five. Okay. We had several come out and look at it, so we've cancelled it.", "source_record_indices": [ 14 ], "timestamp": 599.679, "end_timestamp": 599.679, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "discussion", "subject": "RFP for four HV students", "summary": "The RFP for four HV students was cancelled because the committee needed to approve it before sending it out, and several people had viewed it.", "evidence": "Moving on to 8.2, the RFP for four HV students. That was my mistake. Before we sent out the RFP already, we had to get this committee's approval before we sent the RFP out, so we cancelled it. How many did we get? How many came out and looked at us? There's been like five. Okay. We had several come out and look at it, so we've cancelled it.", "source_chunks": [ 2 ], "timestamp": 599.679, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 14 } ], "timestamp": 599.679, "end_timestamp": 599.679, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" }, { "event_id": "event_0014", "event_type": "discussion", "subject": "Heating system funding source", "summary": "Discussion regarding the heating system repair costs, specifically whether funds would come from the speaker's budget or 50% from the zoning department.", "grouping": { "method": "single_record", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 15 ], "source_chunks": [ 2 ], "components": {}, "evidence": [ { "text": "Is the money for it all going to come out of your budget? Or is it going to come out of some of the zoning department's going to pay for 50% out from their, their foundation.", "source_record_indices": [ 15 ], "timestamp": 655.11, "end_timestamp": 655.11, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "discussion", "subject": "Heating system funding source", "summary": "Discussion regarding the heating system repair costs, specifically whether funds would come from the speaker's budget or 50% from the zoning department.", "evidence": "Is the money for it all going to come out of your budget? Or is it going to come out of some of the zoning department's going to pay for 50% out from their, their foundation.", "source_chunks": [ 2 ], "timestamp": 655.11, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 15 } ], "timestamp": 655.11, "end_timestamp": 655.11, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" }, { "event_id": "event_0015", "event_type": "decision", "subject": "Approval of RFP", "summary": "Motion made to approve the RFP.", "grouping": { "method": "single_record", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 16 ], "source_chunks": [ 2 ], "components": { "motion": [ 16 ] }, "evidence": [ { "text": "I have a motion to approve the RFP.", "source_record_indices": [ 16 ], "timestamp": 668.909, "end_timestamp": 668.909, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "motion", "subject": "Approval of RFP", "summary": "Motion made to approve the RFP.", "evidence": "I have a motion to approve the RFP.", "source_chunks": [ 2 ], "timestamp": 668.909, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 16 } ], "timestamp": 668.909, "end_timestamp": 668.909, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" }, { "event_id": "event_0016", "event_type": "decision", "subject": "Seconding the motion to approve RFP", "summary": "The motion was seconded.", "grouping": { "method": "single_record", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 17 ], "source_chunks": [ 2 ], "components": { "second": [ 17 ] }, "evidence": [ { "text": "I'll do a second.", "source_record_indices": [ 17 ], "timestamp": 677.23, "end_timestamp": 677.23, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "procedural_action", "subject": "Seconding the motion to approve RFP", "summary": "The motion was seconded.", "evidence": "I'll do a second.", "source_chunks": [ 2 ], "timestamp": 677.23, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 17 } ], "timestamp": 677.23, "end_timestamp": 677.23, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "review_flags": [ "unattached_second" ] }, { "event_id": "event_0017", "event_type": "discussion", "subject": "Clarification on RFP document type", "summary": "A discussion occurred clarifying whether the document was an RFQ or an RFP, noting that 'or equivalent' was mentioned in the description and that the budget for one unit was $15,000.", "grouping": { "method": "single_record", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 18 ], "source_chunks": [ 2 ], "components": {}, "evidence": [ { "text": "Sorry. I don't know if it is RFQ, you know it's not an RFP, it's a carrier, RFQ, RFQ, I don't know if it is RFQ, you know it's just an RFP, RFQ means qualifications in Ford, consultants, so it's that you're going to, you ask for the qualification, proposal is