{
  "artifact_kind": "events",
  "schema_version": "civic_events_v1",
  "generation_version": "events_v1",
  "status": "complete",
  "meeting": "ks5b7iklhgo.city_council_meeting_10_6_2025",
  "meeting_date": "2025-10-06",
  "source_records_artifact": "./data/us_il_freeport_city_council/intel_gemma4_e4b/records/ks5b7iklhgo.city_council_meeting_10_6_2025/ks5b7iklhgo.city_council_meeting_10_6_2025.records.json",
  "source_transcript": "./data/us_il_freeport_city_council/normalized/ks5b7iklhgo.city_council_meeting_10_6_2025.txt",
  "source_sha256": "5ed8e2b93f0de8d99265f29126181d02a6a20ebc6b198ac097409f8babe265bf",
  "meeting_type": "city_council",
  "job_profile": "civic",
  "source_model": "gemma4:e4b",
  "source_record_count": 193,
  "event_count": 180,
  "decision_event_count": 33,
  "multi_record_event_count": 12,
  "duplicate_record_count": 2,
  "review_flag_counts": {
    "unattached_motion_request": 2
  },
  "events": [
    {
      "event_id": "event_0001",
      "event_type": "procedural_action",
      "subject": "Call to Order and Roll Call",
      "summary": "The meeting was called to order after a roll call confirmed presence.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        1
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        1
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "So to start this evening, I would like to read the email that I sent to all of the Aldermen last Friday just in case someone did not have the opportunity to read and John. The email was, At our last few meetings, members of the council have been advised to comply with standards of rules of conduct and decorum, and have repeatedly refused to do so.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            1
          ],
          "timestamp": 57.789,
          "end_timestamp": 57.789,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "procedural_action",
          "subject": "Call to Order and Roll Call",
          "summary": "The meeting was called to order after a roll call confirmed presence.",
          "evidence": "So to start this evening, I would like to read the email that I sent to all of the Aldermen last Friday just in case someone did not have the opportunity to read and John. The email was, At our last few meetings, members of the council have been advised to comply with standards of rules of conduct and decorum, and have repeatedly refused to do so.",
          "attribution": "Mayor Miller",
          "attributes": {
            "absent_members": [
              "Alderman Simmons"
            ]
          },
          "source_chunks": [
            1
          ],
          "timestamp": 57.789,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 1
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Mayor Miller"
      ],
      "timestamp": 57.789,
      "end_timestamp": 57.789,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0002",
      "event_type": "procedural_action",
      "subject": "Pledge of Allegiance",
      "summary": "The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Alderman Klemm.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        2
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        1
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "And if you could please stand for the Pledge of Allegiance led by Alderman Klemm.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            2
          ],
          "timestamp": 57.789,
          "end_timestamp": 57.789,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "procedural_action",
          "subject": "Pledge of Allegiance",
          "summary": "The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Alderman Klemm.",
          "evidence": "And if you could please stand for the Pledge of Allegiance led by Alderman Klemm.",
          "attribution": "Mayor Miller",
          "source_chunks": [
            1
          ],
          "timestamp": 57.789,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 2
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Mayor Miller"
      ],
      "timestamp": 57.789,
      "end_timestamp": 57.789,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0003",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Rules of Conduct and Decorum Enforcement",
      "summary": "The Mayor read an email warning that council members must comply with established rules of conduct, or face sanctions up to a $250 fine or removal.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        3
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        1
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "I have had numerous comments from members of the public expressing concern at the lack of decorum at our meetings. This lessens all of us in the eyes of the public and negatively impacts the credibility of this council. And most importantly, failing to observe established rules of procedure leads to disruption of the effective and orderly conduct of the business of the city.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            3
          ],
          "timestamp": 152.9,
          "end_timestamp": 152.9,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Rules of Conduct and Decorum Enforcement",
          "summary": "The Mayor read an email warning that council members must comply with established rules of conduct, or face sanctions up to a $250 fine or removal.",
          "evidence": "I have had numerous comments from members of the public expressing concern at the lack of decorum at our meetings. This lessens all of us in the eyes of the public and negatively impacts the credibility of this council. And most importantly, failing to observe established rules of procedure leads to disruption of the effective and orderly conduct of the business of the city.",
          "attribution": "Mayor Miller",
          "attributes": {
            "ordinance_reference": "City Ordinance 220, 10, 24, and 25"
          },
          "source_chunks": [
            1
          ],
          "timestamp": 152.9,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 3
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Mayor Miller"
      ],
      "timestamp": 152.9,
      "end_timestamp": 152.9,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0004",
      "event_type": "decision",
      "subject": "Approval of the agenda",
      "summary": "Motion to approve the agenda.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "decision_sequence",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        4,
        5
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        1
      ],
      "components": {
        "motion": [
          4
        ],
        "vote": [
          5
        ]
      },
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "So with that, we'll start with item number one, which is the approval of the agenda. Is there such a motion? So moved.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            4
          ],
          "timestamp": 299.399,
          "end_timestamp": 299.399,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        },
        {
          "text": "All those in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed? That motion passes.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            5
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "motion",
          "subject": "Approval of the agenda",
          "summary": "Motion to approve the agenda.",
          "evidence": "So with that, we'll start with item number one, which is the approval of the agenda. Is there such a motion? So moved.",
          "attribution": "Mayor Miller",
          "attributes": {
            "made_by": "Alderman Shadle"
          },
          "source_chunks": [
            1
          ],
          "timestamp": 299.399,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 4
        },
        {
          "record_type": "vote",
          "subject": "Approval of the agenda",
          "summary": "The motion to approve the agenda passed.",
          "evidence": "All those in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed? That motion passes.",
          "attribution": "Mayor Miller",
          "attributes": {
            "vote_outcome": "passed",
            "vote_method": "voice"
          },
          "source_chunks": [
            1
          ],
          "record_index": 5
        }
      ],
      "outcome": "passed",
      "attributions": [
        "Mayor Miller"
      ],
      "timestamp": 299.399,
      "end_timestamp": 299.399,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0005",
      "event_type": "decision",
      "subject": "Approval of the minutes from September 15th, 2025",
      "summary": "Motion to approve the minutes from the regular meeting on September 15th, 2025.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        6
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        1
      ],
      "components": {
        "motion": [
          6
        ]
      },
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "All those in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed? That motion passes.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            6
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "motion",
          "subject": "Approval of the minutes from September 15th, 2025",
          "summary": "Motion to approve the minutes from the regular meeting on September 15th, 2025.",
          "evidence": "All those in favor signify by saying aye. Aye. Opposed? That motion passes.",
          "attribution": "Mayor Miller",
          "attributes": {
            "made_by": "Alderman Shadle"
          },
          "source_chunks": [
            1
          ],
          "record_index": 6
        }
      ],
      "outcome": "passed",
      "attributions": [
        "Mayor Miller"
      ]
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0006",
      "event_type": "recognition",
      "subject": "Service Awards for Fire Department Personnel",
      "summary": "Amos Langlois was recognized for 10 years of service, and Dylan Oberle was recognized for 5 years of service.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        7
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        1
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "I'd like to have the chief, the fire chief, to acknowledge the two firemen. Yes, thank you. It's my pleasure to recognize Amos Langlois and Dylan Oberle for their careers within the fire department. Amos has just completed his 10 years of service and Dylan has completed five years of service.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            7
          ],
          "timestamp": 341.48,
          "end_timestamp": 341.48,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "recognition",
          "subject": "Service Awards for Fire Department Personnel",
          "summary": "Amos Langlois was recognized for 10 years of service, and Dylan Oberle was recognized for 5 years of service.",
          "evidence": "I'd like to have the chief, the fire chief, to acknowledge the two firemen. Yes, thank you. It's my pleasure to recognize Amos Langlois and Dylan Oberle for their careers within the fire department. Amos has just completed his 10 years of service and Dylan has completed five years of service.",
          "attribution": "Manager Boyer",
          "attributes": {
            "award_details": [
              "Amos Langlois: 10 years of service",
              "Dylan Oberle: 5 years of service"
            ]
          },
          "source_chunks": [
            1
          ],
          "timestamp": 341.48,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 7
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Manager Boyer"
      ],
      "timestamp": 341.48,
      "end_timestamp": 341.48,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0007",
      "event_type": "recognition",
      "subject": "Service Award for Police Officer",
      "summary": "Officer Nikeel was recognized for five years with the Freeport Police Department.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        8
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        1
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Yes, I would recognize Officer Nikeel who has been with the Freeport Police Department for five years. She's an outstanding officer and works diligently to protect the citizens every day.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            8
          ],
          "timestamp": 406.189,
          "end_timestamp": 406.189,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "recognition",
          "subject": "Service Award for Police Officer",
          "summary": "Officer Nikeel was recognized for five years with the Freeport Police Department.",
          "evidence": "Yes, I would recognize Officer Nikeel who has been with the Freeport Police Department for five years. She's an outstanding officer and works diligently to protect the citizens every day.",
          "attribution": "Deputy Davis",
          "attributes": {
            "service_years": 5
          },
          "source_chunks": [
            1
          ],
          "timestamp": 406.189,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 8
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Deputy Davis"
      ],
      "timestamp": 406.189,
      "end_timestamp": 406.189,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0008",
      "event_type": "presentation",
      "subject": "Public Comment Period Start",
      "summary": "The council moved on to public comment.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        9
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        1
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "With that, we move on to public comment. We have three. We'll start with an email that was sent to the clerk.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            9
          ],
          "timestamp": 422.3,
          "end_timestamp": 422.3,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "presentation",
          "subject": "Public Comment Period Start",
          "summary": "The council moved on to public comment.",
          "evidence": "With that, we move on to public comment. We have three. We'll start with an email that was sent to the clerk.",
          "attribution": "Mayor Miller",
          "attributes": {
            "public_comment_count": 3
          },
          "source_chunks": [
            1
          ],
          "timestamp": 422.3,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 9
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Mayor Miller"
      ],
      "timestamp": 422.3,
      "end_timestamp": 422.3,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0009",
      "event_type": "proclamation",
      "subject": "Recognition of Officers",
      "summary": "Recognized Officer Nikeel for five years with the Freeport Police Department.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        10
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        2
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Yes, I would recognize Officer Nikeel who has been with the Freeport Police Department for five years. She's an outstanding officer and works diligently to protect the citizens every day. Thank you.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            10
          ],
          "timestamp": 406.189,
          "end_timestamp": 406.189,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "proclamation",
          "subject": "Recognition of Officers",
          "summary": "Recognized Officer Nikeel for five years with the Freeport Police Department.",
          "evidence": "Yes, I would recognize Officer Nikeel who has been with the Freeport Police Department for five years. She's an outstanding officer and works diligently to protect the citizens every day. Thank you.",
          "attribution": "Deputy Davis",
          "source_chunks": [
            2
          ],
          "timestamp": 406.189,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 10
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Deputy Davis"
      ],
      "timestamp": 406.189,
      "end_timestamp": 406.189,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0010",
      "event_type": "public_comment",
      "subject": "Opposition to Short-Term Rentals (Item 7)",
      "summary": "Spoke against item number seven on the agenda for short-term rentals, arguing that vacation rentals serve important needs such as housing employees, testing neighborhoods before buying, and accommodating large families.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        11
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        2
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "I would like to speak against item number seven on the agenda for short-term rentals. I am here on behalf of one of my owners who has a short-term rental and myself as her manager. When it comes to short-term rentals, often called vacation rentals, everyone seems to become a real estate expert, quick to say they destabilize neighborhoods or create problems.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            11
          ],
          "timestamp": 437.1,
          "end_timestamp": 437.1,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "public_comment",
          "subject": "Opposition to Short-Term Rentals (Item 7)",
          "summary": "Spoke against item number seven on the agenda for short-term rentals, arguing that vacation rentals serve important needs such as housing employees, testing neighborhoods before buying, and accommodating large families.",
          "evidence": "I would like to speak against item number seven on the agenda for short-term rentals. I am here on behalf of one of my owners who has a short-term rental and myself as her manager. When it comes to short-term rentals, often called vacation rentals, everyone seems to become a real estate expert, quick to say they destabilize neighborhoods or create problems.",
          "attribution": "Ashley Heilman",
          "source_chunks": [
            2
          ],
          "timestamp": 437.1,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 11
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Ashley Heilman"
      ],
      "timestamp": 437.1,
      "end_timestamp": 437.1,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0011",
      "event_type": "public_comment",
      "subject": "Support for Balanced Short-Term Rental Regulation",
      "summary": "Suggested that instead of rezoning and removing rights, the city could cap the number of vacation rental permits in R1 to R4 zones or make it a special use permit.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        12
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        2
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Instead of rezoning and removing these rights, the city could cap the number of vacation rental permits in R1 to R4 zones instead of removing them completely. This would prevent over-concentration, avoid clustering rentals only on the east side of town, and create a balanced approach that respects neighborhood character and private property rights.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            12
          ],
          "timestamp": 543.399,
          "end_timestamp": 543.399,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "public_comment",
          "subject": "Support for Balanced Short-Term Rental Regulation",
          "summary": "Suggested that instead of rezoning and removing rights, the city could cap the number of vacation rental permits in R1 to R4 zones or make it a special use permit.",
          "evidence": "Instead of rezoning and removing these rights, the city could cap the number of vacation rental permits in R1 to R4 zones instead of removing them completely. This would prevent over-concentration, avoid clustering rentals only on the east side of town, and create a balanced approach that respects neighborhood character and private property rights.",
          "attribution": "Ashley Heilman",
          "source_chunks": [
            2
          ],
          "timestamp": 543.399,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 12
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Ashley Heilman"
      ],
      "timestamp": 543.399,
      "end_timestamp": 543.399,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0012",
      "event_type": "public_comment",
      "subject": "Exempting Primary Residents from Airbnb Bans",
      "summary": "Argued against banning single-family homes used as Airbnbs, noting that three of the six local listings are owner-occupied and exempting primary residents is necessary.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        13
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        2
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Our city's proposed ban on single-family homes being used as Airbnb's is presented as a solution to depleting our owner-occupied housing stock, but in our case, it's simply not supported by the facts. Of the six Airbnbs in our town of 22,600 roughly, three are owner-occupied homes where residents rent out a portion, such as a spare room or a suite, while living in their own home.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            13
          ],
          "timestamp": 623.769,
          "end_timestamp": 623.769,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "public_comment",
          "subject": "Exempting Primary Residents from Airbnb Bans",
          "summary": "Argued against banning single-family homes used as Airbnbs, noting that three of the six local listings are owner-occupied and exempting primary residents is necessary.",
          "evidence": "Our city's proposed ban on single-family homes being used as Airbnb's is presented as a solution to depleting our owner-occupied housing stock, but in our case, it's simply not supported by the facts. Of the six Airbnbs in our town of 22,600 roughly, three are owner-occupied homes where residents rent out a portion, such as a spare room or a suite, while living in their own home.",
          "attribution": "Julie Whiting",
          "source_chunks": [
            2
          ],
          "timestamp": 623.769,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 13
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Julie Whiting"
      ],
      "timestamp": 623.769,
      "end_timestamp": 623.769,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0013",
      "event_type": "public_comment",
      "subject": "History and Compliance of LaFever Short-Term Rental Operation",
      "summary": "Stated that the LaFever family was the first short-term rental operation in Freeport and voluntarily approached the city in 2019 to ensure legal and transparent operation.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        14
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        2
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "We were the very first short-term rental operation in Freeport, and we voluntarily approached the city in 2019 to ensure that we were operating legally and transparency even before ordinances were in place.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            14
          ],
          "timestamp": 771.159,
          "end_timestamp": 771.159,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "public_comment",
          "subject": "History and Compliance of LaFever Short-Term Rental Operation",
          "summary": "Stated that the LaFever family was the first short-term rental operation in Freeport and voluntarily approached the city in 2019 to ensure legal and transparent operation.",
          "evidence": "We were the very first short-term rental operation in Freeport, and we voluntarily approached the city in 2019 to ensure that we were operating legally and transparency even before ordinances were in place.",
          "attribution": "LaFever's",
          "source_chunks": [
            2
          ],
          "timestamp": 771.159,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 14
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "LaFever's"
      ],
      "timestamp": 771.159,
      "end_timestamp": 771.159,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0014",
      "event_type": "public_comment",
      "subject": "Short-term rental policy distinction for owner-occupied vs. non-resident investors",
      "summary": "The speaker requested the council make a clear distinction in any ordinance between entire home STRs where the owner does not reside on the premises and owner-occupied STRs, or grandfathering in established residents.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        15
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        3
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "We asked the council to make a clear distinction in the ordinance between entire home STRs where the owner does not reside on the premises or owner-occupied STRs where the host reside full-time or at minimum grandfather in well-established and other residents of the community.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            15
          ],
          "timestamp": 814.539,
          "end_timestamp": 814.539,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "public_comment",
          "subject": "Short-term rental policy distinction for owner-occupied vs. non-resident investors",
          "summary": "The speaker requested the council make a clear distinction in any ordinance between entire home STRs where the owner does not reside on the premises and owner-occupied STRs, or grandfathering in established residents.",
          "evidence": "We asked the council to make a clear distinction in the ordinance between entire home STRs where the owner does not reside on the premises or owner-occupied STRs where the host reside full-time or at minimum grandfather in well-established and other residents of the community.",
          "attribution": "LaFever family",
          "attributes": {
            "requested_action": "Grandfathering a compliant homeowner, owner-occupied STR like ours, beyond January 2029"
          },
          "source_chunks": [
            3
          ],
          "timestamp": 814.539,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 15
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "LaFever family"
      ],
      "timestamp": 814.539,
      "end_timestamp": 814.539,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0015",
      "event_type": "procedural_action",
      "subject": "Consent Agenda Items for Approval",
      "summary": "The consent agenda included approving to receive and place on file board and commission minutes from the police pension board (May 7th) and the Board of Fire and Police Commissioners (August 12th, 2025); The Greater Freeport Partnerships Monthly Report (September 2025); Approval of finance bills payable in total of $4,189,115.71; and payroll for pay May period ending September 20th, 2025 in total of $676,474.02.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        16
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        3
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "The consent agenda consists of approving to receive and place on file board and commission minutes from the police pension board, May 7th, and the Board of Fire and Police Commissioners, August 12th, 2025. The Greater Freeport Partnerships Monthly Report, September 2025. Approval of the finance bills payable in the total of $4,189,115.71 and payroll for pay May period ending September 20th, 2025 in the total of $676,474.02.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            16
          ],
          "timestamp": 959.98,
          "end_timestamp": 959.98,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "procedural_action",
          "subject": "Consent Agenda Items for Approval",
          "summary": "The consent agenda included approving to receive and place on file board and commission minutes from the police pension board (May 7th) and the Board of Fire and Police Commissioners (August 12th, 2025); The Greater Freeport Partnerships Monthly Report (September 2025); Approval of finance bills payable in total of $4,189,115.71; and payroll for pay May period ending September 20th, 2025 in total of $676,474.02.",
          "evidence": "The consent agenda consists of approving to receive and place on file board and commission minutes from the police pension board, May 7th, and the Board of Fire and Police Commissioners, August 12th, 2025. The Greater Freeport Partnerships Monthly Report, September 2025. Approval of the finance bills payable in the total of $4,189,115.71 and payroll for pay May period ending September 20th, 2025 in the total of $676,474.02.",
          "attribution": "City Council",
          "attributes": {
            "identifiers": [
              "Police Pension Board Minutes (May 7th)",
              "Board of Fire and Police Commissioners Minutes (August 12th, 2025)",
              "Greater Freeport Partnerships Monthly Report (September 2025)",
              "Finance Bills Payable ($4,189,115.71)",
              "Payroll for May Period Ending September 20th, 2025 ($676,474.02)"
            ]
          },
          "source_chunks": [
            3
          ],
          "timestamp": 959.98,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 16
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "City Council"
      ],
      "timestamp": 959.98,
      "end_timestamp": 959.98,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0016",
      "event_type": "decision",
      "subject": "Approval of Consent Agenda Items",
      "summary": "Motion to approve the consent agenda items.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "decision_sequence",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        17,
        18
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        3
      ],
      "components": {
        "motion": [
          17
        ],
        "vote": [
          18
        ]
      },
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "So moved. Second. We have a motion made by Alderman Shadle, seconded by Alderman Sellers.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            17
          ]
        },
        {
          "text": "Klemm? Aye. Johnson? Aye. Simmons? Aye. Parker? Sanders, and Sellers. The motion passes 8 to 0.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            18
          ],
          "timestamp": 1015.16,
          "end_timestamp": 1015.16,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "motion",
          "subject": "Approval of Consent Agenda Items",
          "summary": "Motion to approve the consent agenda items.",
          "evidence": "So moved. Second. We have a motion made by Alderman Shadle, seconded by Alderman Sellers.",
          "attribution": "Alderman Shadle",
          "attributes": {
            "made_by": "Alderman Shadle",
            "seconded_by": "Alderman Sellers"
          },
          "source_chunks": [
            3
          ],
          "record_index": 17
        },
        {
          "record_type": "vote",
          "subject": "Approval of Consent Agenda Items",
          "summary": "Vote on the motion to approve the consent agenda items.",
          "evidence": "Klemm? Aye. Johnson? Aye. Simmons? Aye. Parker? Sanders, and Sellers. The motion passes 8 to 0.",
          "attribution": "City Council",
          "attributes": {
            "vote_outcome": "passed",
            "vote_method": "roll_call",
            "vote_tally": "8 to 0",
            "roll_call": {
              "Klemm": "Aye",
              "Johnson": "Aye",
              "Simmons": "Aye",
              "Parker": "Aye",
              "Sanders": "Aye",
              "Sellers": "Aye"
            }
          },
          "source_chunks": [
            3
          ],
          "timestamp": 1015.16,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 18
        }
      ],
      "outcome": "passed",
      "attributions": [
        "Alderman Shadle",
        "City Council"
      ],
      "timestamp": 1015.16,
      "end_timestamp": 1015.16,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0017",
      "event_type": "ordinance",
      "subject": "Second reading of ordinance 2025-57",
      "summary": "Ordinance revising codified ordinances to create the position of operations superintendent.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        19
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        3
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Item number 6 is the second reading of ordinance 2025-57. Could you please read this? Ordinance revising codified ordinances to create the position of operations superintendent.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            19
          ],
          "timestamp": 1015.16,
          "end_timestamp": 1015.16,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "ordinance",
          "subject": "Second reading of ordinance 2025-57",
          "summary": "Ordinance revising codified ordinances to create the position of operations superintendent.",
          "evidence": "Item number 6 is the second reading of ordinance 2025-57. Could you please read this? Ordinance revising codified ordinances to create the position of operations superintendent.",
          "attribution": "City Council",
          "attributes": {
            "identifiers": [
              "Ordinance 2025-57"
            ]
          },
          "source_chunks": [
            3
          ],
          "timestamp": 1015.16,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 19
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "City Council"
      ],
      "timestamp": 1015.16,
      "end_timestamp": 1015.16,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0018",
      "event_type": "presentation",
      "subject": "Operations Superintendent Position Details",
      "summary": "The new Operations Superintendent position would allow one individual to oversee both the utility and the street department, dealing mainly with field crews, but responsibility would extend to all operations within Public Works.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        20
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        3
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "This is creating a new position for the city that would allow one individual to oversee both the utility and the street department and deal mainly with the field crews. However, responsibility would extend to all operations within Public Works and staff recommends moving forward with this job description approval.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            20
          ],
          "timestamp": 1039.68,
          "end_timestamp": 1039.68,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "presentation",
          "subject": "Operations Superintendent Position Details",
          "summary": "The new Operations Superintendent position would allow one individual to oversee both the utility and the street department, dealing mainly with field crews, but responsibility would extend to all operations within Public Works.",
          "evidence": "This is creating a new position for the city that would allow one individual to oversee both the utility and the street department and deal mainly with the field crews. However, responsibility would extend to all operations within Public Works and staff recommends moving forward with this job description approval.",
          "attribution": "Manager Boyer",
          "attributes": {
            "procedural_stage": "second reading"
          },
          "source_chunks": [
            3
          ],
          "timestamp": 1039.68,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 20
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Manager Boyer"
      ],
      "timestamp": 1039.68,
      "end_timestamp": 1039.68,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0019",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Operations Superintendent Position Title Change",
      "summary": "Alderman Stacy questioned the pattern of changing titles, referencing a previous supervisor position that resulted in an employee quitting, and asked if returning to the original director title was considered.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        21
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        3
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Alderman Stacy? It just seems like every time we change the original title and I. I went back to the original title and went to a supervisor position and that gentleman ended up quitting. And it's like here we go again with wanting to now add duties to another Huffines. Do you consider going back to the original director title and hiring someone under that? Is that all your question?",
          "source_record_indices": [
            21
          ],
          "timestamp": 1069.319,
          "end_timestamp": 1069.319,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Operations Superintendent Position Title Change",
          "summary": "Alderman Stacy questioned the pattern of changing titles, referencing a previous supervisor position that resulted in an employee quitting, and asked if returning to the original director title was considered.",
          "evidence": "Alderman Stacy? It just seems like every time we change the original title and I. I went back to the original title and went to a supervisor position and that gentleman ended up quitting. And it's like here we go again with wanting to now add duties to another Huffines. Do you consider going back to the original director title and hiring someone under that? Is that all your question?",
          "attribution": "Alderman Stacy",
          "source_chunks": [
            3
          ],
          "timestamp": 1069.319,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 21
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Alderman Stacy"
      ],
      "timestamp": 1069.319,
      "end_timestamp": 1069.319,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0020",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Operations Superintendent Role Clarification",
      "summary": "Manager Boyer clarified that the Operations Superintendent is more of a hands-on leader in the field and with day-to-day operations, distinguishing it from the existing contract Public Works Director.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "duplicate_consolidation",
        "duplicate_rules": [
          "identical_evidence"
        ]
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        22,
        23
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        3,
        4
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Manager Boyer? You know, we currently have a public works director, and that is Darren Steakles, our contract public works director. The operations superintendent is more of a hands-on leader in the field and with day-to-day operations in mind. So it's a different job.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            22,
            23
          ],
          "timestamp": 1120.49,
          "end_timestamp": 1120.49,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Operations Superintendent Role Clarification",
          "summary": "Manager Boyer clarified that the Operations Superintendent is more of a hands-on leader in the field and with day-to-day operations, distinguishing it from the existing contract Public Works Director.",
          "evidence": "Manager Boyer? You know, we currently have a public works director, and that is Darren Steakles, our contract public works director. The operations superintendent is more of a hands-on leader in the field and with day-to-day operations in mind. So it's a different job.",
          "attribution": "Manager Boyer",
          "source_chunks": [
            3
          ],
          "timestamp": 1120.49,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 22
        },
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Public Works Director role clarification",
          "summary": "The operations superintendent is described as a hands-on leader for day-to-day field operations, which is different from the Public Works director role held by Darren Steakles.",
          "evidence": "Manager Boyer? You know, we currently have a public works director, and that is Darren Steakles, our contract public works director. The operations superintendent is more of a hands-on leader in the field and with day-to-day operations in mind. So it's a different job.",
          "source_chunks": [
            4
          ],
          "timestamp": 1120.49,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 23
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Manager Boyer"
      ],
      "timestamp": 1120.49,
      "end_timestamp": 1120.49,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0021",
      "event_type": "decision",
      "subject": "Roll Call Vote for Ordinance 2025-58 Passage",
      "summary": "The roll call was taken for the passage of ordinance 2025-58, resulting in a vote of six to two.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        24
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        4
      ],
      "components": {
        "outcome": [
          24
        ]
      },
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Sanders, Sellers, the ordinance is passed six to two.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            24
          ],
          "timestamp": 1158.46,
          "end_timestamp": 1158.46,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "procedural_action",
          "subject": "Roll Call Vote for Ordinance 2025-58 Passage",
          "summary": "The roll call was taken for the passage of ordinance 2025-58, resulting in a vote of six to two.",
          "evidence": "Sanders, Sellers, the ordinance is passed six to two.",
          "source_chunks": [
            4
          ],
          "timestamp": 1158.46,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 24
        }
      ],
      "outcome": "passed",
      "timestamp": 1158.46,
      "end_timestamp": 1158.46,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0022",
      "event_type": "ordinance",
      "subject": "Ordinance amending chapters 810 and 1250 concerning the licensing and zoning of vacation rentals",
      "summary": "The second reading was conducted for Ordinance amending chapters 810 and 1250 concerning the licensing and zoning of vacation rentals.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        25
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        4
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Item number seven is the second reading of ordinance 2025-58. Could you please read this? Ordinance amending chapters 810 and 1250 concerning the licensing and zoning of vacation rentals.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            25
          ],
          "timestamp": 1158.46,
          "end_timestamp": 1158.46,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "ordinance",
          "subject": "Ordinance amending chapters 810 and 1250 concerning the licensing and zoning of vacation rentals",
          "summary": "The second reading was conducted for Ordinance amending chapters 810 and 1250 concerning the licensing and zoning of vacation rentals.",
          "evidence": "Item number seven is the second reading of ordinance 2025-58. Could you please read this? Ordinance amending chapters 810 and 1250 concerning the licensing and zoning of vacation rentals.",
          "source_chunks": [
            4
          ],
          "timestamp": 1158.46,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 25
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 1158.46,
      "end_timestamp": 1158.46,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0023",
      "event_type": "presentation",
      "subject": "Ordinance 2025-58 Overview",
      "summary": "Staff drafted the ordinance to eliminate the planning commission ordinance, which removes short-term vacation rentals from R1 through R4 zoning districts, thereby removing them from single family housing.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        26
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        4
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Just to give you a brief overview of this, staff was tasked to write this ordinance in order to eliminate the planning commission ordinance in order to eliminate short-term vacation rentals from the R1 through R4 zoning districts, which essentially removes the short-term rentals from single family housing, which is the intent here.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            26
          ],
          "timestamp": 1189.88,
          "end_timestamp": 1189.88,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "presentation",
          "subject": "Ordinance 2025-58 Overview",
          "summary": "Staff drafted the ordinance to eliminate the planning commission ordinance, which removes short-term vacation rentals from R1 through R4 zoning districts, thereby removing them from single family housing.",
          "evidence": "Just to give you a brief overview of this, staff was tasked to write this ordinance in order to eliminate the planning commission ordinance in order to eliminate short-term vacation rentals from the R1 through R4 zoning districts, which essentially removes the short-term rentals from single family housing, which is the intent here.",
          "source_chunks": [
            4
          ],
          "timestamp": 1189.88,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 26
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 1189.88,
