Good evening. Linda, could you please give the invocation this evening?
Let us bow our heads. Praise the Lord. Praise the Lord on my soul.
Tudor, James B. Sherwood,chemical,
and
Mr.
John, Mr.
Mr.
and Hope and trusting that you alone can hold us together in your love and peace.
Help us trust you more and lean not on our own understanding. Remove all fears,
cancel all animosity, and bring your peace as we lean on your everlasting arms
to accomplish your purposes for this city and all who dwell here. In Jesus' name,
Amen. Thank you, Linda. Now we'll officially call this meeting to order.
Madam Clerk, would you please take the roll? Mayor Miller? Here. Alderpersons,
Klemm, Monroe, Simmons is absent, Parker, Stacy, Shadle, Sanders, and Sellers.
item number one is the approval of the agenda however we will be removing item
number 10 and moving it to the cow is there a motion for the agenda so move
second in motion made by Alderman Shadle seconded by Alderman Sellers all those
in favor signify by saying aye aye opposed that motion passes could you
Please note that at 6.02 Alderman Simmons joined the meeting. Item number two is the approval from the minutes from the regular meeting on December 16th, 2024. Is there such a motion?
So moved.
Second.
Motion made by Alderman Monroe, seconded by Alderman Klemm. All those in favor signify by saying aye.
Aye.
Opposed? That motion passes. Public comment.
We have two that are on agenda topics for this evening. Rhonda Scott, if you would like to have three minutes.
Hello, I'm Rhonda Scott. I'd like to comment, really ask some questions before you consider Resolution Number 13,
which has something to do with police health employment or employment health
plan I read the notes on this and it was something about some contract had been
negotiated and it wasn't clear there what happened is when I read the memo I had a
whole lot of questions like first of all what do you mean police officers are
getting a pension and we're paying for their health insurance like shouldn't
and
when I looked up Rockford and Chicago, the officers there, if they retire under the age
of 55, the City contributes nothing. They are allowed to participate in the City's health
care plan, but the officers have to pay out of their own pockets. Then once they are 55,
they have the option of staying in the city plan and in Rockford the city contributes
50 percent, the officer contributes the rest out of their pocket and in the city of Chicago
the officers are required to contribute 3.5 percent of their annuity.
I'm not sure what that amount is, I'm just passing this information on to you just because
The memo, it's asking you to approve a resolution,
which you probably have no idea what it means.
And so I would like for you to ask some questions
and find out exactly what are we paying
for retired officers' health insurance?
Is this a standard?
I know most people, the industry standard is,
when you retire after working at a company for 30 years,
you go out and get your own insurance.
And you go out and you pay for it with your 401K.
you know the company is paying for it.
So I hate to be negative but it just seems like
we should run a city like a business.
We have a business manager.
We should be running it like a business.
We should be aware of cost
and I would ask for you respectfully
to look at the cost of what we're paying
and ask some questions please.
Thank you.
Next is Akia Sanders.
How you doing? My name is Akiyah Sanders. I wanted to speak on item number five, reappointing Steve Cox. I don't believe he should be a reappointment.
From November 19th, he actually assisted Wayne Duckman in illegally knocking down one of my residents.
From what I understand, not to be even approved by council to get knocked down, and I just don't think he should be reappointed at this time.
and others. Okay, now we can move on to item number four, which is the consent agenda.
The consent agenda is considered to be routine in nature and acted as one motion unless a
member of the council would like to have something removed for further discussion. Seeing nothing,
and we will approve to receive and place on file the minutes from the boards and commission
from the Foreign Fire Insurance Board, dated October 10th, 2024, the Board of Fire and Police Commissioners from October 25th and 26th, 2024, Greater Freeport Partnerships Monthly Report, dated December 18th, 2024, the National Day of Racial Healing Proclamation, approval of finance bills payable in the total of $4,436,436.46, the approval of payroll for pay period ending December 14th, 2024,
in the total of $657,123.22 as well as payroll
for December 28th, 2024 in the total of $668,168.88.
Is there a motion to approve the consent agenda?
So moved.
Second.
We have a motion made by Alderman Shadle,
seconded by Alderman Klemm.
Madam Clerk, could you please take the roll?
Sellers? Aye. Klemm? Aye. Monroe? Aye. Simmons? Aye. Parker? Aye. Stacy? Aye. Shadle? Aye. And Sanders? Aye. The motion is approved 8-0. Thank you. Item number five is appointments. Could you please read those?
Reappointment of Patrick McDermott to the Board of the Northwest Illinois Enterprise Zone for a three-year term effective through December 31st, 2027.
And the reappointment of Steve Cox to the Board of the Northwest Illinois Enterprise Zone for a three-year term effective through December 31, 2027.
Thank you. Is there a motion to reappoint these? Yes, so moved.
I would like to make a motion that we divide these up.
Sure. Okay, so we'll start with the first one, Patrick McDermott. Is there a motion to approve?
So moved.
Second.
Motion made by Alderman Klemm, seconded by Alderman Sellers. Discussion?
Yes.
Thank you, Madam Mayor. This question goes to the Community Development. Do we know if
Mr. McDermott has registered all of his rental properties here in the City of Freeport?
I'm not sure I'd have to look into that for you.
Any other discussion?
Madam Clerk, please take the roll.
Sellers?
Aye.
Klemm?
Aye.
Monroe?
No.
Simmons?
No.
Parker?
Aye.
Stacy?
No.
Shadle?
Aye.
And Sanders?
No.
We are tied at four to four.
Madam Mayor, what say you?
Aye.
And McDermott is appointed five to four.
And then next would be the reappointment for Steve Cox.
Is there a motion to approve?
I'll move.
Second.
The motion made by Alderman Parker, seconded by Alderman Shadle.
Discussion?
Alderman Monroe.
Thank you, Madam Mayor.