a bit practice, you already know what you need anyway, yeah, so a specified carrier is that, but I believe on the top it says like or equivalent, so whichever, I guess I could, I should have taken carrier, but I think I think the last one we went out or the last one I viewed from the county had a carry on it, but in the description it says or equivalent or hand or we can read it again, and we had a budget of one unit, we had a budget of $15,000 and we couldn't, we couldn't like, we couldn't make, like, We could have gone a little bit over, but now they came in so much cheaper, and then with the zoning stepping up, that really helps us out.", "source_record_indices": [ 18 ], "timestamp": 677.23, "end_timestamp": 677.23, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "discussion", "subject": "Clarification on RFP document type", "summary": "A discussion occurred clarifying whether the document was an RFQ or an RFP, noting that 'or equivalent' was mentioned in the description and that the budget for one unit was $15,000.", "evidence": "Sorry. I don't know if it is RFQ, you know it's not an RFP, it's a carrier, RFQ, RFQ, I don't know if it is RFQ, you know it's just an RFP, RFQ means qualifications in Ford, consultants, so it's that you're going to, you ask for the qualification, proposal is a bit practice, you already know what you need anyway, yeah, so a specified carrier is that, but I believe on the top it says like or equivalent, so whichever, I guess I could, I should have taken carrier, but I think I think the last one we went out or the last one I viewed from the county had a carry on it, but in the description it says or equivalent or hand or we can read it again, and we had a budget of one unit, we had a budget of $15,000 and we couldn't, we couldn't like, we couldn't make, like, We could have gone a little bit over, but now they came in so much cheaper, and then with the zoning stepping up, that really helps us out.", "source_chunks": [ 2 ], "timestamp": 677.23, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 18 } ], "timestamp": 677.23, "end_timestamp": 677.23, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" }, { "event_id": "event_0018", "event_type": "discussion", "subject": "Budget capability for 4HV units", "summary": "Agreement that the budget is capable of handling 50% of the cost.", "grouping": { "method": "single_record", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 19 ], "source_chunks": [ 2 ], "components": {}, "evidence": [ { "text": "I agree that the thing to do is just the budget is capable of handling 50% of the.", "source_record_indices": [ 19 ], "timestamp": 755.71, "end_timestamp": 755.71, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "discussion", "subject": "Budget capability for 4HV units", "summary": "Agreement that the budget is capable of handling 50% of the cost.", "evidence": "I agree that the thing to do is just the budget is capable of handling 50% of the.", "source_chunks": [ 2 ], "timestamp": 755.71, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 19 } ], "timestamp": 755.71, "end_timestamp": 755.71, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" }, { "event_id": "event_0019", "event_type": "discussion", "subject": "Age and condition of building systems", "summary": "The age of the structure was noted as twenty two years, with discussion about the current state of heating/bathroom facilities.", "grouping": { "method": "single_record", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 20 ], "source_chunks": [ 2 ], "components": {}, "evidence": [ { "text": "So what's the age of those? Twenty two years. It was 2003 was when the building. OK, well, then they're definitely. I mean, you know, like I said, the one that controls our camp and our my office, person's office and Dale's office is no longer does it work. But yet you go in the girl's bathroom and it's like a sound of your.", "source_record_indices": [ 20 ], "timestamp": 777.11, "end_timestamp": 777.11, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "discussion", "subject": "Age and condition of building systems", "summary": "The age of the structure was noted as twenty two years, with discussion about the current state of heating/bathroom facilities.", "evidence": "So what's the age of those? Twenty two years. It was 2003 was when the building. OK, well, then they're definitely. I mean, you know, like I said, the one that controls our camp and our my office, person's office and Dale's office is no longer does it work. But yet you go in the girl's bathroom and it's like a sound of your.", "source_chunks": [ 2 ], "timestamp": 777.11, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 20 } ], "timestamp": 777.11, "end_timestamp": 