WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:30.000
We're agreed upon. The RFQ and the draft agreement are two different documents. They do not coincide. In fact, there are contradictions between both. There are requirements listed in the RFQ that do not appear in the draft agreement and vice versa. It is essential that the agreement you approve truly reflects what is intended and what is best for Alberta's airport's future, not just what you were told in a memble.

00:00:30.000 --> 00:00:33.000
Thank you. Thank you for listening.

00:00:33.000 --> 00:00:36.000
Ashley Hauman?

00:00:40.000 --> 00:00:43.000
Ashley Hauman, I'm here tonight to speak on item number nine.

00:00:43.000 --> 00:00:46.000
I'm here tonight on behalf of one of my owners and myself.

00:00:46.000 --> 00:00:49.000
I would first like to note that neither myself nor my owner

00:00:49.000 --> 00:00:52.000
was notified of a possible change to an ordinance

00:00:52.000 --> 00:00:55.000
in regarding the short-term rental

00:00:55.000 --> 00:00:58.000
and noting that I am the rental registered

00:00:58.000 --> 00:01:00.000
and

00:01:01.100 --> 00:01:02.000
the

00:01:02.000 --> 00:01:04.000
Board of Trustees.

00:01:05.000 --> 00:01:06.000
I would like to thank you for your

00:01:06.000 --> 00:01:08.000
attention.

00:01:09.000 --> 00:01:12.000
I am a short-term rentals agent for the rental registry. Please

00:01:12.000 --> 00:01:15.000
know that you would have had to go to the planning commissioning

00:01:15.000 --> 00:01:18.000
agenda to know that there was a public hearing to discuss the

00:01:18.000 --> 00:01:21.000
changes being presented to you this evening. With that said,

00:01:21.000 --> 00:01:24.000
when it comes to short-term rentals, often called vacation

00:01:24.000 --> 00:01:27.000
rentals, everyone seems to become a real estate expert.

00:01:27.000 --> 00:01:29.000
O'Keefe, and his wife, Susan, Mary, who are home owners.

00:01:30.120 --> 00:01:32.120
The first home owners are those who

00:01:33.260 --> 00:01:35.260
work in the area, their employees, families use them to

00:01:35.500 --> 00:01:37.500
test neighborhoods before buying, individuals who are

00:01:38.120 --> 00:01:42.120
displaced from their home due to certain circumstances, traveling

00:01:42.120 --> 00:01:44.120
employment, such as the traveling nurses that work for

00:01:45.019 --> 00:01:48.879
FHN. These homes are typically well-maintained because owners

00:01:48.879 --> 00:01:50.879
depend on good reviews and constant bookings.

00:01:53.719 --> 00:01:55.719
In the real estate business, and I have firsthand acknowledged

00:01:55.719 --> 00:01:56.719
and more.

00:01:56.719 --> 00:01:59.640
They personally own several and have stayed at numerous short-term rentals.

00:01:59.640 --> 00:02:04.719
They provide flexibility for property owners, support local tourism and offer families and

00:02:04.719 --> 00:02:08.120
employees more housing choices throughout a city.

00:02:08.120 --> 00:02:12.599
Many of the issues often raised with these rentals, noise, property maintenance, nuisance

00:02:12.599 --> 00:02:16.079
activities are already addressed by city ordinance.

00:02:16.079 --> 00:02:20.919
The city has tools to address problems with these properties without stripping the rights

00:02:20.919 --> 00:02:23.039
of responsible owners.

00:02:23.039 --> 00:02:28.139
of the current proposed changes and rezoning to only allow in certain districts and removing

00:02:28.139 --> 00:02:29.299
those rights.

00:02:29.299 --> 00:02:34.199
The city could cap the number of vacation rentals permitted in R1 through R4 zoning

00:02:34.199 --> 00:02:37.579
or require special use permits for all zoning areas.

00:02:37.579 --> 00:02:43.899
This would prevent over concentrations, avoid clusters of rentals on the east side of town

00:02:43.899 --> 00:02:48.259
based on the current proposal change, and create a balanced approach that respects neighborhood

00:02:48.259 --> 00:02:50.859
character and provides property rights.

00:02:50.860 --> 00:02:55.560
Other cities like Galena have successfully started with a cap and extended those permits

00:02:55.560 --> 00:02:57.220
because they were going well.

00:02:57.220 --> 00:03:02.500
The city of Rockford requires special use permits for all areas for short-term rentals

00:03:02.500 --> 00:03:03.860
no matter the zoning.

00:03:03.860 --> 00:03:08.700
The village of Cherry Valley with only 2,300 people has a short-term rental ordinance with

00:03:08.700 --> 00:03:12.920
no zoning restrictions with many successes.

00:03:12.920 --> 00:03:16.900
Many of these areas have asked for support and guidance in the ordinance.

00:03:16.900 --> 00:03:21.099
Freeport has some opportunity to balance regulation that works for everyone.

00:03:21.099 --> 00:03:25.700
To strengthen the ordinance further, the City could add guardrails, tie guest limits to

00:03:25.700 --> 00:03:30.259
the bedroom countersquare footage, require a local property manager if the owner is not

00:03:30.259 --> 00:03:34.420
nearby, limit on-site vehicles, or evoke permits.

00:03:34.420 --> 00:03:39.540
This approach creates accountability without overreach, ensuring vacation rentals remain

00:03:39.540 --> 00:03:43.480
residential-friendly while protecting the rights of Freeport homeowners.

00:03:43.480 --> 00:03:45.580
Thank you.

00:03:45.580 --> 00:03:46.580
John Staben.

00:03:59.500 --> 00:04:00.500
Thank you.

00:04:00.500 --> 00:04:03.740
John Staben, 1070 North Canyon Drive.

00:04:03.740 --> 00:04:08.620
I'm here to speak on item 16, the airport manager agreement.

00:04:08.620 --> 00:04:10.580
Thank you for this time.

00:04:10.580 --> 00:04:12.420
I was the fifth person interested

00:04:12.420 --> 00:04:14.700
in the airport manager position.

00:04:14.700 --> 00:04:18.000
I have fought for Alberta's airport for years.

00:04:18.000 --> 00:04:20.640
When I found out Miss Jensen was going to be removed,

00:04:20.640 --> 00:04:22.780
I thought I might be able to help.

00:04:22.780 --> 00:04:25.420
I looked for a notice that an RFP

00:04:25.420 --> 00:04:27.939
for the airport position was available.

00:04:27.939 --> 00:04:30.140
I found none.

00:04:30.140 --> 00:04:32.180
On April 30th, I went to the City Hall

00:04:32.180 --> 00:04:36.060
and requested the RFP, request for a proposal.

00:04:36.060 --> 00:04:41.060
I received the RFQ, request for quotation, on August 13th,

00:04:41.060 --> 00:04:51.060
and was required to respond by September 1st, 18 days to create an LLC, get the bonds and other requirements.

00:04:51.060 --> 00:04:56.060
Only possible if you had prior knowledge this was happening.

00:04:56.060 --> 00:05:01.060
I responded to Mr. Boyer declaring that the RFQ was not biddable.

00:05:01.060 --> 00:05:07.060
As you all know, last year in this chamber it became known that arrangements were underway

00:05:07.060 --> 00:05:11.060
to fill this position with a friend of the city.

00:05:11.060 --> 00:05:16.060
They just needed to wait until Mrs. Jensen's contract expired.

00:05:16.060 --> 00:05:23.060
The draft contract to tonight's agenda was presented as presented on the web.

00:05:23.060 --> 00:05:27.060
It's nothing like the contract Mr. Boyer will sign.

00:05:27.060 --> 00:05:32.060
Please read the final contract before you approve this.

00:05:32.060 --> 00:05:39.060
Please remember this is a one year contract with 19 automatic renewals. This runs 20 years.

00:05:42.579 --> 00:05:49.579
I must come, I must come out, comment on Mr., I must compliment Mr. Boyer. This hurts. He

00:05:51.100 --> 00:05:58.100
has bragged for a year privately he was going to throw Angie Johnson off the airport. He

00:05:58.100 --> 00:06:09.460
has done just that. It wasn't pretty. It wasn't moral. And it certainly wasn't legal. In the

00:06:09.460 --> 00:06:14.580
next two years, the cost of operations at Albertus Airport will go up considerably due

00:06:14.580 --> 00:06:22.860
to lost hang rent. I think the taxpayers should know this. Thank you.

00:06:22.860 --> 00:06:23.699
Cheryl Altman.

00:06:31.500 --> 00:06:33.780
Good evening, my name's Cheryl Altman.

00:06:33.780 --> 00:06:35.780
I'm gonna start with number 13 first

00:06:35.780 --> 00:06:37.520
for the Solar Savings Program.

00:06:38.480 --> 00:06:40.620
I'd like to know, are the taxpayers the one

00:06:40.620 --> 00:06:43.139
that are paying for all these solar panels going up?

00:06:44.020 --> 00:06:46.420
And also, who's getting all the incentives

00:06:46.420 --> 00:06:48.020
from all these solar's going up?

00:06:49.340 --> 00:06:51.740
My next one is number five.

00:06:51.740 --> 00:07:03.060
Fowler. They're renting to Pete Elber for $2,000. That's $166.66 a month. You tell me where anybody

00:07:03.060 --> 00:07:10.259
in this town can go rent a space for $166.66 a month, only if you're friends and family

00:07:10.259 --> 00:07:13.259
with the mayor.

00:07:13.259 --> 00:07:23.980
McClure. Madam Clerk, could you please note for the record that Alderman Simmons joined

00:07:23.980 --> 00:07:31.259
at 622? 622? Correct. Thank you. So we'll move on to item number four which is the consent

00:07:31.259 --> 00:07:35.139
agenda. The consent agenda is considered to be routine in nature unless there's a member

00:07:35.139 --> 00:07:40.259
of the council like to have something removed for further discussion. The consent agenda

00:07:40.259 --> 00:07:41.259
and others.

00:07:41.259 --> 00:07:46.819
The process consists of approving to receive and place on file building permit reports,

00:07:46.819 --> 00:07:51.459
police department reports, and fire department reports all dated August 2025.

00:07:51.459 --> 00:07:58.379
The proclamation for National Sea Treks thinks train week September 15th through the 21st.

00:07:58.379 --> 00:08:03.699
Approval for the 2026 holiday schedule, city council schedule, and the Committee of the

00:08:03.699 --> 00:08:05.259
Whole schedule.

00:08:05.259 --> 00:08:12.199
Payable for the finance bill is payable in total of $3,900,279.24 and payroll ending

00:08:12.199 --> 00:08:21.199
September 6, 2025 in the total of $668,777.79.

00:08:21.199 --> 00:08:22.639
Is there a motion to approve?

00:08:22.639 --> 00:08:23.639
So moved.

00:08:23.639 --> 00:08:24.639
Second.

00:08:24.639 --> 00:08:29.159
We have a motion made by Alderman Shadle, seconded by Alderman Johnson.

00:08:29.159 --> 00:08:31.159
Madam Clerk, please take the roll.

00:08:31.160 --> 00:08:48.000
Sanders. On the consent agenda, do you approve? No. Klemm? Aye. Johnson? Aye. Simmons? Parker? Aye.

00:08:48.000 --> 00:09:09.299
Stacy and Shadle. The motion passes six to two. Five to two. Thank you. Okay, item

00:09:09.299 --> 00:09:13.039
number five is the second reading of ordinance 2025-53. Could you please read

00:09:13.039 --> 00:09:19.719
Ordinance authorizing the city to enter into a fifth renewal to lease agreement with Pete

00:09:19.719 --> 00:09:23.399
Albert for 103 to 111 South Liberty Avenue.

00:09:23.399 --> 00:09:24.399
Thank you.

00:09:24.399 --> 00:09:25.399
Manager Boyer?

00:09:25.399 --> 00:09:26.679
Thank you, Your Honor.

00:09:26.679 --> 00:09:32.360
Pete Albert currently leases the first floor of the Raleigh Metal-clad building.

00:09:32.360 --> 00:09:36.319
There are several floors in the building that are also available for rent.

00:09:36.320 --> 00:09:43.080
If anyone's interested, they're welcome to come to the city and solicit their interest

00:09:43.080 --> 00:09:44.879
in that.

00:09:44.879 --> 00:09:51.360
As for right now, Mr. Elber is leasing it for $2,000 annually, and this is the fifth

00:09:51.360 --> 00:09:58.480
renewal staff request moving forward with this fifth lease renewal.