I'd like to make a motion that we move this to the next regularly scheduled meeting based
Just on the fact that Mr. Cox is involved in negotiations and
negotiations and advisement with the the current City Manager petition that's
going around. What does that have to do with this enterprise zone? It has
everything to do with Madam Mayor. Okay so that was a motion to move it? Yes.
Second. So a motion made by Alderman Monroe, seconded by Alderman Stacy. Any
I don't want this to be my second.
I'll make I'll respond but I don't want to be my second that's up to you okay
then I won't I'm good madam mayor could you repeat what the motion was that the
appointment of Steve Cox to the enterprise zone be moved to the cow no
next regularly scheduled scheduled meeting January 21st okay yes okay so
So, if there's no further discussion on moving that, Madam Clerk, would you please take the role on moving it to the next meeting, the next regularly scheduled meeting?
Sellers? Aye.
Klemm? No.
Monroe? Aye.
Simmons? Aye.
Parker? No.
Stacy? Aye.
Shadle? No.
And Sanders? Aye.
One, two, three, four, five.
It will be moved to the January 21st council meeting by a vote of 4 to 3.
It should be 5 to 3.
5 to 3, thank you.
Okay, next is recognition of service awards. Manager Boyer?
I would have to acknowledge the Fire Chief on this one.
Yes, thank you.
So it's my pleasure to introduce firefighter paramedic Kevin Meads. Here we're recognizing
his five-year anniversary with the department. He comes to us from Winnebago and his hired
date was January 13, 2020. So he's almost five years to date. Some of the certifications
and Documents that he holds in his position is Basic Firefighter Operations, Advanced
Firefighter Technician, Paramedic, Fire Service Vehicle Operator, Fire Service Instructor
1, and then several technical rescue classes consisting of Structural Collapse, Confined
Space, VMO or Vehicle Machinery Operations, and Rope Operations and Technician Level.
He's currently a member of the Mavis Technical Rescue Team, meaning he can respond anywhere
within the county and also outside the county on special requests through Mavis.
He is also a member of the department's TEMS team, the Technical Emergency Paramedics,
that also assist with the police department.
So, and then lastly, he's currently working on his Associate's Degree in Fire Science
through Rock Valley College.
So, with that, I'd like to present Kevin with this certificate of five years, and congratulations.
I also want to add that half the room here is his family that's come to join him this
evening.
I appreciate the opportunity to work in this city. It's been an awesome experience for me. I've learned so much. I've gotten to meet the wonderful residents of the city and had a good time doing it with all my friends. Thank you so much.
We move on to item number seven, which is the second reading of ordinance 2025-01. Could you please read this?
This was formally Ordinance 2024-86 from last year, amending airplane hanger fees at Freeport-Albertus Airport and adopting revised hanger lease form.
Thank you. Manager Boyer?
Thank you, Your Honor. We've gone over this at several meetings. We're requesting Council
move forward with the new lease format and the new rental rates for J. Hanger. So staff
requests approval of this at second reading. Discussion? Alderman Stacey?
I want to be sure, this is talking about 61 hangars?
This is a new lease agreement and the hanger rate adjustment is for J-hanger.
So we've recommended no changes at this time except for J-hanger to increase that to $800
Any further discussion? Alderman, Monroe. Thank you Madam Mayor. So City Manager
Boyer, the rates for the hangers that have working water and other amenities, I would
call them, I guess, those hanger prices aren't changing.
Manager Boyer.
We have had the airport manager review all the hanger rates, compared them to other communities
of our similar size and traffic and she has recommended that we do not right now
our rental rates are in line with other communities of a similar size. Can you
can you tell me who is the owner of Hangar J? The city of Freeport. I think she
Meese, Lessie. Who's renting it? No, no, there's a there's a tenant in there
currently not from Freeport but recently was approved to move in there so
council approved the last one I don't recall it off the top of my head.
I don't need it. If discussion is done. Madam Clerk, please take the roll. Sellers? Aye. Klemm? Aye. Monroe? Aye. Simmons? Aye. Parker? Aye. Stacy? Aye. Shadle? Aye. And Sanders? Aye. The ordinance passes 8-0. Item number 8 is the first reading of Ordinance 2025-02. Could you please read this?
Ordinance Authorizing Northern Illinois Gas Company,
doing business as NICOR Gas Company,
to construct, operate, and maintain
a gas distributing system in and through
the city of Freeport.
Manager Boyer.
Thank you, Your Honor.
About every 50 years, the city has an opportunity
to re-enter or renew their enterprise agreement
with NICOR Gas.
This has recently come up and was negotiated
essentially the same terms that we have had in the past.
However, we've also negotiated free therms for the Freeport Library.
It's one of our larger gas-using facilities, and I think that will save the city somewhere
approximately $70,000 a year.
Correction, it'll save the library $70,000.
Motion to approve.
Second.
We have a motion made by Alderman Klemm, seconded by Alderman Sellers to move Ordinance
2020-502 on to the next meeting. Is there discussion?
Move on to item number nine, which is the first reading of Ordinance 2020-503.
Could you please read this? This was formerly Ordinance 2024-85 from last
.
since 2017, the city has managed social media pages for city
posting and information and more. The social media policy
for all staff has been in place to set guidelines for personal
has yet to set guidelines for page administrators.
In addition, public comment on city pages has been limited since 2017.
In order to improve transparency and strengthen the communication pipeline between the city
City and Residence
and
the City of Freeport believes that the use of social media
platforms can effectively broaden the reach of government
communication to its constituents. The use of social
media by the city is to convey or obtain information that is
useful to or will further the goals of the city.
The City of Freeport believes that the use of social media
platforms can effectively broaden the reach of government
Information that is useful to or will further the goals of this local government.
The revised policy also outlines important guidelines for page administrators to ensure
discourse remains informational and appropriate.
This is the first reading tonight, but in the end, we recommend that the Council approves
this policy.
Thank you.
Is there a motion to move this forward?
So moved.
Second.
May, Alderman, Klemm, Alderman, Sellers, discussion? Alderman Sanders?
Do I understand that there's no administrator at this point in time? Is that what you're
saying?