      "end_timestamp": 1189.88,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0024",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Ordinance 2025-58 Public Comment on Short-Term Rentals",
      "summary": "A resident noted that a supporter (Tom Klemm) and another resident (City Clerk Anderson) were present at the September 11th meeting, with support for the ordinance coming by a vote of five to zero.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        27
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        4
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "At that meeting, there was a supporter, Tom Klemm, Alderperson Klemm, was there as somebody supporting this ordinance, and then City Clerk Anderson was there as a resident and was basically in favor of short-term rentals, which would be opposed to this ordinance. And the results of that meeting was support of this ordinance by a vote of five to zero.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            27
          ],
          "timestamp": 1189.88,
          "end_timestamp": 1189.88,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Ordinance 2025-58 Public Comment on Short-Term Rentals",
          "summary": "A resident noted that a supporter (Tom Klemm) and another resident (City Clerk Anderson) were present at the September 11th meeting, with support for the ordinance coming by a vote of five to zero.",
          "evidence": "At that meeting, there was a supporter, Tom Klemm, Alderperson Klemm, was there as somebody supporting this ordinance, and then City Clerk Anderson was there as a resident and was basically in favor of short-term rentals, which would be opposed to this ordinance. And the results of that meeting was support of this ordinance by a vote of five to zero.",
          "source_chunks": [
            4
          ],
          "timestamp": 1189.88,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 27
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 1189.88,
      "end_timestamp": 1189.88,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0025",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Alderman Sellers' Opposition to Ordinance 2025-58",
      "summary": "Alderman Sellers stated he disagrees with eliminating short-term rentals, calling them an asset to the community and noting that residents need places to stay.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        28
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        4
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "I do have to agree with what Ashley Heilman presented tonight and I do agree with the other ones. I stay at Airbnbs all the time and I think they're awesome. I know we had one bad incident, but I don't think we should take one incident and kind of get away from all of it you do look at a town like Galeno or other different places that have been small towns and it is an asset to the community and like they also said we really don't have hotel space you know and that that was another thing so I will you know be against putting this through because I do think it's something that we need we talk about tourism and people coming in but they and Stacey. They also have to have somewhere to stay.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            28
          ],
          "timestamp": 1272.96,
          "end_timestamp": 1272.96,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Alderman Sellers' Opposition to Ordinance 2025-58",
          "summary": "Alderman Sellers stated he disagrees with eliminating short-term rentals, calling them an asset to the community and noting that residents need places to stay.",
          "evidence": "I do have to agree with what Ashley Heilman presented tonight and I do agree with the other ones. I stay at Airbnbs all the time and I think they're awesome. I know we had one bad incident, but I don't think we should take one incident and kind of get away from all of it you do look at a town like Galeno or other different places that have been small towns and it is an asset to the community and like they also said we really don't have hotel space you know and that that was another thing so I will you know be against putting this through because I do think it's something that we need we talk about tourism and people coming in but they and Stacey. They also have to have somewhere to stay.",
          "source_chunks": [
            4
          ],
          "timestamp": 1272.96,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 28
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 1272.96,
      "end_timestamp": 1272.96,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0026",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Ordinance 2025-58 Licensing Requirements for Property Owners",
      "summary": "A question was raised regarding whether the ordinance restricts licensing only to property owners, specifically concerning 'renting to own' or leasing for business purposes.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        29
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        4
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "So currently the ordinance says that the owner of the property is the only one that can own this license... So what if you're renting to own, you know, or what if you're, if you're renting to own, or if you're leasing property for a business purpose, purpose, why would you not be allowed to obtain, why or why not would one not be allowed to obtain a license?",
          "source_record_indices": [
            29
          ],
          "timestamp": 1344.799,
          "end_timestamp": 1344.799,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Ordinance 2025-58 Licensing Requirements for Property Owners",
          "summary": "A question was raised regarding whether the ordinance restricts licensing only to property owners, specifically concerning 'renting to own' or leasing for business purposes.",
          "evidence": "So currently the ordinance says that the owner of the property is the only one that can own this license... So what if you're renting to own, you know, or what if you're, if you're renting to own, or if you're leasing property for a business purpose, purpose, why would you not be allowed to obtain, why or why not would one not be allowed to obtain a license?",
          "source_chunks": [
            4
          ],
          "timestamp": 1344.799,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 29
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 1344.799,
      "end_timestamp": 1344.799,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0027",
      "event_type": "follow_up",
      "subject": "Short-Term Rental Lease Duration Requirement",
      "summary": "The ordinance requires that any short-term rental agreement must have a lease term of 30 days or less for the current written proposal to apply.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        30
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        4
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "So it's 30 days. Basically, what's going on here is in order for this ordinance to take effect as currently written, your term of your lease would have to be 30 days or less.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            30
          ],
          "timestamp": 1396.759,
          "end_timestamp": 1396.759,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "follow_up",
          "subject": "Short-Term Rental Lease Duration Requirement",
          "summary": "The ordinance requires that any short-term rental agreement must have a lease term of 30 days or less for the current written proposal to apply.",
          "evidence": "So it's 30 days. Basically, what's going on here is in order for this ordinance to take effect as currently written, your term of your lease would have to be 30 days or less.",
          "source_chunks": [
            4
          ],
          "timestamp": 1396.759,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 30
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 1396.759,
      "end_timestamp": 1396.759,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0028",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Rental property ordinance requirements for rent-to-own agreements",
      "summary": "The ordinance applies if the agreement is for 30 days or less and requires checking that the owner matches the insurance on applications; a leaseholder would only have content insurance.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        31
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        5
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "So that's why, if you're in a rent to own agreement, you're not going to fall under this ordinance. Because this ordinance, as it's currently written and is being proposed, it's 30 days or less. You have to have an agreement that you're going to rent somebody's property for less than 30 days.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            31
          ],
          "timestamp": 1409.079,
          "end_timestamp": 1409.079,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Rental property ordinance requirements for rent-to-own agreements",
          "summary": "The ordinance applies if the agreement is for 30 days or less and requires checking that the owner matches the insurance on applications; a leaseholder would only have content insurance.",
          "evidence": "So that's why, if you're in a rent to own agreement, you're not going to fall under this ordinance. Because this ordinance, as it's currently written and is being proposed, it's 30 days or less. You have to have an agreement that you're going to rent somebody's property for less than 30 days.",
          "source_chunks": [
            5
          ],
          "timestamp": 1409.079,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 31
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 1409.079,
      "end_timestamp": 1409.079,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0029",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Title owner protection in rental agreements",
      "summary": "The ordinance protects the title owner, who is defined as a deed owner or fee simple owner. For rent-to-own situations, the city would ask the property owner to sign an affidavit regarding the vacation rental.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        32
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        5
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "And I think the ordinance protects the title owner. Title owner is deed owner, fee simple owner. That owner is protected. And essentially, if you had a rent to own situation, you would, the city would just ask that the property owner sign an affidavit or just sign the paperwork that they would be doing the vacation rental.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            32
          ],
          "timestamp": 1455.9,
          "end_timestamp": 1455.9,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Title owner protection in rental agreements",
          "summary": "The ordinance protects the title owner, who is defined as a deed owner or fee simple owner. For rent-to-own situations, the city would ask the property owner to sign an affidavit regarding the vacation rental.",
          "evidence": "And I think the ordinance protects the title owner. Title owner is deed owner, fee simple owner. That owner is protected. And essentially, if you had a rent to own situation, you would, the city would just ask that the property owner sign an affidavit or just sign the paperwork that they would be doing the vacation rental.",
          "source_chunks": [
            5
          ],
          "timestamp": 1455.9,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 32
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 1455.9,
      "end_timestamp": 1455.9,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0030",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Insurance requirements for rent-to-own situations",
      "summary": "If the person renting to own has the insurance in their name, the title owner would still have to sign off on it.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        33
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        5
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "What if the person renting to own have the insurance and things in their name? They would have to ask the person that they would be buying it from, the title owner would have to give them, would still have to sign off on it.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            33
          ],
          "timestamp": 1513.759,
          "end_timestamp": 1513.759,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Insurance requirements for rent-to-own situations",
          "summary": "If the person renting to own has the insurance in their name, the title owner would still have to sign off on it.",
          "evidence": "What if the person renting to own have the insurance and things in their name? They would have to ask the person that they would be buying it from, the title owner would have to give them, would still have to sign off on it.",
          "source_chunks": [
            5
          ],
          "timestamp": 1513.759,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 33
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 1513.759,
      "end_timestamp": 1513.759,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0031",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Permitting process for rent-to-own situations",
      "summary": "The actual title owner of the property must give permission and be named on the vacation permit, regardless of who is covering the insurance.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        34
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        5
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "That makes sense. The person, so when you're in a rent to own situation, there's a title, there's a fee, the person that owns the property. The actual, not the person renting to own, the person that owns the property would still have to give that permission and be named on that vacation permit.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            34
          ],
          "timestamp": 1534.2,
          "end_timestamp": 1534.2,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Permitting process for rent-to-own situations",
          "summary": "The actual title owner of the property must give permission and be named on the vacation permit, regardless of who is covering the insurance.",
          "evidence": "That makes sense. The person, so when you're in a rent to own situation, there's a title, there's a fee, the person that owns the property. The actual, not the person renting to own, the person that owns the property would still have to give that permission and be named on that vacation permit.",
          "source_chunks": [
            5
          ],
          "timestamp": 1534.2,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 34
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 1534.2,
      "end_timestamp": 1534.2,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0032",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Permit review process",
      "summary": "Every single permit submitted is reviewed by the department of Clark Anderson and staff will review situations involving rent-to-own or insurance verification.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        35
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        5
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Every single permit that gets submitted is reviewed by my department, by Clark Anderson's department, and if there is any situation where we're talking about well we have to verify insurance, we have to verify a rent-to-own situation, the staff, our staff is gonna review it and is going to work with the person.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            35
          ],
          "timestamp": 1585.44,
          "end_timestamp": 1585.44,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Permit review process",
          "summary": "Every single permit submitted is reviewed by the department of Clark Anderson and staff will review situations involving rent-to-own or insurance verification.",
          "evidence": "Every single permit that gets submitted is reviewed by my department, by Clark Anderson's department, and if there is any situation where we're talking about well we have to verify insurance, we have to verify a rent-to-own situation, the staff, our staff is gonna review it and is going to work with the person.",
          "source_chunks": [
            5
          ],
          "timestamp": 1585.44,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 35
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 1585.44,
      "end_timestamp": 1585.44,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0033",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "AirBnB rental frequency statistics",
      "summary": "One source stated that AirBnB rentals or vacation rentals occur sometimes four to five times a month.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        36
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        5
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "I did some checking to ask like how many times a month are these Airbnbs rentals or vacation rentals. And John, and the person I checked with said sometimes four to five times a month.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            36
          ],
          "timestamp": 1625.36,
          "end_timestamp": 1625.36,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "AirBnB rental frequency statistics",
          "summary": "One source stated that AirBnB rentals or vacation rentals occur sometimes four to five times a month.",
          "evidence": "I did some checking to ask like how many times a month are these Airbnbs rentals or vacation rentals. And John, and the person I checked with said sometimes four to five times a month.",
          "source_chunks": [
            5
          ],
          "timestamp": 1625.36,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 36
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 1625.36,
      "end_timestamp": 1625.36,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0034",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Safety concerns regarding vacation rentals",
      "summary": "A speaker raised safety concerns based on an incident involving 12 pistols, automatic weapons, and 15 to 20 people walking out of a location.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        37
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        5
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Keep in mind this wasn't just a little incident. For about 12 pistols, automatic weapons, illegal weapons, and 15 to 20 people that walked out of the place. And it's still under investigation.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            37
          ],
          "timestamp": 1688.97,
          "end_timestamp": 1688.97,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Safety concerns regarding vacation rentals",
          "summary": "A speaker raised safety concerns based on an incident involving 12 pistols, automatic weapons, and 15 to 20 people walking out of a location.",
          "evidence": "Keep in mind this wasn't just a little incident. For about 12 pistols, automatic weapons, illegal weapons, and 15 to 20 people that walked out of the place. And it's still under investigation.",
          "source_chunks": [
            5
          ],
          "timestamp": 1688.97,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 37
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 1688.97,
      "end_timestamp": 1688.97,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0035",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Safety recommendations for AirBnBs",
      "summary": "A speaker suggested contacting Airbnb for consultation on making communities safer regarding AirBnBs.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        38
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        5
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "My nephew, he works for Airbnb, and I called him to ask him some questions about. And I asked him to ask him some questions about all of this and he said that even happens in hotels, that they come in there with that type of ammunition and all that kind of stuff. It happens, but the thing, if you really want maybe some more clarification or some rules on how, on Airbnbs in your community, you can call them and they will have a consultation with you and help you come up with ideas on what you can do in your community to make it safer having the Airbnbs.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            38
          ],
          "timestamp": 1791.17,
          "end_timestamp": 1791.17,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Safety recommendations for AirBnBs",
          "summary": "A speaker suggested contacting Airbnb for consultation on making communities safer regarding AirBnBs.",
          "evidence": "My nephew, he works for Airbnb, and I called him to ask him some questions about. And I asked him to ask him some questions about all of this and he said that even happens in hotels, that they come in there with that type of ammunition and all that kind of stuff. It happens, but the thing, if you really want maybe some more clarification or some rules on how, on Airbnbs in your community, you can call them and they will have a consultation with you and help you come up with ideas on what you can do in your community to make it safer having the Airbnbs.",
          "source_chunks": [
            5
          ],
          "timestamp": 1791.17,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 38
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 1791.17,
      "end_timestamp": 1791.17,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0036",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Airbnbs and community safety concerns",
      "summary": "The speaker discussed the issue of Airbnbs, suggesting consultation with local authorities for rules and emphasizing that one bad incident should not lead to eliminating the practice entirely.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        39
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        6
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "But I've stayed at Airbnbs in places that were probably million-dollar homes, but it's all about how we perceive this and take it on and look at the one mistake that happened, how are we going to prevent it from happening again? But I do think it would be something really good in our community because of the hotel situation. And this is another way people make a hustle. This is how they make extra income to take care of their families or just to have to take care of their homes. But I do agree. I'm not saying that it wasn't bad because it scared me when I heard it, but I'm just thinking that it shouldn't be something that we just do away with it because we had one bad incident.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            39
          ],
          "timestamp": 1829.319,
          "end_timestamp": 1829.319,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Airbnbs and community safety concerns",
          "summary": "The speaker discussed the issue of Airbnbs, suggesting consultation with local authorities for rules and emphasizing that one bad incident should not lead to eliminating the practice entirely.",
          "evidence": "But I've stayed at Airbnbs in places that were probably million-dollar homes, but it's all about how we perceive this and take it on and look at the one mistake that happened, how are we going to prevent it from happening again? But I do think it would be something really good in our community because of the hotel situation. And this is another way people make a hustle. This is how they make extra income to take care of their families or just to have to take care of their homes. But I do agree. I'm not saying that it wasn't bad because it scared me when I heard it, but I'm just thinking that it shouldn't be something that we just do away with it because we had one bad incident.",
          "source_chunks": [
            6
          ],
          "timestamp": 1829.319,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 39
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 1829.319,
      "end_timestamp": 1829.319,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0037",
      "event_type": "decision",
      "subject": "Ordinance failure on first vote",
      "summary": "The ordinance failed by a roll call vote.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        40
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        6
      ],
      "components": {
        "vote": [
          40
        ]
      },
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Klemm? Aye. Johnson? No. Simmons? No. Parker? No. Stacy? No. Shadle? Aye. Sanders? No. Sellers? No. The ordinance fails two to six.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            40
          ],
          "timestamp": 1884.94,
          "end_timestamp": 1884.94,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "vote",
          "subject": "Ordinance failure on first vote",
          "summary": "The ordinance failed by a roll call vote.",
          "evidence": "Klemm? Aye. Johnson? No. Simmons? No. Parker? No. Stacy? No. Shadle? Aye. Sanders? No. Sellers? No. The ordinance fails two to six.",
          "source_chunks": [
            6
          ],
          "timestamp": 1884.94,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 40
        }
      ],
      "outcome": "failed",
      "timestamp": 1884.94,
      "end_timestamp": 1884.94,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0038",
      "event_type": "decision",
      "subject": "Motion to adopt resolution 2025-113 (Community Solar)",
      "summary": "A motion was made by Shadle and seconded by Klemm to adopt the resolution.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "decision_sequence",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        41,
        42,
        43
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        6
      ],
      "components": {
        "request": [
          41
        ],
        "motion": [
          42
        ],
        "vote": [
          43
        ]
      },
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Item number eight is the adoption of resolution 2025-113. Could you please read this reconsideration of resolution regarding community solar with Illinois shines which is a state administered incentive program to support the development of new solar projects okay so before we can have this manager where we need a motion to reconsider so move well it needs the I do not have that.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            41
          ],
          "timestamp": 1893.579,
          "end_timestamp": 1893.579,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        },
        {
          "text": "Shadle made a motion. Klemm seconded to adopt.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            42
          ],
          "timestamp": 1908.63,
          "end_timestamp": 1908.63,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        },
        {
          "text": "Motion failed by roll call vote. Ayes were Klemm, Parker, Shadle, Nays were Johnson, Simmons, Stacy, and Sanders.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            43
          ],
          "timestamp": 1908.63,
          "end_timestamp": 1908.63,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "resolution",
          "subject": "Adoption of resolution 2025-113 regarding community solar",
          "summary": "The item was the adoption of resolution 2025-113 concerning community solar with Illinois shines.",
          "evidence": "Item number eight is the adoption of resolution 2025-113. Could you please read this reconsideration of resolution regarding community solar with Illinois shines which is a state administered incentive program to support the development of new solar projects okay so before we can have this manager where we need a motion to reconsider so move well it needs the I do not have that.",
          "source_chunks": [
            6
          ],
          "timestamp": 1893.579,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 41
        },
        {
          "record_type": "motion",
          "subject": "Motion to adopt resolution 2025-113 (Community Solar)",
          "summary": "A motion was made by Shadle and seconded by Klemm to adopt the resolution.",
          "evidence": "Shadle made a motion. Klemm seconded to adopt.",
          "source_chunks": [
            6
          ],
          "timestamp": 1908.63,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 42
        },
        {
          "record_type": "vote",
          "subject": "Motion to adopt resolution 2025-113 (Community Solar)",
          "summary": "The motion failed by roll call vote.",
          "evidence": "Motion failed by roll call vote. Ayes were Klemm, Parker, Shadle, Nays were Johnson, Simmons, Stacy, and Sanders.",
          "source_chunks": [
            6
          ],
          "timestamp": 1908.63,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 43
        }
      ],
      "outcome": "failed",
      "timestamp": 1908.63,
      "end_timestamp": 1908.63,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0039",
      "event_type": "decision",
      "subject": "Motion to reconsider resolution 2025-113 (Community Solar)",
      "summary": "A motion was made by Johnson regarding reconsideration of the topic.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        44
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        6
      ],
      "components": {
        "motion": [
          44
        ]
      },
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "The motion to reconsider would be made by Johnson, Sanders, Simmons, and Stacy.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            44
          ],
          "timestamp": 1908.63,
          "end_timestamp": 1908.63,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "motion",
          "subject": "Motion to reconsider resolution 2025-113 (Community Solar)",
          "summary": "A motion was made by Johnson regarding reconsideration of the topic.",
          "evidence": "The motion to reconsider would be made by Johnson, Sanders, Simmons, and Stacy.",
          "source_chunks": [
            6
          ],
          "timestamp": 1908.63,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 44
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 1908.63,
      "end_timestamp": 1908.63,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0040",
      "event_type": "decision",
      "subject": "Procedural requirement for reconsideration",
      "summary": "Discussion confirmed that a motion is needed to reconsider the topic before it can be discussed further.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        45
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        6
      ],
      "components": {
        "request": [
          45
        ]
      },
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "So we would need a motion to reconsider the topic first. Because if you guys choose to reconsider the topic, then once that topic is back on the table, then you could talk about, hey, since we're talking about it again, we want to bring Mr. Mudge back in to talk about it at that point.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            45
          ],
          "timestamp": 2039.619,
          "end_timestamp": 2039.619,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Procedural requirement for reconsideration",
          "summary": "Discussion confirmed that a motion is needed to reconsider the topic before it can be discussed further.",
          "evidence": "So we would need a motion to reconsider the topic first. Because if you guys choose to reconsider the topic, then once that topic is back on the table, then you could talk about, hey, since we're talking about it again, we want to bring Mr. Mudge back in to talk about it at that point.",
          "source_chunks": [
            6
          ],
          "timestamp": 2039.619,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 45
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 2039.619,
      "end_timestamp": 2039.619,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
      "review_flags": [
        "unattached_motion_request"
      ]
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0041",
      "event_type": "decision",
      "subject": "Motion to bring community solar topic back up for discussion",
      "summary": "A motion was made by Alderman Stacy and seconded by Alderman Johnson to bring the topic back up.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        46
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        6
      ],
      "components": {
        "motion": [
          46
        ]
      },
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "So are you making a motion to reconsider Alderman Sanders? On the premises of the fact that he would come and give us a better understanding of the process. Okay. So it would be something that maybe Manager Boyer or Mr. Siegel could give a better understanding and Linn, Dean, John, Don, John, D. J., John, Tony, and John, D. J. I want to make a motion to bring the topic back up. It's really free money to the community. No. So if you are making a motion to bring the topic back up, I would need a second. I'll second to bring it back up. Okay. So we have a motion made by. Do we make a motion to bring it back? Alderman Stacy, that's kind of out of order. So he did make the motion. Alderman Johnson seconded it.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            46
          ],
          "timestamp": 2072.079,
          "end_timestamp": 2072.079,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "motion",
          "subject": "Motion to bring community solar topic back up for discussion",
          "summary": "A motion was made by Alderman Stacy and seconded by Alderman Johnson to bring the topic back up.",
          "evidence": "So are you making a motion to reconsider Alderman Sanders? On the premises of the fact that he would come and give us a better understanding of the process. Okay. So it would be something that maybe Manager Boyer or Mr. Siegel could give a better understanding and Linn, Dean, John, Don, John, D. J., John, Tony, and John, D. J. I want to make a motion to bring the topic back up. It's really free money to the community. No. So if you are making a motion to bring the topic back up, I would need a second. I'll second to bring it back up. Okay. So we have a motion made by. Do we make a motion to bring it back? Alderman Stacy, that's kind of out of order. So he did make the motion. Alderman Johnson seconded it.",
          "source_chunks": [
            6
          ],
          "timestamp": 2072.079,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 46
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 2072.079,
      "end_timestamp": 2072.079,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0042",
      "event_type": "decision",
      "subject": "Motion to reconsider topic (Community Solar)",
      "summary": "The motion to reconsider passed by roll call vote.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        47
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        6
      ],
      "components": {
        "vote": [
          47
        ]
      },
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "So on the reconsidering itself, Madam Clerk, could you take the role on the reconsidering? Klemm? Aye. Johnson? Aye. Simmons? No. Parker? No. Stacy? No. Shadle? Aye. Sanders? No. And Sellers? Aye. One, two, three, four, it is currently tied. Mayor? Aye. The motion to reconsider passes five to four.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            47
          ],
          "timestamp": 2132.779,
          "end_timestamp": 2132.779,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "vote",
          "subject": "Motion to reconsider topic (Community Solar)",
          "summary": "The motion to reconsider passed by roll call vote.",
          "evidence": "So on the reconsidering itself, Madam Clerk, could you take the role on the reconsidering? Klemm? Aye. Johnson? Aye. Simmons? No. Parker? No. Stacy? No. Shadle? Aye. Sanders? No. And Sellers? Aye. One, two, three, four, it is currently tied. Mayor? Aye. The motion to reconsider passes five to four.",
          "source_chunks": [
            6
          ],
          "timestamp": 2132.779,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 47
        }
      ],
      "outcome": "passed",
      "timestamp": 2132.779,
      "end_timestamp": 2132.779,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0043",
      "event_type": "presentation",
      "subject": "Community solar bill credits with Illinois shines program",
      "summary": "The City of Freeport was asked at the September 8th meeting for Mike Mudge to present on the community solar bill credits with Illinois shines program.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        48
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        6
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Mayor? Aye. The motion to reconsider passes five to four so now before you then is city managers being able to read the memo sure thank you your honor the city of Freeport was asked at the September 8th Cal Mike Mudge presented on the community solar bill credits with Illinois shines program so anyway if were to participate in the Illinois Solar Energy Incentive Program.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            48
          ],
          "timestamp": 2153.84,
          "end_timestamp": 2153.84,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "presentation",
          "subject": "Community solar bill credits with Illinois shines program",
          "summary": "The City of Freeport was asked at the September 8th meeting for Mike Mudge to present on the community solar bill credits with Illinois shines program.",
          "evidence": "Mayor? Aye. The motion to reconsider passes five to four so now before you then is city managers being able to read the memo sure thank you your honor the city of Freeport was asked at the September 8th Cal Mike Mudge presented on the community solar bill credits with Illinois shines program so anyway if were to participate in the Illinois Solar Energy Incentive Program.",
          "source_chunks": [
            6
          ],
          "timestamp": 2153.84,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 48
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 2153.84,
      "end_timestamp": 2153.84,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0044",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "City Solar Energy Incentive Program Details",
      "summary": "The city of Freeport was asked about the community solar bill credits from the Illinois SHINES program presented on September 8th.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        49
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        7
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "the city of Freeport was asked at the September 8th Cal Mike Mudge presented on the community solar bill credits with Illinois shines program so anyway if were to participate in the Illinois Solar Energy Incentive Program.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            49
          ],
          "timestamp": 2153.84,
          "end_timestamp": 2153.84,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "City Solar Energy Incentive Program Details",
          "summary": "The city of Freeport was asked about the community solar bill credits from the Illinois SHINES program presented on September 8th.",
          "evidence": "the city of Freeport was asked at the September 8th Cal Mike Mudge presented on the community solar bill credits with Illinois shines program so anyway if were to participate in the Illinois Solar Energy Incentive Program.",
          "source_chunks": [
            7
          ],
          "timestamp": 2153.84,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 49
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 2153.84,
      "end_timestamp": 2153.84,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0045",
      "event_type": "metric",
      "subject": "Solar Developer Eligibility and Incentives",
      "summary": "The city's largest electrical counts are 100 kilowatts and under, and will be eligible to receive monetary bill credits from the program incentive.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        50
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        7
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "The city's largest electrical counts are 100 kilowatts and under, and will be eligible to receive the monetary bill credits from the program incentive.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            50
          ],
          "timestamp": 2188.3,
          "end_timestamp": 2188.3,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "metric",
          "subject": "Solar Developer Eligibility and Incentives",
          "summary": "The city's largest electrical counts are 100 kilowatts and under, and will be eligible to receive monetary bill credits from the program incentive.",
          "evidence": "The city's largest electrical counts are 100 kilowatts and under, and will be eligible to receive the monetary bill credits from the program incentive.",
          "source_chunks": [
            7
          ],
          "timestamp": 2188.3,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 50
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 2188.3,
      "end_timestamp": 2188.3,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0046",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Solar Incentive Program Timeline and Participation",
      "summary": "These incentive programs work on a 20-year subscription timeline, and participation allows Freeport to receive solar incentives.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        51
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        7
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "These incentive programs work on a 20-year subscription timeline, and the subscription program application will allow Freeport to participate and receive solar incentives from Soler Array projects that are being installed in the area.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            51
          ],
          "timestamp": 2203.4,
          "end_timestamp": 2203.4,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Solar Incentive Program Timeline and Participation",
          "summary": "These incentive programs work on a 20-year subscription timeline, and participation allows Freeport to receive solar incentives.",
          "evidence": "These incentive programs work on a 20-year subscription timeline, and the subscription program application will allow Freeport to participate and receive solar incentives from Soler Array projects that are being installed in the area.",
          "source_chunks": [
            7
          ],
          "timestamp": 2203.4,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 51
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 2203.4,
      "end_timestamp": 2203.4,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0047",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Financial Liability of Solar Participation",
      "summary": "Freeport will not have any financial or liability participation in installing or paying for any solar build project.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        52
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        7
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Freeport will not have any financial or liability participation in installing or paying for any solar build project.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            52
          ],
          "timestamp": 2203.4,
          "end_timestamp": 2203.4,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Financial Liability of Solar Participation",
          "summary": "Freeport will not have any financial or liability participation in installing or paying for any solar build project.",
          "evidence": "Freeport will not have any financial or liability participation in installing or paying for any solar build project.",
          "source_chunks": [
            7
          ],
          "timestamp": 2203.4,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 52
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 2203.4,
      "end_timestamp": 2203.4,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0048",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Utility Account Usage and Program Appeal",
      "summary": "The city utility accounts are appealing the program due to the large inconsistent use of electricity.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        53
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        7
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "The city utility accounts are appealing the program due to the large inconsistent use of electricity.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            53
          ],
          "timestamp": 2203.4,
          "end_timestamp": 2203.4,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Utility Account Usage and Program Appeal",