00:09:58.480 --> 00:09:59.480
Discussion?

00:09:59.480 --> 00:10:00.480
Alderman Stacey?

00:10:00.480 --> 00:10:10.960
Alderman, Stacy To my understanding, City Manager Boyer, forgive

00:10:10.960 --> 00:10:17.519
me, you speak about other floors being able to be rented.

00:10:17.519 --> 00:10:22.680
However, how would one know that when it's not put out there?

00:10:22.680 --> 00:10:37.400
You spoke about $2,000 a year. It's a steal. But what you didn't speak about is how the

00:10:37.400 --> 00:10:45.000
taxes that's paid on that building is paid by the city because it's in the city's name.

00:10:45.000 --> 00:10:57.279
and so it's maybe a little over $100 for the whole year.

00:10:57.279 --> 00:11:00.960
But that's not accurate, Alderman, Stacy.

00:11:00.960 --> 00:11:05.799
As it was discussed in the last meeting, the city is reimbursed for it.

00:11:05.799 --> 00:11:14.440
Yes, the city is reimbursed, but why get those French benefits in the city's name?

00:11:14.440 --> 00:11:25.840
Why isn't? Because he's renting that floor. Why isn't the rental agreement drawn up and

00:11:25.840 --> 00:11:30.760
the taxes on him and not weeping the benefit of the city?

00:11:30.760 --> 00:11:35.360
Because we own it. It's no different than Manager Boyer.

00:11:35.360 --> 00:11:41.040
I just wanted to add, there's a change to this lease that will allow us to work out

00:11:41.039 --> 00:11:47.039
We've got a sale price for the building between now and the next time this renews so it would

00:11:47.039 --> 00:11:51.279
actually do exactly what you're asking for.

00:11:51.279 --> 00:11:54.559
So if he was able to purchase the building from the city, which I believe the city is

00:11:54.559 --> 00:12:00.039
willing to liquidate at some point here soon, that would put the tax burden on.

00:12:00.039 --> 00:12:01.839
At what cost?

00:12:01.839 --> 00:12:02.839
We're not hearing.

00:12:02.839 --> 00:12:03.839
What are you wanting to sell?

00:12:03.839 --> 00:12:08.000
We're not quite there yet and we have to renew the lease right now because we have a lease

00:12:08.000 --> 00:12:09.000
and others.

00:12:09.000 --> 00:12:10.000
So, I think that's what we're looking at.

00:12:10.000 --> 00:12:12.440
I don't know if it's expiring, but in this version, we've made it available so we could

00:12:12.440 --> 00:12:16.879
open it up and sell the building if that meets Council's approval.

00:12:16.879 --> 00:12:20.879
What I don't want is that it be sold for a dollar.

00:12:20.879 --> 00:12:21.879
Understood.

00:12:21.879 --> 00:12:22.879
I understand.

00:12:22.879 --> 00:12:23.879
So...

00:12:23.879 --> 00:12:24.879
There's no further discussion.

00:12:24.879 --> 00:12:25.879
Alderman Sanders?

00:12:25.879 --> 00:12:26.879
Yeah.

00:12:26.879 --> 00:12:29.879
There's no further discussion. Alderman Sanders?

00:12:29.879 --> 00:12:39.279
Yeah. This ordinance that we're looking at is considered an authorized ordinance by the

00:12:39.279 --> 00:12:47.480
City of Freeport, the City. Who's authorizing this and is it a real ordinance? Is it, because

00:12:47.480 --> 00:12:55.440
I see here, I see it's doctored up here, an Ordinance 2025-53. Is that a legit ordinance

00:12:55.440 --> 00:13:01.840
Authorization from the City, and that means from the Council. That means the Council has

00:13:01.840 --> 00:13:12.840
to authorize that lease before you, Mr. Boyer, even consider, and it needs a revision. That

00:13:12.840 --> 00:13:19.940
ordinance and the leasing needs a revision for Council to go back to justify whether

00:13:49.940 --> 00:14:19.940
A lot of questions there. Do you mind if I answer a few of them? Okay. So where did it come from? We've had that we've been renting that building to Pete Elber since 2021. Then the rent at that time was 1000. Then in 2022, the rent was increased to 2000. Who was authorizing? The City Council. City Council. Yes. Okay. So in the City Council is authorized it for

00:14:49.940 --> 00:14:59.940
Please stop talking. Please stop talking. Attorney Zito, would you like to answer any of that? You don't want to implement it. Robert rules.

00:14:59.940 --> 00:15:11.940
So, to address some of your questions in addition to what Manager Boyer said, the ordinance, this ordinance is before you tonight so that the council can vote on it.

00:15:11.940 --> 00:15:20.940
It's not a done deal. It's here tonight for you guys. The reason why we're talking about it is so that the council can vote on whether or not you want to approve the ordinance or not.

00:15:20.940 --> 00:15:24.940
Is it a legitimate ordinance is what I'm saying.

00:15:24.940 --> 00:15:35.940
It's legitimate in the sense that once you if you guys vote to approve it, then it will become a approved ordinance by the city council as of right now it's a it's pending your guys's vote.

00:15:35.940 --> 00:15:38.940
So it's not an ordinance.

00:16:08.940 --> 00:16:11.940
if you vote not to approve it, then it goes away.

00:16:11.940 --> 00:16:12.940
Okay.

00:16:12.940 --> 00:16:16.940
Madam Clerk, please take the roll.

00:16:16.940 --> 00:16:17.940
Sanders.

00:16:17.940 --> 00:16:18.940
No.

00:16:18.940 --> 00:16:19.940
Klemm.

00:16:19.940 --> 00:16:20.940
Aye.

00:16:20.940 --> 00:16:21.940
Johnson.

00:16:21.940 --> 00:16:22.940
Aye.

00:16:22.940 --> 00:16:23.940
Simmons.

00:16:23.940 --> 00:16:24.940
Aye.

00:16:24.940 --> 00:16:25.940
Parker.

00:16:25.940 --> 00:16:26.940
Aye.

00:16:26.940 --> 00:16:33.940
Stacy.

00:16:33.940 --> 00:16:34.940
No.

00:16:34.940 --> 00:16:35.940
Shadle.

00:16:35.940 --> 00:16:36.940
Aye.

00:16:36.940 --> 00:16:43.840
I have five to two for the lease of property an ordinance has to pass by

00:16:43.840 --> 00:16:47.420
three-fourth three-fourths vote of the corporate authority so three-fourths of

00:16:47.420 --> 00:16:50.720
nine so because the corporate authorities are the council plus the

00:16:50.720 --> 00:16:54.820
mayor you would need a vote of seven in order to pass so this would not pass

00:16:54.820 --> 00:16:59.820
thank you attorney we'll move on to item number six which is the second reading

00:16:59.820 --> 00:17:06.860
of ordinance 2025 57 could you please read this am I in the wrong place I'm

00:17:06.860 --> 00:17:19.380
on 54. Ordinance Establishing the Gladewood Special Service Area and Accepting Dedication

00:17:19.380 --> 00:17:24.940
of Roadways and Levy of Taxes to Offset the Cost of Special Services.

00:17:24.940 --> 00:17:29.980
Thank you, Your Honor. So the City received a petition from a majority of property owners

00:17:29.980 --> 00:17:34.840
in the Gladewood subdivision requesting the creation of a special service area following

00:17:34.839 --> 00:17:39.059
Reporting Required Notices and a public meeting held on May 28th.

00:17:39.059 --> 00:17:41.139
No valid objections were filed.

00:17:41.139 --> 00:17:47.419
The ordinance establishes the special service area, dedicates the subdivision roadway to

00:17:47.419 --> 00:17:51.899
the city, and outlines the framework for funding ongoing maintenance.

00:17:51.899 --> 00:17:57.799
The SSA ensures improvements to the subdivision's upper and lower entrances, including roadway

00:17:57.799 --> 00:18:01.439
base and asphalt upgrades, meeting engineering standards.

00:18:01.440 --> 00:18:06.860
The City will also create a sustainable mechanism for funding services to the benefit area without

00:18:06.860 --> 00:18:11.559
burdening existing taxpayers with the full cost of the needed improvements.

00:18:11.559 --> 00:18:18.920
The ordinance provides for an annual levy of $400 per taxable parcel across 16 parcels.

00:18:18.920 --> 00:18:23.900
The revenues will offset costs of roadway maintenance and improvements specific to Gladewood

00:18:23.900 --> 00:18:26.519
ensuring equitable cost recovery.

00:18:26.519 --> 00:18:33.359
F. recommends moving forward with the ordinance establishing the Gladewood SSA or Special

00:18:33.359 --> 00:18:34.359
Service Area.

00:18:34.359 --> 00:18:42.759
And then, Manager Boyer, there's also the lined copy, do you want to speak to that?

00:18:42.759 --> 00:18:48.799
Just a few comments, this would go for approximately 15 years, I know that was a, or it will go

00:18:48.799 --> 00:18:54.759
for 15 years, that was a question that came up before, it also identifies the lot numbers

00:18:54.759 --> 00:18:57.640
and Parcel IDs.

00:18:57.640 --> 00:19:03.480
So what you have, Council, would be a motion to add that amendment to clarify, correct,

00:19:03.480 --> 00:19:07.200
to clarify that there's 15 years put into the agreement.

00:19:07.200 --> 00:19:08.200
Right.

00:19:08.200 --> 00:19:13.119
So from the version that was previously presented to you at the last council, there was inadvertently

00:19:13.119 --> 00:19:18.079
left out of the ordinance, the timeframe for which the SSA would be effective, which is

00:19:18.079 --> 00:19:19.079
15 years.

00:19:19.079 --> 00:19:22.759
The petitioners, actually when they petition for the SSA, also agreed that it would be

00:19:22.759 --> 00:19:23.759
15 years.

00:19:23.759 --> 00:19:27.680
and a reference was left out of the ordinance there.

00:19:27.680 --> 00:19:31.319
So what you have that was on your desk in the red line,

00:19:31.319 --> 00:19:33.799
the underlying language is the additional language

00:19:33.799 --> 00:19:35.879
that would be proposed to be added into this.

00:19:35.879 --> 00:19:38.279
So if you guys are agreeable to that added language,

00:19:38.279 --> 00:19:41.859
just to clarify the fact that it's a 15 year assessment

00:19:41.859 --> 00:19:44.640
of this SSA tax, a motion in a second

00:19:44.640 --> 00:19:49.519
to add this underlying language in would be made.

00:19:49.519 --> 00:19:51.240
Seconded, if that's approved,

00:19:51.240 --> 00:19:54.700
then you guys would move the second reading final vote

00:19:54.700 --> 00:19:56.380
on the ordinance as amended.

00:19:57.539 --> 00:20:01.079
So is there a motion to add the 15 years into the document?

00:20:01.079 --> 00:20:01.920
So moved.

00:20:01.920 --> 00:20:02.759
Second.

00:20:02.759 --> 00:20:05.120
The motion made by Alderman Shadle,

00:20:05.120 --> 00:20:07.079
seconded by Alderman Klemm,

00:20:07.079 --> 00:20:11.000
discussion on the 15 year amended portion.

00:20:11.000 --> 00:20:11.920
Alderman Stacy.

00:20:12.799 --> 00:20:15.859
What do we do after the 15 years?

00:20:15.859 --> 00:20:18.160
Then it goes away, that assessment goes away.

00:20:21.240 --> 00:20:33.680
Alderman, Sanders, yeah who who who is continually to well I wanted to call it

00:20:33.680 --> 00:20:41.640
the special the special maintenance upkeep and everything is it because the

00:20:41.640 --> 00:20:49.480
city is gonna take on the responsibilities of this particular site

00:20:49.480 --> 00:20:58.000
yes just just to kind of hit some of the highlights it was plotted that the road

00:20:58.000 --> 00:21:04.319
was a private street back in 19 I believe 63 no one really knew that until

00:21:04.319 --> 00:21:08.440
we did some investigation as to the relation it related to gladewood bridge

00:21:08.440 --> 00:21:14.799
and it was possible there because it came to our attention then we notified

00:21:14.799 --> 00:21:44.799
I think there were some arguments one way or the other as far as why it wasn't, why the city wasn't responsible today but it was doing work in the past. This is essentially our negotiated settlement with the property owners in the area so that they're participating in the cost of the road that was never built to city specification and we're offsetting the cost to fix it so that it's not completely borne by the city.