There is an administrator for the city, an administrator for the police, an administrator
for the fire and the library, and the communications director, which is myself, also administrates
All Pages. So who is supervising that media page? So the media page that you are probably
referring to is Facebook and the administrator for the city is myself, the communications
director. So you're the sole person that is managing, you're the sole person that is managing
that website? For the most part I am the sole person, however there are other people who
who have access to it that in times of need are able to post.
So how many administrators can you have at one time or not at just one time but at the
council's discretion, the city's discretion to have privy information to enter into those
administrative areas?
I don't think there is a limit that Facebook or Meta puts on their site, however, within
this policy, the branch that we are adopting is City Manager oversees the administrators.
So ultimately, discretion falls on City Manager.
City Manager.
but that does not mean the City Manager posts nor comments on anything.
Okay.
I just want to see how it's operated and the mission and goals of the website and what
is this protocol.
I would like to see that because we all need to see the protocol of that website and how
it's going to be governed.
and that's an excellent point that you make and that is exactly what this policy does.
Okay, all right, thank you.
Any further discussion?
Alderman Monroe.
Thank you, Madam Mayor.
This is a topic that's come up quite a bit across the country.
The Supreme Court, many of you may or may not know, recently ruled on this back in 2024
and it actually would put the city in my opinion at greater risk of a lawsuit.
Social media itself has tools that have been designed across all platforms to report posts
that go against community standards and I don't believe in a lot of ways this is creating
any transparency.
In a lot of ways it's creating a lack of transparency because it allows city officials and staff
and others, and we have a lot of people that are trying to block comments that they find divisive based on their viewpoints.
It could be religious, it could be social, it could be whatever it might be.
But in a general scheme of the First Amendment, we're given those rights to speak out.
And the problem is, this may be well-intentioned.
But in a lot of ways, this is the rabbit hole that once you open it, doesn't get applied appropriately.
and with so many people having access to this,
the citizens don't know who's blocking them.
It could be the City Manager who disagrees with somebody
who doesn't like what he's doing with the roads.
That doesn't mean what they posted was wrong
or incorrect or inflammatory or anything else.
It just means that they spoke out
and they voiced their opinion in a community forum.
And I think it's a very, very dangerous path to go down
to allow any member of the city staff to block and you know I know the police department does it
regularly they turn off posts they turn off things when people would even make comments
encouraging them and saying they've done a great job but as as citizens we've got a responsibility
as well but I I think as all of us here on this council and as staff have a responsibility to
and others.
I think it's a very dangerous path to take when you start messing with First Amendment,
because it is really our ability as citizens to speak out.
and John. And we've seen in the last, today as a matter of fact, the city officials trying
to block people from speaking out. And I think that this just gives another avenue for that
to happen. And I really believe strongly this should not go through. I hope the citizens
will call and speak up and say that they feel it shouldn't go through. But our First Amendment
here in the United States is the foundation for what all of our society is built on. And
and others.
We have a few people who are trying to control that speech from the government level.
That is a horrible, horrible thing.
Director Bridge.
Alderman Monroe, I understand your perspective because we have heard it within City Hall
that hey, we need to be prepared to not use too much of our opinion, right?
So I totally understand your perspective and I won't say that you are entirely wrong.
However, this policy does lay out really good guidelines to keep us from having one head
of power.
We have to understand that posts that attack a person are not going to be blocked because
of this policy.
We don't have a policy right now.
So those comments can get blocked.
So technically we are not having good transparency right now.
So I understand your perspective.
I still would say let's see what this policy can do for us because I know what goes on
at City Hall.
We are trying our best to represent the residents of Freeport.
Right now we're not doing that as well as we can be doing if we have this policy in place.
Alderman Sanders.
Yeah, I have an understanding what the Alderman Monroe is saying and I also feel there's not
not enough detail as he is explaining for transparency and I think before we initiate any movement
on this particular ordinance that we do a due diligence of evaluation of this particular
Miller.
We need to see things that you are actually speaking on in writing.
How we look at it from a different viewpoint when it's in writing and then we can probably
Walker, and many more.
I have to say, we are trying to move forward.
Not only are you setting up a policy, but you have to remember the public, the Council,
the administrative staff of this city hall also have input on certain things and guidelines.
and
We need to be able to bring those things forth. I understand the concerns. There is a big concern
here. And let us move cautiously with all of that.
Just in case you weren't aware, in your packet, there's seven pages in writing on this policy.
There's seven pages. Director Bridge?
So I'll say a couple things.
Number one, we did talk about this at the Committee of the Whole.
There was no discussion.
There was nothing from Councilmembers.
So if there had been something from Councilmembers, and that is not to blame anyone on this floor,
but I wish that some discussion would come, and that is why this is a first reading so
that we can have those kinds of talks.
Sullivan.
We can also operate with the community at a union level.
I don't know how you prefer this word together a union-level, I got the same thing.
Let me read from section three of the Social Media Policy.
In case someone doesn't have it in front of them.
Social media platforms not only provide the government with a communications venue but
often allow for public comment to be posted to the city's sites.
and the City of Houston.
The following policies are not subject to
removal or restriction by the
administration.
These policies do not comply
endorsement or agreement by the
government nor reflect the opinions or
policies of the government.
The following enumerated list of
content may not be permitted on the
City's social media platforms and
such content is subject to removal
and or restriction by the
administrator.
and others.
It includes personal identifiable information such as a social security number or other
sensitive information, violates any federal, state or local law or encourages illegal activity,
is obscene, sexual or pornographic in content and or language, promotes commercial activities
not related to government business, is spam or links to malware or viruses, or discloses
confidential government information, sensitive information or personal information relating
and
other members of the public. And lastly, before I turn it
back over, if you are in City Hall walking alongside me, you
know what kind of person I am and I'm not one who makes
decisions by myself. Though the Communications Department is a
one-person thing, I do not make decisions by myself. The City
Manager does not make decisions by himself. He and I do not
and I do not make decisions by ourselves, it is a team effort here, and that is why
this is on the floor before you.