          "summary": "The city utility accounts are appealing the program due to the large inconsistent use of electricity.",
          "evidence": "The city utility accounts are appealing the program due to the large inconsistent use of electricity.",
          "source_chunks": [
            7
          ],
          "timestamp": 2203.4,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 53
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 2203.4,
      "end_timestamp": 2203.4,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0049",
      "event_type": "presentation",
      "subject": "Illinois SHINES Program Overview (Director Segal)",
      "summary": "Large solar arrays require credits that must be returned to the community, based on usage.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        54
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        7
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Every large solar array that's done gets credits that they have to give back to the community. And it's dollars that they have to return back to that community. And it's based on usage.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            54
          ],
          "timestamp": 2280.92,
          "end_timestamp": 2280.92,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "presentation",
          "subject": "Illinois SHINES Program Overview (Director Segal)",
          "summary": "Large solar arrays require credits that must be returned to the community, based on usage.",
          "evidence": "Every large solar array that's done gets credits that they have to give back to the community. And it's dollars that they have to return back to that community. And it's based on usage.",
          "source_chunks": [
            7
          ],
          "timestamp": 2280.92,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 54
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 2280.92,
      "end_timestamp": 2280.92,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0050",
      "event_type": "presentation",
      "subject": "Exclusion from Program Benefits (City Hall)",
      "summary": "The City Hall account is excluded because of a separate deal with ComEd.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        55
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        7
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "This is not available for, let's say, our City Hall account, because we don't pay electric for our City Hall account because we have a deal with ComEd on this.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            55
          ],
          "timestamp": 2293.4,
          "end_timestamp": 2293.4,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "presentation",
          "subject": "Exclusion from Program Benefits (City Hall)",
          "summary": "The City Hall account is excluded because of a separate deal with ComEd.",
          "evidence": "This is not available for, let's say, our City Hall account, because we don't pay electric for our City Hall account because we have a deal with ComEd on this.",
          "source_chunks": [
            7
          ],
          "timestamp": 2293.4,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 55
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 2293.4,
      "end_timestamp": 2293.4,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0051",
      "event_type": "presentation",
      "subject": "Potential Annual Financial Benefit from Solar Credits",
      "summary": "The city could receive $10 to $20,000 a year of free money without any commitment.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        56
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        7
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Not that this would be massive money, but this could be 10 to $20,000 a year of free money coming back to the utility with no commitment from us.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            56
          ],
          "timestamp": 2335.639,
          "end_timestamp": 2335.639,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "presentation",
          "subject": "Potential Annual Financial Benefit from Solar Credits",
          "summary": "The city could receive $10 to $20,000 a year of free money without any commitment.",
          "evidence": "Not that this would be massive money, but this could be 10 to $20,000 a year of free money coming back to the utility with no commitment from us.",
          "source_chunks": [
            7
          ],
          "timestamp": 2335.639,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 56
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 2335.639,
      "end_timestamp": 2335.639,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0052",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Program Commitment Level",
      "summary": "Participation involves accepting credits due to high volume accounts and requires no financial or solar field additions.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        57
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        7
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "We don't have to sign up for more solar work. We don't have to do some special program. We don't have to add more solar fields. We're just accepting their credits because we have high volume accounts.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            57
          ],
          "timestamp": 2346.4,
          "end_timestamp": 2346.4,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Program Commitment Level",
          "summary": "Participation involves accepting credits due to high volume accounts and requires no financial or solar field additions.",
          "evidence": "We don't have to sign up for more solar work. We don't have to do some special program. We don't have to add more solar fields. We're just accepting their credits because we have high volume accounts.",
          "source_chunks": [
            7
          ],
          "timestamp": 2346.4,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 57
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 2346.4,
      "end_timestamp": 2346.4,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0053",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Rebate Percentage Increase Offered",
      "summary": "The rebate percentage offered to Freeport was greater than other communities, allegedly increased from 10 to 15.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        58
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        7
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "what has been offered to Freeport, which has been greater than other communities, is I believe they upped the rebate percentage from 10 to 15, but I don't know how that works.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            58
          ],
          "timestamp": 2380.019,
          "end_timestamp": 2380.019,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Rebate Percentage Increase Offered",
          "summary": "The rebate percentage offered to Freeport was greater than other communities, allegedly increased from 10 to 15.",
          "evidence": "what has been offered to Freeport, which has been greater than other communities, is I believe they upped the rebate percentage from 10 to 15, but I don't know how that works.",
          "source_chunks": [
            7
          ],
          "timestamp": 2380.019,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 58
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 2380.019,
      "end_timestamp": 2380.019,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0054",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Opportunity for Community Funding",
      "summary": "The speaker emphasized that accepting these credits is 'truly free money' needed by the community.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        59
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        7
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "It is truly free money to the community that we desperately need more funding. So I don't know why we would pass this opportunity up when there's no commitment based on us spending any financial money whatsoever.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            59
          ],
          "timestamp": 2408.92,
          "end_timestamp": 2408.92,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Opportunity for Community Funding",
          "summary": "The speaker emphasized that accepting these credits is 'truly free money' needed by the community.",
          "evidence": "It is truly free money to the community that we desperately need more funding. So I don't know why we would pass this opportunity up when there's no commitment based on us spending any financial money whatsoever.",
          "source_chunks": [
            7
          ],
          "timestamp": 2408.92,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 59
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 2408.92,
      "end_timestamp": 2408.92,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0055",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Rebate Contingency",
      "summary": "If usage or solar production is low, the rebate for that month will simply not be received.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        60
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        7
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "And if the incentives or the rebates get low enough, for instance, like our accounts, we don't use enough or they don't produce enough solar, we just don't get the rebate for that month.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            60
          ],
          "timestamp": 2426.239,
          "end_timestamp": 2426.239,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Rebate Contingency",
          "summary": "If usage or solar production is low, the rebate for that month will simply not be received.",
          "evidence": "And if the incentives or the rebates get low enough, for instance, like our accounts, we don't use enough or they don't produce enough solar, we just don't get the rebate for that month.",
          "source_chunks": [
            7
          ],
          "timestamp": 2426.239,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 60
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 2426.239,
      "end_timestamp": 2426.239,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0056",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Scope of Program Benefits (Utility Accounts)",
      "summary": "The program only concerns utility building electric bills and does not involve general public accounts.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        61
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        7
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "My understanding is that we're talking just about and the city electric bills that we utilize at our buildings, not all our buildings, not like City Hall, like you said, but our utility building.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            61
          ],
          "timestamp": 2447.84,
          "end_timestamp": 2447.84,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Scope of Program Benefits (Utility Accounts)",
          "summary": "The program only concerns utility building electric bills and does not involve general public accounts.",
          "evidence": "My understanding is that we're talking just about and the city electric bills that we utilize at our buildings, not all our buildings, not like City Hall, like you said, but our utility building.",
          "source_chunks": [
            7
          ],
          "timestamp": 2447.84,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 61
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 2447.84,
      "end_timestamp": 2447.84,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0057",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Qualifying Account Example",
      "summary": "The city lighting bill for street lights qualifies as an account with steady annual usage.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        62
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        7
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "So for an instance, one of our larger bills right now that we have monthly is our city lighting bill for all the street lights around town. That account would qualify for this.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            62
          ],
          "timestamp": 2469.159,
          "end_timestamp": 2469.159,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Qualifying Account Example",
          "summary": "The city lighting bill for street lights qualifies as an account with steady annual usage.",
          "evidence": "So for an instance, one of our larger bills right now that we have monthly is our city lighting bill for all the street lights around town. That account would qualify for this.",
          "source_chunks": [
            7
          ],
          "timestamp": 2469.159,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 62
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 2469.159,
      "end_timestamp": 2469.159,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0058",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Need for Oversight and Decision Framework",
      "summary": "Concerns were raised regarding the lack of a measuring stick, monitoring, or oversight committee to manage the incentives.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        63
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        7
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Well, who's monitoring these incentives and these rebates and how do we make decisions whether or not we wanna go forward with any of this program because we don't have a measuring stick with it.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            63
          ],
          "timestamp": 2484.019,
          "end_timestamp": 2484.019,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Need for Oversight and Decision Framework",
          "summary": "Concerns were raised regarding the lack of a measuring stick, monitoring, or oversight committee to manage the incentives.",
          "evidence": "Well, who's monitoring these incentives and these rebates and how do we make decisions whether or not we wanna go forward with any of this program because we don't have a measuring stick with it.",
          "source_chunks": [
            7
          ],
          "timestamp": 2484.019,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 63
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 2484.019,
      "end_timestamp": 2484.019,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0059",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Need for Council Discussion on Program Details",
      "summary": "A need was stated to establish a process to understand how the rebates benefit Freeport and how they are distributed.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        64
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        7
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "We gotta make sure that we have a lockdown on everything about the understanding of how we are going to receive any kind of receivables, dividends, or whatever the case may be.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            64
          ],
          "timestamp": 2531.26,
          "end_timestamp": 2531.26,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Need for Council Discussion on Program Details",
          "summary": "A need was stated to establish a process to understand how the rebates benefit Freeport and how they are distributed.",
          "evidence": "We gotta make sure that we have a lockdown on everything about the understanding of how we are going to receive any kind of receivables, dividends, or whatever the case may be.",
          "source_chunks": [
            7
          ],
          "timestamp": 2531.26,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 64
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 2531.26,
      "end_timestamp": 2531.26,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0060",
      "event_type": "decision",
      "subject": "Motion to Reconsider Vote Outcome",
      "summary": "The motion to reconsider passed.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        65
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        7
      ],
      "components": {
        "vote": [
          65
        ]
      },
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "The motion to reconsider passes five to four so now before you then is city managers being able to read the memo",
          "source_record_indices": [
            65
          ],
          "timestamp": 2153.84,
          "end_timestamp": 2153.84,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "vote",
          "subject": "Motion to Reconsider Vote Outcome",
          "summary": "The motion to reconsider passed.",
          "evidence": "The motion to reconsider passes five to four so now before you then is city managers being able to read the memo",
          "source_chunks": [
            7
          ],
          "timestamp": 2153.84,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 65
        }
      ],
      "outcome": "passed",
      "timestamp": 2153.84,
      "end_timestamp": 2153.84,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0061",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Receivables and Rebate Monitoring System for Community Incentives",
      "summary": "Concerns were raised regarding the lack of a monitoring system to track incoming rebates from sources like solar incentives, making it unclear how benefits are distributed or if they benefit the community.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        66
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        8
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "We gotta make sure that we have a lockdown on everything about the understanding of how we are going to receive any kind of receivables, dividends, or whatever the case may be. We have not put that in place yet. This, what we're talking about, has not been orchestrated by council yet. We have not had a full discussion, not just because we're having one now here in this assembly, but we need to be able to have this kind of discussion to get the details of how is it benefiting the community of Freeport, who's gonna be served with these types of incentive to join in, to be part of that whole process and how the rebates are distributed. I don't think that the rebates, you narrow it down to the electric here and the facilities of our own water and sewer and everything like that. But we don't have a monitoring system to determine that. Council don't have it. We don't have what they say, alert status about rebates that are coming into the city on behalf of the solar shine or whatever who they are. We don't have that. We don't have indicators that let council know how this is being presented and being brought back each year or whenever the rebates are being submitted to the city. We don't know that. It's just like that.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            66
          ],
          "timestamp": 2553.34,
          "end_timestamp": 2553.34,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Receivables and Rebate Monitoring System for Community Incentives",
          "summary": "Concerns were raised regarding the lack of a monitoring system to track incoming rebates from sources like solar incentives, making it unclear how benefits are distributed or if they benefit the community.",
          "evidence": "We gotta make sure that we have a lockdown on everything about the understanding of how we are going to receive any kind of receivables, dividends, or whatever the case may be. We have not put that in place yet. This, what we're talking about, has not been orchestrated by council yet. We have not had a full discussion, not just because we're having one now here in this assembly, but we need to be able to have this kind of discussion to get the details of how is it benefiting the community of Freeport, who's gonna be served with these types of incentive to join in, to be part of that whole process and how the rebates are distributed. I don't think that the rebates, you narrow it down to the electric here and the facilities of our own water and sewer and everything like that. But we don't have a monitoring system to determine that. Council don't have it. We don't have what they say, alert status about rebates that are coming into the city on behalf of the solar shine or whatever who they are. We don't have that. We don't have indicators that let council know how this is being presented and being brought back each year or whenever the rebates are being submitted to the city. We don't know that. It's just like that.",
          "source_chunks": [
            8
          ],
          "timestamp": 2553.34,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 66
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 2553.34,
      "end_timestamp": 2553.34,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0062",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Rebate Program Details and Financial Opportunity",
      "summary": "A representative stated that rebate money would come directly to the director of finance, suggesting it could provide an additional $100,000 or $200,000 over a 10-year period for utility funds or general fund.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        67
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        8
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "So the rebate money would come directly to our director of finance. Because that is how that works. Fowler. So again, if you guys choose not to go forward, that's your take on it. But we are constantly here asking for more money and here's an opportunity to capture some extra dollars isn't going to, you know, make us rich, but over a 10-year period, it It might be another $100,000 or $200,000 of input to the utility funds or to the general fund, wherever it comes in it gets expended, but it's money that we currently don't have and they want to lock it in for 20 years.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            67
          ],
          "timestamp": 2694.159,
          "end_timestamp": 2694.159,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Rebate Program Details and Financial Opportunity",
          "summary": "A representative stated that rebate money would come directly to the director of finance, suggesting it could provide an additional $100,000 or $200,000 over a 10-year period for utility funds or general fund.",
          "evidence": "So the rebate money would come directly to our director of finance. Because that is how that works. Fowler. So again, if you guys choose not to go forward, that's your take on it. But we are constantly here asking for more money and here's an opportunity to capture some extra dollars isn't going to, you know, make us rich, but over a 10-year period, it It might be another $100,000 or $200,000 of input to the utility funds or to the general fund, wherever it comes in it gets expended, but it's money that we currently don't have and they want to lock it in for 20 years.",
          "source_chunks": [
            8
          ],
          "timestamp": 2694.159,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 67
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 2694.159,
      "end_timestamp": 2694.159,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0063",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Procedural Challenge Regarding Motion to Reconsider",
      "summary": "A council member challenged the process by which a reconsideration was brought up, stating that Alderman Sanders never physically made the motion.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        68
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        8
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Mayor. What you did was not right, Mayor Miller. Who tricked Alderman Sanders into reconsidering. He never said, I make a motion. He said, yes, he would consider under the assumption that the guy could come back and express it greater. Now, Darren has been allowed to speak everything that he knows on this matter because he knows it all. And giving his input is just to promote why we should do this, do something that we have and I have already voted down and I watched the little faces and the little talks, you know, and City Manager Boyer, you're sitting there cracking up till you're red, laughing because now he got all these questions and he's wanting information and he's saying this and he's saying that. He never physically said, I make a motion that we reconsider. You promoted that, Mayor Miller. You promoted that because that's what you want and that's what you said. He never made the motion. So we just voted on a motion that really was not made and was not legal. And that is not right, pushing your values and what you want and tricking him to move forward because this is something that you want. It's just not right and it's not funny.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            68
          ],
          "timestamp": 2763.239,
          "end_timestamp": 2763.239,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Procedural Challenge Regarding Motion to Reconsider",
          "summary": "A council member challenged the process by which a reconsideration was brought up, stating that Alderman Sanders never physically made the motion.",
          "evidence": "Mayor. What you did was not right, Mayor Miller. Who tricked Alderman Sanders into reconsidering. He never said, I make a motion. He said, yes, he would consider under the assumption that the guy could come back and express it greater. Now, Darren has been allowed to speak everything that he knows on this matter because he knows it all. And giving his input is just to promote why we should do this, do something that we have and I have already voted down and I watched the little faces and the little talks, you know, and City Manager Boyer, you're sitting there cracking up till you're red, laughing because now he got all these questions and he's wanting information and he's saying this and he's saying that. He never physically said, I make a motion that we reconsider. You promoted that, Mayor Miller. You promoted that because that's what you want and that's what you said. He never made the motion. So we just voted on a motion that really was not made and was not legal. And that is not right, pushing your values and what you want and tricking him to move forward because this is something that you want. It's just not right and it's not funny.",
          "source_chunks": [
            8
          ],
          "timestamp": 2763.239,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 68
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 2763.239,
      "end_timestamp": 2763.239,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0064",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Rebate Program Details: Subscription Requirement",
      "summary": "A council member questioned the nature of receiving 'free money,' asking what was required in return, referencing a potential subscription to build more solar farms.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        69
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        8
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Alderman Sellers? No, blow me off. I would just like to know, why would we not want to get free money? Can you say it again? I hear you. How would we not want to take on free money? And it's 20 years. I just want to know, why would we say no to free money? Alderman Johnson? I've always been told you never get anything free right so I'd like to know what how can they give us something free without not us not giving them something back or what is it that's promised or what's you know what's the bottom line on this is this something that I mean from what I understood Mr. Mudge to say that there was a subscription you had to do and that subscription would build more solar farms more solar places because there's Huffines. There's not enough right now.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            69
          ],
          "timestamp": 2920.15,
          "end_timestamp": 2920.15,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Rebate Program Details: Subscription Requirement",
          "summary": "A council member questioned the nature of receiving 'free money,' asking what was required in return, referencing a potential subscription to build more solar farms.",
          "evidence": "Alderman Sellers? No, blow me off. I would just like to know, why would we not want to get free money? Can you say it again? I hear you. How would we not want to take on free money? And it's 20 years. I just want to know, why would we say no to free money? Alderman Johnson? I've always been told you never get anything free right so I'd like to know what how can they give us something free without not us not giving them something back or what is it that's promised or what's you know what's the bottom line on this is this something that I mean from what I understood Mr. Mudge to say that there was a subscription you had to do and that subscription would build more solar farms more solar places because there's Huffines. There's not enough right now.",
          "source_chunks": [
            8
          ],
          "timestamp": 2920.15,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 69
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 2920.15,
      "end_timestamp": 2920.15,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0065",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Rebate Program Mechanics: 20-Year Commitment",
      "summary": "A representative explained that the program requires the city to commit to paying electric bills for 20 years, in exchange for a 10 to 15 percent discount incentive.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        70
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        8
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Attorney Zito. And Manager Boyer and Darren, correct me if I misspeak to your guys' understanding of this program as well there. But my understanding of how the program works, what they're asking, what they want in return Warren from the city is 20 years old. From the city is 20 years worth of us paying electric bills to them. So they're willing to say if you're willing to commit and subscribe to us and lock in for 20 years and you're going to pay those month after month after month ever bills that you guys are going to pay, I'm willing to incentivize you to lock in for that period of time by giving you this 10 to 15 percent discount because I locked in the otherwise all of that revenue that you're going to pay month after month and so on. That we would have paid month after month anyways there.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            70
          ],
          "timestamp": 2976.269,
          "end_timestamp": 2976.269,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Rebate Program Mechanics: 20-Year Commitment",
          "summary": "A representative explained that the program requires the city to commit to paying electric bills for 20 years, in exchange for a 10 to 15 percent discount incentive.",
          "evidence": "Attorney Zito. And Manager Boyer and Darren, correct me if I misspeak to your guys' understanding of this program as well there. But my understanding of how the program works, what they're asking, what they want in return Warren from the city is 20 years old. From the city is 20 years worth of us paying electric bills to them. So they're willing to say if you're willing to commit and subscribe to us and lock in for 20 years and you're going to pay those month after month after month ever bills that you guys are going to pay, I'm willing to incentivize you to lock in for that period of time by giving you this 10 to 15 percent discount because I locked in the otherwise all of that revenue that you're going to pay month after month and so on. That we would have paid month after month anyways there.",
          "source_chunks": [
            8
          ],
          "timestamp": 2976.269,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 70
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 2976.269,
      "end_timestamp": 2976.269,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0066",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Solar energy commitment and discount program details",
      "summary": "The city is being asked to commit for 20 years to pay electric bills in exchange for a 10 to 15 percent discount from the utility provider.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        71
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        9
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "But my understanding of how the program works, what they're asking, what they want in return Warren from the city is 20 years old. From the city is 20 years worth of us paying electric bills to them. So they're willing to say if you're willing to commit and subscribe to us and lock in for 20 years and you're going to pay those month after month after month ever bills that you guys are going to pay, I'm willing to incentivize you to lock in for that period of time by giving you this 10 to 15 percent discount because I locked in the otherwise all of that revenue that you're going to pay month after month and so on.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            71
          ],
          "timestamp": 2986.01,
          "end_timestamp": 2986.01,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Solar energy commitment and discount program details",
          "summary": "The city is being asked to commit for 20 years to pay electric bills in exchange for a 10 to 15 percent discount from the utility provider.",
          "evidence": "But my understanding of how the program works, what they're asking, what they want in return Warren from the city is 20 years old. From the city is 20 years worth of us paying electric bills to them. So they're willing to say if you're willing to commit and subscribe to us and lock in for 20 years and you're going to pay those month after month after month ever bills that you guys are going to pay, I'm willing to incentivize you to lock in for that period of time by giving you this 10 to 15 percent discount because I locked in the otherwise all of that revenue that you're going to pay month after month and so on.",
          "source_chunks": [
            9
          ],
          "timestamp": 2986.01,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 71
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 2986.01,
      "end_timestamp": 2986.01,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0067",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Utility company justification for solar build-out",
      "summary": "The utility company stated that signing up 15 to 20 large industrial users would be enough to justify building a grid or solar field.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        72
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        9
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "And they take that revenue stream, that committed revenue stream, that company will say, if I know I got the city of Freeport and I know I have this other, let's say, large manufacturer that has, you know, a larger electric bill, let's say it's an industrial user, right, and I sign up 15 to 20 of those types of companies, those sorts of users, that's enough for me to justify building then my grid or my plant, my solar field there.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            72
          ],
          "timestamp": 3018.92,
          "end_timestamp": 3018.92,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Utility company justification for solar build-out",
          "summary": "The utility company stated that signing up 15 to 20 large industrial users would be enough to justify building a grid or solar field.",
          "evidence": "And they take that revenue stream, that committed revenue stream, that company will say, if I know I got the city of Freeport and I know I have this other, let's say, large manufacturer that has, you know, a larger electric bill, let's say it's an industrial user, right, and I sign up 15 to 20 of those types of companies, those sorts of users, that's enough for me to justify building then my grid or my plant, my solar field there.",
          "source_chunks": [
            9
          ],
          "timestamp": 3018.92,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 72
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 3018.92,
      "end_timestamp": 3018.92,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0068",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Eligibility restrictions for incentive program",
      "summary": "Accounts already in aggregation programs are not eligible for this type of incentive; the program applies only to City of Freeport utility accounts.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        73
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        9
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "accounts that are already in aggregation programs are not eligible for this type of and John. I am not aware of any of the people that are eligible for this type of project. ≫ When you say aggregation is not fitted for this particular project, is that what you just said? I thought that's what I heard. But if I didn't, if I heard you wrong, I apologize. ≫ Accounts that are already in aggregation programs are not eligible for this type of incentive. On the City of Freeport utility accounts only.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            73
          ],
          "timestamp": 3105.179,
          "end_timestamp": 3105.179,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Eligibility restrictions for incentive program",
          "summary": "Accounts already in aggregation programs are not eligible for this type of incentive; the program applies only to City of Freeport utility accounts.",
          "evidence": "accounts that are already in aggregation programs are not eligible for this type of and John. I am not aware of any of the people that are eligible for this type of project. ≫ When you say aggregation is not fitted for this particular project, is that what you just said? I thought that's what I heard. But if I didn't, if I heard you wrong, I apologize. ≫ Accounts that are already in aggregation programs are not eligible for this type of incentive. On the City of Freeport utility accounts only.",
          "source_chunks": [
            9
          ],
          "timestamp": 3105.179,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 73
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 3105.179,
      "end_timestamp": 3105.179,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0069",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Scope limitation of program benefits",
      "summary": "The program only affects utility accounts done by Public Works and has nothing to do with individual residential electric bills.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        74
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        9
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "This has nothing to do with our right now. This is just for the City of Freeport property accounts. OK. It has nothing to do with it. It does not drill down to the homes. OK, I see. Now I get the picture. Right, it has nothing to do with everyone's individual electric bill, it has only to do with the utility accounts that are done by Public Works and or",
          "source_record_indices": [
            74
          ],
          "timestamp": 3148.139,
          "end_timestamp": 3148.139,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Scope limitation of program benefits",
          "summary": "The program only affects utility accounts done by Public Works and has nothing to do with individual residential electric bills.",
          "evidence": "This has nothing to do with our right now. This is just for the City of Freeport property accounts. OK. It has nothing to do with it. It does not drill down to the homes. OK, I see. Now I get the picture. Right, it has nothing to do with everyone's individual electric bill, it has only to do with the utility accounts that are done by Public Works and or",
          "source_chunks": [
            9
          ],
          "timestamp": 3148.139,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 74
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 3148.139,
      "end_timestamp": 3148.139,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0070",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Cost implications of 20-year discount commitment",
      "summary": "The cost involves a subscription fee based on monthly savings, which is unknown until an agreement is signed, despite a potential 15% saving.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        75
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        9
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Yes, and so for 20 years, how much are we paying them for this little, what, 10 or 15% discount. How much is it costing us month after month after month for 20 years? The, I'm sorry. Go ahead. There's a subscription fee based on what you save every month. And I don't know that number because until we enter into something with them, that number won't be disclosed. What they're saying is there's a 15% savings on the electrical bills that will qualify for this program but they do get a subscription fee for the process.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            75
          ],
          "timestamp": 3196.139,
          "end_timestamp": 3196.139,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Cost implications of 20-year discount commitment",
          "summary": "The cost involves a subscription fee based on monthly savings, which is unknown until an agreement is signed, despite a potential 15% saving.",
          "evidence": "Yes, and so for 20 years, how much are we paying them for this little, what, 10 or 15% discount. How much is it costing us month after month after month for 20 years? The, I'm sorry. Go ahead. There's a subscription fee based on what you save every month. And I don't know that number because until we enter into something with them, that number won't be disclosed. What they're saying is there's a 15% savings on the electrical bills that will qualify for this program but they do get a subscription fee for the process.",
          "source_chunks": [
            9
          ],
          "timestamp": 3196.139,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 75
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 3196.139,
      "end_timestamp": 3196.139,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0071",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Mechanism of payment deduction",
      "summary": "The utility company stated that payments are deducted from what the city owes them, resulting in a net positive amount if savings exceed fees.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        76
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        9
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "To her point, it's not like we're paying them. They're just deducting it from what they owe us. That is the correct statement. They're deducting. At what rate? Well, that's what he said. It's kind of out there, but it's we get the payment minus the fee. So we still come out in the positive.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            76
          ],
          "timestamp": 3256.529,
          "end_timestamp": 3256.529,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Mechanism of payment deduction",
          "summary": "The utility company stated that payments are deducted from what the city owes them, resulting in a net positive amount if savings exceed fees.",
          "evidence": "To her point, it's not like we're paying them. They're just deducting it from what they owe us. That is the correct statement. They're deducting. At what rate? Well, that's what he said. It's kind of out there, but it's we get the payment minus the fee. So we still come out in the positive.",
          "source_chunks": [
            9
          ],
          "timestamp": 3256.529,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 76
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 3256.529,
      "end_timestamp": 3256.529,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0072",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Stability of discount percentage",
      "summary": "The 15% savings percentage is stated to remain constant and not change based on monthly usage fluctuations.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        77
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        9