00:21:44.799 --> 00:21:49.359
Taxpayers. Did that answer your question? Is that the taxpayers of that particular

00:21:49.359 --> 00:21:54.159
area? Yeah, well in Gladewood, the lots that are mentioned in the ordinance, each

00:21:54.159 --> 00:21:57.440
one of them will be assessed $400 per year for 15 years, so there's

00:21:57.440 --> 00:22:06.200
approximately 16 landowners. Okay. Any other discussion on the amendment? Madam

00:22:06.200 --> 00:22:09.279
Clerk, would you please take the role on the amendment of adding the language of

00:22:09.279 --> 00:22:23.680
Sanders, Klemm, Johnson, Simmons, Parker, Stacey, and Shadle.

00:22:23.680 --> 00:22:26.519
The motion passes 7-0.

00:22:26.519 --> 00:22:31.000
So then now before you counsel would be the passage of the amended version.

00:22:31.000 --> 00:22:36.000
If there's no further discussion, Madam Clerk, please take the roll.

00:22:36.000 --> 00:22:37.000
I'm sorry.

00:22:37.000 --> 00:22:38.000
Go ahead.

00:22:38.000 --> 00:22:44.680
So I guess my only problem with this is we add them and then they they jump the line like we we start on

00:22:44.680 --> 00:22:50.039
Claywood when we've had roads that have been part of the city infrastructure and

00:22:50.039 --> 00:22:55.920
have been waiting to get done and then this area gets to go first because we

00:22:55.920 --> 00:23:01.220
added them and haven't done it. It's a yes asterisk okay right now the

00:23:01.220 --> 00:23:06.140
entrance and exit of the area is in really poor degraded shape so in the

00:23:06.140 --> 00:23:13.500
since that yes we're going to fix approximately 400 feet of that road so that the entry and exit is

00:23:13.500 --> 00:23:20.940
passable but the rest of Gladewood will have to wait in the normal road program when council brings

00:23:20.940 --> 00:23:26.780
it to staff's attention that need to move forward so it doesn't this is not a reconstruct of the

00:23:26.780 --> 00:23:32.540
entire Gladewood Road this is simply the dealing with the issues at the front and the back entry

00:23:32.539 --> 00:23:33.159
and

00:23:33.159 --> 00:23:34.920
Alex,

00:23:34.920 --> 00:23:35.440
Jason,

00:23:35.440 --> 00:23:36.180
sleeve,

00:23:36.180 --> 00:23:36.559
Alex.

00:23:36.559 --> 00:23:37.599
Go ahead.

00:23:37.599 --> 00:23:44.579
I guess my problem with that is most of our roadways, the entry and exit areas need to be redone.

00:23:44.579 --> 00:23:51.139
So, that's my only thing with that. Like, that's fine. But in time, in your turn, like,

00:23:51.139 --> 00:23:56.839
we should just, I don't see the ferrety in that. We do it right away just because.

00:23:56.839 --> 00:24:03.959
Well, and to answer that, these residents are paying an additional $400 a month for,

00:24:03.959 --> 00:24:09.879
I'm sorry, $400 a year for 15 years so that we would be able to have the cost offset to

00:24:09.879 --> 00:24:15.199
make repairs to that area. So there is a give and a take there.

00:24:15.199 --> 00:24:17.799
Can I follow up with that?

00:24:17.799 --> 00:24:18.799
Alderman Sanders?

00:24:18.799 --> 00:24:34.599
Yeah, is that a collective annual $400 a year for the collective area or individual? Individuals. Individuals, okay, good, all right.

00:24:34.599 --> 00:24:35.639
Alderman Stacey.

00:24:35.639 --> 00:24:46.000
Every home in this Glenwood area will be paying $400 every year.

00:24:46.000 --> 00:24:47.119
For 15 years.

00:24:47.119 --> 00:24:48.279
For 15 years.

00:24:48.279 --> 00:24:55.000
yes and they're in agreement with this yes that's what took so long the majority

00:24:55.000 --> 00:24:59.720
yes there's going to be people who may not agree but we we have gone through

00:24:59.720 --> 00:25:04.180
the process followed the legal procedures and we are able to move

00:25:04.180 --> 00:25:13.119
forward with a special assessment based upon the participants yes madam clerk

00:25:13.120 --> 00:25:38.440
please take the roll. This is on final passage with the amendment. Sanders, Klemm, Johnson, Simmons, Parker, Stacy, and Shadle. And the ordinance passes seven to zero.

00:25:38.440 --> 00:25:45.799
item number seven is a second reading of ordinance 2025 56 could you please read

00:25:45.799 --> 00:25:51.220
this ordinance amending chapters 1248 and 1250 of the zoning code of the city

00:25:51.220 --> 00:25:56.600
of Freeport concerning ground-mounted solar arrays thank you director duckman

00:25:56.600 --> 00:26:01.920
thank you madam mayor so the last time this was up we're at second reading

00:26:01.920 --> 00:26:07.000
right now and at the first reading it was discussed a little more might maybe

00:26:07.000 --> 00:26:11.440
We wanted a little more detail about the voting and what was discussed.

00:26:11.440 --> 00:26:20.480
So as stated in the first reading, the vote was 5-0-0 at our Planning Commission.

00:26:20.480 --> 00:26:26.880
And the people that were present were Ryan Walton, Matt Moyer, Andrea Schultz-Winner,

00:26:26.880 --> 00:26:29.240
Dr. George Walker, and Dustin Wilkinson.

00:26:29.240 --> 00:26:33.759
So specifically, that's who was present.

00:26:33.759 --> 00:27:03.759
I know Director Steekle had also mentioned, had talked about this matter, but he was not present, Bill Green also wasn't present, so just giving a little background here, there was, due to the fact that Mr. Steekle and Mr. Green were not present, they were, as we stated earlier, two members who had strong opinions on this matter, they were not actually at the meeting, truly there was discussion, but it wasn't

00:27:03.759 --> 00:27:11.119
and I wouldn't call it lengthy and, you know, with all that being said, this matter was

00:27:11.119 --> 00:27:18.079
discussed at the Planning Commission meeting and staff is recommending moving this ordinance

00:27:18.079 --> 00:27:19.079
forward.

00:27:19.079 --> 00:27:20.079
Discussion?

00:27:20.079 --> 00:27:24.319
Madam Clerk, please take the roll.

00:27:24.319 --> 00:27:25.319
Hold it.

00:27:25.319 --> 00:27:26.319
Alderman Sanders.

00:27:26.319 --> 00:27:27.319
Hold it.

00:27:27.319 --> 00:27:38.319
Last meeting, were you making reference to not moving it forward?

00:27:38.319 --> 00:27:46.319
No, the first reading I recommended and it was voted to move it forward for second reading.

00:27:46.319 --> 00:27:47.319
Oh, it was?

00:27:47.319 --> 00:27:48.319
Yes.

00:27:48.319 --> 00:28:09.519
My thing is, okay, with that, who does all of the infrastructure or the construction of this solar mounting and who benefits from it?

00:28:09.519 --> 00:28:17.720
Well, I mean, I would have to agree that really doesn't have anything to do with this ordinance

00:28:17.720 --> 00:28:31.160
who does what a question on the ordinance about can go in that direction there's

00:28:31.160 --> 00:28:35.640
not I think another way I think what mayor Miller is saying is that this

00:28:35.640 --> 00:28:43.519
ordinance has to do with somebody being allowed to to put or install a solar a

00:28:43.519 --> 00:28:44.519
and Schoenberg.

00:28:44.519 --> 00:28:54.240
I know that before I was rudely interrupted, I understand that.

00:28:54.240 --> 00:29:02.920
But my thing, especially concerning, there's a concern there when I'm reading this about

00:29:02.920 --> 00:29:04.799
the mounting, the ground mounting.

00:29:04.799 --> 00:29:10.759
Is the City of Freeport, or the residents, should be concerned about the mounting of

00:29:40.759 --> 00:29:41.059
and

00:29:41.059 --> 00:29:41.259
General.

00:29:41.259 --> 00:29:44.019
Lee that ground mounted solar doesn't fit with the

00:29:44.019 --> 00:29:45.220
character of the neighborhood.

00:29:45.220 --> 00:29:46.859
And so sorry.

00:29:46.859 --> 00:29:47.099
Go ahead.

00:29:47.099 --> 00:29:49.240
Can you give me the characteristics of this

00:29:49.240 --> 00:29:53.700
ordinance and kind of defined it for me so I can

00:29:53.700 --> 00:29:57.859
understand exactly how did this ordinance came to be

00:29:57.859 --> 00:30:00.539
came into existence.

00:30:00.539 --> 00:30:04.119
Director Steagall would you like to address that.

00:30:04.119 --> 00:30:06.660
I sit on the Planning Commission and it was the

00:30:06.660 --> 00:30:09.980
direction of the Commission members that they are not

00:30:09.980 --> 00:30:39.980
We are interested in having ground mount solar. Currently our ordinance provides if you wish to have roof mounted solar that's fully acceptable and you don't need city approval to do that in order to put it on the ground which most of it's built through steel structures on the ground and it becomes a giant lawn ornament, right? That's the contention of the Planning Commission is neighbors generally don't want to see these in their yard if they're not in favor of them because they're very large and obtrusive.

00:30:39.980 --> 00:30:44.460
So it has nothing to do with the structure itself as in the way it's structurally built

00:30:44.460 --> 00:30:51.720
It's in the looks of the property right and these types of panels only benefit the actual user that installs them

00:30:51.720 --> 00:30:53.720
Nothing goes back to the grid. It's for the house only

00:30:55.019 --> 00:30:57.019
Okay

00:30:57.940 --> 00:30:59.940
Currently how many

00:31:00.980 --> 00:31:02.980
Ground mount solar

00:31:03.620 --> 00:31:09.059
Do we have so the last I did a little bit of research on that

00:31:09.980 --> 00:31:39.980
We had, and this is in the past two years, we've had an uptick in the amount of the solar projects and the reason that there's an uptick is there's many of the private sector has truly pushed the installation of solar due to the fact that there's incentives to construct solar, so they're essentially salespeople are, I'm sure everyone in this room has had a salesperson trying to sell them solar, so in the past

00:31:39.980 --> 00:31:45.720
Last year we've had Park Hills, which was owning a Board of Appeals, they recommended

00:31:45.720 --> 00:31:55.799
approval 4-0, Planning Commission at that point recommended 5-1, it passed, City Council.

00:31:55.799 --> 00:32:00.460
Park Hills has had quite a few people complain after the fact.

00:32:00.460 --> 00:32:08.220
They don't like the way it looks, and I think, and moving on from there, we had 1405 South

00:32:08.220 --> 00:32:13.220
Benson, which was a large residential lot. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended

00:32:13.220 --> 00:32:19.880
approval 5 to 0. Planning Commission voted 5 to 0. That ended up passing our City

00:32:19.880 --> 00:32:25.360
Council. 1161 West Lincoln. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended approval 5

00:32:25.360 --> 00:32:31.160
0 with one abstention. The Planning Commission voted against this and it

00:32:31.160 --> 00:32:36.000
ultimately failed Council. So you're starting to see midway through this

00:33:06.000 --> 00:33:13.000
you're starting to see it in the evidence because it let 1161 West Lincoln Planning Commission voted against it, it failed City Council.

00:33:13.000 --> 00:33:20.000
Then you look at Harmony Church, that was a highly contested ground-mounted solar project.

00:33:20.000 --> 00:33:25.000
That went through zoning water repeals five to zero, Planning Commission was zero to six to one.

00:33:25.000 --> 00:33:35.000
So at this point you're starting to see our Planning Commission is digging in its heels, not really seeing the connection to our community with ground-mounted solar.

00:33:35.000 --> 00:33:42.000
Ultimately, that did pass council, although it took several hearings before it was heard.

00:33:42.000 --> 00:33:52.059
So the point here is that, to your point, our Planning Commission noticed that it was not

00:33:52.059 --> 00:33:58.200
well received in our community and they directed staff to draft an ordinance that would eliminate

00:33:58.200 --> 00:34:03.920
it zoning-wise in residential neighborhoods.

00:34:03.920 --> 00:34:17.599
Director Duckman, I think giving all that information about how the zoning department

00:34:17.599 --> 00:34:33.840
feel is being said to sway the vote. My original question was in the past two years, how many

00:34:33.840 --> 00:34:45.039
have we approved we've approved three out of four we have approved three out of the four

00:34:45.039 --> 00:34:52.640
we're not approving any ground monitor tonight we're trying to remove it I understand but

00:34:52.639 --> 00:35:09.079
It goes back, Madam Mayor, it goes back to us allowing some and now not others.