Manager Boyer, did you want to say something?
No, I'm good.
Any further discussion?
Alderman Monroe.
Thank you, Madam Mayor.
Thank you for reading that, Director.
You know, you bring up a couple of really good points.
I'm going to go through them.
Promotes discrimination, define discrimination for me.
That's a gray area, Mr.
Thank you, exactly.
Exactly. Part number number six. I think we all know what obscene sexual and
pornographic content is, but explain to me what that language is. That's a gray
area, Mr. Monroe. Thank you. Once again, here we are going down a rabbit hole.
What you consider to be obscene, what the city manager of the mayor considers
obscene, the Supreme Court says is free speech. And those are things that you're
DeVine, and the President of the United States, and I want to
thank you for your work in the room, and the work you're
taking into your powers as a government official and applying
those to individuals in the community. That limits the
communication and the ability of those citizens to stand up and
voice their opinions about how the city is doing. And this is
where it comes. There was recently within the last six
and the other two weeks ago.
And he was arrested because the police chief and the sheriff said it's not allowed.
Well guess what happened two weeks later?
His lawyer and he came back to the room and they served him papers.
The city paid $50,000 for violating their constitutional rights.
This is where this is going.
And the problem is you want me to trust you.
and others.
I don't trust people easily because I've seen what's happened with behavior behind closed
doors in this building and all of a sudden now you're coming here in front of this forum,
the people that represent the citizens of Freeport and you want to take away those people's
rights to speak and that is a major problem anywhere in the United States of America.
Fowler, Director, Bridge, only thing I will say to that is this is not taking away. We are taking away right now. This is adding to what they can say.
If there is no further discussion, move on to the next item. Thank you, Director, Bridge.
Move on to item number 11, which is the adoption of resolution 2025-02. Could you please read this?
Resolution Approving Memorandum of Understanding with U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs for
Response to Calls for Service.
Thank you.
Chief Shenberger.
The United States Department of Veterans Affairs operates facility within the City of Freeport
at 750 South Kiwanis Drive.
The VA is requesting the City of Freeport to enter an MOU regarding the response to
calls for service at the VA.
Thomas, MOU will be effective upon signature and the date will be reviewed every three years.
Is there a motion to adopt?
So moved.
Second.
A motion made by Alderman Parker, seconded by Alderman Sellers.
Discussion on the resolution?
Seeing none, Madam Clerk, would you please take the roll?
Sellers?
Aye.
Klemm?
Aye.
Monroe?
Aye.
Senator, aye, Stacy, aye, Shadle, aye, Sanders is currently absent.
The resolution is adopted 7-0.
Item number 12 is the adoption of resolution 20-2503.
Could you please read this?
Resolution approving invoice from Stevers Ford for upfitting for three new squad vehicles.
Thank you.
Chief Shenberger?
The Freeport Police Department is currently in need of purchasing and replacing three
squad cars.
The squad cars will replace F2, which is a 2021 Dodge Durango with about 75,000 miles,
F5, a 2021 Dodge Durango with about 90,000 miles, and F6, a 2022 Ford Explorer with 75,000
miles.
All three squad cars are currently utilized by the Patrol Division.
On December 16th, 2024, the Council approved the squad bid submitted by Stivers Ford in
and Walkie, Iowa, at $48,190 for each for three 2025 Ford Explorer police interceptors
for a total of $144,570,000.
Minus $19,000 to trade in the four older squad cars, the total cost to purchase the three
new squad cars will be $125,570.
During subsequent conversations with Stivers-Ford, the salesmen agreed to discount squad cars
by $500 each, which ended up being a total of $124,070, which includes the $19,000 deduction
for trade-ins.
Stivers-Ford also submitted a bid to upfit the three marked squad cars.
Stivers-Ford upfitted the squad cars purchased by the police department in 2024, and the
and others.
The cost to upfit the two Ford Explorers from Dodge Durangos will be $8,375 each.
The cost to upfit the third Ford Explorer Police Interceptor will be $7,372.
So the total cost to upfit all three vehicles will be $148,192.
The funding for the three new squad cars and upfitting is provided in the fiscal year 2025
Police Department Capital Budget 331-302-7005.
Thank you.
Is there a motion to adopt?
Motion to adopt, Mayor.
Second.
We have a motion made by Alderman Monroe, seconded by Alderman Parker.
Discussion on the resolution?
Seeing none.
Oh, I'm sorry.
Alderman Stacy.
Yes.
Yes, I just have a question. And it maybe was spoken of the first time. I just do not remember. And I would just like to know why did we, why Iowa? Why not our Ford dealership right here in good old Freeport?
couldn't we get the discounts and all the extra right here you know and I would
agree with that but we did post the bid and we had only one full response and
that was from Stivers in Iowa and we had one incomplete response which was out of
Detroit, Michigan.
Thank you, Madam Mayor. Chief, there are only a few dealerships within, say, 400 miles
and others.
Thank you.
I'd say 400 miles up here that sell these type of vehicles. Is that true or not?
Well, I mean, there's probably more dealerships. I don't know. I mean, you can, you know, we've bought them locally before.
But like I said, we posted the bid and we only had one complete response, so.
There's no further discussion. Madam Clerk, please take the roll.
Sellers?
Aye.
Klemm?
Monroe? Aye. Simmons? Aye. Parker? Aye. Stacy? Aye. Shadle? Aye. And Sanders? Aye. The resolution is adopted 8 to 0. Item number 13 is the adoption of resolution 2025-04. Could you please read this? Resolution approving Memorandum of Understanding with Fraternal Order of Police regarding Post-Employment Health Plan or PEP. Thank you. Manager Boyer. Madam Mayor. Chief.