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Alderman Simmons. So does the percentage change go up or decrease per year based on what they get? Mr. At all? Oh, I'm sorry. Director. The percentage for the city's savings or the percentage of that fee? And the percentage, the fee and the savings like. So I can only go off of what the brochure was and the brochure, I believe it's a percentage of the savings per month. And our rebate though would be locked in on a percentage of the bill because our electrical bills aren't the same amount every month, they go up and down based on seasonality. So we're not locked in? Is that what you said? The percentage was 15%. It doesn't go up or go down.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            77
          ],
          "timestamp": 3309.599,
          "end_timestamp": 3309.599,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Stability of discount percentage",
          "summary": "The 15% savings percentage is stated to remain constant and not change based on monthly usage fluctuations.",
          "evidence": "Alderman Simmons. So does the percentage change go up or decrease per year based on what they get? Mr. At all? Oh, I'm sorry. Director. The percentage for the city's savings or the percentage of that fee? And the percentage, the fee and the savings like. So I can only go off of what the brochure was and the brochure, I believe it's a percentage of the savings per month. And our rebate though would be locked in on a percentage of the bill because our electrical bills aren't the same amount every month, they go up and down based on seasonality. So we're not locked in? Is that what you said? The percentage was 15%. It doesn't go up or go down.",
          "source_chunks": [
            9
          ],
          "timestamp": 3309.599,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 77
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 3309.599,
      "end_timestamp": 3309.599,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0073",
      "event_type": "attendance",
      "subject": "Roll call for council vote",
      "summary": "Council members voted on a resolution.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        78
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        9
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Klemm? Yes. Johnson? No. Simmons? No. Parker? Yes. Stacy? No. Shadle? Aye. Sanders is currently absent. Sellers? Aye.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            78
          ],
          "timestamp": 3337.36,
          "end_timestamp": 3337.36,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "attendance",
          "subject": "Roll call for council vote",
          "summary": "Council members voted on a resolution.",
          "evidence": "Klemm? Yes. Johnson? No. Simmons? No. Parker? Yes. Stacy? No. Shadle? Aye. Sanders is currently absent. Sellers? Aye.",
          "source_chunks": [
            9
          ],
          "timestamp": 3337.36,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 78
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 3337.36,
      "end_timestamp": 3337.36,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0074",
      "event_type": "decision",
      "subject": "Adoption of resolution 2025-118 (Emergency storm sewer system repairs)",
      "summary": "The resolution was adopted by a vote of four to three.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        79
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        9
      ],
      "components": {
        "vote": [
          79
        ]
      },
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "The resolution is adopted four to three. Oh I'm sorry it has to have five positive.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            79
          ],
          "timestamp": 3337.36,
          "end_timestamp": 3337.36,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "vote",
          "subject": "Adoption of resolution 2025-118 (Emergency storm sewer system repairs)",
          "summary": "The resolution was adopted by a vote of four to three.",
          "evidence": "The resolution is adopted four to three. Oh I'm sorry it has to have five positive.",
          "source_chunks": [
            9
          ],
          "timestamp": 3337.36,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 79
        }
      ],
      "outcome": "adopted",
      "timestamp": 3337.36,
      "end_timestamp": 3337.36,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0075",
      "event_type": "procedural_action",
      "subject": "Mayor's vote required for quorum/majority",
      "summary": "Due to the previous vote outcome, the Mayor was allowed to cast a vote.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        80
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        9
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Right so you have half of the council voting in favor already so that triggers the situation where the mayor is allowed to vote. Okay, I forgot, Mayor? Aye.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            80
          ],
          "timestamp": 3337.36,
          "end_timestamp": 3337.36,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "procedural_action",
          "subject": "Mayor's vote required for quorum/majority",
          "summary": "Due to the previous vote outcome, the Mayor was allowed to cast a vote.",
          "evidence": "Right so you have half of the council voting in favor already so that triggers the situation where the mayor is allowed to vote. Okay, I forgot, Mayor? Aye.",
          "source_chunks": [
            9
          ],
          "timestamp": 3337.36,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 80
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 3337.36,
      "end_timestamp": 3337.36,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0076",
      "event_type": "presentation",
      "subject": "Resolution 2025-118: Emergency storm sewer system repairs at Greenfield and Santa Fe by Fisher Excavating",
      "summary": "The city of Freeport had an emergency repair to the storm system which included sidewalk EDA ramps and curb replacement. City staff recently received an invoice for concrete work, as Fisher Excavating stated it was not invoiced during the busy end of the 2024 season.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        81
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        9
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Item number nine is the adoption of resolution 2025-118. Could you please read this? Resolution ratifying emergency storm sewer system repairs at Greenfield and Santa Fe by Fisher Excavating. Thank you, Manager Boyer. Yeah, thank you, your honor. The city of Freeport had an emergency repair to the storm system. The repair was much more significant in scope included sidewalk EDA ramps and curb replacement. City staff did not receive an invoice for the concrete work until recently and Fisher Excavating informed us that the concrete pay item had not been invoiced during the busy end of the 2024 season.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            81
          ],
          "timestamp": 3401.3,
          "end_timestamp": 3401.3,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "presentation",
          "subject": "Resolution 2025-118: Emergency storm sewer system repairs at Greenfield and Santa Fe by Fisher Excavating",
          "summary": "The city of Freeport had an emergency repair to the storm system which included sidewalk EDA ramps and curb replacement. City staff recently received an invoice for concrete work, as Fisher Excavating stated it was not invoiced during the busy end of the 2024 season.",
          "evidence": "Item number nine is the adoption of resolution 2025-118. Could you please read this? Resolution ratifying emergency storm sewer system repairs at Greenfield and Santa Fe by Fisher Excavating. Thank you, Manager Boyer. Yeah, thank you, your honor. The city of Freeport had an emergency repair to the storm system. The repair was much more significant in scope included sidewalk EDA ramps and curb replacement. City staff did not receive an invoice for the concrete work until recently and Fisher Excavating informed us that the concrete pay item had not been invoiced during the busy end of the 2024 season.",
          "source_chunks": [
            9
          ],
          "timestamp": 3401.3,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 81
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 3401.3,
      "end_timestamp": 3401.3,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0077",
      "event_type": "resolution",
      "subject": "Adoption of resolution 2025-118 for storm sewer repairs",
      "summary": "Resolution ratifying emergency storm sewer system repairs at Greenfield and Santa Fe by Fisher Excavating.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        82
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        10
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Item number nine is the adoption of resolution 2025-118. Could you please read this? Resolution ratifying emergency storm sewer system repairs at Greenfield and Santa Fe by Fisher Excavating.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            82
          ],
          "timestamp": 3401.3,
          "end_timestamp": 3401.3,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "resolution",
          "subject": "Adoption of resolution 2025-118 for storm sewer repairs",
          "summary": "Resolution ratifying emergency storm sewer system repairs at Greenfield and Santa Fe by Fisher Excavating.",
          "evidence": "Item number nine is the adoption of resolution 2025-118. Could you please read this? Resolution ratifying emergency storm sewer system repairs at Greenfield and Santa Fe by Fisher Excavating.",
          "attribution": "N/A",
          "attributes": {
            "identifiers": [
              "resolution 2025-118"
            ]
          },
          "source_chunks": [
            10
          ],
          "timestamp": 3401.3,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 82
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "N/A"
      ],
      "timestamp": 3401.3,
      "end_timestamp": 3401.3,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0078",
      "event_type": "presentation",
      "subject": "Storm sewer repair invoice payment recommendation",
      "summary": "Staff recommends payment of $19,540 to Fisher Excavating for the repairs at Greenfield and Santa Fe.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        83
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        10
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Staff recommends payment of the $19,540 to Fisher Excavating for the repairs at Greenfield and Santa Fe. Thank you.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            83
          ],
          "timestamp": 3464.739,
          "end_timestamp": 3464.739,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "presentation",
          "subject": "Storm sewer repair invoice payment recommendation",
          "summary": "Staff recommends payment of $19,540 to Fisher Excavating for the repairs at Greenfield and Santa Fe.",
          "evidence": "Staff recommends payment of the $19,540 to Fisher Excavating for the repairs at Greenfield and Santa Fe. Thank you.",
          "attribution": "N/A",
          "source_chunks": [
            10
          ],
          "timestamp": 3464.739,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 83
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "N/A"
      ],
      "timestamp": 3464.739,
      "end_timestamp": 3464.739,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0079",
      "event_type": "decision",
      "subject": "Adoption of resolution 2025-118",
      "summary": "Motion made by Alderman Klemm, seconded by Alderman Sellers.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        84
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        10
      ],
      "components": {
        "motion": [
          84
        ]
      },
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "So moved. Second. A motion made by Alderman Klemm, seconded by Alderman Sellers.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            84
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "motion",
          "subject": "Adoption of resolution 2025-118",
          "summary": "Motion made by Alderman Klemm, seconded by Alderman Sellers.",
          "evidence": "So moved. Second. A motion made by Alderman Klemm, seconded by Alderman Sellers.",
          "attribution": "Alderman Klemm",
          "attributes": {
            "made_by": "Alderman Klemm",
            "seconded_by": "Alderman Sellers"
          },
          "source_chunks": [
            10
          ],
          "record_index": 84
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Alderman Klemm"
      ]
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0080",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Review of payment process for emergency repairs",
      "summary": "Alderman Sellers expressed concern about the city's financial record-keeping regarding outstanding debts.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        85
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        10
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "I know that sometimes you get busy and I know they're a big organization, but I do think that we as a city and in our finances, we need to look at something like this a little more closer to not let something like this get this far behind in paying our debts. I know that they should have given us the invoice, but we also need to look at maybe the end of the year or something to see what still we have out there outstanding to make sure that it's paid in a timely fashion so that we don't have to come back this many months later and pay for something like that. So I do think that we need to also look at making sure that if we have a bill out there or invoice out there, we need to make sure that it's in so that we can have better records too for us.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            85
          ],
          "timestamp": 3481.659,
          "end_timestamp": 3481.659,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Review of payment process for emergency repairs",
          "summary": "Alderman Sellers expressed concern about the city's financial record-keeping regarding outstanding debts.",
          "evidence": "I know that sometimes you get busy and I know they're a big organization, but I do think that we as a city and in our finances, we need to look at something like this a little more closer to not let something like this get this far behind in paying our debts. I know that they should have given us the invoice, but we also need to look at maybe the end of the year or something to see what still we have out there outstanding to make sure that it's paid in a timely fashion so that we don't have to come back this many months later and pay for something like that. So I do think that we need to also look at making sure that if we have a bill out there or invoice out there, we need to make sure that it's in so that we can have better records too for us.",
          "attribution": "Alderman Sellers",
          "source_chunks": [
            10
          ],
          "timestamp": 3481.659,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 85
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Alderman Sellers"
      ],
      "timestamp": 3481.659,
      "end_timestamp": 3481.659,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0081",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Confirmation of payment error on storm work",
      "summary": "Director Segal admitted fault regarding the failure to collect payment for emergency storm sewer repair work from Fisher Excavating.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        86
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        10
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "I'll take the blame on this one. We did storm work in this location for a storm collapse and we did pay them during the appropriate period for the storm work. However, it led into a lot of concrete and we had a couple of other jobs going with them at the same time. And it was our area, we thought we had collected it, but, or not collected it, we thought that they had billed us for it. They thought we, we've actually been going back and forth for quite a bit of time, thinking it was placed. And I were thinking it was played but I really drilled down into this and it was unduly fair not to pay them for the work that was done and I did go back through all the invoicing and I also had the public works admin help me and we proved that we never paid them for this emergency work so you know it's unfortunate that they didn't bill us sooner but we have been negotiating on it trying to figure out whether we did or didn't and that took a little bit of time and like I said we had three or four open jobs with the at the time, so again, we'll try to do a better job trapping that, but I will take this one as my fault.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            86
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Confirmation of payment error on storm work",
          "summary": "Director Segal admitted fault regarding the failure to collect payment for emergency storm sewer repair work from Fisher Excavating.",
          "evidence": "I'll take the blame on this one. We did storm work in this location for a storm collapse and we did pay them during the appropriate period for the storm work. However, it led into a lot of concrete and we had a couple of other jobs going with them at the same time. And it was our area, we thought we had collected it, but, or not collected it, we thought that they had billed us for it. They thought we, we've actually been going back and forth for quite a bit of time, thinking it was placed. And I were thinking it was played but I really drilled down into this and it was unduly fair not to pay them for the work that was done and I did go back through all the invoicing and I also had the public works admin help me and we proved that we never paid them for this emergency work so you know it's unfortunate that they didn't bill us sooner but we have been negotiating on it trying to figure out whether we did or didn't and that took a little bit of time and like I said we had three or four open jobs with the at the time, so again, we'll try to do a better job trapping that, but I will take this one as my fault.",
          "attribution": "Director Segal",
          "source_chunks": [
            10
          ],
          "record_index": 86
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Director Segal"
      ]
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0082",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Scope and nature of emergency work",
      "summary": "Alderman Stacy questioned whether the emergency work was bid out or given to Fisher Excavating, and asked for clarification on the scope of materials involved.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        87
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        10
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Yes, I would like to know, so when was this emergency work done and was this emergency work bided out or was it given to them to do and if it was bided out, did they bid $19,540? Yes, so no, this was emergency work. The storms that were at Santa Fe and Greenfield collapsed last fall, and they did the pipe work.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            87
          ],
          "timestamp": 3625.28,
          "end_timestamp": 3625.28,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Scope and nature of emergency work",
          "summary": "Alderman Stacy questioned whether the emergency work was bid out or given to Fisher Excavating, and asked for clarification on the scope of materials involved.",
          "evidence": "Yes, I would like to know, so when was this emergency work done and was this emergency work bided out or was it given to them to do and if it was bided out, did they bid $19,540? Yes, so no, this was emergency work. The storms that were at Santa Fe and Greenfield collapsed last fall, and they did the pipe work.",
          "attribution": "Alderman Stacy",
          "source_chunks": [
            10
          ],
          "timestamp": 3625.28,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 87
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Alderman Stacy"
      ],
      "timestamp": 3625.28,
      "end_timestamp": 3625.28,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0083",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Prerequisite for ADA ramp installation",
      "summary": "Miller confirmed that the ADA ramps could not be installed until the storm sewer was repaired.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        88
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        10
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "The ADA ramps could not be installed until the new piping was under ramped. That's what I just said. That's exactly what I just said.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            88
          ],
          "timestamp": 3756.519,
          "end_timestamp": 3756.519,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Prerequisite for ADA ramp installation",
          "summary": "Miller confirmed that the ADA ramps could not be installed until the storm sewer was repaired.",
          "evidence": "The ADA ramps could not be installed until the new piping was under ramped. That's what I just said. That's exactly what I just said.",
          "attribution": "Miller",
          "source_chunks": [
            10
          ],
          "timestamp": 3756.519,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 88
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Miller"
      ],
      "timestamp": 3756.519,
      "end_timestamp": 3756.519,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0084",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Need for cost breakdown of emergency work",
      "summary": "A council member requested a detailed cost breakdown, including material and labor costs, to verify the scope of the 'time and material' emergency deal.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        89
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        10
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "So we don't have, as a council, when that came up and you declared it as an emergency kind of deal, what was the emergency? It's just time and material. You're talking time and material we need to know the cost of we need to know what kind of material we're going to replace it with how much we're going to pay for material and what was the scope and the measurement of that project that brought us to a price that I feel that was an estimated cost until we We understand that we need to know how much material and work our time and material that went into that project to make sure that it was an emergency kind of deal because I don't recall us having any major storms developing and any washouts or anything like that could have prevented you from continuing with the project of the ADA ramps.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            89
          ],
          "timestamp": 3763.4,
          "end_timestamp": 3763.4,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Need for cost breakdown of emergency work",
          "summary": "A council member requested a detailed cost breakdown, including material and labor costs, to verify the scope of the 'time and material' emergency deal.",
          "evidence": "So we don't have, as a council, when that came up and you declared it as an emergency kind of deal, what was the emergency? It's just time and material. You're talking time and material we need to know the cost of we need to know what kind of material we're going to replace it with how much we're going to pay for material and what was the scope and the measurement of that project that brought us to a price that I feel that was an estimated cost until we We understand that we need to know how much material and work our time and material that went into that project to make sure that it was an emergency kind of deal because I don't recall us having any major storms developing and any washouts or anything like that could have prevented you from continuing with the project of the ADA ramps.",
          "attribution": "N/A",
          "source_chunks": [
            10
          ],
          "timestamp": 3763.4,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 89
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "N/A"
      ],
      "timestamp": 3763.4,
      "end_timestamp": 3763.4,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0085",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Time and material cost for project repairs",
      "summary": "Discussion regarding the need to know the time, material costs, scope, and measurement of a project to verify billing, specifically concerning ADA ramps.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        90
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        11
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "You're talking time and material we need to know the cost of we need to know what kind of material we're going to replace it with how much we're going to pay for material and what was the scope and the measurement of that project that brought us to a price that we that I feel that was an estimated cost until we We understand that we need to know how much material and work our time and material that went into that project to make sure that it was an emergency kind of deal because I don't recall us having any major storms developing and any washouts or anything like that could have prevented you from continuing with the project of the ADA ramps.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            90
          ],
          "timestamp": 3776.44,
          "end_timestamp": 3776.44,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Time and material cost for project repairs",
          "summary": "Discussion regarding the need to know the time, material costs, scope, and measurement of a project to verify billing, specifically concerning ADA ramps.",
          "evidence": "You're talking time and material we need to know the cost of we need to know what kind of material we're going to replace it with how much we're going to pay for material and what was the scope and the measurement of that project that brought us to a price that we that I feel that was an estimated cost until we We understand that we need to know how much material and work our time and material that went into that project to make sure that it was an emergency kind of deal because I don't recall us having any major storms developing and any washouts or anything like that could have prevented you from continuing with the project of the ADA ramps.",
          "source_chunks": [
            11
          ],
          "timestamp": 3776.44,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 90
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 3776.44,
      "end_timestamp": 3776.44,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0086",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "ADA ramp repair context",
      "summary": "Clarification that the initial work was for a storm pipe collapse under an intersection, which necessitated ripping out two ADA ramps.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        91
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        11
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "I'm just looking at this from a position where what came before? It was not an ADA project. It was a storm pipe collapse under an intersection that had to be repaired. And resultingly, the two ADA ramps had to be ripped out in order to fix the pipe.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            91
          ],
          "timestamp": 3829.48,
          "end_timestamp": 3829.48,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "ADA ramp repair context",
          "summary": "Clarification that the initial work was for a storm pipe collapse under an intersection, which necessitated ripping out two ADA ramps.",
          "evidence": "I'm just looking at this from a position where what came before? It was not an ADA project. It was a storm pipe collapse under an intersection that had to be repaired. And resultingly, the two ADA ramps had to be ripped out in order to fix the pipe.",
          "source_chunks": [
            11
          ],
          "timestamp": 3829.48,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 91
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 3829.48,
      "end_timestamp": 3829.48,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0087",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Time and material billing for emergency repair",
      "summary": "Confirmation that the project was treated as an emergency repair ratified by council, billed on a time and material basis.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        92
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        11
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "OK, so did we get a time? Did we get a time in material? No, it was an emergency repair that was ratified by this council, and we went through with it. Time and material.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            92
          ],
          "timestamp": 3850.84,
          "end_timestamp": 3850.84,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Time and material billing for emergency repair",
          "summary": "Confirmation that the project was treated as an emergency repair ratified by council, billed on a time and material basis.",
          "evidence": "OK, so did we get a time? Did we get a time in material? No, it was an emergency repair that was ratified by this council, and we went through with it. Time and material.",
          "source_chunks": [
            11
          ],
          "timestamp": 3850.84,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 92
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 3850.84,
      "end_timestamp": 3850.84,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0088",
      "event_type": "procedural_action",
      "subject": "Speaking procedure reminder",
      "summary": "A procedural warning regarding speaking order: speakers must be recognized to continue.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        93
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        11
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "So if you can pull together your thoughts and then ask something, but then just one minute. Can I say something here? One minute. And so then when I give the floor to the director, then it becomes his. So then if you want to speak again, then you have to ask. So it's just that procedure. So I appreciate the questions. But once someone else finishes speaking, then you have to be recognized in order to continue.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            93
          ],
          "timestamp": 3877.079,
          "end_timestamp": 3877.079,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "procedural_action",
          "subject": "Speaking procedure reminder",
          "summary": "A procedural warning regarding speaking order: speakers must be recognized to continue.",
          "evidence": "So if you can pull together your thoughts and then ask something, but then just one minute. Can I say something here? One minute. And so then when I give the floor to the director, then it becomes his. So then if you want to speak again, then you have to ask. So it's just that procedure. So I appreciate the questions. But once someone else finishes speaking, then you have to be recognized in order to continue.",
          "source_chunks": [
            11
          ],
          "timestamp": 3877.079,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 93
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 3877.079,
      "end_timestamp": 3877.079,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0089",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Contempt allegation regarding meeting conduct",
      "summary": "A statement alleging that the council is currently in contempt.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        94
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        11
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "So would you like to continue with- I'm going to have a litigation meeting with this attorney, with the attorney here, the city's attorney, because as far as I'm concerned, we are in contempt. We are in contempt right now at this moment, and you're-",
          "source_record_indices": [
            94
          ],
          "timestamp": 3892.599,
          "end_timestamp": 3892.599,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Contempt allegation regarding meeting conduct",
          "summary": "A statement alleging that the council is currently in contempt.",
          "evidence": "So would you like to continue with- I'm going to have a litigation meeting with this attorney, with the attorney here, the city's attorney, because as far as I'm concerned, we are in contempt. We are in contempt right now at this moment, and you're-",
          "source_chunks": [
            11
          ],
          "timestamp": 3892.599,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 94
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 3892.599,
      "end_timestamp": 3892.599,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0090",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Payment status of emergency work",
      "summary": "Confirmation that council voted to approve the emergency event, but the workers were not paid for all services rendered.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        95
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        11
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Yes, so when this emergency event happened, was it brought to council? And we voted and agreed on this, but they did the work, but they were not paid. And so now we realize they have not been paid and there a year later is coming for what is due for the service they've rendered.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            95
          ],
          "timestamp": 3925.639,
          "end_timestamp": 3925.639,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Payment status of emergency work",
          "summary": "Confirmation that council voted to approve the emergency event, but the workers were not paid for all services rendered.",
          "evidence": "Yes, so when this emergency event happened, was it brought to council? And we voted and agreed on this, but they did the work, but they were not paid. And so now we realize they have not been paid and there a year later is coming for what is due for the service they've rendered.",
          "source_chunks": [
            11
          ],
          "timestamp": 3925.639,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 95
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 3925.639,
      "end_timestamp": 3925.639,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0091",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Scope of payment received",
      "summary": "It was confirmed that only the piping portion was paid for; the concrete work and ADA ramp restoration were delayed payments.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        96
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        11
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Correct. We only paid them for the piping portion. We never because we had to get a we there was a delay to get the concrete work done so we paid them for the piping portion and the restoration the ADA ramps were delayed so they didn't get Payde right away.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            96
          ],
          "timestamp": 3954.159,
          "end_timestamp": 3954.159,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Scope of payment received",
          "summary": "It was confirmed that only the piping portion was paid for; the concrete work and ADA ramp restoration were delayed payments.",
          "evidence": "Correct. We only paid them for the piping portion. We never because we had to get a we there was a delay to get the concrete work done so we paid them for the piping portion and the restoration the ADA ramps were delayed so they didn't get Payde right away.",
          "source_chunks": [
            11
          ],
          "timestamp": 3954.159,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 96
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 3954.159,
      "end_timestamp": 3954.159,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0092",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Invoice review details",
      "summary": "A contractor invoice from Stenstrom Concrete Works was reviewed, noting that Fisher is billed by Stenstrom and that a markup of 10 or 15 percent was waived.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        97
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        11
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Madam Clerk has some input on this. I just looked at the invoice a little bit closer. It says Stenstrom Concrete Works. So, Darren, when you say no contract, the markup for the contractor fees, so Fisher has been billed by Stenstrom Fischer is stuck with Stenstrom's bill. They've given us the courtesy of not giving their what, 10 or 15 percent markup and they're only charging us for 19,000 plus that was done over a year ago.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            97
          ],
          "timestamp": 3954.159,
          "end_timestamp": 3954.159,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Invoice review details",
          "summary": "A contractor invoice from Stenstrom Concrete Works was reviewed, noting that Fisher is billed by Stenstrom and that a markup of 10 or 15 percent was waived.",
          "evidence": "Madam Clerk has some input on this. I just looked at the invoice a little bit closer. It says Stenstrom Concrete Works. So, Darren, when you say no contract, the markup for the contractor fees, so Fisher has been billed by Stenstrom Fischer is stuck with Stenstrom's bill. They've given us the courtesy of not giving their what, 10 or 15 percent markup and they're only charging us for 19,000 plus that was done over a year ago.",
          "source_chunks": [
            11
          ],
          "timestamp": 3954.159,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 97
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 3954.159,
      "end_timestamp": 3954.159,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0093",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Need for time and material justification",
      "summary": "A demand for documentation to determine the actual time and material costs justifying hourly wages and replaced materials.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        98
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        11
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "And John. We have to determine what the time and material costs that justify the hourly wages and the material that was replaced in it. We had not received that. And a year has already gone by.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            98
          ],
          "timestamp": 4045.36,
          "end_timestamp": 4045.36,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Need for time and material justification",
          "summary": "A demand for documentation to determine the actual time and material costs justifying hourly wages and replaced materials.",
          "evidence": "And John. We have to determine what the time and material costs that justify the hourly wages and the material that was replaced in it. We had not received that. And a year has already gone by.",
          "source_chunks": [
            11
          ],
          "timestamp": 4045.36,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 98
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 4045.36,
      "end_timestamp": 4045.36,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0094",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Estimation vs. Invoice documentation",
      "summary": "A dispute over whether charges are based on estimation or actual invoices, with insistence on seeing supporting documentation.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        99
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        11
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "These are estimated, yeah, because you have not demonstrated to us the invoice. The invoice has not been looked at at this current time. We have not seen that.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            99
          ],
          "timestamp": 4063.039,
          "end_timestamp": 4063.039,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Estimation vs. Invoice documentation",
          "summary": "A dispute over whether charges are based on estimation or actual invoices, with insistence on seeing supporting documentation.",
          "evidence": "These are estimated, yeah, because you have not demonstrated to us the invoice. The invoice has not been looked at at this current time. We have not seen that.",
          "source_chunks": [
            11
          ],
          "timestamp": 4063.039,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 99
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 4063.039,
      "end_timestamp": 4063.039,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0095",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Material measurement requirement",
      "summary": "A demand that all material costs be accounted for on the invoice by the square foot for easy measurability.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        100
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        11
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "And so we need to know all of that before. All of the material is accounted for on the invoice by the square foot so it's easily measurable by anybody that would go out there and it was included in the packet.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            100
          ],
          "timestamp": 4156.199,
          "end_timestamp": 4156.199,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Material measurement requirement",
          "summary": "A demand that all material costs be accounted for on the invoice by the square foot for easy measurability.",
          "evidence": "And so we need to know all of that before. All of the material is accounted for on the invoice by the square foot so it's easily measurable by anybody that would go out there and it was included in the packet.",
          "source_chunks": [
            11
          ],
          "timestamp": 4156.199,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 100
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 4156.199,
      "end_timestamp": 4156.199,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0096",
      "event_type": "procedural_action",
      "subject": "Alderman Sanders warning regarding speaking order",
      "summary": "A formal warning issued to Alderman Sanders regarding speaking out of turn.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        101
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        11
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Baldwin Sanders you were warned now you're out of order so please don't do it again because if it happens again you're going to be escorted out. Refrain from asked to refrain from talking out of order.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            101
          ],
          "timestamp": 4173.6,
          "end_timestamp": 4173.6,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "procedural_action",
          "subject": "Alderman Sanders warning regarding speaking order",
          "summary": "A formal warning issued to Alderman Sanders regarding speaking out of turn.",
          "evidence": "Baldwin Sanders you were warned now you're out of order so please don't do it again because if it happens again you're going to be escorted out. Refrain from asked to refrain from talking out of order.",
          "source_chunks": [
            11
          ],
          "timestamp": 4173.6,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 101
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 4173.6,
      "end_timestamp": 4173.6,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0097",
      "event_type": "procedural_action",
      "subject": "Roll call for council members present",
      "summary": "A roll call was conducted, confirming attendance or status for several council members.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        102
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        11
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Is there any more discussion on Alderman Shadle? I just would like Clerk Anderson to know that her work of attaching these memos doesn't go wasted on all eyes. If there is no further discussion, Madam Clerk, please take the role.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            102
          ],
          "timestamp": 4193.84,
          "end_timestamp": 4193.84,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "procedural_action",
          "subject": "Roll call for council members present",
          "summary": "A roll call was conducted, confirming attendance or status for several council members.",