00:35:09.079 --> 00:35:14.759
And how do you say yes to one and no to someone else?

00:35:14.759 --> 00:35:16.879
I guess you just say it.

00:35:16.880 --> 00:35:46.880
So this goes back to realistically the error of City Manager Crowe who decided at that time with the council that we were a solar friendly city and we were experimenting with solar and trying to you know a lot of communities were looking at the facts of what solar was and wasn't and so as with any new process you learn things over time what

00:35:46.880 --> 00:35:48.880
and

00:35:49.880 --> 00:35:52.880
the other two are the two projects that we have been working on

00:35:52.880 --> 00:35:54.880
to see what works and what doesn't work.

00:35:55.880 --> 00:35:58.880
And we did allow a handful of these projects to move forward.

00:35:58.880 --> 00:36:02.880
And we've gotten feedback from community members more than like

00:36:02.880 --> 00:36:05.880
them. We've had more feedback that people don't like them.

00:36:05.880 --> 00:36:09.880
The biggest example is the one that's at Park Hills Church.

00:36:09.880 --> 00:36:12.880
There's, I don't want to say there's been issues with it

00:36:12.880 --> 00:36:14.880
throughout, but maintenance has been a problem.

00:36:14.880 --> 00:36:19.800
that nobody could see happening until it it started to happen and we're also

00:36:19.800 --> 00:36:24.119
talking the difference between residential zoning and commercial

00:36:24.119 --> 00:36:30.039
zoning so this application here is for residential home zoning so it'd be if

00:36:30.039 --> 00:36:33.320
your next-door neighbor came to the council and said I want to fill my

00:36:33.320 --> 00:36:37.880
backyard full of an array and you can see it from your house while it's their

00:36:37.880 --> 00:36:44.720
property is their property well I'm glad you feel that way but a lot of other

00:36:44.720 --> 00:36:53.720
and other people don't because it becomes their problem and Wayne's exactly right in dealing with a lot of solar companies over the last year.

00:36:53.720 --> 00:37:04.720
Many of the solar companies are pushing the ground mount because it's cheaper for them to install than the roof mount and it's less work for them long term, even though it hides it better from the community.

00:37:04.720 --> 00:37:10.920
Well, while I do sit on the Planning Commission, and I agree totally with their recommendation

00:37:10.920 --> 00:37:14.400
to get rid of this, this wasn't pushed by me.

00:37:14.400 --> 00:37:19.360
This was a completely unanimous vote by the Planning Commission, and we directed Council,

00:37:19.360 --> 00:37:25.440
which is Mr. Cox, that sits on that committee, to draft this ordinance so we don't have to

00:37:25.440 --> 00:37:29.840
keep having these hearings and discussions about GroundMount Solar because we don't think

00:37:29.840 --> 00:37:31.960
that it fits the residential platform.

00:37:31.960 --> 00:37:35.599
We're not talking about panels that are two by two, we're talking about panels that are

00:37:35.599 --> 00:37:36.599
ten by eight.

00:37:36.599 --> 00:37:37.599
Wow.

00:37:37.599 --> 00:37:38.599
It's a big difference.

00:37:38.599 --> 00:37:40.159
Yeah, it is.

00:37:40.159 --> 00:37:46.079
And so the panels, they get primarily mounted on rooftops now, are about a two by two square

00:37:46.079 --> 00:37:49.119
in bundles that they put on based on your usage.

00:37:49.119 --> 00:37:54.760
The ones that they put in backyards are actually a trapeze of steel that they get put on and

00:37:54.760 --> 00:37:59.360
most of the panels are eight to ten foot tall and probably four foot wide and the average

00:37:59.360 --> 00:38:03.480
House probably needs four to six of them to gain power so we're talking about you

00:38:03.480 --> 00:38:07.640
know a mini RV of solar panels sitting in the backyard that everybody's got to

00:38:07.640 --> 00:38:13.320
steer at in their community. But that's not what Harmony asks for that's not what

00:38:13.320 --> 00:38:20.079
that is exactly what Harmony asked for that large yes ma'am and you and it was

00:38:20.079 --> 00:38:27.320
in the back it was it was by their garage near the trees of their property

00:38:27.320 --> 00:38:31.160
but that is exactly what they asked for and that's what this council approved.

00:38:31.160 --> 00:38:40.519
Yes because what was the the danger of it other than we might see it driving down

00:38:40.519 --> 00:38:48.920
what's the road? Pearl City Road. Yes. The danger of it in my opinion is exactly

00:38:48.920 --> 00:38:53.480
what we're talking about here. That church is in a residentially zoned area

00:38:53.480 --> 00:39:00.079
that opens up to more residentially zoned people adding this and so what the

00:39:00.079 --> 00:39:05.000
Planning Commission is recommending and I'm not speaking for everyone but I

00:39:05.000 --> 00:39:08.880
think based on the vote I can we're recommending that this is not a path that

00:39:08.880 --> 00:39:14.079
Freeport should move forward that it will not long-term benefit residential

00:39:14.079 --> 00:39:19.480
properties and it'll become an eyesore like an old car sitting in a yard over

00:39:19.480 --> 00:39:34.559
There's no further discussion. Madam Clerk, please take the roll.

00:39:34.559 --> 00:39:43.440
Sanders? No. Klemm? Aye. Johnson? Aye. Simmons? Aye. Parker? Aye.

00:39:43.440 --> 00:39:48.639
Stacy? No. And Shadle? Aye. The motion passes five to two.

00:39:53.039 --> 00:39:58.000
Item number eight is the first reading of ordinance 2025-57. Could you please read this?

00:39:58.000 --> 00:40:03.280
Ordinance revising codified ordinances to create the position of Operations Superintendent.

00:40:03.280 --> 00:40:07.840
Thank you, Manager Boyer. Thank you, Your Honor. The Freeport Public Works team is requesting that

00:40:07.840 --> 00:40:13.120
City Council create a job description for the department in a restructuring effort.

00:40:13.120 --> 00:40:18.500
At this time, we are requesting the creation of a new position, Public Works Operation Superintendent.

00:40:18.500 --> 00:40:25.280
This is not an additional position to the department, but a promotional opportunity for a department

00:40:25.280 --> 00:40:30.320
leader to assume more management duties and responsibilities within the combined department

00:40:30.320 --> 00:40:31.320
leadership team.

00:40:31.320 --> 00:40:36.100
Due to a key employee leaving the City Public Works team, the department is looking to restructure

00:40:36.099 --> 00:40:37.099
and others.

00:40:37.099 --> 00:40:40.639
These are important key roles and responsibilities, allowing better collaboration and uniting

00:40:40.639 --> 00:40:42.440
the overall team.

00:40:42.440 --> 00:40:45.920
Creating an operations superintendent role will enable the department leader to effectively

00:40:45.920 --> 00:40:50.900
manage the daily activities of the construction crew and be involved in the utility operations

00:40:50.900 --> 00:40:52.099
division.

00:40:52.099 --> 00:40:55.819
This change will facilitate more departmental collaboration.

00:40:55.819 --> 00:41:00.219
Strategic plan alignment, aligned to a teamwork integration in departments are especially

00:41:00.219 --> 00:41:05.940
important because they direct impact the efficiency, consistency and overall performance of the

00:41:05.940 --> 00:41:10.860
and the Division. This position changes an important first step in evaluating overall

00:41:10.860 --> 00:41:17.139
non-bargaining job duties to ensure a unified approach to the departments. This new job description

00:41:17.139 --> 00:41:25.139
is budgeted for through the Public Works budget and should not increase the overall payroll

00:41:25.139 --> 00:41:26.139
of the department.

00:41:26.139 --> 00:41:27.740
Is there a motion to move forward?

00:41:27.740 --> 00:41:31.500
Staff recommends moving forward with this. And there is a request, due to the timeliness

00:41:31.500 --> 00:41:35.220
of this, there is a request for suspension of the rules.

00:41:35.220 --> 00:41:37.220
Is there a motion to move this forward?

00:41:37.220 --> 00:41:39.220
So I'll move.

00:41:39.220 --> 00:41:39.720
Second.

00:41:39.720 --> 00:41:43.020
A motion made by Alderman Shadle, seconded by Alderman Klemm.

00:41:43.020 --> 00:41:45.060
Discussion on this, Alderman Stacey?

00:41:48.700 --> 00:41:50.940
Alderman Stacey?

00:41:50.940 --> 00:41:58.300
Does this have something to do with an open position

00:41:58.300 --> 00:41:59.140
in Public Works?

00:42:02.300 --> 00:42:04.780
It does have something to do with an open position

00:42:04.780 --> 00:42:07.580
and Public Works in the water utility.

00:42:07.580 --> 00:42:10.220
So recently the utility operation

00:42:10.220 --> 00:42:13.900
or the utility superintendent has moved on

00:42:13.900 --> 00:42:16.300
and we felt that this was a good opportunity

00:42:16.300 --> 00:42:20.380
to consolidate the departments overall.

00:42:20.380 --> 00:42:23.740
And that's why staff is asking for a new person

00:42:23.740 --> 00:42:27.220
to oversee the Public Works Department.

00:42:27.220 --> 00:42:28.660
Alderman Sanders.

00:42:28.660 --> 00:42:31.780
Is that a salary-based position?

00:42:31.780 --> 00:42:33.700
Yes, sir, that would be so.

00:42:33.700 --> 00:42:41.200
and we're going to replace it as a salary or are we going to incorporate it within the city structure?

00:42:41.200 --> 00:42:47.700
So we'll incorporate it. It would basically mean the street superintendent position would remain.

00:42:47.700 --> 00:42:52.200
It would no longer be filled and the utility superintendent wouldn't be filled.

00:42:52.200 --> 00:42:58.700
And then we would fill it with a operations superintendent whose overall responsibility covered both.

00:42:58.700 --> 00:43:13.100
and then we will be bringing back an assistant for that individual to help cover weekends and times that they're unable to be there and also have a little bit more background in the operations and regulatory end of the water utility.

00:43:13.100 --> 00:43:17.500
Okay, the assistance is not going to be of... Would you like your second time of speaking, Robert Sanders?

00:43:17.500 --> 00:43:22.500
Oh, I thought I was in a conversation. I'm sorry. No, or Darren, did you want to have the...

00:43:22.500 --> 00:43:52.500
Yeah, I just want to give a point of clarity to Rob's statement there. So this is creating a job position that we currently don't have in the structure. That's what it's doing. It's not adding a role. It's giving it's giving a new role to an old position that we currently don't have. So this will allow us to change the job description of an individual and allow him to manage more areas than currently is aligned in his job duties, his or her job duties. So this provides us

00:43:52.500 --> 00:43:53.500
Johnson.

00:43:53.500 --> 00:43:58.460
This opportunity to somewhat restructure and reorganize the department, which we started

00:43:58.460 --> 00:44:03.539
again many years under City Manager Crowe, and then we've been doing this little at a

00:44:03.539 --> 00:44:05.219
time as jobs have turned over.

00:44:05.219 --> 00:44:11.019
So we're not adding, asking for an additional position, we're asking for merging a few positions

00:44:11.019 --> 00:44:15.039
together at this time to have one person oversee more areas.

00:44:15.039 --> 00:44:19.340
And we don't currently have this role, and that's why we're asking approval to create

00:44:19.340 --> 00:44:20.340
this role.

00:44:20.340 --> 00:44:25.940
Johnson. So would this be filled by someone inside already here or would this

00:44:25.940 --> 00:44:31.660
be something we would? We believe we have a, I'm sorry to interrupt, we believe we

00:44:31.660 --> 00:44:37.980
have a qualified internal candidate for this position. Alderman Stacey? Will this

00:44:37.980 --> 00:44:46.420
position also be covered covering the position where the gentleman resigned

00:44:46.420 --> 00:44:56.519
and so on. And so, it's like in a roundabout way, I hear what you're saying and I hear

00:44:56.519 --> 00:45:07.900
what you're saying. But it's like we're ignoring the fact that a person you put in position

00:45:07.900 --> 00:45:16.300
has left the department. And so, that is an opening position, or you're telling me it's

00:45:16.300 --> 00:45:21.539
it's not going to be an opening position because we're going to add those duties to someone

00:45:21.539 --> 00:45:28.019
else's duty so if we could have done that from the beginning why did we ever hire this

00:45:28.019 --> 00:45:35.660
gentleman because that's who you chose, that's who you wanted and we hired him.

00:45:35.660 --> 00:45:41.860
Well you'll have to ask that individual, however, we're asking for counsel.