Sure. So before we get into this memo, I just want to clarify something about that was brought up. This is by no means this is not post employment health insurance. Once you separate, you don't have health insurance unless you participate in the COBRA. So this is just a savings account, a medical savings account that the city was contributing to. But during the recent negotiations with the FOP, they got rid of the PEP plan. So this is to consider
3 people who had this benefit throughout their entire career and then during discussions
with the union it was suggested that they would be allowed to have that during this
next contract.
So in a prior version of the collective bargaining agreement between the City of Freeport and
the Illinois Fraternal Order of Police Labor Council, employees were entitled to a post-employment
and
a PEP plan to help fund health insurance costs post-employment.
The current CBA between the city and IL FOPLC no longer includes this benefit.
At the time the current CBA was negotiated, three employees either reached or will reach
20 years of service during the current agreement, qualifying them for the at-retirement portion
of the previous PEP provisions.
M. Hickman,
Patrolman Brandi Hilbyshe,
Patrolman Brandi Hilbyshe reached 25 years of service in October of 2024.
Patrolman Eric Diemer will reach 20 years of service in September of 2025.
And Patrolman Tony Bradbury will reach 20 years of service in October of 2027.
In recognition of the years of service, the officers and as part of, years of, years of
service, the officers and as part of the agreement reached with the ILFOP, IOF, I'm getting,
I'm going to start all over.
ILFOPLC, the city desires to extend the specific at-retire provisions from the former section
11.7 to these three officers.
So if one of these three officers chooses to retire during the current ILFOPLC CBA,
the following language will be applicable and honored at the time of retirement, effective
Upon the retirement of an officer with 20 or more years of employment with the city,
the city shall contribute to the employee's post-employment health plan, health care premium
sub-account, an amount equal to $4 for every hour of unused sick time accumulated during
the employee's 10-year service, up to a maximum of $5,556.
Is there a motion to adopt?
So moved.
We have a motion made by Alderman Klemm,
seconded by Alderman Parker.
Any discussion on the adoption?
Alderman Stacy.
Are you saying that these three employees
would be the last three officers to receive this benefit?
That's correct. And the city was contributing to the PEP plans. That was something that was given up during the negotiations. If you had 10 years or under, the city was contributing 1% of the salary per year to this plan. And if you had more than 10 years, then the city was contributing 1.5%. So that has been given up. The accounts are still there, whatever the officers were able to accumulate throughout their tenure here. It's just,
and
who could possibly reach the age of retirement during this current contract.
Because it was something that was afforded to them or offered to them up until this point.
Any other discussion?
Alderman Monroe?
just to be clear theoretically there's an amount of cash in this amount in this
these accounts already that's accumulated so they could already be at
the five thousand five hundred and fifty six dollars or no no I mean yeah they
they would have accounts with money in that the city has contributed to you
know during the time they've worked here up until this point that's just the
and others.
So if they have the maximum amount of sick time and they decide to leave next year, then
the city would pay $4 an hour, which would be a max out of $5,556 that would go in that
account.
So if they had 500 hours of sick time, it would be significantly less.
Any further discussion, Alderman Stacy?
What you have said tonight has given me more insight and I'm using my last question, so
I would like to make a motion that we move this to the COW so that we can have a greater
understanding and more discussion on this matter because I, if they're invested and
have been invested, then just maybe they should be acknowledged.
But to add something back into a contract that was missed, no, I'm not for that, but according
to what you're saying, that's not what's happening, am I correct?
This was brought up during the negotiations, just not in the contract.
I make a motion that we move this to the COW for greater discussion.
Is there a second?
Yeah, I'll second.
OK, so what's on the floor before you
is a motion to move this to the COW, which would be next week.
Is there any discussion on the movement?
Madam Clerk, please take the role on the, yes.
So are we just trying to get information
on moving it to the COW to get more information on understanding
Why just these three are getting this, or are we moving it to?
No, it only pertains to these three, to my understanding.
It only pertains to these three.
OK, so I just want to know, what am I going to be looking for?
What questions should I ask?
Because I don't understand what else we need to.
I don't know.
You might have to talk to Chief Shenberger and get that.
But I'm saying, I'm OK with it.
that's why I'm saying I just want to understand the reasoning for you know continuing the the conversation on it I just want to I just want to know that's all I want to know do you I don't know is it because thank you thank you Madam Mayor you know I don't think any of these officers are retiring in the next two weeks so the delay I don't think is a huge deal from that standpoint yeah I've got a few questions myself I'd
I'd like to know how much is in those accounts, financially, how much that means, and I had asked that question before this meeting, but never heard back, so I'd at least like to understand that, I mean, we're probably talking a few hundred bucks to a thousand bucks, maybe, each, but I mean, that's just a thought.
Okay. Director Richter, did you have an answer on that?
I do.
Oh, perfect.
So, PEP is something that currently all employees get, but it's been, well, with police it has been negotiated out, but it is up until 10 years, until you work 10 years, you get 1% of your wage.
So every payroll, we calculate 1% of your base wage, it doesn't apply to overtime, it's just your base wage, goes into an account.
So, you know, for an average employee, you know, it might just be $15 a paycheck.
But if you're here for 20 years, if you're here for 30 years, yes, it is substantial.
and when I say substantial, you know it could be $30,000 or something, but you can't use
and others, but you can't use these funds until you separate from the City of Freeport,
and they are for medical expenses, is the purpose of the funds.
So yes, they add up, you have to be here a while.
Chief?
Yeah, and I'm sure this is already clear, I know people listening to me try to fumble
through this.
So the only payout is for, let's say, someone retires tomorrow and they have 500 hours of
sick time.
The only payout is $4 an hour for the sick time.
So that's what it is, it's not to continue to contribute to it, it's just to pay out
for the sick time, that's all.
Alderman, Klemm.
This would very rarely be for the Chief or Michelle, so basically this is similar to
Okay, so before you is the motion to move this to the next COW next week. Madam Clerk,
would you please take the roll on moving it to the COW? Sellers? No. Klemm? No. Monroe?