          "evidence": "Is there any more discussion on Alderman Shadle? I just would like Clerk Anderson to know that her work of attaching these memos doesn't go wasted on all eyes. If there is no further discussion, Madam Clerk, please take the role.",
          "source_chunks": [
            11
          ],
          "timestamp": 4193.84,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 102
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 4193.84,
      "end_timestamp": 4193.84,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0098",
      "event_type": "decision",
      "subject": "Adoption of Resolution 2025-119",
      "summary": "The resolution approving a software renewal from Ferguson Waterworks for AMI Neptune 360 utility software was adopted.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        103
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        11
      ],
      "components": {
        "vote": [
          103
        ]
      },
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "The resolution is adopted 7 to 1. Item number 10 is the adoption of resolution 2025-119. Could you please read this? Resolution approving a software renewal from Ferguson Waterworks for AMI Neptune 360 utility software.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            103
          ],
          "timestamp": 4213.859,
          "end_timestamp": 4213.859,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "vote",
          "subject": "Adoption of Resolution 2025-119",
          "summary": "The resolution approving a software renewal from Ferguson Waterworks for AMI Neptune 360 utility software was adopted.",
          "evidence": "The resolution is adopted 7 to 1. Item number 10 is the adoption of resolution 2025-119. Could you please read this? Resolution approving a software renewal from Ferguson Waterworks for AMI Neptune 360 utility software.",
          "source_chunks": [
            11
          ],
          "timestamp": 4213.859,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 103
        }
      ],
      "outcome": "adopted",
      "timestamp": 4213.859,
      "end_timestamp": 4213.859,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0099",
      "event_type": "procedural_action",
      "subject": "Procedural request to proceed with discussion",
      "summary": "A speaker requested confirmation on whether there was further discussion regarding Alderman Shadle.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        104
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        12
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Is there any more discussion on Alderman Shadle?",
          "source_record_indices": [
            104
          ],
          "timestamp": 4193.84,
          "end_timestamp": 4193.84,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "procedural_action",
          "subject": "Procedural request to proceed with discussion",
          "summary": "A speaker requested confirmation on whether there was further discussion regarding Alderman Shadle.",
          "evidence": "Is there any more discussion on Alderman Shadle?",
          "source_chunks": [
            12
          ],
          "timestamp": 4193.84,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 104
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 4193.84,
      "end_timestamp": 4193.84,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0100",
      "event_type": "procedural_action",
      "subject": "Clerk's role assumption",
      "summary": "The speaker requested the Clerk to take the role if there was no further discussion.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        105
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        12
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "If there is no further discussion, Madam Clerk, please take the role.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            105
          ],
          "timestamp": 4207.56,
          "end_timestamp": 4207.56,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "procedural_action",
          "subject": "Clerk's role assumption",
          "summary": "The speaker requested the Clerk to take the role if there was no further discussion.",
          "evidence": "If there is no further discussion, Madam Clerk, please take the role.",
          "source_chunks": [
            12
          ],
          "timestamp": 4207.56,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 105
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 4207.56,
      "end_timestamp": 4207.56,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0101",
      "event_type": "decision",
      "subject": "Roll call confirmation for proceeding with agenda items",
      "summary": "Confirmation of presence or agreement from several council members.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        106
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        12
      ],
      "components": {
        "vote": [
          106
        ]
      },
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Klemm? Aye. Johnson? Aye. Simmons? Aye. Parker? Aye. Stacy? Aye. Shadle? Aye. Sanders? No. Sellers? Aye.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            106
          ],
          "timestamp": 4207.56,
          "end_timestamp": 4207.56,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "vote",
          "subject": "Roll call confirmation for proceeding with agenda items",
          "summary": "Confirmation of presence or agreement from several council members.",
          "evidence": "Klemm? Aye. Johnson? Aye. Simmons? Aye. Parker? Aye. Stacy? Aye. Shadle? Aye. Sanders? No. Sellers? Aye.",
          "source_chunks": [
            12
          ],
          "timestamp": 4207.56,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 106
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 4207.56,
      "end_timestamp": 4207.56,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0102",
      "event_type": "resolution",
      "subject": "Adoption of resolution 2025-119",
      "summary": "The resolution approving a software renewal from Ferguson Waterworks for AMI Neptune 360 utility software was adopted by a vote of 7 to 1.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        107
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        12
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "The resolution is adopted 7 to 1. Item number 10 is the adoption of resolution 2025-119. Could you please read this? Resolution approving a software renewal from Ferguson Waterworks for AMI Neptune 360 utility software.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            107
          ],
          "timestamp": 4213.859,
          "end_timestamp": 4213.859,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "resolution",
          "subject": "Adoption of resolution 2025-119",
          "summary": "The resolution approving a software renewal from Ferguson Waterworks for AMI Neptune 360 utility software was adopted by a vote of 7 to 1.",
          "evidence": "The resolution is adopted 7 to 1. Item number 10 is the adoption of resolution 2025-119. Could you please read this? Resolution approving a software renewal from Ferguson Waterworks for AMI Neptune 360 utility software.",
          "attributes": {
            "identifiers": [
              "resolution 2025-119"
            ]
          },
          "source_chunks": [
            12
          ],
          "timestamp": 4213.859,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 107
        }
      ],
      "outcome": "adopted",
      "timestamp": 4213.859,
      "end_timestamp": 4213.859,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0103",
      "event_type": "presentation",
      "subject": "Software Renewal Details (Neptune 360)",
      "summary": "A presentation detailing the annual agreement for Neptune 360 software platform, which handles water meter reading data from collectors to processing.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        108
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        12
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Council, this is the annual agreement for our are Neptune 360 software platform. That software is kind of the interface for the water meter collectors. The reading is taken at your meter, goes to MIU on your house, goes to the collector, and from there it goes to 360, Neptune 360 for processing. This agreement and proposal includes the licensing support, cloud storage, and other pertinences. The total cost is $37,138.58. Has been budgeted in the fiscal year 25 water and sewer budget.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            108
          ],
          "timestamp": 4245.22,
          "end_timestamp": 4245.22,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "presentation",
          "subject": "Software Renewal Details (Neptune 360)",
          "summary": "A presentation detailing the annual agreement for Neptune 360 software platform, which handles water meter reading data from collectors to processing.",
          "evidence": "Council, this is the annual agreement for our are Neptune 360 software platform. That software is kind of the interface for the water meter collectors. The reading is taken at your meter, goes to MIU on your house, goes to the collector, and from there it goes to 360, Neptune 360 for processing. This agreement and proposal includes the licensing support, cloud storage, and other pertinences. The total cost is $37,138.58. Has been budgeted in the fiscal year 25 water and sewer budget.",
          "attribution": "Director Shuttman",
          "attributes": {
            "financial": {
              "amount": "$37,138.58",
              "description": "total cost"
            }
          },
          "source_chunks": [
            12
          ],
          "timestamp": 4245.22,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 108
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Director Shuttman"
      ],
      "timestamp": 4245.22,
      "end_timestamp": 4245.22,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0104",
      "event_type": "decision",
      "subject": "Adoption of resolution 2025-119",
      "summary": "Motion to adopt the software renewal resolution.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "decision_sequence",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        109,
        112
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        12
      ],
      "components": {
        "motion": [
          109
        ],
        "vote": [
          112
        ]
      },
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "So moved. Second. We have a motion made by Alderman Klemm, seconded by Alderman Sellers.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            109
          ],
          "timestamp": 4288.02,
          "end_timestamp": 4288.02,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        },
        {
          "text": "The resolution is adopted 8-0.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            112
          ],
          "timestamp": 4338.229,
          "end_timestamp": 4338.229,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "motion",
          "subject": "Adoption of resolution 2025-119",
          "summary": "Motion to adopt the software renewal resolution.",
          "evidence": "So moved. Second. We have a motion made by Alderman Klemm, seconded by Alderman Sellers.",
          "attributes": {
            "made_by": "Alderman Klemm",
            "seconded_by": "Alderman Sellers"
          },
          "source_chunks": [
            12
          ],
          "timestamp": 4288.02,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 109
        },
        {
          "record_type": "vote",
          "subject": "Adoption of resolution 2025-119",
          "summary": "The resolution approving the software renewal was adopted by a vote of 8 to 0.",
          "evidence": "The resolution is adopted 8-0.",
          "attributes": {
            "identifiers": [
              "resolution 2025-119"
            ]
          },
          "source_chunks": [
            12
          ],
          "timestamp": 4338.229,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 112
        }
      ],
      "outcome": "adopted",
      "timestamp": 4288.02,
      "end_timestamp": 4338.229,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0105",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Cost comparison for manual meter reading vs. software renewal",
      "summary": "Discussion regarding the cost of manually reading meters versus using the proposed software system.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        110
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        12
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Alderman Johnson? Yeah, I asked how much it would cost if we were doing all this by hand and people were going out and reading the meters and so forth. And it would cost anywhere between $130,000 and $155,000",
          "source_record_indices": [
            110
          ],
          "timestamp": 4295.579,
          "end_timestamp": 4295.579,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Cost comparison for manual meter reading vs. software renewal",
          "summary": "Discussion regarding the cost of manually reading meters versus using the proposed software system.",
          "evidence": "Alderman Johnson? Yeah, I asked how much it would cost if we were doing all this by hand and people were going out and reading the meters and so forth. And it would cost anywhere between $130,000 and $155,000",
          "attribution": "Alderman Johnson",
          "source_chunks": [
            12
          ],
          "timestamp": 4295.579,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 110
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Alderman Johnson"
      ],
      "timestamp": 4295.579,
      "end_timestamp": 4295.579,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0106",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Cost justification for software renewal",
      "summary": "Discussion questioning the methodology used to determine the cost of the proposed resolution.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        111
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        12
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Alderman Sanders? Yeah. How did we get to this cost? What drove this? Are we getting, is it been, is this by percentage? Did we get this by percentage?",
          "source_record_indices": [
            111
          ],
          "timestamp": 4315.229,
          "end_timestamp": 4315.229,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Cost justification for software renewal",
          "summary": "Discussion questioning the methodology used to determine the cost of the proposed resolution.",
          "evidence": "Alderman Sanders? Yeah. How did we get to this cost? What drove this? Are we getting, is it been, is this by percentage? Did we get this by percentage?",
          "attribution": "Alderman Sanders",
          "source_chunks": [
            12
          ],
          "timestamp": 4315.229,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 111
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Alderman Sanders"
      ],
      "timestamp": 4315.229,
      "end_timestamp": 4315.229,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0107",
      "event_type": "resolution",
      "subject": "Adoption of resolution 2025-120",
      "summary": "The resolution approving an agreement with Fehr Graham for professional services was introduced.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        113
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        12
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Item number 11 is the adoption of resolution 2025-120. Could you please read this? Resolution approving an agreement with Fehr Graham to provide additional civil, environmental, engineering, project management, and other professional services for the 2025 Public Works Master Services contract.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            113
          ],
          "timestamp": 4338.229,
          "end_timestamp": 4338.229,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "resolution",
          "subject": "Adoption of resolution 2025-120",
          "summary": "The resolution approving an agreement with Fehr Graham for professional services was introduced.",
          "evidence": "Item number 11 is the adoption of resolution 2025-120. Could you please read this? Resolution approving an agreement with Fehr Graham to provide additional civil, environmental, engineering, project management, and other professional services for the 2025 Public Works Master Services contract.",
          "attributes": {
            "identifiers": [
              "resolution 2025-120"
            ]
          },
          "source_chunks": [
            12
          ],
          "timestamp": 4338.229,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 113
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 4338.229,
      "end_timestamp": 4338.229,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0108",
      "event_type": "presentation",
      "subject": "Scope of Engineering Support (Fehr Graham)",
      "summary": "A presentation detailing the various annual engineering needs for the City of Freeport that require external consulting support.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        114
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        12
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "The City of Freeport has various annual engineering needs. These include topographic study, infrastructure, system mapping, geotechnical, construction, survey and staking, elevation records, ADA issues, multiple grants and loan assistance, water, sewer, storm, and utility design, structural assessment, street infrastructure, airport engineering support, right-of-way permitting, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency requirements, Illinois Department of Transportation and Necessities, quality assurance, quality control inspections, observations, soil borings, and analysis, and all emergency needs for professional engineering requirements. This consultant work is performed outside of specific project contracts brought to the council and required by specific funding sources.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            114
          ],
          "timestamp": 4403.55,
          "end_timestamp": 4403.55,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "presentation",
          "subject": "Scope of Engineering Support (Fehr Graham)",
          "summary": "A presentation detailing the various annual engineering needs for the City of Freeport that require external consulting support.",
          "evidence": "The City of Freeport has various annual engineering needs. These include topographic study, infrastructure, system mapping, geotechnical, construction, survey and staking, elevation records, ADA issues, multiple grants and loan assistance, water, sewer, storm, and utility design, structural assessment, street infrastructure, airport engineering support, right-of-way permitting, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency requirements, Illinois Department of Transportation and Necessities, quality assurance, quality control inspections, observations, soil borings, and analysis, and all emergency needs for professional engineering requirements. This consultant work is performed outside of specific project contracts brought to the council and required by specific funding sources.",
          "attribution": "Manager Boyer",
          "source_chunks": [
            12
          ],
          "timestamp": 4403.55,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 114
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Manager Boyer"
      ],
      "timestamp": 4403.55,
      "end_timestamp": 4403.55,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0109",
      "event_type": "presentation",
      "subject": "Engineering Contract Scope Details",
      "summary": "Details on how the proposed contract provides general engineering support for city staff departments on an as-needed basis.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        115
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        12
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "This support is for all city staff departments on an as-needed basis, time and material. This contract allows general engineering requirements not related to contracted projects to be performed on a day-to-day basis for the city departments. It also enables the City's staff to be reactive to our daily needs and requirements as infrastructure and emergencies arise. This year has been extremely busy due to the large amount of engineering work, grant submittal, extensive permitting requirements, etc. The original contract funds have been expunged through nine months and staff requires additional funds to complete 2025.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            115
          ],
          "timestamp": 4465.17,
          "end_timestamp": 4465.17,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "presentation",
          "subject": "Engineering Contract Scope Details",
          "summary": "Details on how the proposed contract provides general engineering support for city staff departments on an as-needed basis.",
          "evidence": "This support is for all city staff departments on an as-needed basis, time and material. This contract allows general engineering requirements not related to contracted projects to be performed on a day-to-day basis for the city departments. It also enables the City's staff to be reactive to our daily needs and requirements as infrastructure and emergencies arise. This year has been extremely busy due to the large amount of engineering work, grant submittal, extensive permitting requirements, etc. The original contract funds have been expunged through nine months and staff requires additional funds to complete 2025.",
          "attribution": "Manager Boyer",
          "source_chunks": [
            12
          ],
          "timestamp": 4465.17,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 115
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Manager Boyer"
      ],
      "timestamp": 4465.17,
      "end_timestamp": 4465.17,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0110",
      "event_type": "presentation",
      "subject": "Engineering services contract funding and scope",
      "summary": "The original contract funds for general engineering requirements have been expended through nine months, requiring additional funds estimated at $100,000 on a time and material basis to complete 2025. Staff recommends moving forward with the additional services contract with Fehr Graham.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        116
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        13
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "The original contract funds have been expunged through nine months and staff requires additional funds to complete 2025. The estimated cost is about $100,000 on a time and material basis and used as needed. The funding for these additional services was included in the 2025 engineering budget and staff recommends moving forward with the additional services contract with Fehr Graham.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            116
          ],
          "timestamp": 4500.89,
          "end_timestamp": 4500.89,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "presentation",
          "subject": "Engineering services contract funding and scope",
          "summary": "The original contract funds for general engineering requirements have been expended through nine months, requiring additional funds estimated at $100,000 on a time and material basis to complete 2025. Staff recommends moving forward with the additional services contract with Fehr Graham.",
          "evidence": "The original contract funds have been expunged through nine months and staff requires additional funds to complete 2025. The estimated cost is about $100,000 on a time and material basis and used as needed. The funding for these additional services was included in the 2025 engineering budget and staff recommends moving forward with the additional services contract with Fehr Graham.",
          "attribution": "Manager Boyer",
          "source_chunks": [
            13
          ],
          "timestamp": 4500.89,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 116
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Manager Boyer"
      ],
      "timestamp": 4500.89,
      "end_timestamp": 4500.89,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0111",
      "event_type": "decision",
      "subject": "Adoption of additional services contract",
      "summary": "Motion to adopt the additional services contract.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "duplicate_consolidation",
        "duplicate_rules": [
          "identical_subject_summary"
        ]
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        117,
        118
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        13
      ],
      "components": {
        "motion": [
          117,
          118
        ]
      },
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "So staff request moving forward Settler. Is there a motion to adopt? So moved.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            117
          ],
          "timestamp": 4527.449,
          "end_timestamp": 4527.449,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        },
        {
          "text": "Second. We have a motion made by Alderman Shadle, seconded by Alderman Sellers.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            118
          ],
          "timestamp": 4565.729,
          "end_timestamp": 4565.729,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "motion",
          "subject": "Adoption of additional services contract",
          "summary": "Motion to adopt the additional services contract.",
          "evidence": "So staff request moving forward Settler. Is there a motion to adopt? So moved.",
          "attribution": "Staff/Unknown",
          "attributes": {
            "made_by": "Unknown"
          },
          "source_chunks": [
            13
          ],
          "timestamp": 4527.449,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 117
        },
        {
          "record_type": "motion",
          "subject": "Adoption of additional services contract",
          "summary": "Motion to adopt the additional services contract.",
          "evidence": "Second. We have a motion made by Alderman Shadle, seconded by Alderman Sellers.",
          "attribution": "Alderman Shadle",
          "attributes": {
            "seconded_by": "Alderman Sellers"
          },
          "source_chunks": [
            13
          ],
          "timestamp": 4565.729,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 118
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Staff/Unknown",
        "Alderman Shadle"
      ],
      "timestamp": 4527.449,
      "end_timestamp": 4565.729,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0112",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Master Services Contract scope and necessity",
      "summary": "A council member questioned the need for Fehr Graham services when an existing contractor is already on board, questioning the master services contract details and potential cost overruns.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        119
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        13
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Well, the question I have, there's an existing contractor already on board before Fehr and Farrin Graham gets involved with this particular contractor to supplement or to engineer or to support it. Is that what we're talking about? If we're talking about that kind of occasion, then why do we need Farrin Graham services when we have not even talked about the master services contract and what's all entailed with it?",
          "source_record_indices": [
            119
          ],
          "timestamp": 4583.67,
          "end_timestamp": 4583.67,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Master Services Contract scope and necessity",
          "summary": "A council member questioned the need for Fehr Graham services when an existing contractor is already on board, questioning the master services contract details and potential cost overruns.",
          "evidence": "Well, the question I have, there's an existing contractor already on board before Fehr and Farrin Graham gets involved with this particular contractor to supplement or to engineer or to support it. Is that what we're talking about? If we're talking about that kind of occasion, then why do we need Farrin Graham services when we have not even talked about the master services contract and what's all entailed with it?",
          "attribution": "Alderman Sanders",
          "source_chunks": [
            13
          ],
          "timestamp": 4583.67,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 119
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Alderman Sanders"
      ],
      "timestamp": 4583.67,
      "end_timestamp": 4583.67,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0113",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Master Services Contract scope and necessity",
      "summary": "A council member suggested getting more information regarding the Master Service Contract before approving further spending.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        120
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        13
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "I'm going to suggest that we get more information from whoever's submitting this or suggesting or recommending that I see that your name is there, Mr. Steekle. I think we should, I think before we indulge ourself in spending more money, because it seems like to me we're spending millions of dollars and hundreds of millions of dollars just on this project or whatever this construction work is, and I'm surprised that we're not asking questions as council.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            120
          ],
          "timestamp": 4693.75,
          "end_timestamp": 4693.75,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Master Services Contract scope and necessity",
          "summary": "A council member suggested getting more information regarding the Master Service Contract before approving further spending.",
          "evidence": "I'm going to suggest that we get more information from whoever's submitting this or suggesting or recommending that I see that your name is there, Mr. Steekle. I think we should, I think before we indulge ourself in spending more money, because it seems like to me we're spending millions of dollars and hundreds of millions of dollars just on this project or whatever this construction work is, and I'm surprised that we're not asking questions as council.",
          "attribution": "Alderman Sanders",
          "source_chunks": [
            13
          ],
          "timestamp": 4693.75,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 120
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Alderman Sanders"
      ],
      "timestamp": 4693.75,
      "end_timestamp": 4693.75,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0114",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Master Services Contract scope and necessity",
      "summary": "A council member stated the need to reevaluate the contract before adoption, emphasizing the lack of defined scope for the master service.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        121
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        13
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "And so we need to reevaluate all of that. And I think this is like a dead horse or dead dog heading down the wrong road and I don't think this should be happening until we reveal who in the heck is a master service and finding out what kind of work that they're doing for the City of Freeport, then we can have another discussion about it.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            121
          ],
          "timestamp": 4774.05,
          "end_timestamp": 4774.05,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Master Services Contract scope and necessity",
          "summary": "A council member stated the need to reevaluate the contract before adoption, emphasizing the lack of defined scope for the master service.",
          "evidence": "And so we need to reevaluate all of that. And I think this is like a dead horse or dead dog heading down the wrong road and I don't think this should be happening until we reveal who in the heck is a master service and finding out what kind of work that they're doing for the City of Freeport, then we can have another discussion about it.",
          "attribution": "Alderman Sanders",
          "source_chunks": [
            13
          ],
          "timestamp": 4774.05,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 121
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Alderman Sanders"
      ],
      "timestamp": 4774.05,
      "end_timestamp": 4774.05,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0115",
      "event_type": "presentation",
      "subject": "Master Services Program expenditures",
      "summary": "Manager Boyer provided figures on expenditures related to survey calculations, utility permit reviews, IDOT updates, and preliminary design review for Hancock Bridge using the master services program.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        122
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        13
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "So let me start out Alderman Sanders. We can have these discussions anytime. [...] With that being said, let me start with the list here. We've had survey calculations and staking at the Fire Station improvements and there are many projects throughout the city that we've used the master services degree program to get done. That came up to about $29,000. We had utility permit reviews so that would be for all the construction going in the right of way. That came to about $45,000 but we are getting repaid for that through our right of way permit process. IDOT has a multi-year program that has to be updated that's about $5,000. Hancock Bridge, preliminary design review is about 24,000, but that's a major priority.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            122
          ],
          "timestamp": 4802.0,
          "end_timestamp": 4802.0,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "presentation",
          "subject": "Master Services Program expenditures",
          "summary": "Manager Boyer provided figures on expenditures related to survey calculations, utility permit reviews, IDOT updates, and preliminary design review for Hancock Bridge using the master services program.",
          "evidence": "So let me start out Alderman Sanders. We can have these discussions anytime. [...] With that being said, let me start with the list here. We've had survey calculations and staking at the Fire Station improvements and there are many projects throughout the city that we've used the master services degree program to get done. That came up to about $29,000. We had utility permit reviews so that would be for all the construction going in the right of way. That came to about $45,000 but we are getting repaid for that through our right of way permit process. IDOT has a multi-year program that has to be updated that's about $5,000. Hancock Bridge, preliminary design review is about 24,000, but that's a major priority.",
          "attribution": "Manager Boyer",
          "source_chunks": [
            13
          ],
          "timestamp": 4802.0,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 122
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Manager Boyer"
      ],
      "timestamp": 4802.0,
      "end_timestamp": 4802.0,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0116",
      "event_type": "presentation",
      "subject": "City Improvement Project Costs and Services",
      "summary": "Reported costs for various city projects including Fire Station improvements ($29,000), utility permit reviews ($45,000, with repayment expected), IDOT multi-year program update ($5,000), Hancock Bridge preliminary design review ($24,000), sewer lining/cleaning contracts ($30,000), process optimization, site development ($6,300), crack ceiling bidding and construction oversight ($2,000), tree removal ($8,000), and public works fuel pump paving system ($23,000).",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        123
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        14
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "We've had survey calculations and staking at the Fire Station improvements and there are many projects throughout the city that we've used the master services degree program to get done. That came up to about $29,000. We had utility permit reviews so that would be for all the construction going in the right of way. That came to about $45,000 but we are getting repaid for that through our right of way permit process. IDOT has a multi-year program that has to be updated that's about $5,000. Hancock Bridge, preliminary design review is about 24,000, but that's a major priority. We want to get the Hancock Bridge fixed, so we got to figure out what we're doing and then be able to apply for the IDOT funds to make that happen. That happens through a lot of diligent and careful work that goes on at Fehr Graham. Also, we required assistance with setup for the cleaning and lining contracts for all the sewer projects that we've done, and it's about 30,000, but we spent I think around close to a half a million dollars in sewer lining and that just keeps all the water out of the sewer so we don't end up at the wastewater plant, flooding out the wastewater plant. I'm sure you're familiar with it though. We've also got process optimization. So that's Tom Glenn Denning working with us at the water treatment plant and the wastewater treatment plant, getting processes in place and making sure things are running efficiently there. Site development so we're talking about the city developed projects we had about 6,300 there we had a crack ceiling bidding and construction oversight about 2,000 there tree removal we had about $8,000 in bidding and inspections and ensuring that our that our contractors are doing appropriate work out there and getting good quality for us for the city get high value for our dollars public works fuel pump paving system we spent about $23,000 with the updated tank Hicks, and Pumps, and everything that goes on.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            123
          ],
          "timestamp": 4802.0,
          "end_timestamp": 4802.0,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "presentation",
          "subject": "City Improvement Project Costs and Services",
          "summary": "Reported costs for various city projects including Fire Station improvements ($29,000), utility permit reviews ($45,000, with repayment expected), IDOT multi-year program update ($5,000), Hancock Bridge preliminary design review ($24,000), sewer lining/cleaning contracts ($30,000), process optimization, site development ($6,300), crack ceiling bidding and construction oversight ($2,000), tree removal ($8,000), and public works fuel pump paving system ($23,000).",
          "evidence": "We've had survey calculations and staking at the Fire Station improvements and there are many projects throughout the city that we've used the master services degree program to get done. That came up to about $29,000. We had utility permit reviews so that would be for all the construction going in the right of way. That came to about $45,000 but we are getting repaid for that through our right of way permit process. IDOT has a multi-year program that has to be updated that's about $5,000. Hancock Bridge, preliminary design review is about 24,000, but that's a major priority. We want to get the Hancock Bridge fixed, so we got to figure out what we're doing and then be able to apply for the IDOT funds to make that happen. That happens through a lot of diligent and careful work that goes on at Fehr Graham. Also, we required assistance with setup for the cleaning and lining contracts for all the sewer projects that we've done, and it's about 30,000, but we spent I think around close to a half a million dollars in sewer lining and that just keeps all the water out of the sewer so we don't end up at the wastewater plant, flooding out the wastewater plant. I'm sure you're familiar with it though. We've also got process optimization. So that's Tom Glenn Denning working with us at the water treatment plant and the wastewater treatment plant, getting processes in place and making sure things are running efficiently there. Site development so we're talking about the city developed projects we had about 6,300 there we had a crack ceiling bidding and construction oversight about 2,000 there tree removal we had about $8,000 in bidding and inspections and ensuring that our that our contractors are doing appropriate work out there and getting good quality for us for the city get high value for our dollars public works fuel pump paving system we spent about $23,000 with the updated tank Hicks, and Pumps, and everything that goes on.",
          "attribution": "Manager Boyer",
          "attributes": {
            "financial": [
              {
                "amount": 29000,
                "description": "Fire Station improvements"
              },
              {
                "amount": 45000,
                "description": "Utility permit reviews"
              },
              {
                "amount": 5000,
                "description": "IDOT multi-year program update"
              },
              {
                "amount": 24000,
                "description": "Hancock Bridge preliminary design review"
              },
              {
                "amount": 30000,
                "description": "Sewer cleaning and lining contracts setup assistance"
              },
              {
                "amount": 500000,
                "description": "Total spent on sewer lining"
              },
              {
                "amount": 6300,
                "description": "City developed projects (site development)"
              },
              {
                "amount": 2000,
                "description": "Crack ceiling bidding and construction oversight"
              },
              {
                "amount": 8000,
                "description": "Tree removal bidding and inspections"
              },
              {
                "amount": 23000,
                "description": "Public works fuel pump paving system"
              }
            ]
          },
          "source_chunks": [
            14
          ],
          "timestamp": 4802.0,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 123
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Manager Boyer"
      ],
      "timestamp": 4802.0,
      "end_timestamp": 4802.0,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0117",
      "event_type": "presentation",
      "subject": "Master Service Contract Status with Fehr Graham",
      "summary": "The original Master Service Contract is with Fehr Graham. They are requesting additional money because the contract has been used up for work done throughout the year.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        124
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        14
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Holderman Sanders, the Master, the original Master Service Contract, that's with Fehr Graham. So, the Master Service Contract, that was approved by the City Council probably near the beginning of the year, and it's with Fehr Graham. They're asking basically to add more money to that contract. That's that's the simple aspect of it because of all the work that manager Boyer just said. We've used up the contract thus far so now we need additional work done just for the rest of the year to cover the rest of the year. That's all.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            124
          ],
          "timestamp": 4959.539,
          "end_timestamp": 4959.539,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "presentation",
          "subject": "Master Service Contract Status with Fehr Graham",
          "summary": "The original Master Service Contract is with Fehr Graham. They are requesting additional money because the contract has been used up for work done throughout the year.",
          "evidence": "Holderman Sanders, the Master, the original Master Service Contract, that's with Fehr Graham. So, the Master Service Contract, that was approved by the City Council probably near the beginning of the year, and it's with Fehr Graham. They're asking basically to add more money to that contract. That's that's the simple aspect of it because of all the work that manager Boyer just said. We've used up the contract thus far so now we need additional work done just for the rest of the year to cover the rest of the year. That's all.",
          "attribution": "Holderman Sanders",
          "attributes": {
            "contract_details": {
              "contractor": "Fehr Graham",
              "issue": "Requesting additional funds due to contract usage."