00:45:41.860 --> 00:45:46.500
I'm not going to speculate on the motivations or or the needs of that.

00:45:46.500 --> 00:45:49.940
I mean, why did we need that position then if we don't need it now?

00:45:51.380 --> 00:45:57.460
Well, as I mentioned, it'll be the superintendent will oversee all of public works

00:45:57.860 --> 00:46:03.340
and will be asking for an assistant to also come alongside to cover weekends.

00:46:03.579 --> 00:46:07.420
And the superintendent did not do that before.

00:46:08.300 --> 00:46:09.780
Correct. They did.

00:46:09.780 --> 00:46:15.340
but it was not a clearly defined role.

00:46:15.340 --> 00:46:18.460
And the way it's being explained tonight

00:46:18.460 --> 00:46:19.820
is not clearly defined.

00:46:23.019 --> 00:46:25.260
Well, the job description is provided,

00:46:25.260 --> 00:46:27.660
so I could give that to you if you'd like.

00:46:27.660 --> 00:46:28.700
No, I have it.

00:46:28.700 --> 00:46:29.200
OK.

00:46:33.180 --> 00:46:34.740
OK, there's no further discussion.

00:46:34.740 --> 00:46:35.500
We'll move on.

00:46:35.500 --> 00:46:39.060
Oh, actually, it was a request for suspension of the rules

00:46:39.059 --> 00:46:40.380
if someone wants to make that motion.

00:46:40.380 --> 00:46:41.179
So moved.

00:46:41.179 --> 00:46:42.019
Second.

00:46:42.019 --> 00:46:44.420
The motion made by Alderman Klemm,

00:46:44.420 --> 00:46:47.460
seconded by Alderman Shadle for suspension of the rules.

00:46:47.460 --> 00:46:48.219
It's not debatable.

00:46:48.219 --> 00:46:49.900
It's passed by two-thirds majority.

00:46:49.900 --> 00:46:51.539
Madam Clerk, would you please take the role

00:46:51.539 --> 00:46:53.259
in the suspension only?

00:46:53.259 --> 00:46:54.460
Sanders.

00:46:54.460 --> 00:46:55.820
No.

00:46:55.820 --> 00:46:56.380
Klemm.

00:46:56.380 --> 00:46:56.980
Aye.

00:46:56.980 --> 00:46:57.619
Johnson.

00:46:57.619 --> 00:46:58.179
Aye.

00:46:58.179 --> 00:46:58.739
Simmons.

00:46:58.739 --> 00:46:59.619
No.

00:46:59.619 --> 00:47:00.380
Parker.

00:47:00.380 --> 00:47:01.340
Aye.

00:47:01.340 --> 00:47:02.420
Stacy.

00:47:02.420 --> 00:47:03.299
No.

00:47:03.299 --> 00:47:03.980
And Shadle.

00:47:03.980 --> 00:47:05.340
Aye.

00:47:05.340 --> 00:47:11.660
the motion to suspend fails because it needs two thirds and we only ended up with what four to three

00:47:13.180 --> 00:47:17.740
American vote because half the council has been uh has uh voted in favor

00:47:18.620 --> 00:47:25.180
repeat that again don't we need six people attorney zito correct one two three we only have four

00:47:26.620 --> 00:47:33.500
one two we have four to three oh i'm sorry so so you can you can you can call the mayor's vote but

00:47:33.500 --> 00:47:37.139
but I don't, depending on how you vote, I don't know if it makes a difference or not.

00:47:37.139 --> 00:47:38.139
I object.

00:47:38.139 --> 00:47:41.340
You can't object, this is an attorney ruling.

00:47:41.340 --> 00:47:46.179
Wait a minute, it's not an attorney ruling, it's a council ruling, what are you talking

00:47:46.179 --> 00:47:47.179
about?

00:47:47.179 --> 00:47:50.780
This is not a- Please don't interrupt Alderman Sanders.

00:47:50.780 --> 00:47:53.900
Well you can't be saying things like that.

00:47:53.900 --> 00:47:57.300
Will it make any difference?

00:47:57.300 --> 00:48:03.219
No because right now you have one, two- The best we have is five to three.

00:48:03.220 --> 00:48:05.140
All right, so that still wouldn't pass.

00:48:05.140 --> 00:48:06.460
Okay, so the suspension fails.

00:48:06.460 --> 00:48:09.180
We'll move this on to the next regularly scheduled meeting.

00:48:10.900 --> 00:48:12.500
Come on, Mayor.

00:48:12.500 --> 00:48:15.980
Item number nine is the first reading of ordinance 2025-58.

00:48:15.980 --> 00:48:17.300
Could you please read this?

00:48:17.300 --> 00:48:20.020
Ordinance amending chapters 810 and 1250

00:48:20.020 --> 00:48:23.380
concerning the licensing and zoning of vacation rentals.

00:48:23.380 --> 00:48:25.140
Director Duckman.

00:48:25.140 --> 00:48:26.980
Thank you, Madam Mayor.

00:48:26.980 --> 00:48:29.780
The Community Economic Development Department

00:48:29.780 --> 00:48:33.540
has been directed to draft an amended ordinance.

00:48:33.540 --> 00:48:38.940
And the idea here is that vacation rentals, which

00:48:38.940 --> 00:48:45.519
is the RBO, Airbnb, it's getting a little less technical here

00:48:45.519 --> 00:48:47.940
to kind of give you a better idea of what we're talking

00:48:47.940 --> 00:48:53.220
about, short-term rental in line with those popular products

00:48:53.220 --> 00:48:55.780
is essentially what currently happens here

00:48:55.780 --> 00:48:57.980
is you could own a single-family house

00:48:57.980 --> 00:49:01.659
and you could put it on Airbnb with proper licensing

00:49:01.659 --> 00:49:07.300
and have a short-term rental weekend, et cetera.

00:49:07.300 --> 00:49:12.500
So it has been brought to our attention

00:49:12.500 --> 00:49:17.059
and we were directed to draft a new ordinance that essentially

00:49:17.059 --> 00:49:23.639
is removing vacation rentals from the R1 through R4

00:49:23.639 --> 00:49:24.699
residential district.

00:49:24.700 --> 00:49:52.700
So, again, to kind of break down what's going on here, R1 through R4, that is where you're allowed to have a single-family home, not a duplex, not a four-unit, that is your true one-family residential neighborhoods, and what has been directed and what staff is proposing tonight is eliminating short-term rentals in single-family housing.

00:49:52.700 --> 00:49:59.300
that's the simplest way to kind of boil it down in a little background here and

00:49:59.300 --> 00:50:04.460
also what would essentially happen is if you have a single-family home we would be

00:50:04.460 --> 00:50:09.380
we're proposing to eliminate the short-term vacation rentals if you have

00:50:09.380 --> 00:50:20.020
a two unit duplex three unit four unit etc. it would be a special use permit so

00:50:20.019 --> 00:50:25.659
that I hope gives a basic understanding of what's being proposed here to go

00:50:25.659 --> 00:50:31.059
with a little bit of background on August 14th a public hearing was held by our

00:50:31.059 --> 00:50:37.539
Planning Commission and the outcome of that meeting was that our Planning

00:50:37.539 --> 00:50:41.539
Commission heard public comment we had one supporter and one objector present

00:50:41.539 --> 00:50:53.980
and to be clear, the supporter for, or pro vacation rental would be Clerk Anderson. Do

00:50:53.980 --> 00:50:59.259
you remember being there just to confirm? I was the opposer. I'm sorry, you were opposing

00:50:59.259 --> 00:51:06.179
the, I'm getting the pros and negatives, but to be fair, you're pro, you were pro, you

00:51:06.180 --> 00:51:12.180
you are not pro you're against I'm against the ordinance yes yes yes just

00:51:12.180 --> 00:51:17.020
wanted to make that clear and that Alderperson Klemm was also at the hearing

00:51:17.020 --> 00:51:24.420
and he was for the ordinance which would outlaw the vacation rentals so I wanted

00:51:24.420 --> 00:51:28.060
to make that clear for some background so after that hearing was held by our

00:51:28.060 --> 00:51:34.680
Planning Commission they wanted to hear take some time and in motion was made to

00:51:34.680 --> 00:51:42.200
discuss at the next hearing which was September 11th of 2025 and all that being said the Planning

00:51:42.200 --> 00:51:48.280
Commission recommended approval of this text amendments pertaining to vacation rentals

00:51:48.280 --> 00:51:53.600
with what I had said earlier eliminating them from the single-family residences and with

00:51:53.600 --> 00:51:58.160
that in mind staff is recommending moving this ordinance forward.

00:51:58.160 --> 00:52:00.000
Is there a motion to move this order?

00:52:00.000 --> 00:52:01.000
So moved.

00:52:01.000 --> 00:52:02.000
Second.

00:52:02.000 --> 00:52:06.639
Motion made by Alderman Klemm, seconded by Alderman Shadle. Discussion on the ordinance?

00:52:08.800 --> 00:52:17.760
Alderman Klemm? Sure. The real crux of this comes from everybody here believes in Airbnb's,

00:52:18.480 --> 00:52:24.639
everybody believes that it can be a positive thing for the community. There's no doubt about that,

00:52:24.639 --> 00:52:30.880
but it stems from, mostly stems from two incidents, an incident and where it was at basically.

00:52:30.880 --> 00:53:00.880
I believe it was June 6th at one of these Airbnbs that this person first of all go back to the point where I was here when they originally discussed Airbnbs over a year ago and nobody really brought up the thought of what was going to happen in that area what could happen in that area what could develop in that area nobody in that area would know who's going to be in that house when they're going to be in that house

00:53:00.880 --> 00:53:01.880
and others.

00:53:01.880 --> 00:53:02.880
I want to give you a little bit of an overview of the house.

00:53:02.880 --> 00:53:05.160
When it's rented, when it isn't going to be rented, and who's there.

00:53:05.160 --> 00:53:09.619
Also this person that rents this house doesn't have all the capabilities in the world of

00:53:09.619 --> 00:53:14.480
finding that out, who calls them up and says, I want to rent your house for the evening.

00:53:14.480 --> 00:53:22.740
So this house here is in a neighborhood that's probably 250 to $300,000 houses.

00:53:22.740 --> 00:53:30.039
On a Friday night, all of a sudden a whole bunch of cars started pulling up to the house.

00:53:30.039 --> 00:53:36.079
And keep in mind, as this person rents this Airbnb, they have their total family with

00:53:36.079 --> 00:53:43.079
little kids above this. They rent out just their basement only. They've developed a sidewalk

00:53:43.079 --> 00:53:49.480
and entrance into that basement. They've created a pool out there and they've created an area

00:53:49.480 --> 00:53:55.920
where this could be used. Approximately, they got a phone call. I'm not sure what the time

00:53:55.920 --> 00:54:02.200
was a good firm with the chief, but 10 o'clock is area in there. One of the neighbors called,

00:54:02.200 --> 00:54:08.720
the owner also called. He had a whole bunch of people downstairs. There were cars out in

00:54:08.720 --> 00:54:15.599
the street. And come to find out the whole end of this deal was there were probably,

00:54:15.599 --> 00:54:24.639
I believe, 10 to 15 youths under 20 years old left, and they confiscated, I'm going

00:54:24.639 --> 00:54:25.639
and others.

00:54:25.639 --> 00:54:32.000
I'm not going to say at least a dozen loaded weapons, okay?

00:54:32.000 --> 00:54:36.480
Now I don't think this is a normal thing that should happen at your house on Friday night,

00:54:36.480 --> 00:54:41.759
especially if you live in a $200,000, $300,000 neighborhood.

00:54:41.759 --> 00:54:42.759
That's my concern.

00:54:42.759 --> 00:54:50.159
The people have come to me, okay, and said, look, if I buy a house in a residential area

00:54:50.159 --> 00:54:56.179
and single family homes. I'm expecting it to be a single family home. I'm not expecting

00:54:56.179 --> 00:55:04.039
a commercial thing to be run out. The night before this happened, there were 10 cars there.

00:55:04.039 --> 00:55:11.039
What this person actually did is there's zero security involved in it. They provided no security

00:55:11.039 --> 00:55:16.420
and instantly the police were called. So we were their security for this whole thing to

00:55:16.420 --> 00:55:18.139
to try and straighten it out.

00:55:18.139 --> 00:55:21.700
And you've got people still that from the DNA,

00:55:21.700 --> 00:55:25.579
all these weapons are gonna be possibly traced

00:55:25.579 --> 00:55:29.300
to different people and to be arrest made off the deal.