Aye. Simmons? Aye. Parker? No. Stacy? Aye. Shadle? No. And Sanders? Aye. I can't believe, I can't believe this man. We are tied again, four to four. Mayor? I'm not sure what more is going to be learned, but if you want to have more understanding, then let's move it to the cow. Motion passes five to four to move item 13 to the cow. Thank you, Mayor.
Discussion and Possible Action to Install a Street Light at the Intersection of Iroquois
Street and State Avenue.
Alderman Stacey and Simmons, yes, I am, I'm asking the City of Freeport to put a stoplight,
I'm sorry, a light at State and Iroquois.
This is where a young man was murdered.
And it's Shalom Park or picnic area.
And it's pitch black.
Yes, yes it is.
and you know, we say we wanna make a difference
in these neighborhoods.
We want people to be safe and be better and do better.
If something goes down at that spot tonight,
it's no way you'll even be able to tell
if they're white or black
and
because the area is dark. And so I am asking the city, we done marched over this, we done
had gatherings over this, we done had church outside on the lawn for this. So I'm asking
the city to move forward in lightening that area. I don't care if it's a street light,
I don't care if it's a street light, I don't care if it's a private light just over the Shalom Park area,
but we need to change that dilemma so that it doesn't happen again, and we need light on that corner.
Shadle. Alderman Shadle. There's a street light on the corner. There. On the southeast corner. There's a pole. It's got a street light on. Alderman Shadle, have you driven through there? I drove by it tonight. Okay, was it dark outside? It had not become lit yet. Okay, so when you leave here tonight, I'm gonna ask you to go to the
I ask you to please drive through Iroquois all the way up to state and you will see exactly
what I'm speaking of.
It's pitch black.
Yes, there is a street light across the street, but it's heading toward the Iroquois way,
at the State Way.
Manager Boyer, is there any way we can put a brighter light in that spot that Alderman
Shadle is talking about?
I can go by there tonight and have a look and yes, we can put a brighter light on the
existing pole.
I'm sure Mr. Galrapp would be helpful with us on that one.
So yeah, I'm sure we can make that happen.
Sellers. I drive that way all the time but um and I do know there is a light but I
think the problem is not really the light I think that the trees around there
need to be cut back a lot because those trees cover that light because that's the
way I go all the time when I'm leaving my family home and I go there all the
time but it's the trees that need to be cut back because they're too thick
Hick, around that light. Okay, Director Duckman, what are the chances of that, too, happening?
Of trimming back those trees? Yes. I'm sure we can ask Pat to cut some trees, right? Alright.
Alderman Sanders. Yeah, my concern is it's not the one light that is not illuminating
that whole block. That's what we're referring to is the reason why the request to push trees
and I have a question about the trees.
I think if you cut the trees back, even if you cut the trees down or cut them back, it's not going to illuminate that whole block, not that one pole.
So you need at least two poles or three, maybe.
I don't know.
But I think it should go all the way to Chicago myself, in front of the church.
But my thing is, cutting back trees is not going to cause one pole to illuminate that whole block.
I will say that as I circle through the Fifth Ward, I see a lot of street lights angled
down, not up.
And that too makes a difference in how much it's able, the area it's able to illuminate.
So I'm going to ask that that too be taken into consideration.
A lot of the lights in 3rd and 5th Ward are angled downward, not upward, where they can
illuminate.
Thank you.
If there's no further discussion, we'll move on to Department Head Reports, Finance.
Nothing this evening.
Yes ma'am.
can we take action on this I was hoping if there was any further discussion and no one said anything I
was hoping to take action on this tonight well I think it was kind of decided that we would
task the some trees to be removed or trimmed back and a brighter light put in and let's see how it
looks we can always talk about it once those things are done if it's not satisfactory okay
I'm not all right with that, but what do I say?
What do you want to do?
Let's take it one step at a time and see how, if it solves the problem, if it doesn't then
let's come back to the board.
Mayor Miller, there's people that know this area.
There's people that know the power in the angle of the light and the power in the bulb.
And so you already know what it's going to take to lighten up this area and make it better.
So that's all I'm asking for.
So if people are committing to lighting up that area and making it better, then okay.
George, did you want to say something about that?
Okay, Darren.
So George and I can go look at it together.
We have no problem adding, you know, additional lighting if it's needed.
There's different kinds of lighting.
The existing lighting that ComEd utilizes on most of their poles, the new LEDs has a downward
sweep on it, right?
So we can buy different lights to go on poles if that's the direction of council to try
to illuminate it better.
And cutting trees is just a function of ordering that to be done.
So we can absolutely have that done.
If it's not enough, then we can investigate adding another pole to the area or maybe adding
some lighting to the park, although I don't believe it's a city park.
Alderman, Alderman, Alderman
and others that are causing a little bit of darkness in the
community or whatever the case may be. If we can do that, also
in addition to what we're doing here on State and
Iroquois, I think we'll get a better
understanding of what's going on throughout the city itself.
So, we discussed this subject
I want to say maybe six months ago, and I brought
We can change lights out in areas. The police chief and I sat down and targeted some areas in town. To replace the lights is roughly probably $500 a fixture plus install to change them out to a brighter fixture, something like you'd see in downtown Freeport.
That's not something ComEd can support. That's something that we locally have to do. If we want to add poles and lights and tap those into the electric system, roughly that's going to cost us about $15,000 per pole to add and that's a cost to the City of Freeport because those pole placements and everything are already all negotiated out and I've talked to Georgia at length about it. They're more than willing to add them but that's a bill that we have to sustain.
and others.
Realistically, when we changed from an incandescent fixture, which used a lot more electricity,
those had more of a bulb type of fan light, where the LEDs are more directional because
they're way less wattage.
So I'm not saying we can't, we just have to have direction.
The last time we discussed this, and I can go back and get the date, there was no direction
to do anything, so we didn't do anything with it at that time because we can't have
have ComEd do it and not pay them for the work.
I don't know what the city can do with switching the heads or the light fixtures.
So on the ComEd-owned poles, ComEd has to change the fixtures on ComEd poles.