            }
          },
          "source_chunks": [
            14
          ],
          "timestamp": 4959.539,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 124
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Holderman Sanders"
      ],
      "timestamp": 4959.539,
      "end_timestamp": 4959.539,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0118",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Scope of Public Works Master Service Contract Services",
      "summary": "The original Public Works Master Service Contract states Fehr Graham will provide various civil, environment, and engineering service, project management, and other related professional services as requested or directed by the city manager.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        125
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        14
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "In the scope of services section of the the original Public Works Master Service Contract. It states, Fehr Graham will provide various civil, environment, and engineering service, project management, and other related professional services as requested or directed by city manager representing the City of Freeport Public Works Department.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            125
          ],
          "timestamp": 4994.26,
          "end_timestamp": 4994.26,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Scope of Public Works Master Service Contract Services",
          "summary": "The original Public Works Master Service Contract states Fehr Graham will provide various civil, environment, and engineering service, project management, and other related professional services as requested or directed by the city manager.",
          "evidence": "In the scope of services section of the the original Public Works Master Service Contract. It states, Fehr Graham will provide various civil, environment, and engineering service, project management, and other related professional services as requested or directed by city manager representing the City of Freeport Public Works Department.",
          "source_chunks": [
            14
          ],
          "timestamp": 4994.26,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 125
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 4994.26,
      "end_timestamp": 4994.26,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0119",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Public Works Master Service Contract Scope Limitations",
      "summary": "The discussion clarified that all duties described by the city manager were considered consultant work performed outside of specific contracts, but these tasks actually fall within the scope of public works, and the master service contract had no limits or stipulations on services rendered.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        126
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        14
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "All the duties, please don't stop me, all the duties that the city manager, Boyer, described in the background of his memo were considered consultant work performed outside of spec contracts. However, these tags actually fall within the scope of public works. There were no limits or stipulations on the services rendered in the master service contract, nor did it allow for additional invoice for service considered outside the scope.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            126
          ],
          "timestamp": 5045.34,
          "end_timestamp": 5045.34,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Public Works Master Service Contract Scope Limitations",
          "summary": "The discussion clarified that all duties described by the city manager were considered consultant work performed outside of specific contracts, but these tasks actually fall within the scope of public works, and the master service contract had no limits or stipulations on services rendered.",
          "evidence": "All the duties, please don't stop me, all the duties that the city manager, Boyer, described in the background of his memo were considered consultant work performed outside of spec contracts. However, these tags actually fall within the scope of public works. There were no limits or stipulations on the services rendered in the master service contract, nor did it allow for additional invoice for service considered outside the scope.",
          "source_chunks": [
            14
          ],
          "timestamp": 5045.34,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 126
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 5045.34,
      "end_timestamp": 5045.34,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0120",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Fehr Graham Contract Funding Dispute",
      "summary": "A speaker questioned the request for another $100,000 from Fehr Graham nine months into a contract after already paying $100,000, suggesting the issue should be addressed when council decides to renew the contract.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        127
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        14
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "We have already paid Fehr Graham $100,000. Now, nine months in, you're asking for another $100,000 and what is the purpose of this again, I ask. And others. The situation reflects either Fairground fell to properly price their service or the inability to produce and present a solid contract. Regardless, it is not the city's obligation to provide more and John. I believe this is, this issue should be addressed if and when council decides to renew this contract, this $100,000 contract with Fehr Graham. At that time, we can consider whether to increase funding or not. We have a contract in place, and we have honored that contract. Our end of the agreement by paying the $100,000 that the contract asks for.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            127
          ],
          "timestamp": 5087.84,
          "end_timestamp": 5087.84,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Fehr Graham Contract Funding Dispute",
          "summary": "A speaker questioned the request for another $100,000 from Fehr Graham nine months into a contract after already paying $100,000, suggesting the issue should be addressed when council decides to renew the contract.",
          "evidence": "We have already paid Fehr Graham $100,000. Now, nine months in, you're asking for another $100,000 and what is the purpose of this again, I ask. And others. The situation reflects either Fairground fell to properly price their service or the inability to produce and present a solid contract. Regardless, it is not the city's obligation to provide more and John. I believe this is, this issue should be addressed if and when council decides to renew this contract, this $100,000 contract with Fehr Graham. At that time, we can consider whether to increase funding or not. We have a contract in place, and we have honored that contract. Our end of the agreement by paying the $100,000 that the contract asks for.",
          "source_chunks": [
            14
          ],
          "timestamp": 5087.84,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 127
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 5087.84,
      "end_timestamp": 5087.84,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0121",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Clarification on Master Service Agreements",
      "summary": "A clarification was provided distinguishing between the general master service agreement for city engineering and the separate Public Works Director Master Contract.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        128
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        14
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Yes. Did you reference the Public Works contract? Is that is that what you said public works contract that this is a different kind of scope of service this is the section of the public works master this service contract this is in addition to the general yeah master services correct so this is a different like to clarify this yeah so there's the general master service agreement for city engineering which is a totally different contract than the one you're referencing the one you're referencing is is the public works director master contract, which we're not asking for any more money to that. And we are just fine on the budget of that.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            128
          ],
          "timestamp": 5187.67,
          "end_timestamp": 5187.67,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Clarification on Master Service Agreements",
          "summary": "A clarification was provided distinguishing between the general master service agreement for city engineering and the separate Public Works Director Master Contract.",
          "evidence": "Yes. Did you reference the Public Works contract? Is that is that what you said public works contract that this is a different kind of scope of service this is the section of the public works master this service contract this is in addition to the general yeah master services correct so this is a different like to clarify this yeah so there's the general master service agreement for city engineering which is a totally different contract than the one you're referencing the one you're referencing is is the public works director master contract, which we're not asking for any more money to that. And we are just fine on the budget of that.",
          "source_chunks": [
            14
          ],
          "timestamp": 5187.67,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 128
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 5187.67,
      "end_timestamp": 5187.67,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0122",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Public Works Master Service Contract Scope",
      "summary": "The discussion clarified that the public works assistance contract is separate from the general engineering master service agreement and that the current budget for the public works contract is fine.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        129
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        15
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "The public works assistance that I give to public works is the contract you're talking about there, and we don't need extra money on that. We're just fine. We're right on budget for the year.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            129
          ],
          "timestamp": 5296.289,
          "end_timestamp": 5296.289,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Public Works Master Service Contract Scope",
          "summary": "The discussion clarified that the public works assistance contract is separate from the general engineering master service agreement and that the current budget for the public works contract is fine.",
          "evidence": "The public works assistance that I give to public works is the contract you're talking about there, and we don't need extra money on that. We're just fine. We're right on budget for the year.",
          "source_chunks": [
            15
          ],
          "timestamp": 5296.289,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 129
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 5296.289,
      "end_timestamp": 5296.289,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0123",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "City Engineering Master Service Agreement Status",
      "summary": "The general engineering contract for the city of Freeport originally was $350,000 and has been expended through various phases; if not extended, services will stop because it is a time and materials master service agreement.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        130
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        15
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "This is the general engineering contract for the city of Freeport. The original amount was $350,000. And with all the phases that we have done, we have expended that, and it was a time and materials contract, which all of them are. So if we don't extend it, which originally it was supposed to be $450,000 for this year, but we decided to go with $350,000 to start to see where that landed us for the year. So if you choose not to extend it, the services will stop because it's a master service agreement that's time and material for city engineering.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            130
          ],
          "timestamp": 5243.13,
          "end_timestamp": 5243.13,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "City Engineering Master Service Agreement Status",
          "summary": "The general engineering contract for the city of Freeport originally was $350,000 and has been expended through various phases; if not extended, services will stop because it is a time and materials master service agreement.",
          "evidence": "This is the general engineering contract for the city of Freeport. The original amount was $350,000. And with all the phases that we have done, we have expended that, and it was a time and materials contract, which all of them are. So if we don't extend it, which originally it was supposed to be $450,000 for this year, but we decided to go with $350,000 to start to see where that landed us for the year. So if you choose not to extend it, the services will stop because it's a master service agreement that's time and material for city engineering.",
          "source_chunks": [
            15
          ],
          "timestamp": 5243.13,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 130
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 5243.13,
      "end_timestamp": 5243.13,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0124",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Public Works Director Master Contract Status",
      "summary": "The public works director master contract is separate from the general engineering contract, and no additional money is being requested for it.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        131
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        15
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "there's the general master service agreement for city engineering which is a totally different contract than the one you're referencing the one you're referencing is is the public works director master contract, which we're not asking for any more money to that. And we are just fine on the budget of that.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            131
          ],
          "timestamp": 5187.67,
          "end_timestamp": 5187.67,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Public Works Director Master Contract Status",
          "summary": "The public works director master contract is separate from the general engineering contract, and no additional money is being requested for it.",
          "evidence": "there's the general master service agreement for city engineering which is a totally different contract than the one you're referencing the one you're referencing is is the public works director master contract, which we're not asking for any more money to that. And we are just fine on the budget of that.",
          "source_chunks": [
            15
          ],
          "timestamp": 5187.67,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 131
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 5187.67,
      "end_timestamp": 5187.67,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0125",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Reason for Bringing Contract Status to Council",
      "summary": "The issue was brought up because services are being provided even though the contract funds are running low, and service will not stop.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        132
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        15
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "It is being brought to you because we're getting close to running out of money. We're We're still providing the services, even though we're beyond our contract. We haven't stopped because we work in good faith.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            132
          ],
          "timestamp": 5331.18,
          "end_timestamp": 5331.18,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Reason for Bringing Contract Status to Council",
          "summary": "The issue was brought up because services are being provided even though the contract funds are running low, and service will not stop.",
          "evidence": "It is being brought to you because we're getting close to running out of money. We're We're still providing the services, even though we're beyond our contract. We haven't stopped because we work in good faith.",
          "source_chunks": [
            15
          ],
          "timestamp": 5331.18,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 132
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 5331.18,
      "end_timestamp": 5331.18,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0126",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Contract Savings and Efficiency Claims",
      "summary": "The speaker claimed to have saved the city of Freeport over $100,000 just on fees and enforcement of right-of-way permits, and that contracts pay for themselves daily.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        133
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        15
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "And I will say that there's over $100,000 that i have saved the city of Freeport just on fees and enforcement of right away permits. Well over that, I had one claim that was over $30,000 that came back to the city general fund.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            133
          ],
          "timestamp": 5392.399,
          "end_timestamp": 5392.399,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Contract Savings and Efficiency Claims",
          "summary": "The speaker claimed to have saved the city of Freeport over $100,000 just on fees and enforcement of right-of-way permits, and that contracts pay for themselves daily.",
          "evidence": "And I will say that there's over $100,000 that i have saved the city of Freeport just on fees and enforcement of right away permits. Well over that, I had one claim that was over $30,000 that came back to the city general fund.",
          "source_chunks": [
            15
          ],
          "timestamp": 5392.399,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 133
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 5392.399,
      "end_timestamp": 5392.399,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0127",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Concerns regarding Fehr & Graham and Master Service Coordination",
      "summary": "A concern was raised about potential collusion between two contracting companies (Fehr & Graham) and Master Service working together, questioning who is being estimated for.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        134
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        15
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "I've heard your explanation but when when I find out that there's been a collusion with two contracting companies that's Fehr and Farrin Graham and Master Service working in conjunction with each other because it says it's working with each other.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            134
          ],
          "timestamp": 5463.46,
          "end_timestamp": 5463.46,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Concerns regarding Fehr & Graham and Master Service Coordination",
          "summary": "A concern was raised about potential collusion between two contracting companies (Fehr & Graham) and Master Service working together, questioning who is being estimated for.",
          "evidence": "I've heard your explanation but when when I find out that there's been a collusion with two contracting companies that's Fehr and Farrin Graham and Master Service working in conjunction with each other because it says it's working with each other.",
          "source_chunks": [
            15
          ],
          "timestamp": 5463.46,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 134
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 5463.46,
      "end_timestamp": 5463.46,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0128",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Need for Itemized Scope Review of Contracts",
      "summary": "It was stated that an itemized list detailing all services provided by Master Service, the scope of their contract, and what Fehr & Graham is supporting them with is needed to justify the cost.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        135
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        15
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "The fact of the matter is until we get an itemized list of everything that Master Service have been doing, what the scope of their contract, what is contracted, we need a list of all All of the services that are provided and finding out all of the things that Fehr and Graham is supporting them with to justify this cost.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            135
          ],
          "timestamp": 5525.109,
          "end_timestamp": 5525.109,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Need for Itemized Scope Review of Contracts",
          "summary": "It was stated that an itemized list detailing all services provided by Master Service, the scope of their contract, and what Fehr & Graham is supporting them with is needed to justify the cost.",
          "evidence": "The fact of the matter is until we get an itemized list of everything that Master Service have been doing, what the scope of their contract, what is contracted, we need a list of all All of the services that are provided and finding out all of the things that Fehr and Graham is supporting them with to justify this cost.",
          "source_chunks": [
            15
          ],
          "timestamp": 5525.109,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 135
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 5525.109,
      "end_timestamp": 5525.109,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0129",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Recommendation on Future Contract Estimates",
      "summary": "The speaker advised against entertaining an estimated cost between Fehr & Graham and Master Service until a full understanding of the scope is achieved.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        136
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        15
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "I just don't feel comfortable, and I don't think the people of the City of Freeport should feel comfortable with opening up the gates of an estimated cost between Fehr and Graham and master service. That whole thing should not even be entertained until we get right down to the bottom of St. Louis, and Kray.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            136
          ],
          "timestamp": 5579.609,
          "end_timestamp": 5579.609,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Recommendation on Future Contract Estimates",
          "summary": "The speaker advised against entertaining an estimated cost between Fehr & Graham and Master Service until a full understanding of the scope is achieved.",
          "evidence": "I just don't feel comfortable, and I don't think the people of the City of Freeport should feel comfortable with opening up the gates of an estimated cost between Fehr and Graham and master service. That whole thing should not even be entertained until we get right down to the bottom of St. Louis, and Kray.",
          "source_chunks": [
            15
          ],
          "timestamp": 5579.609,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 136
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 5579.609,
      "end_timestamp": 5579.609,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0130",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Master services discussion scope",
      "summary": "The speaker expressed discomfort with opening up the gates of an estimated cost between Fehr and Graham for master service until issues regarding St. Louis and Kray are addressed.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        137
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        16
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "There's a collusion going on, and so we need to get the scope of an understanding. And right now, I just don't feel comfortable, and I don't think the people of the City of Freeport should feel comfortable with opening up the gates of an estimated cost between Fehr and Graham and master service. That whole thing should not even be entertained until we get right down to the bottom of St. Louis, and Kray.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            137
          ],
          "timestamp": 5574.149,
          "end_timestamp": 5574.149,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Master services discussion scope",
          "summary": "The speaker expressed discomfort with opening up the gates of an estimated cost between Fehr and Graham for master service until issues regarding St. Louis and Kray are addressed.",
          "evidence": "There's a collusion going on, and so we need to get the scope of an understanding. And right now, I just don't feel comfortable, and I don't think the people of the City of Freeport should feel comfortable with opening up the gates of an estimated cost between Fehr and Graham and master service. That whole thing should not even be entertained until we get right down to the bottom of St. Louis, and Kray.",
          "source_chunks": [
            16
          ],
          "timestamp": 5574.149,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 137
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 5574.149,
      "end_timestamp": 5574.149,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0131",
      "event_type": "procedural_action",
      "subject": "Request for discussion clarity on Master Services",
      "summary": "The speaker sought clarification regarding whether 'Master services' is a business.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        138
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        16
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "So let me bring clarity. Master services is not a business, not a that's what I was going to say.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            138
          ],
          "timestamp": 5624.21,
          "end_timestamp": 5624.21,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "procedural_action",
          "subject": "Request for discussion clarity on Master Services",
          "summary": "The speaker sought clarification regarding whether 'Master services' is a business.",
          "evidence": "So let me bring clarity. Master services is not a business, not a that's what I was going to say.",
          "source_chunks": [
            16
          ],
          "timestamp": 5624.21,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 138
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 5624.21,
      "end_timestamp": 5624.21,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0132",
      "event_type": "procedural_action",
      "subject": "Call for roll call before vote",
      "summary": "The speaker requested the Madam Clerk to take the roll.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        139
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        16
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Is there any other discussion before we go to vote? Madam Clerk, please take the roll.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            139
          ],
          "timestamp": 5624.21,
          "end_timestamp": 5624.21,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "procedural_action",
          "subject": "Call for roll call before vote",
          "summary": "The speaker requested the Madam Clerk to take the roll.",
          "evidence": "Is there any other discussion before we go to vote? Madam Clerk, please take the roll.",
          "source_chunks": [
            16
          ],
          "timestamp": 5624.21,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 139
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 5624.21,
      "end_timestamp": 5624.21,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0133",
      "event_type": "decision",
      "subject": "Adoption of Resolution 2025-121 (FROE for MFT Project)",
      "summary": "The resolution was adopted seven to one.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        140
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        16
      ],
      "components": {
        "vote": [
          140
        ]
      },
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Klemm? Aye. Johnson? Aye. Simmons? Aye. Parker? Aye. Stacy? Aye. Shadle? Aye. Sanders? No. Sellers? Aye. The resolution is adopted seven to one.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            140
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "vote",
          "subject": "Adoption of Resolution 2025-121 (FROE for MFT Project)",
          "summary": "The resolution was adopted seven to one.",
          "evidence": "Klemm? Aye. Johnson? Aye. Simmons? Aye. Parker? Aye. Stacy? Aye. Shadle? Aye. Sanders? No. Sellers? Aye. The resolution is adopted seven to one.",
          "source_chunks": [
            16
          ],
          "record_index": 140
        }
      ],
      "outcome": "adopted"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0134",
      "event_type": "presentation",
      "subject": "Resolution of Final Report of Expenditure (FROE) for MFT Project 23-00169-00-RS",
      "summary": "Manager Boyer explained that IDOT requires a final resolution when completing MFT projects to keep records in order, asking the council to move forward with IDOT's resolution.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        141
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        16
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Item number 12 is the The adoption of Resolution 2025-121. Could you please read this? Resolution of Final Report of Expenditure, FROE, from IDOT for Sullivan, Greenfield, Navajo, MFT Project 23-00169-00-RS Thank you. Manager Boyer? Thank you, Your Honor. As part of IDOT's process, when we complete MFT projects, we need to have a final resolution that we then submit so that we have our records all in order. So all we're asking for is to move forward with IDOT's resolution, final report for 23-00169-00-RS. That is the 2023 MFT projects.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            141
          ],
          "timestamp": 5656.689,
          "end_timestamp": 5656.689,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "presentation",
          "subject": "Resolution of Final Report of Expenditure (FROE) for MFT Project 23-00169-00-RS",
          "summary": "Manager Boyer explained that IDOT requires a final resolution when completing MFT projects to keep records in order, asking the council to move forward with IDOT's resolution.",
          "evidence": "Item number 12 is the The adoption of Resolution 2025-121. Could you please read this? Resolution of Final Report of Expenditure, FROE, from IDOT for Sullivan, Greenfield, Navajo, MFT Project 23-00169-00-RS Thank you. Manager Boyer? Thank you, Your Honor. As part of IDOT's process, when we complete MFT projects, we need to have a final resolution that we then submit so that we have our records all in order. So all we're asking for is to move forward with IDOT's resolution, final report for 23-00169-00-RS. That is the 2023 MFT projects.",
          "source_chunks": [
            16
          ],
          "timestamp": 5656.689,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 141
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 5656.689,
      "end_timestamp": 5656.689,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0135",
      "event_type": "decision",
      "subject": "Adoption of Resolution 2025-121 (FROE)",
      "summary": "A motion was made by Alderman Shadle and seconded by Alderman Klemm to adopt the resolution.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "decision_sequence",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        142,
        143
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        16
      ],
      "components": {
        "motion": [
          142
        ],
        "vote": [
          143
        ]
      },
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "So moved. Shadle and Klemm. We have a motion made by Alderman Shadle, seconded by Alderman Klemm.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            142
          ],
          "timestamp": 5699.689,
          "end_timestamp": 5699.689,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        },
        {
          "text": "Klemm? Aye. Johnson? Aye. Simmons? Aye. Parker? Aye. Stacy? Aye. Shadle? Aye. Sanders? No. And Sellers? Aye. The resolution is adopted. 7-1.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            143
          ],
          "timestamp": 5699.689,
          "end_timestamp": 5699.689,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "motion",
          "subject": "Adoption of Resolution 2025-121 (FROE)",
          "summary": "A motion was made by Alderman Shadle and seconded by Alderman Klemm to adopt the resolution.",
          "evidence": "So moved. Shadle and Klemm. We have a motion made by Alderman Shadle, seconded by Alderman Klemm.",
          "source_chunks": [
            16
          ],
          "timestamp": 5699.689,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 142
        },
        {
          "record_type": "vote",
          "subject": "Adoption of Resolution 2025-121 (FROE)",
          "summary": "The resolution was adopted with a vote tally of 7-1.",
          "evidence": "Klemm? Aye. Johnson? Aye. Simmons? Aye. Parker? Aye. Stacy? Aye. Shadle? Aye. Sanders? No. And Sellers? Aye. The resolution is adopted. 7-1.",
          "source_chunks": [
            16
          ],
          "timestamp": 5699.689,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 143
        }
      ],
      "outcome": "adopted",
      "timestamp": 5699.689,
      "end_timestamp": 5699.689,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0136",
      "event_type": "presentation",
      "subject": "Resolution approving purchase of brush mulcher attachment",
      "summary": "Manager Boyer presented the need for a new brush mulcher attachment costing $17,878 from Helm Truck and Equipment to maintain catch basins and overgrown areas. He noted that funds would come from the utility budget, using savings ($30,000) realized on aeration equipment for the wastewater treatment plant.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        144
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        16
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Item number 13 is the adoption of Resolution 2025-122. Could you please read this? Resolution approving the purchase of a brush mulcher attachment from Helm Truck and Equipment. Thank you. Manager Boyer? Thank you, Your Honor. Many activities within the Public Works Department require brush elimination, mowing, that type of thing. Staff has requested that we bring this to Council for approval. This is the new brush mulcher that would attach to a skid steer skid steer machine. The cost is $17,878 from Helm Truck, which is a source well dealer. This would be a vital piece of equipment for maintaining the catch basins and some of the areas that get overgrown with woods and weeds and that type of thing. And right now Sioux Basin is is a project that's coming up that we'll be cleaning up and fixing. And this is a vital piece of equipment for that. This will be coming out of the utility budget. And the amount for this brush mulcher was not specifically enumerated in the budget. However, due to the fact that we saved about $30,000 on our aeration equipment for the wastewater treatment plant, staff is requesting using these funds the remainder of that budget for the purchase of this piece of equipment.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            144
          ],
          "timestamp": 5732.029,
          "end_timestamp": 5732.029,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "presentation",
          "subject": "Resolution approving purchase of brush mulcher attachment",
          "summary": "Manager Boyer presented the need for a new brush mulcher attachment costing $17,878 from Helm Truck and Equipment to maintain catch basins and overgrown areas. He noted that funds would come from the utility budget, using savings ($30,000) realized on aeration equipment for the wastewater treatment plant.",
          "evidence": "Item number 13 is the adoption of Resolution 2025-122. Could you please read this? Resolution approving the purchase of a brush mulcher attachment from Helm Truck and Equipment. Thank you. Manager Boyer? Thank you, Your Honor. Many activities within the Public Works Department require brush elimination, mowing, that type of thing. Staff has requested that we bring this to Council for approval. This is the new brush mulcher that would attach to a skid steer skid steer machine. The cost is $17,878 from Helm Truck, which is a source well dealer. This would be a vital piece of equipment for maintaining the catch basins and some of the areas that get overgrown with woods and weeds and that type of thing. And right now Sioux Basin is is a project that's coming up that we'll be cleaning up and fixing. And this is a vital piece of equipment for that. This will be coming out of the utility budget. And the amount for this brush mulcher was not specifically enumerated in the budget. However, due to the fact that we saved about $30,000 on our aeration equipment for the wastewater treatment plant, staff is requesting using these funds the remainder of that budget for the purchase of this piece of equipment.",
          "source_chunks": [
            16
          ],
          "timestamp": 5732.029,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 144
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 5732.029,
      "end_timestamp": 5732.029,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0137",
      "event_type": "decision",
      "subject": "Adoption of Resolution 2025-122 (Brush Mulcher Purchase)",
      "summary": "A motion was made by Alderman Sellers and seconded by Alderman Johnson to adopt the resolution.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        145
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        16
      ],
      "components": {
        "motion": [
          145
        ]
      },
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Is there a motion to adopt? So moved. Second. A motion made by Alderman Sellers, seconded by Alderman Johnson.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            145
          ],
          "timestamp": 5817.069,
          "end_timestamp": 5817.069,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "motion",
          "subject": "Adoption of Resolution 2025-122 (Brush Mulcher Purchase)",
          "summary": "A motion was made by Alderman Sellers and seconded by Alderman Johnson to adopt the resolution.",
          "evidence": "Is there a motion to adopt? So moved. Second. A motion made by Alderman Sellers, seconded by Alderman Johnson.",
          "source_chunks": [
            16
          ],
          "timestamp": 5817.069,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 145
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 5817.069,
      "end_timestamp": 5817.069,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0138",
      "event_type": "decision",
      "subject": "Adoption of funding for aeration equipment purchase",
      "summary": "A motion was made to use saved funds from the aeration equipment budget remainder for purchasing specific equipment.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "decision_sequence",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        146,
        147
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        17
      ],
      "components": {
        "motion": [
          146
        ],
        "vote": [
          147
        ]
      },
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "So there saved about $30,000 on our aeration equipment for the wastewater treatment plant, staff is requesting using these funds the remainder of that budget for the purchase of this piece of equipment. Is there a motion to adopt? So moved.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            146
          ],
          "timestamp": 5793.949,
          "end_timestamp": 5793.949,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        },
        {
          "text": "Klemm? Aye. Johnson? Aye. Simmons? No. Parker? Aye. Stacy? Aye. Shadle? Aye. Sanders? No. And Sellers? Aye. The resolution is adapted 6-2.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            147
          ],
          "timestamp": 5830.09,
          "end_timestamp": 5830.09,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "motion",
          "subject": "Adoption of funding for aeration equipment purchase",
          "summary": "A motion was made to use saved funds from the aeration equipment budget remainder for purchasing specific equipment.",
          "evidence": "So there saved about $30,000 on our aeration equipment for the wastewater treatment plant, staff is requesting using these funds the remainder of that budget for the purchase of this piece of equipment. Is there a motion to adopt? So moved.",
          "attributes": {
            "made_by": "Alderman Sellers",
            "seconded_by": "Alderman Johnson"
          },
          "source_chunks": [