00:55:29.300 --> 00:55:31.780
So that enlightened everybody there to say,

00:55:31.780 --> 00:55:34.099
hey, this is what we got in our neighborhood

00:55:34.099 --> 00:55:35.539
and we don't like it.

00:55:35.539 --> 00:55:39.380
So that's where my opinion and the opinion

00:55:39.380 --> 00:55:41.780
of all the people in that neighborhood come from.

00:55:46.420 --> 00:55:50.019
Any other discussion, Alderman Johnson?

00:55:50.019 --> 00:55:55.460
I'm not sure how many of these Airbnbs we have here in Freeport, but they are businesses.

00:55:55.460 --> 00:55:56.460
Three.

00:55:56.460 --> 00:55:57.460
Three is all we have?

00:55:57.460 --> 00:55:59.460
We have three in single.

00:55:59.460 --> 00:56:00.460
Okay.

00:56:00.460 --> 00:56:04.539
And they bring, I mean, they bring people in who spend money here, so that's, you know,

00:56:04.539 --> 00:56:06.059
part of the city.

00:56:06.059 --> 00:56:11.340
The other thing I'm thinking about, you know, you do take a chance when you're a person

00:56:11.340 --> 00:56:16.860
that owns an Airbnb of who you rent to, but I know any of the vacation rentals that we've

00:56:16.860 --> 00:56:20.900
ever rented, there's a very long contract that you have to fill out with them that has

00:56:20.900 --> 00:56:24.700
a lot of stipulations on it, what you can do and what you can't do, how many cars you

00:56:24.700 --> 00:56:31.820
can park there, and a lot of things that regulate that that I think could be put in place for

00:56:31.820 --> 00:56:36.660
those that do have Airbnbs.

00:56:36.659 --> 00:56:42.500
So I don't know, and you know, plus the fact that when you live in a home, you don't really

00:56:42.500 --> 00:56:46.099
know if that house beside you goes up for sale.

00:56:46.099 --> 00:56:47.699
You don't know who might come in there.

00:56:47.699 --> 00:56:49.019
You don't know if they might have guns.

00:56:49.019 --> 00:56:53.899
You don't know if they might be on drugs and, you know, that sort of thing.

00:56:53.899 --> 00:56:56.819
So there's, you know, you take chances every day.

00:56:56.819 --> 00:57:02.940
So I'm not sure that this would be friendly for the City of Freeport to say we don't want

00:57:02.940 --> 00:57:06.059
and I were just talking about the number of AirBnBs we have.

00:57:06.059 --> 00:57:09.659
We're looking at your AirBnB businesses in our residential areas.

00:57:09.659 --> 00:57:15.659
There's not very many R5 or R6 areas, I know west of west of west.

00:57:15.659 --> 00:57:18.039
There's a lot that are east of west.

00:57:18.039 --> 00:57:24.039
So I'm not sure how all that plays out for fairness for people that own those homes

00:57:24.039 --> 00:57:27.639
and maybe are looking to have a business here in Freeport.

00:57:27.639 --> 00:57:32.860
We could put a limit maybe on the number of AirBnBs we have.

00:57:32.860 --> 00:57:34.860
and

00:57:36.059 --> 00:57:38.320
I'm going to ask you to do a special use permit every year or

00:57:38.320 --> 00:57:41.360
something like that instead of totally disregarding this

00:57:41.360 --> 00:57:44.360
altogether. Those are my thoughts.

00:57:48.360 --> 00:57:51.360
Alderman Simmons. I'm sorry, but that is laughable.

00:57:51.360 --> 00:57:54.360
So because it happened in this area and these houses are worth

00:57:54.360 --> 00:57:58.360
that much, we're going to ban it for single family houses.

00:57:58.360 --> 00:58:01.860
But in the areas that happen to be mostly apartments, we're

00:58:01.860 --> 00:58:08.860
We're going to allow it because these houses are $250,000, $300,000, which was repeated a couple of times.

00:58:08.860 --> 00:58:12.860
So it's not okay there, but it's okay in other neighborhoods.

00:58:12.860 --> 00:58:18.860
And to even feel safe making a statement as such is...

00:58:18.860 --> 00:58:24.860
Wow. Wow. Wow.

00:58:24.860 --> 00:58:41.860
Director Duckman, I have a question. In this, would that be in effect immediately or is there, can you enlighten that there's three businesses that would be affected, how far out, that kind of thing?

00:58:41.860 --> 00:58:58.860
So essentially, the ordinance reads that this would, they would have to still, basically the current licenses for the three properties that we're speaking of, they would still have to reapply for the license.

00:58:58.860 --> 00:59:01.860
If they let it lapse on their own, they let it lapse on their own.

00:59:01.860 --> 00:59:08.940
But if they continued to reapply, it would sunset January 1st, 2029.

00:59:08.940 --> 00:59:14.220
And after such date, all licenses would cease to be valid.

00:59:14.220 --> 00:59:15.380
So a little over three years.

00:59:15.380 --> 00:59:15.880
Correct.

00:59:18.460 --> 00:59:19.380
Any other discussion?

00:59:19.380 --> 00:59:20.180
I have one second.

00:59:20.180 --> 00:59:20.780
Yeah.

00:59:20.780 --> 00:59:21.539
Sure.

00:59:21.539 --> 00:59:24.460
I would like to agree with Alderperson Johnson.

00:59:24.460 --> 00:59:26.980
We are trying to be a tourist town.

00:59:26.980 --> 00:59:29.380
We are trying to do things to draw people here.

00:59:29.380 --> 00:59:34.019
We only have two, I'm not sure if the other one's still open,

00:59:34.019 --> 00:59:36.900
legitimate hotels that you wouldn't mind staying in.

00:59:36.900 --> 00:59:40.460
So, and myself, I have a couple of kids,

00:59:40.460 --> 00:59:42.440
so when we go, we use Airbnbs.

00:59:42.440 --> 00:59:45.300
I don't understand why you would want to stop that

00:59:45.300 --> 00:59:47.059
for the city of Freeport.

00:59:47.059 --> 00:59:50.059
I, like, that just doesn't make sense.

00:59:54.220 --> 00:59:55.059
Anyone else?

00:59:55.059 --> 00:59:55.900
Yeah.

00:59:55.900 --> 00:59:56.820
Alderman Sanders?

00:59:56.820 --> 00:59:57.660
Yeah.

00:59:59.380 --> 01:00:15.380
Director Duckman, how long has this, do you know, if you know, that this ordinance has been in existence?

01:00:15.380 --> 01:00:25.380
Well, the current short-term vacation rental ordinance, I would say, has been what, Clerk Anderson, five years, right around COVID, I think?

01:00:25.380 --> 01:00:28.900
We had bed and breakfast on the books for a very long time,

01:00:28.900 --> 01:00:32.460
because that's an older model.

01:00:32.460 --> 01:00:37.140
But we added the Airbnb pre-COVID.

01:00:37.140 --> 01:00:39.300
I've been here eight years, somewhere between five

01:00:39.300 --> 01:00:40.740
and eight years.

01:00:40.740 --> 01:00:42.099
It's a newer concept, correct?

01:00:42.099 --> 01:00:45.860
So when we're talking short-term rentals, the idea generally

01:00:45.860 --> 01:00:48.300
is that short-term rentals, by the way,

01:00:48.300 --> 01:00:52.860
it is not just in the city of Freeport, it's a hot topic.

01:00:52.860 --> 01:01:22.860
it causes quite a bit of conflict you know on one side of the coin people believe that they're good for the community because they are adding tourism and it also allows property owners to make some extra revenue on the other side not just in the city of Freeport but there has been you know complaints with people use them for parties or use them for nefarious activities and it makes neighbors upset so I think there's good discussion here

01:01:22.860 --> 01:01:28.099
Staff was directed to draft this ordinance. It's through the Planning Commission. It's

01:01:28.099 --> 01:01:31.980
at two Planning Commission meetings and I anticipate for the next two readings, if it

01:01:31.980 --> 01:01:35.380
gets that far, there's going to be plenty more heated discussion.

01:01:35.380 --> 01:01:36.380
So

01:01:36.380 --> 01:01:37.380
Alderman Sanders?

01:01:37.380 --> 01:01:47.019
Yeah, just elaborating on the concerning of neighborhood areas that has got a concern

01:01:47.019 --> 01:01:56.940
about the vacationing property and the zoning and the licensing, and we have not set up

01:01:56.940 --> 01:02:07.780
any policies or anything like that, guidelines for the people who does have concerns about

01:02:07.780 --> 01:02:13.420
the area of vacationing rentals and things like that.

01:02:13.420 --> 01:02:20.500
We have not set up guidelines for those kinds of things. What are the policy terms and conditions

01:02:20.500 --> 01:02:27.460
that helps to guide to let the community know or the citizens know in the community area

01:02:27.460 --> 01:02:32.860
that these are the guidelines that you have to abide by and what is permitted and what

01:02:32.860 --> 01:02:40.500
is not permitted. Have we had that discussion or have you had that discussions with those

01:02:40.500 --> 01:02:43.380
that are already currently living in those areas.

01:02:43.380 --> 01:02:49.019
Yes, we had two Planning Commission meetings

01:02:49.019 --> 01:02:51.420
that we talked about before.

01:02:51.420 --> 01:02:56.340
I took some notes on that.

01:02:56.340 --> 01:02:58.099
We had a meeting on August 14th.

01:02:58.099 --> 01:03:01.300
And as I stated before, Clerk Anderson and Alderperson Klemm

01:03:01.300 --> 01:03:04.199
were in attendance there.

01:03:04.199 --> 01:03:05.940
Notes I wrote down from that meeting

01:03:05.940 --> 01:03:09.820
was quite a bit of consideration and discussion.

01:03:09.820 --> 01:03:13.380
and based on that from August 14th,

01:03:13.380 --> 01:03:16.700
the meeting was moved to the next regularly scheduled meeting

01:03:16.700 --> 01:03:18.420
for more discussion.

01:03:18.420 --> 01:03:23.320
So the second meeting would have been September 11th.

01:03:23.320 --> 01:03:27.900
And again, some of the issues that were one of the notes

01:03:27.900 --> 01:03:31.580
I wrote was that one supporter, Alderperson Klemm,

01:03:31.580 --> 01:03:34.580
his concerns were for safety, legal activities,

01:03:34.580 --> 01:03:36.300
and parking concerns.

01:03:36.300 --> 01:03:40.740
and as Clerk Anderson has stated,

01:03:40.740 --> 01:03:44.860
she's provided that she obviously works in the licensing

01:03:44.860 --> 01:03:48.360
and can fill you in on all of the requirements for a license.

01:03:48.360 --> 01:03:50.660
But she also came in as a member of the public,

01:03:50.660 --> 01:03:55.180
issuing her support of the matter.

01:03:55.180 --> 01:03:58.860
So the reason I'm stating this is to answer your question,

01:03:58.860 --> 01:04:00.220
has the public been notified?

01:04:00.220 --> 01:04:03.740
Well, yes, through two meetings before we've even

01:04:03.740 --> 01:04:05.300
gotten to this part of it.

01:04:05.300 --> 01:04:35.300
and we've had members of our... Does this ordinance have protocols to it? Does this ordinance have protocols? Yes. It does have protocols and so that should spill everything out to the residents of those areas. Yes. The easiest thing to explain to somebody is no. Can I, if I have a single family house, what is the protocol for having a vacation rental? That's easy. No. That's what you're voting for. You believe, and I'm not trying to be insulting, but I mean that's literally what this says. You know, you cannot

01:04:35.300 --> 01:04:40.380
you know I want to have a Airbnb in my single-family house if you vote for this

01:04:40.380 --> 01:04:46.220
you're saying no you cannot or if you're in favor of it you're saying yes you can

01:04:46.220 --> 01:04:51.100
do it that's the heart of it you know what I mean there is no I mean once

01:04:51.100 --> 01:04:53.900
if you vote for this ordinance you're saying we don't think it fits in our

01:04:53.900 --> 01:05:00.019
community no you can't do it. Alderman Parker, that's you go ahead sorry I'm

01:05:00.019 --> 01:05:30.019
Yeah, I'm sorry, and I, yes, I was asked to clarify that, okay, so, I'm just, I always, I always try to talk and make things simple, um, my best I can. Single, right now what you would be voting on is single family house, no, you cannot have an Airbnb. If you have a duplex, you would have to go to a hearing and ask for permission

01:05:30.019 --> 01:05:34.940
Or ask, you'd have to have it voted on by council, which is that special use hearing.