777.11, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" }, { "event_id": "event_0020", "event_type": "discussion", "subject": "Energy efficiency potential", "summary": "A suggestion was made that if the shredded contract was up, energy could be saved by burning it instead of wasting it.", "grouping": { "method": "single_record", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 21 ], "source_chunks": [ 2 ], "components": {}, "evidence": [ { "text": "I heard that the shredded contract was up. We wouldn't need to send all that energy away as we could just burn it and never eat it.", "source_record_indices": [ 21 ], "timestamp": 814.37, "end_timestamp": 814.37, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "discussion", "subject": "Energy efficiency potential", "summary": "A suggestion was made that if the shredded contract was up, energy could be saved by burning it instead of wasting it.", "evidence": "I heard that the shredded contract was up. We wouldn't need to send all that energy away as we could just burn it and never eat it.", "source_chunks": [ 2 ], "timestamp": 814.37, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 21 } ], "timestamp": 814.37, "end_timestamp": 814.37, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" }, { "event_id": "event_0021", "event_type": "decision", "subject": "Approval of RFP (Second instance)", "summary": "Motion made to approve the RFP.", "grouping": { "method": "single_record", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 22 ], "source_chunks": [ 2 ], "components": { "motion": [ 22 ] }, "evidence": [ { "text": "This has been moved and seconded to approve the RFP.", "source_record_indices": [ 22 ], "timestamp": 827.09, "end_timestamp": 827.09, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "motion", "subject": "Approval of RFP (Second instance)", "summary": "Motion made to approve the RFP.", "evidence": "This has been moved and seconded to approve the RFP.", "source_chunks": [ 2 ], "timestamp": 827.09, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 22 } ], "timestamp": 827.09, "end_timestamp": 827.09, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" }, { "event_id": "event_0022", "event_type": "decision", "subject": "Vote on RFP approval", "summary": "The motion was approved by a vote of 'aye'.", "grouping": { "method": "single_record", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 23 ], "source_chunks": [ 2 ], "components": { "outcome": [ 23 ] }, "evidence": [ { "text": "Seeing none, all those in favor say aye. Aye. Motion approved.", "source_record_indices": [ 23 ], "timestamp": 827.09, "end_timestamp": 827.09, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "procedural_action", "subject": "Vote on RFP approval", "summary": "The motion was approved by a vote of 'aye'.", "evidence": "Seeing none, all those in favor say aye. Aye. Motion approved.", "source_chunks": [ 2 ], "timestamp": 827.09, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 23 } ], "outcome": "approved", "timestamp": 827.09, "end_timestamp": 827.09, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" }, { "event_id": "event_0023", "event_type": "presentation", "subject": "Pavin Chassis for new snowplow", "summary": "Scott presented information on the Pavin Chassis, noting it is for a 2027 model year snowplow and that emissions changes could cause a dramatic price increase.", "grouping": { "method": "single_record", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 24 ], "source_chunks": [ 2 ], "components": {}, "evidence": [ { "text": "I don't know about it, so I'm going to turn it over to Scott to talk about the Pavin Chassis. It's a chassis for a new snowplow in 2020. I guess that what I should say is it's going to be a 2027 modeling year, but when they start building chassis in 27, the emissions changes and the price is going to go up dramatically.", "source_record_indices": [ 24 ], "timestamp": 848.09, "end_timestamp": 848.09, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "presentation", "subject": "Pavin Chassis for new snowplow", "summary": "Scott presented information on the Pavin Chassis, noting it is for a 2027 model year snowplow and that emissions changes could cause a dramatic price increase.", "evidence": "I don't know about it, so I'm going to turn it over to Scott to talk about the Pavin Chassis. It's a chassis for a new snowplow in 2020. I guess that what I should say is it's going to be a 2027 modeling year, but when they start building chassis in 27, the emissions changes and the price is going to go up dramatically.", "source_chunks": [ 2 ], "timestamp": 848.09, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 24 } ], "timestamp": 848.09, "end_timestamp": 848.09, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" }, { "event_id": "event_0024", "event_type": "discussion", "subject": "Pavin