            17
          ],
          "timestamp": 5793.949,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 146
        },
        {
          "record_type": "vote",
          "subject": "Adoption of funding for aeration equipment purchase",
          "summary": "The resolution was adopted with a vote count of 6-2.",
          "evidence": "Klemm? Aye. Johnson? Aye. Simmons? No. Parker? Aye. Stacy? Aye. Shadle? Aye. Sanders? No. And Sellers? Aye. The resolution is adapted 6-2.",
          "attributes": {
            "vote_outcome": "passed",
            "vote_tally": "6-2"
          },
          "source_chunks": [
            17
          ],
          "timestamp": 5830.09,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 147
        }
      ],
      "outcome": "passed",
      "timestamp": 5793.949,
      "end_timestamp": 5830.09,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0139",
      "event_type": "resolution",
      "subject": "Adoption of construction observation engineering agreement with Fehr Graham for lift station projects",
      "summary": "Item number 14 is the adoption of resolution 2025-123, approving a construction observation engineering agreement with Fehr Graham.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        148
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        17
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Item number 14 is the adoption of resolution 2025-123. Could you please read this? Resolution approving construction observation engineering agreement with Fehr Graham for lift station projects.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            148
          ],
          "timestamp": 5862.52,
          "end_timestamp": 5862.52,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "resolution",
          "subject": "Adoption of construction observation engineering agreement with Fehr Graham for lift station projects",
          "summary": "Item number 14 is the adoption of resolution 2025-123, approving a construction observation engineering agreement with Fehr Graham.",
          "evidence": "Item number 14 is the adoption of resolution 2025-123. Could you please read this? Resolution approving construction observation engineering agreement with Fehr Graham for lift station projects.",
          "source_chunks": [
            17
          ],
          "timestamp": 5862.52,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 148
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 5862.52,
      "end_timestamp": 5862.52,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0140",
      "event_type": "presentation",
      "subject": "Construction Engineering Contract with Fehr Graham",
      "summary": "Staff requested approval for a contract with Fehr Graham for $146,750 to complete two sanitary lift stations (Galena and Laurel) rehabilitation projects and include a new backup generator for the Carroll tank at well number eight.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        149
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        17
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "So staff is asking for approval of the construction engineering Contract with Fehr Graham for the amount of $146,750 to move forward and get these projects completed.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            149
          ],
          "timestamp": 5884.52,
          "end_timestamp": 5884.52,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "presentation",
          "subject": "Construction Engineering Contract with Fehr Graham",
          "summary": "Staff requested approval for a contract with Fehr Graham for $146,750 to complete two sanitary lift stations (Galena and Laurel) rehabilitation projects and include a new backup generator for the Carroll tank at well number eight.",
          "evidence": "So staff is asking for approval of the construction engineering Contract with Fehr Graham for the amount of $146,750 to move forward and get these projects completed.",
          "source_chunks": [
            17
          ],
          "timestamp": 5884.52,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 149
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 5884.52,
      "end_timestamp": 5884.52,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0141",
      "event_type": "decision",
      "subject": "Approval of construction engineering contract with Fehr Graham",
      "summary": "A motion was made by Alderman Klemm, seconded by Alderman Parker, regarding the construction engineering contract.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "decision_sequence",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        150,
        152
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        17
      ],
      "components": {
        "motion": [
          150
        ],
        "vote": [
          152
        ]
      },
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Is there a motion to adopt? So moved. Second. We have a motion made by Alderman Klemm, seconded by Alderman Parker.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            150
          ]
        },
        {
          "text": "Klemm, aye, Johnson, aye, Simmons, no, Parker, aye, Stacy, no, Shadle, aye, Sanders, no, Sellers, aye, the resolution is has adapted five to three.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            152
          ],
          "timestamp": 6006.079,
          "end_timestamp": 6006.079,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "motion",
          "subject": "Approval of construction engineering contract with Fehr Graham",
          "summary": "A motion was made by Alderman Klemm, seconded by Alderman Parker, regarding the construction engineering contract.",
          "evidence": "Is there a motion to adopt? So moved. Second. We have a motion made by Alderman Klemm, seconded by Alderman Parker.",
          "source_chunks": [
            17
          ],
          "record_index": 150
        },
        {
          "record_type": "vote",
          "subject": "Approval of construction engineering contract with Fehr Graham",
          "summary": "The resolution was adopted with a vote count of 5-3.",
          "evidence": "Klemm, aye, Johnson, aye, Simmons, no, Parker, aye, Stacy, no, Shadle, aye, Sanders, no, Sellers, aye, the resolution is has adapted five to three.",
          "source_chunks": [
            17
          ],
          "timestamp": 6006.079,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 152
        }
      ],
      "outcome": "adopted",
      "timestamp": 6006.079,
      "end_timestamp": 6006.079,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0142",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Scope and cost of lift station enhancements",
      "summary": "Discussion covered that the total project cost is about $2 million, including new pumps, motors, drivers, controllers, backup systems, starters, electrical work for two lift stations, and a new backup generator for well number eight.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        151
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        17
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "The total cost of the project is about $2 million. It's going to include new pumps, motors, drivers and controllers, backup systems, starters, electrical work and that. So the two lift stations and then of course well eight is going to have a whole new backup generator that's sufficiently sized to cover the entire electrical needs for well number eight so any other discussion madam clerk please take the role.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            151
          ],
          "timestamp": 5987.359,
          "end_timestamp": 5987.359,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Scope and cost of lift station enhancements",
          "summary": "Discussion covered that the total project cost is about $2 million, including new pumps, motors, drivers, controllers, backup systems, starters, electrical work for two lift stations, and a new backup generator for well number eight.",
          "evidence": "The total cost of the project is about $2 million. It's going to include new pumps, motors, drivers and controllers, backup systems, starters, electrical work and that. So the two lift stations and then of course well eight is going to have a whole new backup generator that's sufficiently sized to cover the entire electrical needs for well number eight so any other discussion madam clerk please take the role.",
          "source_chunks": [
            17
          ],
          "timestamp": 5987.359,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 151
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 5987.359,
      "end_timestamp": 5987.359,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0143",
      "event_type": "resolution",
      "subject": "Approval of bids for lift station renovations and generator",
      "summary": "Item number 15 concerns the approval of bids following a bid opening on September 30th for Galena lift station renovations, Laurel lift station renovations, and well number eight generator.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        153
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        17
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "And item number 15 is the approval of bids. Could you please read this? A bid opening was held on September 30th for that last contract, Galena lift station renovations, Laurel lift station renovations, and well number eight generator.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            153
          ],
          "timestamp": 6038.159,
          "end_timestamp": 6038.159,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "resolution",
          "subject": "Approval of bids for lift station renovations and generator",
          "summary": "Item number 15 concerns the approval of bids following a bid opening on September 30th for Galena lift station renovations, Laurel lift station renovations, and well number eight generator.",
          "evidence": "And item number 15 is the approval of bids. Could you please read this? A bid opening was held on September 30th for that last contract, Galena lift station renovations, Laurel lift station renovations, and well number eight generator.",
          "source_chunks": [
            17
          ],
          "timestamp": 6038.159,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 153
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 6038.159,
      "end_timestamp": 6038.159,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0144",
      "event_type": "presentation",
      "subject": "Low bidder recommendation for infrastructure projects",
      "summary": "Helm Group was the low bidder with a base bid of $2,036,116, and staff recommended moving forward with this low bid.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        154
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        17
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "So we had a bid opening. Helm Group was the low bidder. And the lowest, the amount was $2,036,116. That was the base bid. And Helm frequently works with the City of Freeport on all kinds of infrastructure projects. So staff's recommending moving forward with the low bid from Helm Group.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            154
          ],
          "timestamp": 6075.239,
          "end_timestamp": 6075.239,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "presentation",
          "subject": "Low bidder recommendation for infrastructure projects",
          "summary": "Helm Group was the low bidder with a base bid of $2,036,116, and staff recommended moving forward with this low bid.",
          "evidence": "So we had a bid opening. Helm Group was the low bidder. And the lowest, the amount was $2,036,116. That was the base bid. And Helm frequently works with the City of Freeport on all kinds of infrastructure projects. So staff's recommending moving forward with the low bid from Helm Group.",
          "source_chunks": [
            17
          ],
          "timestamp": 6075.239,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 154
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 6075.239,
      "end_timestamp": 6075.239,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0145",
      "event_type": "decision",
      "subject": "Approval of bids for lift station renovations and generator",
      "summary": "A motion was made to approve the low bid from Helm Group.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        155
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        17
      ],
      "components": {
        "request": [
          155
        ]
      },
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Is there a motion to approve?",
          "source_record_indices": [
            155
          ],
          "timestamp": 6090.76,
          "end_timestamp": 6090.76,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "motion",
          "subject": "Approval of bids for lift station renovations and generator",
          "summary": "A motion was made to approve the low bid from Helm Group.",
          "evidence": "Is there a motion to approve?",
          "source_chunks": [
            17
          ],
          "timestamp": 6090.76,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 155
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 6090.76,
      "end_timestamp": 6090.76,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
      "review_flags": [
        "unattached_motion_request"
      ]
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0146",
      "event_type": "decision",
      "subject": "Approval of low bid from Helm Group for infrastructure project",
      "summary": "Motion to approve moving forward with the low bid from Helm Group.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        156
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        18
      ],
      "components": {
        "motion": [
          156
        ]
      },
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "So staff's recommending moving forward with the low bid from Helm Group. Is there a motion to approve? So moved. Second.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            156
          ],
          "timestamp": 6090.76,
          "end_timestamp": 6090.76,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "motion",
          "subject": "Approval of low bid from Helm Group for infrastructure project",
          "summary": "Motion to approve moving forward with the low bid from Helm Group.",
          "evidence": "So staff's recommending moving forward with the low bid from Helm Group. Is there a motion to approve? So moved. Second.",
          "attribution": "Alderman Shadle",
          "attributes": {
            "made_by": "Alderman Shadle",
            "seconded_by": "Alderman Sellers"
          },
          "source_chunks": [
            18
          ],
          "timestamp": 6090.76,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 156
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Alderman Shadle"
      ],
      "timestamp": 6090.76,
      "end_timestamp": 6090.76,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0147",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Bid for renovation with any contractor",
      "summary": "Discussion regarding the deficiency of existing generators and the need for new backup systems.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        157
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        18
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Alderman Sanders. Wow. Amazement right now. But approving this bid for the renovation with any contractor as far as I'm concerned. When it comes to understanding the existing generators that we already have, have there been a deficiency in those generators where, I'm just talking right now, is there a deficiency in the generators that we already have in our in our sheds right now or on our property where we know that they are mobile we know that these generators are more the existing ones we only have one now that's all we've that's all we ever had okay does this show that uh does it show that uh the purpose of an of an extended one or an a second one does do Did we open up more lift stations to justify why we need another generator?",
          "source_record_indices": [
            157
          ],
          "timestamp": 6105.92,
          "end_timestamp": 6105.92,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Bid for renovation with any contractor",
          "summary": "Discussion regarding the deficiency of existing generators and the need for new backup systems.",
          "evidence": "Alderman Sanders. Wow. Amazement right now. But approving this bid for the renovation with any contractor as far as I'm concerned. When it comes to understanding the existing generators that we already have, have there been a deficiency in those generators where, I'm just talking right now, is there a deficiency in the generators that we already have in our in our sheds right now or on our property where we know that they are mobile we know that these generators are more the existing ones we only have one now that's all we've that's all we ever had okay does this show that uh does it show that uh the purpose of an of an extended one or an a second one does do Did we open up more lift stations to justify why we need another generator?",
          "attribution": "Alderman Sanders",
          "source_chunks": [
            18
          ],
          "timestamp": 6105.92,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 157
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Alderman Sanders"
      ],
      "timestamp": 6105.92,
      "end_timestamp": 6105.92,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0148",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Generator backup plan for remote sites",
      "summary": "Manager Boyer explained the plan to install stationary backup generators at all critical points.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        158
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        18
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "So if you're referring to a portable generator, every time you have one portable generator, that means you've got one guy driving around in the middle of an emergency. Because when do you lose power? When you have an emergency, it's usually during an ice storm. So the idea here is all of our remote sites at some point are gonna end up with their own dedicated backup generators. Okay, so well 11 has backup generator already. Well 11 has a backup generator as part of its construction. The new well 12 will have its own. Well eight does not, and well nine does not. We need one or the other of those always functioning. As far as the lift stations well you know what happens when you run out of electricity on a lift station right it's not good so what we got currently is one guy driving around the middle of a storm trying to plug it in and start things up and I don't think that's safe and so and because it has to be sized for everything in the system it's enormous and so some things only need a little bit of power some things need a lot of power but you don't be hauling around a and John. We're going to be putting in stationary backup generators at all critical points so that our crew don't have to drive around the middle of the night with a big heavy generator.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            158
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Generator backup plan for remote sites",
          "summary": "Manager Boyer explained the plan to install stationary backup generators at all critical points.",
          "evidence": "So if you're referring to a portable generator, every time you have one portable generator, that means you've got one guy driving around in the middle of an emergency. Because when do you lose power? When you have an emergency, it's usually during an ice storm. So the idea here is all of our remote sites at some point are gonna end up with their own dedicated backup generators. Okay, so well 11 has backup generator already. Well 11 has a backup generator as part of its construction. The new well 12 will have its own. Well eight does not, and well nine does not. We need one or the other of those always functioning. As far as the lift stations well you know what happens when you run out of electricity on a lift station right it's not good so what we got currently is one guy driving around the middle of a storm trying to plug it in and start things up and I don't think that's safe and so and because it has to be sized for everything in the system it's enormous and so some things only need a little bit of power some things need a lot of power but you don't be hauling around a and John. We're going to be putting in stationary backup generators at all critical points so that our crew don't have to drive around the middle of the night with a big heavy generator.",
          "attribution": "Manager Boyer",
          "source_chunks": [
            18
          ],
          "record_index": 158
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Manager Boyer"
      ]
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0149",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Scope of bid discussion",
      "summary": "A council member questioned whether generator equipment was part of the current bid discussion.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        159
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        18
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Yeah. I'm sorry. Okay. Just one second. Generator equipment isn't a part of this discussion. Johnson. It's not? No. This is about approving the bid for Helm Group. So if you have something you want to talk about, approving a bid for Helm Group, then we just need to get back on track.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            159
          ],
          "timestamp": 6280.079,
          "end_timestamp": 6280.079,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Scope of bid discussion",
          "summary": "A council member questioned whether generator equipment was part of the current bid discussion.",
          "evidence": "Yeah. I'm sorry. Okay. Just one second. Generator equipment isn't a part of this discussion. Johnson. It's not? No. This is about approving the bid for Helm Group. So if you have something you want to talk about, approving a bid for Helm Group, then we just need to get back on track.",
          "attribution": "Unknown",
          "source_chunks": [
            18
          ],
          "timestamp": 6280.079,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 159
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 6280.079,
      "end_timestamp": 6280.079,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0150",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Helm Group Bid Cost Confirmation",
      "summary": "Confirmation of the cost associated with the Helm Group bid.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        160
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        18
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "On the Helm Group, did they give us a cost or I don't want to say estimate it. I don't like estimations anymore. We have a cost in mind what it would cost the city to have the helm group to to follow up with us yes two million thirty six thousand one hundred sixteen dollars this is that's the baby",
          "source_record_indices": [
            160
          ],
          "timestamp": 6298.079,
          "end_timestamp": 6298.079,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Helm Group Bid Cost Confirmation",
          "summary": "Confirmation of the cost associated with the Helm Group bid.",
          "evidence": "On the Helm Group, did they give us a cost or I don't want to say estimate it. I don't like estimations anymore. We have a cost in mind what it would cost the city to have the helm group to to follow up with us yes two million thirty six thousand one hundred sixteen dollars this is that's the baby",
          "attribution": "Unknown",
          "source_chunks": [
            18
          ],
          "timestamp": 6298.079,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 160
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 6298.079,
      "end_timestamp": 6298.079,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0151",
      "event_type": "decision",
      "subject": "Approval of Helm Group Bid",
      "summary": "Motion to approve the bid for Helm Group.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        161
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        18
      ],
      "components": {
        "motion": [
          161
        ]
      },
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Madam Clerk, please take the role plumb all right Johnson I Simmons Parker I Stacy I Shadle, Sanders, and Sellers. The bid is approved 8 to 0.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            161
          ],
          "timestamp": 6311.119,
          "end_timestamp": 6311.119,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "motion",
          "subject": "Approval of Helm Group Bid",
          "summary": "Motion to approve the bid for Helm Group.",
          "evidence": "Madam Clerk, please take the role plumb all right Johnson I Simmons Parker I Stacy I Shadle, Sanders, and Sellers. The bid is approved 8 to 0.",
          "attribution": "Unknown",
          "attributes": {
            "vote_outcome": "passed",
            "vote_method": "roll_call",
            "vote_tally": "8 to 0"
          },
          "source_chunks": [
            18
          ],
          "timestamp": 6311.119,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 161
        }
      ],
      "outcome": "passed",
      "timestamp": 6311.119,
      "end_timestamp": 6311.119,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0152",
      "event_type": "presentation",
      "subject": "Bid opening for demolition of five residential properties",
      "summary": "Staff presented the results of a bid opening on October 3rd for the demolition of five residential properties.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        162
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        18
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "There was a bid opening on October 3rd for the demolition of five residential properties. Thank you. City staff published a notice for a bid opening in the Journal Standard on September 28th and the bid opening was held on October 3rd at 9 o'clock in the morning, and staff received bids from five contractors, and based on those submitted bids, staff is recommending the following submitted bids to do the work for demolition asbestos abatement of five properties. So Klechner excavating in the amount of $31,500, and that would be for the demolition of 623 and 625 East Oran, as well as 32 South Hooker. Albert and Son Earthworks, $15,840 for the demolition of 227 North Henderson, and Fisher excavating $33,150 for the demolition of 612 East Oran and 640 East Oran.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            162
          ],
          "timestamp": 6311.119,
          "end_timestamp": 6311.119,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "presentation",
          "subject": "Bid opening for demolition of five residential properties",
          "summary": "Staff presented the results of a bid opening on October 3rd for the demolition of five residential properties.",
          "evidence": "There was a bid opening on October 3rd for the demolition of five residential properties. Thank you. City staff published a notice for a bid opening in the Journal Standard on September 28th and the bid opening was held on October 3rd at 9 o'clock in the morning, and staff received bids from five contractors, and based on those submitted bids, staff is recommending the following submitted bids to do the work for demolition asbestos abatement of five properties. So Klechner excavating in the amount of $31,500, and that would be for the demolition of 623 and 625 East Oran, as well as 32 South Hooker. Albert and Son Earthworks, $15,840 for the demolition of 227 North Henderson, and Fisher excavating $33,150 for the demolition of 612 East Oran and 640 East Oran.",
          "attribution": "Director Duckman",
          "source_chunks": [
            18
          ],
          "timestamp": 6311.119,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 162
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Director Duckman"
      ],
      "timestamp": 6311.119,
      "end_timestamp": 6311.119,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0153",
      "event_type": "decision",
      "subject": "Adoption of Demolition Bids",
      "summary": "Motion to adopt the submitted bids for the demolition of five residential properties as stated by staff.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        163
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        18
      ],
      "components": {
        "motion": [
          163
        ]
      },
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Is there a motion to adopt the bids as stated? So moved. Second.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            163
          ],
          "timestamp": 6430.1,
          "end_timestamp": 6430.1,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "motion",
          "subject": "Adoption of Demolition Bids",
          "summary": "Motion to adopt the submitted bids for the demolition of five residential properties as stated by staff.",
          "evidence": "Is there a motion to adopt the bids as stated? So moved. Second.",
          "attribution": "Alderman Sellers",
          "attributes": {
            "made_by": "Alderman Sellers",
            "seconded_by": "Alderman Shadle"
          },
          "source_chunks": [
            18
          ],
          "timestamp": 6430.1,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 163
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Alderman Sellers"
      ],
      "timestamp": 6430.1,
      "end_timestamp": 6430.1,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0154",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Demolition bid confirmation",
      "summary": "Discussion regarding the suitability of the three recommended demolition contractors.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        164
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        18
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Alderman Stacy? I trust that the homework has been done and that all three of these companies are in good standing with federal and state laws. I appreciate the trust, yes. Anything else?",
          "source_record_indices": [
            164
          ],
          "timestamp": 6438.659,
          "end_timestamp": 6438.659,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Demolition bid confirmation",
          "summary": "Discussion regarding the suitability of the three recommended demolition contractors.",
          "evidence": "Alderman Stacy? I trust that the homework has been done and that all three of these companies are in good standing with federal and state laws. I appreciate the trust, yes. Anything else?",
          "attribution": "Alderman Stacy",
          "source_chunks": [
            18
          ],
          "timestamp": 6438.659,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 164
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Alderman Stacy"
      ],
      "timestamp": 6438.659,
      "end_timestamp": 6438.659,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0155",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Occupancy status of demolished properties",
      "summary": "Director Duckman addressed concerns about whether the abandoned homes were still occupied.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        165
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        18
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Director Duckman, these abandoned homes, are they still occupied and owned by any owners at this time? At this time, we won't have a problem with somebody complaining about the demolition of a property without their consent. We won't discover anything. I can never promise that people don't complain in the City of Freeport over demolitions, so I won't make that promise. But I can promise you that we won't demolish a house with somebody living in it.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            165
          ],
          "timestamp": 6469.699,
          "end_timestamp": 6469.699,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Occupancy status of demolished properties",
          "summary": "Director Duckman addressed concerns about whether the abandoned homes were still occupied.",
          "evidence": "Director Duckman, these abandoned homes, are they still occupied and owned by any owners at this time? At this time, we won't have a problem with somebody complaining about the demolition of a property without their consent. We won't discover anything. I can never promise that people don't complain in the City of Freeport over demolitions, so I won't make that promise. But I can promise you that we won't demolish a house with somebody living in it.",
          "attribution": "Director Duckman",
          "source_chunks": [
            18
          ],
          "timestamp": 6469.699,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 165
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Director Duckman"
      ],
      "timestamp": 6469.699,
      "end_timestamp": 6469.699,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0156",
      "event_type": "attendance",
      "subject": "Roll Call Vote for Council Members",
      "summary": "Alderman Klemm, Alderman Sanders, Alderman Simmons, Alderman Parker, Alderman Stacy, Alderman Shadle, and Alderman Sellers were present.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        166
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        19
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Klemm. Excuse me. Alderman Sanders. Sorry about that. ... Klemm. Aye. Johnson. Aye. Simmons. Aye. Parker. Aye. Stacy. Aye. Shadle. Aye. Sanders. Aye. And Sellers. Aye.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            166
          ],
          "timestamp": 5699.689,
          "end_timestamp": 5699.689,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "attendance",
          "subject": "Roll Call Vote for Council Members",
          "summary": "Alderman Klemm, Alderman Sanders, Alderman Simmons, Alderman Parker, Alderman Stacy, Alderman Shadle, and Alderman Sellers were present.",
          "evidence": "Klemm. Excuse me. Alderman Sanders. Sorry about that. ... Klemm. Aye. Johnson. Aye. Simmons. Aye. Parker. Aye. Stacy. Aye. Shadle. Aye. Sanders. Aye. And Sellers. Aye.",
          "source_chunks": [
            19
          ],
          "timestamp": 5699.689,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 166
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 5699.689,
      "end_timestamp": 5699.689,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0157",
      "event_type": "decision",
      "subject": "Bid Approval",
      "summary": "A bid was approved by a vote of 8 to 0.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        167
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        19
      ],
      "components": {
        "vote": [
          167
        ]
      },
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "And that bid is approved 8 to 0.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            167
          ],
          "timestamp": 6522.559,
          "end_timestamp": 6522.559,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "vote",
          "subject": "Bid Approval",
          "summary": "A bid was approved by a vote of 8 to 0.",
          "evidence": "And that bid is approved 8 to 0.",
          "source_chunks": [
            19
          ],
          "timestamp": 6522.559,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 167
        }
      ],
      "outcome": "approved",
      "timestamp": 6522.559,
      "end_timestamp": 6522.559,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0158",
      "event_type": "presentation",
      "subject": "Public Works Department Update",
      "summary": "18th Avenue reconstruction will start next week and should be paved before the end of the season. Water service replacement on Warren is expected to be ready for paving sometime next week or the week after next. Paving on hands might also occur later next week.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        168
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        19
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "I'd like to let everybody know that 18th Avenue reconstruction will start next week. A huge win for the city of Freeport. Be an inconvenience for the people that live out there for, you know, probably a month, but they should get that going and have it paved before the end of the season. The utility is going to continue on replacing water services on Warren and should be have that ready to pave sometime next week and we're hopeful that excuse me the week after next and we're hopeful sometime later next week we might be able to pave hands as well.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            168
          ],
          "timestamp": 6529.96,
          "end_timestamp": 6529.96,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "presentation",
          "subject": "Public Works Department Update",
          "summary": "18th Avenue reconstruction will start next week and should be paved before the end of the season. Water service replacement on Warren is expected to be ready for paving sometime next week or the week after next. Paving on hands might also occur later next week.",
          "evidence": "I'd like to let everybody know that 18th Avenue reconstruction will start next week. A huge win for the city of Freeport. Be an inconvenience for the people that live out there for, you know, probably a month, but they should get that going and have it paved before the end of the season. The utility is going to continue on replacing water services on Warren and should be have that ready to pave sometime next week and we're hopeful that excuse me the week after next and we're hopeful sometime later next week we might be able to pave hands as well.",
          "source_chunks": [
            19
          ],
          "timestamp": 6529.96,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 168
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 6529.96,
      "end_timestamp": 6529.96,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0159",
      "event_type": "presentation",
      "subject": "Fire Department Activities",
      "summary": "October is fire prevention month, and the department will begin school visits for all public and private grade schools over the next three weeks, delivering fire safety lessons to an estimated 2,500 children.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        169
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        19
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "October is fire prevention month. So that means we'll be starting our school visits for all public and private grade schools. They'll be consisting of the the next three weeks will be delivering fire safety lessons to an estimated 2,500 children this month.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            169
          ],
          "timestamp": 6594.38,
          "end_timestamp": 6594.38,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "presentation",
          "subject": "Fire Department Activities",
          "summary": "October is fire prevention month, and the department will begin school visits for all public and private grade schools over the next three weeks, delivering fire safety lessons to an estimated 2,500 children.",
          "evidence": "October is fire prevention month. So that means we'll be starting our school visits for all public and private grade schools. They'll be consisting of the the next three weeks will be delivering fire safety lessons to an estimated 2,500 children this month.",
          "source_chunks": [
            19
          ],
          "timestamp": 6594.38,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 169
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 6594.38,
      "end_timestamp": 6594.38,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0160",
      "event_type": "recognition",
      "subject": "Police Chief Chris Shenberger Retirement",
      "summary": "Manager Boyer congratulated Police Chief Chris Shenberger on 27 years of outstanding service and announced his retirement effective October 24th. A reception will be held at City Hall, with Michelle handling details.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        170
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        19
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "I want to congratulate Police Chief Chris Shenberger on 27 years of outstanding service to the city of Freeport. He has announced his retirement taking effect October 24th. We will have a, we will be having a reception here at City Hall. You can contact Michelle for that details, but he's been an outstanding public servant to the city of Freeport and we all wish him very well on his future endeavors",
          "source_record_indices": [
            170
          ],
          "timestamp": 6621.96,
          "end_timestamp": 6621.96,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "recognition",
          "subject": "Police Chief Chris Shenberger Retirement",
          "summary": "Manager Boyer congratulated Police Chief Chris Shenberger on 27 years of outstanding service and announced his retirement effective October 24th. A reception will be held at City Hall, with Michelle handling details.",
          "evidence": "I want to congratulate Police Chief Chris Shenberger on 27 years of outstanding service to the city of Freeport. He has announced his retirement taking effect October 24th. We will have a, we will be having a reception here at City Hall. You can contact Michelle for that details, but he's been an outstanding public servant to the city of Freeport and we all wish him very well on his future endeavors",