01:05:34.940 --> 01:05:38.380
If you have a duplex, you would have to come, it wouldn't be allowed by right.

01:05:38.380 --> 01:05:42.860
You would still have to show up to a zoning board hearing, to a planning commission hearing,

01:05:42.860 --> 01:05:49.980
and to a city council hearing to be allowed to have a Airbnb or VRBO.

01:05:49.980 --> 01:05:51.820
And we're not voting on anything tonight.

01:05:51.820 --> 01:05:52.820
This is first reading.

01:05:52.820 --> 01:05:53.820
Okay.

01:05:53.820 --> 01:05:54.820
Alderman Parker.

01:05:54.820 --> 01:05:59.099
I wasn't going to say anything, but the way I understand this, I own a single family home,

01:05:59.099 --> 01:06:29.099
I happen to be a snowbird and want to go to Florida for the winter and I have some friends that want to come in and rent my house I can't do it under this ordinance you know my house I didn't ask permission when I bought the thing what's defined short-term less than 30 days what if I go a month short-term less than 30 days okay maybe I want to go visit my family out in California for two weeks or three weeks somebody said needs a place yeah come on in can't do that but I didn't get permission when I bought the

01:06:29.099 --> 01:06:34.099
Plays, so I'm just against it, so thank you.

01:06:34.099 --> 01:06:36.099
All right, then we will move on.

01:06:36.099 --> 01:06:42.099
I did want to just share, if nobody else, if nobody else mirrored my thoughts.

01:06:42.099 --> 01:06:47.099
So I just, I believe the Airbnb craze is really popular.

01:06:47.099 --> 01:06:49.099
I think it's growing nationwide.

01:06:49.099 --> 01:06:53.099
I think it adds a lodging option.

01:06:53.099 --> 01:07:05.099
Personally, I've stayed in many, in several states, single-family homes, multi-units, I've stayed by myself, I felt very safe.

01:07:08.099 --> 01:07:20.099
Currently there are three license holders, but we've had more, and if you go onto an Airbnb website, as many as like maybe even seven will pop up.

01:07:20.099 --> 01:07:25.400
It's very difficult to find where these are located and you don't get an address until

01:07:25.400 --> 01:07:26.659
you make that reservation.

01:07:26.659 --> 01:07:30.539
So you don't know, you don't know the location.

01:07:30.539 --> 01:07:37.099
I have already sent out applications to, you know, I'll find an address, I'll find a homeowner

01:07:37.099 --> 01:07:40.940
and they will sometimes ignore the application.

01:07:40.940 --> 01:07:44.480
Our third one just got licensed this year because it's a new owner.

01:07:44.480 --> 01:07:48.900
But I knew where it was for years, they just never turned the application back in.

01:07:48.900 --> 01:07:54.900
There's probably about three I don't know of. Three I know of that I don't know the address for.

01:07:54.900 --> 01:08:03.900
One of my concerns is if this passes, it will be very punitive to the people who have followed the rules.

01:08:03.900 --> 01:08:09.900
We have three people who have come in religiously and got licensed. Very easy to work with.

01:08:09.900 --> 01:08:39.899
but I I don't see any enforcement or no no gut to go out and find those ones who aren't licensed so we're going to punish the ones who have been licensed by taking their license away that that doesn't make sense to me I attended both planning commissions I I heard you know we don't want it in our neighborhood I think that special use is the tool to solve that because you ask our neighbors you

01:08:39.899 --> 01:08:40.899
and others.

01:08:40.899 --> 01:09:07.979
We do have, we do have ordinances on the books and I'm quite certain the number of cars are

01:09:07.980 --> 01:09:37.980
and 일я They were limited because I remember that being a big discussion. We might have even limited to one, but no more than two cars are allowed. And I suspect that's maybe why the owners maybe started calling because they knew that was something they could call about was too many cars in the driveway. And I just wanted to address, you know, this was a very unfortunate event, I don't want it to happen again. But this I think this is kind of throwing the baby out with the bathwater I think we're knee jerking too many

01:09:37.980 --> 01:09:43.260
and Walsh over one bad incident, and I just wanted to add that there was concern about

01:09:43.260 --> 01:09:49.820
that in this particular incident, there were children living upstairs. And I feel for that,

01:09:49.820 --> 01:09:56.480
I understand that. But also this homeowner chose to get that license, knowing he has

01:09:56.480 --> 01:10:02.660
two children, and I think that should be the homeowner's choice. My two cents.

01:10:02.659 --> 01:10:06.460
All right, we will move on to item number 10, which is the

01:10:06.460 --> 01:10:10.460
adoption of resolution 2025-109. Could you please read this?

01:10:10.460 --> 01:10:13.460
Resolution authorizing the payment of an invoice from

01:10:13.460 --> 01:10:16.659
Green Road Tire Recycling for Citywide Tire Recycling

01:10:16.659 --> 01:10:20.059
Collection event held on August 23rd. Thank you. Director

01:10:20.059 --> 01:10:26.359
Bridge. Thank you. Good evening. In August, the City of

01:10:26.359 --> 01:10:29.059
Freeport conducted a tire recycling event where residents

01:10:29.059 --> 01:10:32.159
could bring passenger car and semi truck tires to be

01:10:32.159 --> 01:10:57.159
Winslow, Greene Road Tire Recycling, Refresh Freeport, Electronic Recycling Event, Green Road, 7,029 Passenger Car Tires, 118 Semi Truck Tires,

01:10:57.159 --> 01:11:01.539
Sanders. Hundreds of residents took advantage of this service and the city received positive

01:11:01.539 --> 01:11:07.239
feedback from residents and surrounding communities. The full amount of the invoice, which is about

01:11:07.239 --> 01:11:14.800
$38,000, has been budgeted for and will be paid from the Health and Environment Fund.

01:11:14.800 --> 01:11:16.519
Thank you. Is there a motion to adopt?

01:11:16.519 --> 01:11:17.519
So moved.

01:11:17.519 --> 01:11:18.519
Second.

01:11:18.519 --> 01:11:22.639
We have a motion made by Alderman Shadle, seconded by Alderman Johnson. Discussion on

01:11:22.640 --> 01:11:25.480
and the Resolution.

01:11:25.480 --> 01:11:28.160
Seeing none, Madam Clerk, please take the roll.

01:11:28.160 --> 01:11:30.360
Sanders is temporarily absent.

01:11:30.360 --> 01:11:31.119
Klemm?

01:11:31.119 --> 01:11:31.720
Aye.

01:11:31.720 --> 01:11:32.640
Johnson?

01:11:32.640 --> 01:11:33.160
Aye.

01:11:33.160 --> 01:11:33.760
Simmons?

01:11:33.760 --> 01:11:34.240
Aye.

01:11:34.240 --> 01:11:34.840
Parker?

01:11:34.840 --> 01:11:35.340
Aye.

01:11:35.340 --> 01:11:35.840
Stacy?

01:11:35.840 --> 01:11:36.340
Aye.

01:11:36.340 --> 01:11:36.840
And Shadle?

01:11:36.840 --> 01:11:37.400
Aye.

01:11:37.400 --> 01:11:40.240
The Resolution is adopted 6 to 0.

01:11:43.079 --> 01:11:44.880
And we'll move on to Item Number 11, which

01:11:44.880 --> 01:11:47.680
is the Adoption of Resolution 2025-111.

01:11:47.680 --> 01:11:48.800
Could you please read this?

01:11:48.800 --> 01:11:49.300
One moment.

01:11:49.300 --> 01:11:56.659
Resolution setting the date and hours for trick-or-treating in the city for 2025.

01:11:56.659 --> 01:11:59.020
Thank you, Manager Boyer.

01:11:59.020 --> 01:12:00.020
Thank you, Your Honor.

01:12:00.020 --> 01:12:03.640
In the past, trick-or-treating has been observed on Halloween, October 31st.

01:12:03.640 --> 01:12:07.739
For the past several years, the hours have been from 5 p.m. to 7 p.m.

01:12:07.739 --> 01:12:10.300
This year, Halloween falls on a Friday.

01:12:10.300 --> 01:12:13.900
This year, the city is collaborating with the Freeport School District, second graders,

01:12:13.900 --> 01:12:16.340
and their civic responsibility unit for social studies.

01:12:16.340 --> 01:12:24.340
They will be touring City Hall and the police station and have the opportunity to role play a City Council meeting deliberating on the same resolution.

01:12:24.340 --> 01:12:32.340
Staff recommendation is to keep the trick-or-treating on Friday, October 31st from 5 p.m. to 7 p.m.

01:12:32.340 --> 01:12:34.340
Staff requests the approval of this resolution.

01:12:34.340 --> 01:12:36.340
Is there a motion to adopt?

01:12:36.340 --> 01:12:37.340
So moved.

01:12:37.340 --> 01:12:38.340
Second.

01:12:38.340 --> 01:12:42.340
Motion made by Alderman Parker, seconded by Alderman Shadle.

01:12:42.340 --> 01:12:45.340
Discussion on the resolution?

01:12:45.340 --> 01:12:47.539
Madam Clerk, please take the roll.

01:12:47.539 --> 01:12:49.539
Sanders is absent.

01:12:49.539 --> 01:12:50.539
Klemm?

01:12:50.539 --> 01:12:51.539
Aye.

01:12:51.539 --> 01:12:52.539
Johnson?

01:12:52.539 --> 01:12:53.539
Aye.

01:12:53.539 --> 01:12:54.539
Simmons?

01:12:54.539 --> 01:12:55.539
Aye.

01:12:55.539 --> 01:12:56.539
Parker?

01:12:56.539 --> 01:12:57.539
Aye.

01:12:57.539 --> 01:12:58.539
Stacy?

01:12:58.539 --> 01:12:59.539
Aye.

01:12:59.539 --> 01:13:00.539
And Shadle?

01:13:00.539 --> 01:13:01.539
Aye.

01:13:01.539 --> 01:13:02.539
The resolution is adopted, 6-0.

01:13:02.539 --> 01:13:03.539
And item number 12 is the adoption of resolution 2025-112.

01:13:03.539 --> 01:13:06.539
Could you please read this?

01:13:06.539 --> 01:13:11.360
Resolution approving application for contract with FLOC Safety for live video cameras, additional

01:13:11.360 --> 01:13:14.659
license plate reader cameras, and mobile trailer cameras.

01:13:14.659 --> 01:13:16.659
Thank you. Chief Shenberger?

01:13:16.659 --> 01:13:29.659
Thank you. So as I discussed last week, earlier in the year I had some representatives from FLOC that came and did a presentation on the products that they offer and how they could help us as law enforcement officers.

01:13:29.659 --> 01:13:36.659
I've applied for several grants and looked for different funding throughout this year.

01:13:36.659 --> 01:13:38.659
and

01:13:39.659 --> 01:13:40.659
the

01:13:40.659 --> 01:13:42.659
President's Office.

01:13:42.659 --> 01:13:47.659
I was able to secure some funding through Senator Durbin's office by utilizing lobbyists

01:13:47.659 --> 01:13:49.659
through sound thinking.

01:13:49.659 --> 01:13:52.659
There's a wish list of things that comes with that.

01:13:52.659 --> 01:13:57.659
However, we realize that if that funding falls through, more than likely, it's not going

01:13:57.659 --> 01:13:59.659
to happen.

01:13:59.659 --> 01:14:04.659
And within the contract for FLOC, there's a contingency.

01:14:04.659 --> 01:14:07.300
if we don't pass then we're not,

01:14:07.300 --> 01:14:09.420
or we don't have to pay that amount of money.

01:14:09.420 --> 01:14:14.420
So I also secured organized crime retail theft grant

01:14:15.779 --> 01:14:18.180
from the Attorney General's office for $9,000.

01:14:18.180 --> 01:14:21.979
So the plan basically is to leverage that money

01:14:21.979 --> 01:14:24.479
to start this project one month early

01:14:24.479 --> 01:14:26.979
that gives us into December

01:14:26.979 --> 01:14:30.300
and then utilize the appropriations dollars

01:14:30.300 --> 01:14:34.220
for the year of 2026 and 2027.

01:14:34.659 --> 01:14:36.659
Thank you, Chief. Is there a motion to adopt?

01:14:36.659 --> 01:14:37.659
It's all moved.

01:14:37.659 --> 01:14:38.659
Second.

01:14:38.659 --> 01:14:44.659
Motion made by Alderman Shadle, seconded by Alderman Parker. Discussion on the resolution?