Chassis pricing stability", "summary": "A salesman stated that the price for the chassis was expected to stay the same.", "grouping": { "method": "single_record", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 25 ], "source_chunks": [ 2 ], "components": {}, "evidence": [ { "text": "I talked to the salesman a couple weeks ago and he said, it's going to stay the same.", "source_record_indices": [ 25 ], "timestamp": 888.889, "end_timestamp": 888.889, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "discussion", "subject": "Pavin Chassis pricing stability", "summary": "A salesman stated that the price for the chassis was expected to stay the same.", "evidence": "I talked to the salesman a couple weeks ago and he said, it's going to stay the same.", "source_chunks": [ 2 ], "timestamp": 888.889, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 25 } ], "timestamp": 888.889, "end_timestamp": 888.889, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" }, { "event_id": "event_0025", "event_type": "discussion", "subject": "Snowplow acquisition timeline", "summary": "The snowplow might be acquired by the end of the year, with potential equipment ordering starting in the third quarter of 2025.", "grouping": { "method": "single_record", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 26 ], "source_chunks": [ 2 ], "components": {}, "evidence": [ { "text": "Even though we get this, it probably wouldn't be till the end of this year. And if we, when an old truck, like if we had been out for them to equip it, we're looking at 400 days out. So that's from when you would let them know that, hey, we've got the chassis tied up, and go ahead and get us on the list. So we'll be looking at the earliest, getting that, the earliest, probably the third quarter of 20th South.", "source_record_indices": [ 26 ], "timestamp": 911.289, "end_timestamp": 911.289, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "discussion", "subject": "Snowplow acquisition timeline", "summary": "The snowplow might be acquired by the end of the year, with potential equipment ordering starting in the third quarter of 2025.", "evidence": "Even though we get this, it probably wouldn't be till the end of this year. And if we, when an old truck, like if we had been out for them to equip it, we're looking at 400 days out. So that's from when you would let them know that, hey, we've got the chassis tied up, and go ahead and get us on the list. So we'll be looking at the earliest, getting that, the earliest, probably the third quarter of 20th South.", "source_chunks": [ 2 ], "timestamp": 911.289, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 26 } ], "timestamp": 911.289, "end_timestamp": 911.289, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" }, { "event_id": "event_0026", "event_type": "financial", "subject": "Cabin Chassis Budgeting", "summary": "The cabin chassis is budgeted for this year with a price lower than one year ago.", "grouping": { "method": "single_record", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 27 ], "source_chunks": [ 2 ], "components": {}, "evidence": [ { "text": "And the cabin chassis, we have that in the budget for this year. This year, 1.6 is budget. It actually, the price actually is a little lower than it was the last one we got a year ago because I, Well, I changed one thing a little bit so it lowered the price.", "source_record_indices": [ 27 ], "timestamp": 943.799, "end_timestamp": 943.799, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "financial", "subject": "Cabin Chassis Budgeting", "summary": "The cabin chassis is budgeted for this year with a price lower than one year ago.", "evidence": "And the cabin chassis, we have that in the budget for this year. This year, 1.6 is budget. It actually, the price actually is a little lower than it was the last one we got a year ago because I, Well, I changed one thing a little bit so it lowered the price.", "source_chunks": [ 2 ], "timestamp": 943.799, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 27 } ], "timestamp": 943.799, "end_timestamp": 943.799, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" }, { "event_id": "event_0027", "event_type": "discussion", "subject": "Funding sources for chassis purchase", "summary": "The total cost of the chassis will be covered by construction equipment funds and supplemental funding.", "grouping": { "method": "single_record", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 28 ], "source_chunks": [ 2 ], "components": {}, "evidence": [ { "text": "Do you know which funds, do you remember which funds? Operational Equipment and Construction Equipment both at 100,000. Well, we got a supplemental for 100,000 and then the construction