We can buy the lights and they can do the replacements, but they're their fixtures,
they're under their contracts.
Okay, I just don't want this to go another six months and don't see nothing happening
or nothing done.
So I am asking that we move on this now.
Alderman Sellers?
Alderman Stacy, I totally agree with you about lighting, but that is all over Freeport.
If you go down to the corner of, what is it, Ottawa and Iroquois, it's dark down, you
you can't hardly see down there. If you go, if you ride down Lincoln, it's dark riding
down Lincoln. If you ride down, so we need to make it where it's a whole city looking
into lighting, not just one area, because to me the whole city needs more lighting.
I understand what you're saying Alderman Sellers, but we have to start somewhere. We have to
to start somewhere. So I brought this tonight. Rachel and I brought this tonight to the Council,
hoping that we have a beginning of something wonderful and new. But we have to start somewhere.
Darren, do you have any idea how many lights the City has replaced with the brighter LED?
Excuse me. I believe that the only brighter LED lights in town are the ones that the city actually owns and paid for, which are through the downtown loops, because the ones that are outside of downtown are all comment owned. They're not directly ours.
that being said if we want to do a light I'm gonna call it a light fixture
replacement because it's not something we just change a bulb in you got to
change the whole head unit then we need direction on where that money will come
from out of the budget which is fine and we can move on it and I would suggest
that if we are going to make some changes then we work off of Chief
Shenberger's list of higher area of crime that's where we kind of started
and sort of directed that before, but we've got to have a budget to purchase these fixtures
out of because it will become our cost.
Alderman Sanders.
Yeah, I gather all of that which you just said, which is a true statement as I believe
it is.
But I also want, because my sister Alderman is crying about the scheduling and the planning
of this project and how to get it moving, getting it off the ground.
So I want Manager Boyer to give us a preview of how this is going to come about and what
it's going to cost us and things of this nature because I'm thinking that his input to when
this should be scheduled and done, we should be hearing it from Manager Boyer.
That's how we get this thing started, that's what I'm trying to say.
She wants to get it, Alderman, Stacy wants to get it started, I'm quite sure everybody
in this room wants to get it started because it's a necessity, it's a necessity and we
should not wait.
And so I'm asking Manager Boyer if it's possible that he can start this project planning so
So we can get a big view of how we're going to go about and what it's going to cost us
and how we're going to plan it out for the council to understand how we're going to go
about it in the community as well.
So I think starting this project is definitely something that I feel that should be something
you're looking into.
You should look into that matter so we can get it started.
Thomas, I don't want to hear her say, again, how to get it started, you know, or what should
we be doing, because to me it looks like, or sound like, I don't hear no sound.
I don't hear the reverberation that's supposed to be going on about, yeah, yeah, let's put
more lights out there so people are not getting killed, you know, that kind of stuff.
and so we need a plan and strategy, survey, all of the things that is required to make
this thing happen. I may not have all the answers right now, but I'm quite sure we
all sitting here collectively should be able to come up with a plan.
George, did you want to add to that?
Good evening, George Galrap, Freeport Residence, employed by ComEd. So, six months ago I did
take a tour of the streets that Darren gave me. They are LED lights. Freeport's, I believe
all Freeport lights, incandescent lights, have been replaced with LED. Now, maybe not
the standard of the alums that you want to have it, so I did give Darren a cost estimate
and let's do it the right way the first time. So if somebody else would like to join that
tour or make suggestions, that's fine. And like Alderman Sanders said, this is not one
area. I live in Catherine Drive over in Highland Heights along with Alderman Klemm and we have
one street light period, single street light. The developer traded out with the city 30
years ago that the homes were supposed to have a garage peak light to light the area.
Hardly any do. So we'll make sure we include the entire city. But next week or this week
coming up will be a tour of the Fifth Ward. Any questions?
Alderman Monroe. Thank you, Madam Mayor. Since you're here,
I'll ask you face to face. So northbound on 26, on the east side of the road, there's
a pole that was hit by lightning, burned to the ground. The wires are all the way to the
ground. Power line appears. I've been asking for over a year to get that fixed. Several
people within the city administration not been fixed the other who do we call to
notify of light street lights that are out and who's responsible for that pretty
easy it's 1-800-Edison-1 so 1-800-Edison-1 yes so it's 1-800-334-7661
or you can cheat and call me a lot quicker if you call me and the city
Manager will give you my cell number, okay? Any other questions? Thank you. Thank you.
You're welcome. Thank you, George.
Madam Mayor, I do have a question. Not for you, Mr. Goreff. Thank you for your time.
Yeah, go ahead.
Okay, so my question would be for you, Darren, or Wayne, whichever one. So trimming the trees,
getting a brighter bowl, what is our timeline?
Trim and Trees, we can probably get done if the weather holds in the next 5 to 10 days max.
Lights, I will have to see if we have anything in the inventory. If we do, we can address that.
I don't know if we have any ones that are as bright as Freeport or as downtown.
If not, we can order one based on supply. I would think within a couple weeks we could have that light changed out.
you know shouldn't be shouldn't be that big a hassle to get done as long as
that's direction we want to move yes you keep saying that why do you keep saying
that I what I'm if the one at the the corner of Iroquois and state is no
problem it's if we want to move further then we have to have more direction that
until we do the fifth board drive-through with Mr. Gaurav, we don't know, correct?
That's where it comes back to one step at a time.
Yep. Exactly. Okay, we good? And I believe Finance, you said no report. Community
Development. Nothing tonight Madam Mayor. Thank you. Public Works? Just one thing we
have a water main break on Galena, North Galena Avenue by the McDonald's and the
Lincoln Mall. We have traffic control set up at this time. Please avoid the area if
at all possible till we get the area fixed. I'm not sure if we'll get working
on it tomorrow or actually Wednesday. We're trying to pinpoint where the leak
is before we start digging the road up. Thank you. Chief Miller. No report from fire this
evening. Thank you. Chief Schaffer. I have nothing tonight. Thank you. Library. Now is
the perfect time to sign up for the Library's eNewsletter and learn all about our upcoming
events which include our American History lecture series, our One Book One Freeport
Community Read which begins on January 25th, and we are also working on a collaboration
with the Greater Freeport Partnership and the Link of Douglas Society for a Journey to Freedom,
Illinois's Underground Railroad, and it's a museum exhibit.