          "source_chunks": [
            19
          ],
          "timestamp": 6621.96,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 170
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 6621.96,
      "end_timestamp": 6621.96,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0161",
      "event_type": "procedural_action",
      "subject": "Next Council Meeting Date Change",
      "summary": "City Hall will be closed next Monday, the 13th, for Columbus Day observation. The next committee of the whole meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, the 14th, starting at 5:30 PM.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        171
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        19
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "and just remind council that next Monday, the 13th city hall is closed and observation of Columbus Day. So our next city council meeting, which is the committee of the whole will be on Tuesday, the 14th, starting at 5.30 with the finance cow.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            171
          ],
          "timestamp": 6633.0,
          "end_timestamp": 6633.0,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "procedural_action",
          "subject": "Next Council Meeting Date Change",
          "summary": "City Hall will be closed next Monday, the 13th, for Columbus Day observation. The next committee of the whole meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, the 14th, starting at 5:30 PM.",
          "evidence": "and just remind council that next Monday, the 13th city hall is closed and observation of Columbus Day. So our next city council meeting, which is the committee of the whole will be on Tuesday, the 14th, starting at 5.30 with the finance cow.",
          "source_chunks": [
            19
          ],
          "timestamp": 6633.0,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 171
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 6633.0,
      "end_timestamp": 6633.0,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0162",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Admonishment to Council Authority",
      "summary": "Alderman Sanders argued that only the council has the authority to admonish the mayor and other officials, not vice versa, and stressed that any such action requires written policy documentation.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        172
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        19
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Alderman Simmons, Alderman Parker, nothing, Alderman Stacy, Alderman Shadle, nothing tonight. Alderman Sanders, yes I just want to bring up the first thing that came to counsel tonight in regards to admonishment, admonishing council, and and the fact that the person that is admonishing council has no authoritative jurisdiction to be admonishing council.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            172
          ],
          "timestamp": 6690.079,
          "end_timestamp": 6690.079,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Admonishment to Council Authority",
          "summary": "Alderman Sanders argued that only the council has the authority to admonish the mayor and other officials, not vice versa, and stressed that any such action requires written policy documentation.",
          "evidence": "Alderman Simmons, Alderman Parker, nothing, Alderman Stacy, Alderman Shadle, nothing tonight. Alderman Sanders, yes I just want to bring up the first thing that came to counsel tonight in regards to admonishment, admonishing council, and and the fact that the person that is admonishing council has no authoritative jurisdiction to be admonishing council.",
          "source_chunks": [
            19
          ],
          "timestamp": 6690.079,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 172
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 6690.079,
      "end_timestamp": 6690.079,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0163",
      "event_type": "discussion",
      "subject": "Council Order and Jurisdiction",
      "summary": "The speaker stated that the council's order and duties are unclear and that Attorney Zito will present the actual order and duties of counsel.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        173
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        20
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "It is council that runs the authorizations and duties of this council. People don't understand that yet until we get this thing in order. This is what's going to happen. I am going to have Attorney Zito to bring forth the actual order and the duties of counsel. Counsel is just not doing the homework enough to make sure that we are all in proper order. That's the reason why I get up screaming all the and the other people. We are not going to be able to do that all the time because the order of council is out of order. And then anyone that impeds up on it is in contempt of council. So until someone wants to argue that fact, show me the paperwork and show me the policies and the fact that the council don't have jurisdiction over the whole government body of these proceedings.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            173
          ],
          "timestamp": 6856.899,
          "end_timestamp": 6856.899,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "discussion",
          "subject": "Council Order and Jurisdiction",
          "summary": "The speaker stated that the council's order and duties are unclear and that Attorney Zito will present the actual order and duties of counsel.",
          "evidence": "It is council that runs the authorizations and duties of this council. People don't understand that yet until we get this thing in order. This is what's going to happen. I am going to have Attorney Zito to bring forth the actual order and the duties of counsel. Counsel is just not doing the homework enough to make sure that we are all in proper order. That's the reason why I get up screaming all the and the other people. We are not going to be able to do that all the time because the order of council is out of order. And then anyone that impeds up on it is in contempt of council. So until someone wants to argue that fact, show me the paperwork and show me the policies and the fact that the council don't have jurisdiction over the whole government body of these proceedings.",
          "attribution": "Unknown",
          "source_chunks": [
            20
          ],
          "timestamp": 6856.899,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 173
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 6856.899,
      "end_timestamp": 6856.899,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0164",
      "event_type": "presentation",
      "subject": "Observation on City Government Education",
      "summary": "The speaker noted it was nice to see elementary children learning about city government at a location and then going to the police station to learn about rules and regulations.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        174
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        20
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "I would just like to say that I was down here earlier today, and it was just so sweet to see the elementary children down here learning about city government and then going over to the police station, learning about rules and regulations. I thought that was really nice, so I just wanted to say that that was really nice. That was really, it was kind of nice to see the kids.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            174
          ],
          "timestamp": 6909.38,
          "end_timestamp": 6909.38,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "presentation",
          "subject": "Observation on City Government Education",
          "summary": "The speaker noted it was nice to see elementary children learning about city government at a location and then going to the police station to learn about rules and regulations.",
          "evidence": "I would just like to say that I was down here earlier today, and it was just so sweet to see the elementary children down here learning about city government and then going over to the police station, learning about rules and regulations. I thought that was really nice, so I just wanted to say that that was really nice. That was really, it was kind of nice to see the kids.",
          "attribution": "Unknown",
          "source_chunks": [
            20
          ],
          "timestamp": 6909.38,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 174
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 6909.38,
      "end_timestamp": 6909.38,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0165",
      "event_type": "procedural_action",
      "subject": "Moving to Public Comments",
      "summary": "The council moved on to public comments and asked if there were any comments for the evening.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        175
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        20
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "I agree and thank you, Clerk Anderson for working on that. We will move on to public comments. Is there any public comments this evening? Go ahead.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            175
          ],
          "timestamp": 6939.38,
          "end_timestamp": 6939.38,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "procedural_action",
          "subject": "Moving to Public Comments",
          "summary": "The council moved on to public comments and asked if there were any comments for the evening.",
          "evidence": "I agree and thank you, Clerk Anderson for working on that. We will move on to public comments. Is there any public comments this evening? Go ahead.",
          "attribution": "Unknown",
          "source_chunks": [
            20
          ],
          "timestamp": 6939.38,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 175
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 6939.38,
      "end_timestamp": 6939.38,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0166",
      "event_type": "public_comment",
      "subject": "Concerns about City Focus and Ordinances",
      "summary": "A resident expressed concern that the city council only cares about one side of the city, citing discussions on an ordinance to prevent gun sales in one neighborhood while ignoring potential issues like murders or drug houses on another side.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        176
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        20
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Good evening, I'm Kelvin McElwain, 515 West Moseley Street. I just want to say that what was discussed here on the floor tonight definitely reinforces the perception that the city and probably the majority of this community only care about one side of the city and not the other half of the city. That incident that occurred where there was a big gun sale, party happening, within months this city council is discussing an ordinance to prevent something like that from ever happening again in that neighborhood. Wood. And the ordinance that was presented was pretty radical, basically it was to just get rid of all Airbnbs in Freeport. Now it was voted down, but I'm pretty sure that ordinance will probably come back again, just adjust it to something that's a little more reasonable. But the fact remains though, is that there was an immediate conversation on the council floor about how to use city ordinances to control the problem. There are rental properties on the other side of town that are even more problematic. There have been murders, major neighborhood disruptions, drug houses, and rental properties. That's way more significant than what looked like a possible gun sale. People on that side of town, homeowners on that side of town, are just as concerned about what's next door to them. They're just as concerned about wild parties going on next to them. They're just as concerned about drug houses next door to them. They're just as concerned about their property values dropping because of unkept rental housing on their street. But where are the ordinance discussions regarding helping those homeowners out? Now church in the street is awesome. Resource fairs are awesome. Community meetings are awesome. Fowler. All of the community action that's happening is awesome and is needed. But until this city council starts having conversations about ordinances to correct and help reduce crime in Freeport, because there are certain levers that only the city can pull, just like you tried to do tonight to get rid of all air and bees and residential properties. Only the city can pull that lever. And there was discussion on this council floor to talk about that. There are conversations on this council floor to talk about the levers the city can pull on the other side of town that perception is going to continue and from what I saw tonight it might not be perception it actually this might be the hard reality if something happens on one side of town action is taken to wipe it out immediately on the other side of town oh well",
          "source_record_indices": [
            176
          ],
          "timestamp": 6958.46,
          "end_timestamp": 6958.46,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "public_comment",
          "subject": "Concerns about City Focus and Ordinances",
          "summary": "A resident expressed concern that the city council only cares about one side of the city, citing discussions on an ordinance to prevent gun sales in one neighborhood while ignoring potential issues like murders or drug houses on another side.",
          "evidence": "Good evening, I'm Kelvin McElwain, 515 West Moseley Street. I just want to say that what was discussed here on the floor tonight definitely reinforces the perception that the city and probably the majority of this community only care about one side of the city and not the other half of the city. That incident that occurred where there was a big gun sale, party happening, within months this city council is discussing an ordinance to prevent something like that from ever happening again in that neighborhood. Wood. And the ordinance that was presented was pretty radical, basically it was to just get rid of all Airbnbs in Freeport. Now it was voted down, but I'm pretty sure that ordinance will probably come back again, just adjust it to something that's a little more reasonable. But the fact remains though, is that there was an immediate conversation on the council floor about how to use city ordinances to control the problem. There are rental properties on the other side of town that are even more problematic. There have been murders, major neighborhood disruptions, drug houses, and rental properties. That's way more significant than what looked like a possible gun sale. People on that side of town, homeowners on that side of town, are just as concerned about what's next door to them. They're just as concerned about wild parties going on next to them. They're just as concerned about drug houses next door to them. They're just as concerned about their property values dropping because of unkept rental housing on their street. But where are the ordinance discussions regarding helping those homeowners out? Now church in the street is awesome. Resource fairs are awesome. Community meetings are awesome. Fowler. All of the community action that's happening is awesome and is needed. But until this city council starts having conversations about ordinances to correct and help reduce crime in Freeport, because there are certain levers that only the city can pull, just like you tried to do tonight to get rid of all air and bees and residential properties. Only the city can pull that lever. And there was discussion on this council floor to talk about that. There are conversations on this council floor to talk about the levers the city can pull on the other side of town that perception is going to continue and from what I saw tonight it might not be perception it actually this might be the hard reality if something happens on one side of town action is taken to wipe it out immediately on the other side of town oh well",
          "attribution": "Kelvin McElwain",
          "source_chunks": [
            20
          ],
          "timestamp": 6958.46,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 176
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Kelvin McElwain"
      ],
      "timestamp": 6958.46,
      "end_timestamp": 6958.46,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0167",
      "event_type": "public_comment",
      "subject": "Inquiry Regarding Chief Selection Process",
      "summary": "A resident inquired about the process for selecting a new chief due to retirement, sharing personal anecdotes about past interactions with law enforcement.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        177
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        20
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "not okay sorry I missed the meeting earlier but I made sure I put in two hours for PTO to make it here tonight I just had one question for you is there someone in mind for the new chief now since he's retiring there's a process of I came here today to please and I'm asking not let I remember him searching me falsely. I remember him searching me falsely, walking as a kid, 13, 14, plenty of times, this guy. I'd seen him in the black police detective car before he was riding in his Ford truck, making faces, you know, being really immature for what he does for a living. That's all I had to say.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            177
          ],
          "timestamp": 7116.8,
          "end_timestamp": 7116.8,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "public_comment",
          "subject": "Inquiry Regarding Chief Selection Process",
          "summary": "A resident inquired about the process for selecting a new chief due to retirement, sharing personal anecdotes about past interactions with law enforcement.",
          "evidence": "not okay sorry I missed the meeting earlier but I made sure I put in two hours for PTO to make it here tonight I just had one question for you is there someone in mind for the new chief now since he's retiring there's a process of I came here today to please and I'm asking not let I remember him searching me falsely. I remember him searching me falsely, walking as a kid, 13, 14, plenty of times, this guy. I'd seen him in the black police detective car before he was riding in his Ford truck, making faces, you know, being really immature for what he does for a living. That's all I had to say.",
          "attribution": "Unknown",
          "source_chunks": [
            20
          ],
          "timestamp": 7116.8,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 177
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 7116.8,
      "end_timestamp": 7116.8,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0168",
      "event_type": "public_comment",
      "subject": "Prayer for City Leadership and Fairness",
      "summary": "A prayer was offered asking God to bring fairness to every business deal in the city, guide the council leaders to do what is right for the constituents, and prevent the city from crumbling.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        178
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        20
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Father God, in the name of Jesus. The word in Proverbs 16-11 says the Lord demands fairness in every business deal. He established this principle. So Father God, we continue to look to you to take control of this city. Father God, you know what's been said. You know what continues to be done. Make it right, God. From A through Z, make it right. This is your city. I'm just living here right now. And without your help, without you doing it, it won't be done. Continue to search the hearts of the people. Continue to search the hearts of the people on this This Council, the leaders of our city, Father God, help us to do what's right, in spite of, for our constituents, for this city, so that we don't crumble to nothing. In Jesus' name, amen.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            178
          ],
          "timestamp": 7216.71,
          "end_timestamp": 7216.71,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "public_comment",
          "subject": "Prayer for City Leadership and Fairness",
          "summary": "A prayer was offered asking God to bring fairness to every business deal in the city, guide the council leaders to do what is right for the constituents, and prevent the city from crumbling.",
          "evidence": "Father God, in the name of Jesus. The word in Proverbs 16-11 says the Lord demands fairness in every business deal. He established this principle. So Father God, we continue to look to you to take control of this city. Father God, you know what's been said. You know what continues to be done. Make it right, God. From A through Z, make it right. This is your city. I'm just living here right now. And without your help, without you doing it, it won't be done. Continue to search the hearts of the people. Continue to search the hearts of the people on this This Council, the leaders of our city, Father God, help us to do what's right, in spite of, for our constituents, for this city, so that we don't crumble to nothing. In Jesus' name, amen.",
          "attribution": "Unknown",
          "source_chunks": [
            20
          ],
          "timestamp": 7216.71,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 178
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 7216.71,
      "end_timestamp": 7216.71,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0169",
      "event_type": "procedural_action",
      "subject": "Entering Executive Session",
      "summary": "The clerk read the basis for entering executive session: Pursuant to five ILCS, 122C2, concerning Collective Negotiating Matters between the public body and its employees or their representatives or deliberations concerning salary schedules for one or more classes of employees.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        179
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        20
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "We'll move on to item number 22, Madam Clerk, could you please read Executive Session? Pursuant to five ILCS, 122C2, Collective Negotiating Matters between the public body and its employees or their representatives or deliberations concerning salary schedules for one or more classes of employees.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            179
          ],
          "timestamp": 7315.88,
          "end_timestamp": 7315.88,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "procedural_action",
          "subject": "Entering Executive Session",
          "summary": "The clerk read the basis for entering executive session: Pursuant to five ILCS, 122C2, concerning Collective Negotiating Matters between the public body and its employees or their representatives or deliberations concerning salary schedules for one or more classes of employees.",
          "evidence": "We'll move on to item number 22, Madam Clerk, could you please read Executive Session? Pursuant to five ILCS, 122C2, Collective Negotiating Matters between the public body and its employees or their representatives or deliberations concerning salary schedules for one or more classes of employees.",
          "attribution": "Clerk Anderson",
          "source_chunks": [
            20
          ],
          "timestamp": 7315.88,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 179
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Clerk Anderson"
      ],
      "timestamp": 7315.88,
      "end_timestamp": 7315.88,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0170",
      "event_type": "decision",
      "subject": "Entering Executive Session Roll Call",
      "summary": "Roll call taken for entering executive session.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "decision_sequence",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        180,
        182
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        20
      ],
      "components": {
        "request": [
          180
        ],
        "vote": [
          182
        ]
      },
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Is there a motion to enter into executive?",
          "source_record_indices": [
            180
          ],
          "timestamp": 7338.52,
          "end_timestamp": 7338.52,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        },
        {
          "text": "Madam Clerk, could you please call the roll on that? Klemm? Aye.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            182
          ],
          "timestamp": 7348.579,
          "end_timestamp": 7348.579,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "motion",
          "subject": "Entering Executive Session",
          "summary": "Motion to enter into executive session.",
          "evidence": "Is there a motion to enter into executive?",
          "attribution": "Unknown",
          "attributes": {
            "made_by": "Alderman Sellers"
          },
          "source_chunks": [
            20
          ],
          "timestamp": 7338.52,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 180
        },
        {
          "record_type": "vote",
          "subject": "Entering Executive Session Roll Call",
          "summary": "Roll call taken for entering executive session.",
          "evidence": "Madam Clerk, could you please call the roll on that? Klemm? Aye.",
          "attribution": "Clerk Anderson",
          "attributes": {
            "roll_call": {
              "Klemm": "Aye"
            }
          },
          "source_chunks": [
            20
          ],
          "timestamp": 7348.579,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 182
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Clerk Anderson"
      ],
      "timestamp": 7348.579,
      "end_timestamp": 7348.579,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0171",
      "event_type": "procedural_action",
      "subject": "Seconding Motion to Enter Executive Session",
      "summary": "The motion to enter executive session was seconded.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        181
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        20
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "A motion made by Alderman Sellers, seconded by Alderman Shadle.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            181
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "procedural_action",
          "subject": "Seconding Motion to Enter Executive Session",
          "summary": "The motion to enter executive session was seconded.",
          "evidence": "A motion made by Alderman Sellers, seconded by Alderman Shadle.",
          "attribution": "Unknown",
          "source_chunks": [
            20
          ],
          "record_index": 181
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0172",
      "event_type": "procedural_action",
      "subject": "Moving to item number 22: Executive Session",
      "summary": "The Clerk read the purpose for entering executive session.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        183
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        21
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "We'll move on to item number 22, Madam Clerk, could you please read Executive Session? Pursuant to five ILCS, 122C2, Collective Negotiating Matters between the public body and its employees or their representatives or deliberations concerning salary schedules for one or more classes of employees.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            183
          ],
          "timestamp": 7315.88,
          "end_timestamp": 7315.88,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "procedural_action",
          "subject": "Moving to item number 22: Executive Session",
          "summary": "The Clerk read the purpose for entering executive session.",
          "evidence": "We'll move on to item number 22, Madam Clerk, could you please read Executive Session? Pursuant to five ILCS, 122C2, Collective Negotiating Matters between the public body and its employees or their representatives or deliberations concerning salary schedules for one or more classes of employees.",
          "attribution": "Mayor Miller",
          "source_chunks": [
            21
          ],
          "timestamp": 7315.88,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 183
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Mayor Miller"
      ],
      "timestamp": 7315.88,
      "end_timestamp": 7315.88,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0173",
      "event_type": "decision",
      "subject": "Enter into executive session",
      "summary": "Vote on entering executive session.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "decision_sequence",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        184,
        185
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        21
      ],
      "components": {
        "request": [
          184
        ],
        "vote": [
          185
        ]
      },
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Is there a motion to enter into executive?",
          "source_record_indices": [
            184
          ],
          "timestamp": 7338.52,
          "end_timestamp": 7338.52,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        },
        {
          "text": "Passes 8 to 0.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            185
          ],
          "timestamp": 7354.46,
          "end_timestamp": 7354.46,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "motion",
          "subject": "Enter into executive session",
          "summary": "Motion to enter into executive session.",
          "evidence": "Is there a motion to enter into executive?",
          "attributes": {
            "made_by": "Alderman Sellers"
          },
          "source_chunks": [
            21
          ],
          "timestamp": 7338.52,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 184
        },
        {
          "record_type": "vote",
          "subject": "Enter into executive session",
          "summary": "Vote on entering executive session.",
          "evidence": "Passes 8 to 0.",
          "attributes": {
            "vote_outcome": "passed",
            "vote_tally": "8 to 0"
          },
          "source_chunks": [
            21
          ],
          "timestamp": 7354.46,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 185
        }
      ],
      "outcome": "passed",
      "timestamp": 7354.46,
      "end_timestamp": 7354.46,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0174",
      "event_type": "decision",
      "subject": "Calling roll for Executive Session entry",
      "summary": "Roll call conducted for entering executive session.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        186
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        21
      ],
      "components": {
        "outcome": [
          186
        ]
      },
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Madam Clerk, could you please call the roll on that? Klemm? Aye. Johnson? Aye. Simmons? Aye. Parker? Shadle, Sanders, and Sellers. Passes 8 to 0.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            186
          ],
          "timestamp": 7348.579,
          "end_timestamp": 7348.579,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "procedural_action",
          "subject": "Calling roll for Executive Session entry",
          "summary": "Roll call conducted for entering executive session.",
          "evidence": "Madam Clerk, could you please call the roll on that? Klemm? Aye. Johnson? Aye. Simmons? Aye. Parker? Shadle, Sanders, and Sellers. Passes 8 to 0.",
          "attribution": "Mayor Miller",
          "source_chunks": [
            21
          ],
          "timestamp": 7348.579,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 186
        }
      ],
      "outcome": "passed",
      "attributions": [
        "Mayor Miller"
      ],
      "timestamp": 7348.579,
      "end_timestamp": 7348.579,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0175",
      "event_type": "procedural_action",
      "subject": "Calling roll for return to open session",
      "summary": "Roll call conducted before returning to open session.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        187
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        21
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Madam Clerk, could you please call the roll? Mayor Miller? Here. Are these on? Okay, Alderpersons, Klemm? Here. Johnson? Here. Simmons? Here. Parker? Here. Stacy? Here. Shadle? Here. Sanders? Here. And Sellers? Yeah.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            187
          ],
          "timestamp": 7354.46,
          "end_timestamp": 7354.46,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "procedural_action",
          "subject": "Calling roll for return to open session",
          "summary": "Roll call conducted before returning to open session.",
          "evidence": "Madam Clerk, could you please call the roll? Mayor Miller? Here. Are these on? Okay, Alderpersons, Klemm? Here. Johnson? Here. Simmons? Here. Parker? Here. Stacy? Here. Shadle? Here. Sanders? Here. And Sellers? Yeah.",
          "source_chunks": [
            21
          ],
          "timestamp": 7354.46,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 187
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 7354.46,
      "end_timestamp": 7354.46,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0176",
      "event_type": "procedural_action",
      "subject": "Item number 23: Adoption of resolution 2025-123",
      "summary": "The Clerk read the title for Resolution to ratify 2025 to 2028 collective bargaining agreement with council 31 of the American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees or AFSCME local 3367 AFL-CIO.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        188
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        21
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "That leaves us with item number 23, which is the adoption of resolution 2025-123. Madam Clerk, could you please read this? Resolution to ratify 2025 to 2028 collective bargaining agreement with council 31 of the American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees or AFSCME local 3367 AFL-CIO.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            188
          ],
          "timestamp": 7924.569,
          "end_timestamp": 7924.569,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "procedural_action",
          "subject": "Item number 23: Adoption of resolution 2025-123",
          "summary": "The Clerk read the title for Resolution to ratify 2025 to 2028 collective bargaining agreement with council 31 of the American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees or AFSCME local 3367 AFL-CIO.",
          "evidence": "That leaves us with item number 23, which is the adoption of resolution 2025-123. Madam Clerk, could you please read this? Resolution to ratify 2025 to 2028 collective bargaining agreement with council 31 of the American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees or AFSCME local 3367 AFL-CIO.",
          "source_chunks": [
            21
          ],
          "timestamp": 7924.569,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 188
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 7924.569,
      "end_timestamp": 7924.569,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0177",
      "event_type": "presentation",
      "subject": "Collective Bargaining Agreement Ratification",
      "summary": "Manager Boyer stated the city reached a tentative agreement with the local AFSCME union and staff, requiring council approval.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        189
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        21
      ],
      "components": {},
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Thank you manager Boyer. Thank your honor the city has reached a tentative agreement with our local AFSCME union and staff We have to request council approval of this agreement.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            189
          ],
          "timestamp": 7934.89,
          "end_timestamp": 7934.89,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "presentation",
          "subject": "Collective Bargaining Agreement Ratification",
          "summary": "Manager Boyer stated the city reached a tentative agreement with the local AFSCME union and staff, requiring council approval.",
          "evidence": "Thank you manager Boyer. Thank your honor the city has reached a tentative agreement with our local AFSCME union and staff We have to request council approval of this agreement.",
          "attribution": "Manager Boyer",
          "source_chunks": [
            21
          ],
          "timestamp": 7934.89,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 189
        }
      ],
      "attributions": [
        "Manager Boyer"
      ],
      "timestamp": 7934.89,
      "end_timestamp": 7934.89,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0178",
      "event_type": "decision",
      "subject": "Adopt resolution 2025-123",
      "summary": "Motion to adopt the resolution ratifying the collective bargaining agreement.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "decision_sequence",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        190,
        191
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        21
      ],
      "components": {
        "motion": [
          190
        ],
        "vote": [
          191
        ]
      },
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "Is there a motion to adopt? So moved. Second. We have a motion. Second.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            190
          ],
          "timestamp": 7962.449,
          "end_timestamp": 7962.449,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        },
        {
          "text": "The resolution is adapted, seven to zero with one abstentia.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            191
          ],
          "timestamp": 7978.869,
          "end_timestamp": 7978.869,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "motion",
          "subject": "Adopt resolution 2025-123",
          "summary": "Motion to adopt the resolution ratifying the collective bargaining agreement.",
          "evidence": "Is there a motion to adopt? So moved. Second. We have a motion. Second.",
          "attributes": {
            "made_by": "Alderman Sellers"
          },
          "source_chunks": [
            21
          ],
          "timestamp": 7962.449,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 190
        },
        {
          "record_type": "vote",
          "subject": "Adopt resolution 2025-123",
          "summary": "Vote on adopting the resolution ratifying the collective bargaining agreement.",
          "evidence": "The resolution is adapted, seven to zero with one abstentia.",
          "attributes": {
            "vote_outcome": "passed",
            "vote_tally": "seven to zero with one abstentia"
          },
          "source_chunks": [
            21
          ],
          "timestamp": 7978.869,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 191
        }
      ],
      "outcome": "passed",
      "timestamp": 7962.449,
      "end_timestamp": 7978.869,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0179",
      "event_type": "decision",
      "subject": "Adjournment",
      "summary": "Motion for adjournment.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        192
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        21
      ],
      "components": {
        "motion": [
          192
        ]
      },
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "I will entertain a motion for adjournment. So moved. Second.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            192
          ],
          "timestamp": 7993.369,
          "end_timestamp": 7993.369,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "motion",
          "subject": "Adjournment",
          "summary": "Motion for adjournment.",
          "evidence": "I will entertain a motion for adjournment. So moved. Second.",
          "attributes": {
            "made_by": "Alderman Shadle"
          },
          "source_chunks": [
            21
          ],
          "timestamp": 7993.369,
          "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo",
          "record_index": 192
        }
      ],
      "timestamp": 7993.369,
      "end_timestamp": 7993.369,
      "video_id": "ks5b7ikLhGo"
    },
    {
      "event_id": "event_0180",
      "event_type": "decision",
      "subject": "Adjourn meeting",
      "summary": "Vote on adjournment.",
      "grouping": {
        "method": "single_record",
        "duplicate_rules": []
      },
      "source_record_indices": [
        193
      ],
      "source_chunks": [
        21
      ],
      "components": {
        "vote": [
          193
        ]
      },
      "evidence": [
        {
          "text": "All those in favor signify by saying aye. Aye.",
          "source_record_indices": [
            193
          ]
        }
      ],
      "source_records": [
        {
          "record_type": "vote",
          "subject": "Adjourn meeting",
          "summary": "Vote on adjournment.",
          "evidence": "All those in favor signify by saying aye. Aye.",
          "attributes": {
            "vote_outcome": "passed",
            "vote_method": "voice"
          },
          "source_chunks": [
            21
          ],
          "record_index": 193
        }
      ],
      "outcome": "passed"
    }
  ]
}