is for 100,000. So it's going to be construction, construction equipment, and then the balance will come out of the supplemental that we got.", "source_record_indices": [ 28 ], "timestamp": 974.339, "end_timestamp": 974.339, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "discussion", "subject": "Funding sources for chassis purchase", "summary": "The total cost of the chassis will be covered by construction equipment funds and supplemental funding.", "evidence": "Do you know which funds, do you remember which funds? Operational Equipment and Construction Equipment both at 100,000. Well, we got a supplemental for 100,000 and then the construction is for 100,000. So it's going to be construction, construction equipment, and then the balance will come out of the supplemental that we got.", "source_chunks": [ 2 ], "timestamp": 974.339, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 28 } ], "timestamp": 974.339, "end_timestamp": 974.339, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" }, { "event_id": "event_0028", "event_type": "discussion", "subject": "Equipment disposal procedure", "summary": "If trading in an old dump truck, there is no problem, but any disposed equipment must first be declared surplus property by the board.", "grouping": { "method": "single_record", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 29 ], "source_chunks": [ 2 ], "components": {}, "evidence": [ { "text": "No, but I, if I might likely try to sell one, like on an auction site, when I talk to them about trading in an old dump truck, there's no problem, they kind of look at me like, no, they'd prefer not to. Do you remember what year the truck is that you're replacing? I knew it would be 99, 90 and a half. Yeah, it says. Yes. Chairman. If you are going to dispose of it, it has to be declared a surplus property before you can put it on an option site. Okay. So George can help you with that. Yeah, so don't get rid of any equipment without declaring it surplus waste. We haven't even thought about it, because we have that old oil truck that I'd like to do at the same time. So it'd be a good time to get rid of two pieces. So even if we're going to auction with what we want to declare it surplus. We have to declare it surplus. The board has to declare it surplus property before it should be.", "source_record_indices": [ 29 ], "timestamp": 1004.899, "end_timestamp": 1004.899, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "discussion", "subject": "Equipment disposal procedure", "summary": "If trading in an old dump truck, there is no problem, but any disposed equipment must first be declared surplus property by the board.", "evidence": "No, but I, if I might likely try to sell one, like on an auction site, when I talk to them about trading in an old dump truck, there's no problem, they kind of look at me like, no, they'd prefer not to. Do you remember what year the truck is that you're replacing? I knew it would be 99, 90 and a half. Yeah, it says. Yes. Chairman. If you are going to dispose of it, it has to be declared a surplus property before you can put it on an option site. Okay. So George can help you with that. Yeah, so don't get rid of any equipment without declaring it surplus waste. We haven't even thought about it, because we have that old oil truck that I'd like to do at the same time. So it'd be a good time to get rid of two pieces. So even if we're going to auction with what we want to declare it surplus. We have to declare it surplus. The board has to declare it surplus property before it should be.", "source_chunks": [ 2 ], "timestamp": 1004.899, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 29 } ], "timestamp": 1004.899, "end_timestamp": 1004.899, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" }, { "event_id": "event_0029", "event_type": "discussion", "subject": "Surplus property declaration process for equipment", "summary": "Equipment must be declared surplus before being placed on an option site.", "grouping": { "method": "single_record", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 30 ], "source_chunks": [ 3 ], "components": {}, "evidence": [ { "text": "If you are going to dispose of it, it has to be declared a surplus property before you can put it on an option site.", "source_record_indices": [ 30 ], "timestamp": 1033.579, "end_timestamp": 1033.579, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "discussion", "subject": "Surplus property declaration process for equipment", "summary": "Equipment must be declared surplus before being placed on an option site.", "evidence": "If you are going to dispose of it, it has to be declared a surplus property before you can put it on an option site.", "source_chunks": [ 3 ], "timestamp": 