Thank you.
Communication?
IT?
City Manager?
Thank you, Your Honor.
I just want to report on the successful Refresh Freeport endeavor we did this last weekend.
We received, had 83 vehicles come by with over 17 tons of garbage.
so that's a victory as far as I'm concerned the Gills did not anticipate anywhere near
that much of a response so the way we have to look at it is this is garbage that's going
to end up in the dump not on these empty lots so that's all.
Thank you Mayor.
Yes.
Thank you to Gills' disposal.
Alderman Sellers?
No.
Nothing.
Alderman Klemm?
Clem? A couple things if I could. First off, we'll have a neighborhood watch on the 28th
at Schwartz Chapel. I'll get email out on that. And there's a group of concerned citizens
working at the moment with an extra amount of homeless people here in the city. As we
know, it's really going to get cold tonight. There's a setup at the church next door all
Ready to Go. The people are looking for somebody to help man it from different churches or
different organizations. So if there's anything we can do at all to help with this, you can
please get ahold of me and I can pass it on, or there's a number of people that you can
get ahold of. But it's really important because they have ten setups and FACC is overwhelmed
I've got it at the moment and it's something we as citizens need to help everybody out with.
Thank you.
My number is, I'll just give it 815-978-0484 and I'll be happy to pass any information on.
Thank you.
Alderman Monroe?
Thank you, Madam Mayor.
I'm glad we're getting to that water break that's been there for about three weeks now
that's important.
It's been wet for three weeks.
and, you know, never mind, that's all I've got, Mayor.
Thank you.
Alderman Simmons?
I don't have anything.
Thank you.
And Alderman Parker?
Nothing tonight.
Alderman Stake?
Nothing.
Alderman Shadle?
Nothing tonight.
Alderman Sanders?
Nothing.
That leaves us to public comment.
We had one that signed in, Makaya Stacey.
Good evening.
I'm here to express my deep concern
regarding the events surrounding item number nine,
discussing the revisions to ordinance chapter 220,
council section 220.10, rules of council,
which was discussed on November 12th.
It is a fact that after much conversation, Alderperson Stacy moved and Alderperson Simmons
seconded a motion to move this item to December 16th.
The motion was carried with full support from seven Alderpersons, including Klemm, Simmons,
Parker, Stacy, Shadle, Sanders, and Sellers.
It appears that the direction given by our elected Alderpersons was ignored and not respected
and the item was not placed on the December 16th agenda.
The people of Freeport would like to know why.
Not only was this a blatant disregard for the Council's decision, but it also furthered
and Z.
The City Council is pleased to announce that the Public Order has been informed of the
development of the Public Order by the Department of Public Administration.
The Public Order has made clear that the public will be able to exercise their authority.
This is a matter of course, and it is of course very important.
We are also very concerned about the current administration and the current actions of
the public.
We are also concerned about the current administration and the current actions of the public, which
seem rooted in inclusion and hate, have been designed to restrict the voice of our elected
officials and, by extension, the people of Freeport.
The proposal to increase fines and impose more strict rules further diminishes the public's
ability to engage in local governance.
We expected this Mayor to provide some type of explanation for our proposal on December
16.
Or did you think we would forget?
The situation needs to be addressed immediately.
I urge the Mayor, City Council, and the City Manager to take the necessary steps to uphold the will of the council and ensure that all items are discussed and placed on the agenda according to the proper procedures.
The public's trust in this administration has been shaken and transparency must be restored. Thank you.
Are there any other public comments?
Branch off what I said earlier. On November 19th, when they thought that they were going
to be able to knock my house down, Albers and Sons, one in my house stole a bunch of
stuff, created a felony theft, and I'm trying to figure out why they was not arrested. The
The only thing I could say is that Chief Shenberger told me today that he was going to still look
into it.
They continue to bring items every time they're spoken to.
Even today I got a call.
They have two of my bounce houses, commercial grade, that they keep getting.
I would have been arrested the second that they thought I committed felony theft.
I don't know why this is being ignored or being treated as not important.
And then also, I've talked to Mayor Miller, I've talked to Rob Boyer about the direct
Duckman has been aiming towards me. He actually said that he was going to knock down everything
I own. On the 27th of December, I served him and Steve Cox with a stop demolition order.
They tore down my house the same day. The legal is if I am filing a legal court proceeding
that my house automatically halted demolition. He chose to knock it down anyway. And I just
Don't Understand Why or Who's Ignoring What and Why Is He Giving So Much Power to Do What He Want?
And if it wasn't part of the approval on the council member, it's 402 and 404 E. Shawnee
that was not approved to get knocked down. Thank you.
Are there any other public comments?
Seeing none, we'll move on to Executive Session. Madam Clerk, could you please read that for the record?
We have two items tonight pursuant to 5 ILCS 122 C 11 litigation when an action against
effecting or on behalf of the particular public body has been filed and is pending before
a court or administration administrative tribunal or when the public body finds that an action
is probable or imminent in which case the basis for the finding shall be recorded and
entered into the minutes of the closed meeting. Pursuant to 5 ILCS 122 C 21 discussion of
of Minutes of Meetings, lawfully closed under this act,
whether for purposes of approval by the body of the minutes
or semi-annual review of the minutes
as mandated by Section 2.06.
Is there a motion to enter into executive session?
So moved. Second.
Motion made by Alderman Klemm, seconded by Alderman Monroe,
Madam Clerk, would you please take the roll?
Sellers?
Aye.
Klemm?
Aye.
Monroe?
Aye.
Simmons?
Stacy, Shadle, and Sanders.