1033.579, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 30 } ], "timestamp": 1033.579, "end_timestamp": 1033.579, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" }, { "event_id": "event_0030", "event_type": "discussion", "subject": "Surplus property declaration process for equipment", "summary": "The board must declare the property as surplus.", "grouping": { "method": "single_record", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 31 ], "source_chunks": [ 3 ], "components": {}, "evidence": [ { "text": "We have to declare it surplus. The board has to declare it surplus property before it should be.", "source_record_indices": [ 31 ], "timestamp": 1070.579, "end_timestamp": 1070.579, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "discussion", "subject": "Surplus property declaration process for equipment", "summary": "The board must declare the property as surplus.", "evidence": "We have to declare it surplus. The board has to declare it surplus property before it should be.", "source_chunks": [ 3 ], "timestamp": 1070.579, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 31 } ], "timestamp": 1070.579, "end_timestamp": 1070.579, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" }, { "event_id": "event_0031", "event_type": "discussion", "subject": "Frequency of declaring surplus property", "summary": "It was unclear if declaring surplus property is limited to once a year or can be done as needed.", "grouping": { "method": "single_record", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 32 ], "source_chunks": [ 3 ], "components": {}, "evidence": [ { "text": "Is that just the one time a year or can you do it like each one like as soon as you want?", "source_record_indices": [ 32 ], "timestamp": 1074.579, "end_timestamp": 1074.579, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "discussion", "subject": "Frequency of declaring surplus property", "summary": "It was unclear if declaring surplus property is limited to once a year or can be done as needed.", "evidence": "Is that just the one time a year or can you do it like each one like as soon as you want?", "source_chunks": [ 3 ], "timestamp": 1074.579, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 32 } ], "timestamp": 1074.579, "end_timestamp": 1074.579, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" }, { "event_id": "event_0032", "event_type": "discussion", "subject": "Declaring copier as surplus property", "summary": "A previous instance of declaring copiers as surplus property was mentioned.", "grouping": { "method": "single_record", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 33 ], "source_chunks": [ 3 ], "components": {}, "evidence": [ { "text": "Yes, we've done We've done copyers, we've done desks, we've done, what else?", "source_record_indices": [ 33 ], "timestamp": 1091.86, "end_timestamp": 1091.86, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "discussion", "subject": "Declaring copier as surplus property", "summary": "A previous instance of declaring copiers as surplus property was mentioned.", "evidence": "Yes, we've done We've done copyers, we've done desks, we've done, what else?", "source_chunks": [ 3 ], "timestamp": 1091.86, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 33 } ], "timestamp": 1091.86, "end_timestamp": 1091.86, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" }, { "event_id": "event_0033", "event_type": "discussion", "subject": "Declaring large items as surplus property", "summary": "The ability to declare large items like statues and guardrails as surplus was discussed hypothetically.", "grouping": { "method": "single_record", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 34 ], "source_chunks": [ 3 ], "components": {}, "evidence": [ { "text": "This is a big statue. I'll give you a paper roll. Not only that, but big things. So, i guess, if I sold who's guardrail? You're talking hypothetically, right?", "source_record_indices": [ 34 ], "timestamp": 1103.7, "end_timestamp": 1103.7, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "discussion", "subject": "Declaring large items as surplus property", "summary": "The ability to declare large items like statues and guardrails as surplus was discussed hypothetically.", "evidence": "This is a big statue. I'll give you a paper roll. Not only that, but big things. So, i guess, if I sold who's guardrail? You're talking hypothetically, right?", "source_chunks": [ 3 ], "timestamp": 1103.7, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 34 } ], "timestamp": 1103.7, "end_timestamp": 1103.7, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" }, { "event_id": "event_0034", "event_type": "discussion", "subject": "Declaring all owned items as surplus property", "summary": "A question was raised about whether everything owned could be declared surplus.", "grouping": { "method": "single_record", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 35 ], "source_chunks": [ 3 ], "components": {}, "evidence": [ { "text": "Can I just say everything we own? Can I just say everything?", "source_record_indices": [ 35 ], "timestamp": 1191.7, "end_timestamp": 1191.7, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "discussion", "subject": "Declaring all owned items as surplus property", "summary": "A question was raised about whether everything owned could be declared surplus.", "evidence": "Can I just say everything we own? Can I just say everything?", "source_chunks": [ 3 ], "timestamp": 1191.7, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 35 } ], "timestamp": 1191.7, "end_timestamp": 1191.7, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" }, { "event_id": "event_0035", "event_type": "decision", "subject": "Motion to approve accepting 2604", "summary": "Move by Mr. Moderow, seconded by Mr. Jogerst.", "grouping": { "method": "single_record", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 36 ], "source_chunks": [ 3 ], "components": { "request": [ 36 ] }, "evidence": [ { "text": "I need a motion for accepting 2604. Move by Mr. Moderow. Second by Mr. Jogerst.", "source_record_indices": [ 36 ], "timestamp": 1214.72, "end_timestamp": 1214.72, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "motion", "subject": "Motion to approve accepting 2604", "summary": "Move by Mr. Moderow, seconded by Mr. Jogerst.", "evidence": "I need a motion for accepting 2604. Move by Mr. Moderow. Second by Mr. Jogerst.", "source_chunks": [ 3 ], "timestamp": 1214.72, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 36 } ], "timestamp": 1214.72, "end_timestamp": 1214.72, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "review_flags": [ "unattached_motion_request" ] }, { "event_id": "event_0036", "event_type": "discussion", "subject": "Tractor/Vehicle Bids Comparison", "summary": "A comparison was made between a quote from Sourcewell and another from Kenworth regarding freight liners.", "grouping": { "method": "single_record", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 37 ], "source_chunks": [ 3 ], "components": {}, "evidence": [ { "text": "It's through Sourcewell and I got another quote from Kenworth which was and this was back in the fourth quarter of 25 when he gave me one and it was let's see 149,000 compared to We've got mostly freight liners and it's kind of nice to keep everything uniform, parts-wise.", "source_record_indices": [ 37 ], "timestamp": 1226.0, "end_timestamp": 1226.0, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "discussion", "subject": "Tractor/Vehicle Bids Comparison", "summary": "A comparison was made between a quote from Sourcewell and another from Kenworth regarding freight liners.", "evidence": "It's through Sourcewell and I got another quote from Kenworth which was and this was back in the fourth quarter of 25 when he gave me one and it was let's see 149,000 compared to We've got mostly freight liners and it's kind of nice to keep everything uniform, parts-wise.", "source_chunks": [ 3 ], "timestamp": 1226.0, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 37 } ], "timestamp": 1226.0, "end_timestamp": 1226.0, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" }, { "event_id": "event_0037", "event_type": "discussion", "subject": "RFP approval for Sourcewell use", "summary": "The Administrator approved the RFP regarding using a source well.", "grouping": { "method": "single_record", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 38 ], "source_chunks": [ 3 ], "components": {}, "evidence": [ { "text": "I did contact the Administrator, if you remember there earlier today, about the RFP about this, using a source well. What's done before, I think it was a John Deere tractor or something. And since that time we've asked for Mr. Larson's approval on this and he again blessed it and thinks everything's fine.", "source_record_indices": [ 38 ], "timestamp": 1263.24, "end_timestamp": 1263.24, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "discussion", "subject": "RFP approval for Sourcewell use", "summary": "The Administrator approved the RFP regarding using a source well.", "evidence": "I did contact the Administrator, if you remember there earlier today, about the RFP about this, using a source well. What's done before, I think it was a John Deere tractor or something. And since that time we've asked for Mr. Larson's approval on this and he again blessed it and thinks everything's fine.", "source_chunks": [ 3 ], "timestamp": 1263.24, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 38 } ], "timestamp": 1263.24, "end_timestamp": 1263.24, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" }, { "event_id": "event_0038", "event_type": "procedural_action", "subject": "Call to vote on motion", "summary": "The chair confirmed the readiness to vote.", "grouping": { "method": "single_record", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 39 ], "source_chunks": [ 3 ], "components": {}, "evidence": [ { "text": "Seeing none, all those in favor say aye.", "source_record_indices": [ 39 ], "timestamp": 1292.279, "end_timestamp": 1292.279, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "procedural_action", "subject": "Call to vote on motion", "summary": "The chair confirmed the readiness to vote.", "evidence": "Seeing none, all those in favor say aye.", "source_chunks": [ 3 ], "timestamp": 1292.279, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 39 } ], "timestamp": 1292.279, "end_timestamp": 1292.279, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" }, { "event_id": "event_0039", "event_type": "discussion", "subject": "Committee discussion conclusion", "summary": "A comment was made regarding Bill's status.", "grouping": { "method": "single_record", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 40 ], "source_chunks": [ 3 ], "components": {}, "evidence": [ { "text": "Oh, okay. So it is. Bill's dying. Yeah.", "source_record_indices": [ 40 ], "timestamp": 1307.66, "end_timestamp": 1307.66, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "discussion", "subject": "Committee discussion conclusion", "summary": "A comment was made regarding Bill's status.", "evidence": "Oh, okay. So it is. Bill's dying. Yeah.", "source_chunks": [ 3 ], "timestamp": 1307.66, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 40 } ], "timestamp": 1307.66, "end_timestamp": 1307.66, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" }, { "event_id": "event_0040", "event_type": "presentation", "subject": "Item 9.06 comments from committee members", "summary": "The floor was opened for comments from committee members on Item 9.06.", "grouping": { "method": "single_record", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 41 ], "source_chunks": [ 3 ], "components": {}, "evidence": [ { "text": "Item 9.06 comments from committee members. Anybody have anything they'd like to share at this time?", "source_record_indices": [ 41 ], "timestamp": 1385.079, "end_timestamp": 1385.079, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "presentation", "subject": "Item 9.06 comments from committee members", "summary": "The floor was opened for comments from committee members on Item 9.06.", "evidence": "Item 9.06 comments from committee members. Anybody have anything they'd like to share at this time?", "source_chunks": [ 3 ], "timestamp": 1385.079, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 41 } ], "timestamp": 1385.079, "end_timestamp": 1385.079, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" }, { "event_id": "event_0041", "event_type": "decision", "subject": "Motion to adjourn meeting", "summary": "Motion made to adjourn the meeting.", "grouping": { "method": "single_record", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 42 ], "source_chunks": [ 3 ], "components": { "motion": [ 42 ] }, "evidence": [ { "text": "So we're exactly looking for a motion to adjourn. Motion to adjourn.", "source_record_indices": [ 42 ], "timestamp": 1476.339, "end_timestamp": 1476.339, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "motion", "subject": "Motion to adjourn meeting", "summary": "Motion made to adjourn the meeting.", "evidence": "So we're exactly looking for a motion to adjourn. Motion to adjourn.", "source_chunks": [ 3 ], "timestamp": 1476.339, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 42 } ], "timestamp": 1476.339, "end_timestamp": 1476.339, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" }, { "event_id": "event_0042", "event_type": "decision", "subject": "Adjournment vote", "summary": "The motion to adjourn was seconded and passed.", "grouping": { "method": "single_record", "duplicate_rules": [] }, "source_record_indices": [ 43 ], "source_chunks": [ 3 ], "components": { "outcome": [ 43 ] }, "evidence": [ { "text": "Motion to adjourn. Second. Seconded. And I'm Adam.", "source_record_indices": [ 43 ], "timestamp": 1476.339, "end_timestamp": 1476.339, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ], "source_records": [ { "record_type": "procedural_action", "subject": "Adjournment vote", "summary": "The motion to adjourn was seconded and passed.", "evidence": "Motion to adjourn. Second. Seconded. And I'm Adam.", "source_chunks": [ 3 ], "timestamp": 1476.339, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE", "record_index": 43 } ], "outcome": "passed", "timestamp": 1476.339, "end_timestamp": 1476.339, "video_id": "K8lqjGXrucE" } ] }