01:14:44.659 --> 01:14:46.659
Madam Clerk, please take the roll.

01:14:46.659 --> 01:14:47.659
I have...

01:14:47.659 --> 01:14:49.659
Oh, Alderman Stacy, I'm sorry.

01:14:49.659 --> 01:14:54.659
So this is, you're asking for a voting to approve this?

01:14:54.659 --> 01:15:00.659
Approve the resolution for the Chief to move forward on what he just made a comment on.

01:15:00.659 --> 01:15:12.659
Okay, I do have a question, but I don't know, do it come now or later?

01:15:12.659 --> 01:15:18.180
This is the one pertaining to the drones you were speaking of?

01:15:18.180 --> 01:15:26.000
No, this is for license plate reader cameras, some live video bundles with those, a trailer

01:15:26.000 --> 01:15:28.000
and

01:15:29.100 --> 01:15:39.100
I'm going to talk about the license plate reader camera that is live video and then a trailer camera that has a license plate reader camera in it and also it's just like a speed wagon with a license plate reader camera in it.

01:15:39.100 --> 01:15:44.100
Can you tell me like what does it cost per year to operate this?

01:15:44.100 --> 01:15:46.100
Right.

01:15:46.100 --> 01:15:55.100
So, I mean, this is covered, this would be covered under appropriations, dollars and grant money, but roughly, I know it's in the agreement, but the money that we're utilizing is $200,000 from appropriations, dollars, and grants.

01:15:56.000 --> 01:16:26.000
and others, and then we're also using the $9,000 that we're getting from the Organized Crime Retail Theft Grant. So that's what it's going to cost for two years. However, all that money is going to be used to pay for the license plate reader cameras, and then we're also using the $9,000 that we're getting from the Organized Crime Retail Theft

01:16:26.000 --> 01:16:28.840
Money is not coming out of the city's funds.

01:16:28.840 --> 01:16:31.840
That's all money that's being appropriated to us

01:16:31.840 --> 01:16:33.779
and already given to us through grant.

01:16:35.560 --> 01:16:38.359
Okay, any further, Alderman Sanders?

01:16:38.359 --> 01:16:43.359
Yeah, have you had an opportunity to determine

01:16:46.039 --> 01:16:49.359
whether this is appropriate for this particular county

01:16:49.359 --> 01:16:53.560
or this city to determine if it doesn't violate

01:16:53.560 --> 01:16:55.560
and the rest of the board.

01:16:56.680 --> 01:16:59.560
So I think we have to do a search to see if anybody has

01:16:59.560 --> 01:17:01.560
rights or anything of that nature.

01:17:03.880 --> 01:17:05.880
So in order for us to even do a search, we have to have a

01:17:05.880 --> 01:17:07.880
reason, a law enforcement reason.

01:17:09.780 --> 01:17:11.780
So generally, you know, a crime has occurred or if there's a

01:17:11.780 --> 01:17:13.780
missing person or something like that.

01:17:15.080 --> 01:17:17.080
So we have to put a reason in and there are certain things

01:17:17.080 --> 01:17:19.620
you can't search for. We also have to put a case number in

01:17:19.620 --> 01:17:21.620
there.

01:17:21.619 --> 01:17:26.619
and I have been working on this for a long time and I think it's been a great opportunity for us to even access the cameras.

01:17:26.619 --> 01:17:31.619
Now, the live video, that's something that I've talked to people in the community.

01:17:31.619 --> 01:17:36.619
They feel like, you know, we need more live video out there.

01:17:36.619 --> 01:17:43.619
It's very helpful, you know, as long as it's in the right place in the right time and capturing the right thing, you know, it's very helpful for us for certain things.

01:17:43.619 --> 01:17:48.619
So we do utilize license plate reader cameras right now.

01:17:48.619 --> 01:17:59.619
I think it was in 2021. So it's a different platform, but Vigilant doesn't have the trailer cameras and the other two things that we're looking to get to.

01:17:59.619 --> 01:18:11.619
FOC is a smoother, easier to use, more modern platform. It's something that wasn't available in 2021. It kind of really became popular about two years ago.

01:18:11.619 --> 01:18:16.619
A lot of agencies are going to that. So that's why I chose them.

01:18:16.619 --> 01:18:20.619
Would you like your second time, Alderman Sanders?

01:18:20.619 --> 01:18:26.619
I'll elaborate a little bit longer. I need to use my four minutes.

01:18:26.619 --> 01:18:31.619
Just to ask your question.

01:18:31.619 --> 01:18:37.619
All police vehicles will be designated with a plate reader.

01:18:37.619 --> 01:18:42.619
No, these are not mobile devices. These would be stationary.

01:18:42.619 --> 01:18:50.220
Stationary. Yeah, and they're solar powered. And they're located through Alpha City? They would be, yes. Okay. All right. Thank you.

01:18:51.220 --> 01:18:55.180
Alderman, Stacy? You know, I hear you talk about

01:18:56.939 --> 01:19:03.819
more cameras, more, you know, we tried to get cameras

01:19:07.220 --> 01:19:10.059
and it was shut down like

01:19:12.619 --> 01:19:27.619
Fire, burning in the forest. It was not wanted. Now all of a sudden, now we want cameras.

01:19:27.619 --> 01:19:35.739
And so, I don't know if this will pass or not, but since we want cameras, we could get

01:19:35.739 --> 01:19:45.260
with them and it was grants and money out there where we could have had cameras on every

01:19:45.260 --> 01:19:54.300
telephone pole to help detour some of the crime here in our city and we were denied

01:19:54.300 --> 01:20:13.820
Not that right. But now, with you bringing it to the council, they're all in. It's sad

01:20:13.820 --> 01:20:19.480
to me. I don't know what rights were denied. Alderman Johnson?

01:20:19.480 --> 01:20:25.080
So did this grant just come out recently or it just came out recently? You can apply for it.

01:20:25.080 --> 01:20:31.280
So the, yeah, the Retail Theft Grant, it's an annual grant. It's one that you can reapply for every year.

01:20:31.280 --> 01:20:31.780
Okay.

01:20:31.780 --> 01:20:39.280
And that's for the $9,000. The appropriations, that's something totally different. You know, that's being appropriated to us through Senator Durbin's office.

01:20:39.280 --> 01:20:48.280
So I don't, Darren's probably more knowledgeable about that type of money. This is the first time I've ever been able to secure funds that way.

01:20:48.279 --> 01:20:49.279
and others.

01:20:49.279 --> 01:20:53.619
I've been able to get a lot of grants, but it's for two years.

01:20:53.619 --> 01:20:54.619
That one's for two years.

01:20:54.619 --> 01:20:56.960
The Attorney General's $9,000.

01:20:56.960 --> 01:20:59.479
That's just a one-year thing, but we can reapply for it.

01:20:59.479 --> 01:21:01.199
You want your second?

01:21:01.199 --> 01:21:02.199
Sure.

01:21:02.199 --> 01:21:07.319
And so just to clarify, this won't go forward unless we get the grant money, and we'll use

01:21:07.319 --> 01:21:12.199
part the appropriations money for part of these things, but we won't get it all unless

01:21:12.199 --> 01:21:13.639
we get the grant money.

01:21:13.639 --> 01:21:14.639
Is that correct?

01:21:14.639 --> 01:21:15.639
Right.

01:21:15.640 --> 01:21:18.880
I mean, let's say the $9,000 is a for sure thing.

01:21:18.880 --> 01:21:20.200
I've already been awarded that.

01:21:20.200 --> 01:21:23.880
The appropriations, I mean, I'm just playing it safe.

01:21:23.880 --> 01:21:26.520
You know, I asked for a contingency in the contract

01:21:26.520 --> 01:21:27.500
and there is one in there.

01:21:27.500 --> 01:21:29.280
So if the appropriations fail,

01:21:29.280 --> 01:21:31.260
then we're left with $9,000,

01:21:31.260 --> 01:21:33.800
which gives us about two to three cameras, so.

01:21:33.800 --> 01:21:34.740
Okay, thank you.

01:21:37.280 --> 01:21:38.980
Madam Clerk, please take the roll.

01:21:40.360 --> 01:21:41.200
Sanders.

01:21:45.640 --> 01:22:01.640
Johnson, Clem, Johnson, Simmons, Parker, Stacy, and Shadle. The resolution is adopted, 6-0.

01:22:01.640 --> 01:22:17.119
7, 7-0. Did you say 6, Madam Clerk? It's 7. Oh, yes, that's because we have everybody

01:22:17.119 --> 01:22:21.400
back on the floor now. 7-0. Thank you, Attorney Zito. Sorry.

01:22:21.400 --> 01:22:26.680
Item number 13 is the adoption of resolution 2025-113. Could you please read this?

01:22:26.680 --> 01:22:30.640
Resolution Endorsing Community Solar Savings Program through Illinois Shines, which is

01:22:30.640 --> 01:22:33.220
and

01:22:33.220 --> 01:22:33.240
Senator,

01:22:33.240 --> 01:22:33.760
Paul Hagen,

01:22:33.760 --> 01:22:35.160
Chairman,

01:22:35.160 --> 01:22:43.640
has been asked if he would like to participate in the Illinois Solar Energy Incentive Program.

01:22:43.640 --> 01:22:48.280
Solar developers are often required to offer subscription incentives.

01:22:48.280 --> 01:22:51.960
The City's largest accounts, 100 KW and under, would be

01:22:51.960 --> 01:22:57.500
eligible to receive the monetary bill credits from the program incentive.

01:22:57.500 --> 01:23:02.060
These incentive programs work on the 20-year subscription timeline, and this program was

01:23:02.060 --> 01:23:09.359
reviewed by Mr. Mudge, who is here tonight on September 8th, 2025.

01:23:09.359 --> 01:23:14.000
This subscription program application will allow Freeport to participate and receive solar

01:23:14.000 --> 01:23:18.859
incentives from solar array projects that are being installed in the area.

01:23:18.859 --> 01:23:20.859
Freeport will not have any financial or...

01:23:20.859 --> 01:23:36.460
The City utility accounts are appealing to the program due to the large and consistent

01:23:36.460 --> 01:23:42.059
use of electricity. Many northwestern Illinois cities are joining this program and there is

01:23:42.059 --> 01:23:48.139
a brochure if someone is interested to see it. But Mike did present at the last Committee

01:23:48.140 --> 01:23:54.940
Hall. So there are many questions as to that time. So there is no financial requirement

01:23:54.940 --> 01:23:59.960
except the provider will charge a subscription fee from the credit received. Staff will also

01:23:59.960 --> 01:24:06.140
incur work time to subscribe and provide detailed account information. Staff is recommending

01:24:06.140 --> 01:24:10.579
the City Council to approve move forward with the community solar with Illinois Shine to

01:24:10.579 --> 01:24:13.380
receive solar credit incentives.

01:24:13.380 --> 01:24:14.860
Is there a motion to adopt?

01:24:14.860 --> 01:24:15.860
So moved.

01:24:15.860 --> 01:24:16.860
Second.

01:24:16.859 --> 01:24:21.859
Motion made by Alderman Shadle, seconded by Alderman Klemm. Discussion on the

01:24:21.859 --> 01:24:29.299
resolution. Alderman Simmons. So if I can persuade any of you even since before my

01:24:29.299 --> 01:24:34.579
time on council I cannot think of one person that has said I'm glad that the

01:24:34.579 --> 01:24:39.399
city has done this program and I would like to remind you all that last time we

01:24:39.399 --> 01:24:44.739
set up we signed up for this the company was not able to honor their contract so

01:24:44.739 --> 01:24:50.139
So please just keep those things in mind when making your decision.

01:24:50.139 --> 01:24:51.139
Manager Boyer?

01:24:51.139 --> 01:24:55.099
I'd like to make one minor comment related to this.

01:24:55.099 --> 01:24:58.179
The aggregation contract is what the city's done in the past.

01:24:58.179 --> 01:25:02.380
This is something new and this is completely different from the aggregation contract.

01:25:02.380 --> 01:25:07.199
This would allow the city to receive solar credits for the solar arrays that are already

01:25:07.199 --> 01:25:12.019
being built by other people.

01:25:12.020 --> 01:25:18.700
It is the next item. Yes. Alderman Johnson. From what I understood the gentleman telling

01:25:18.700 --> 01:25:28.740
us is that the subscriptions that we do are to give money to have more solar farms or

01:25:28.740 --> 01:25:36.060
plots put up. So if we get electricity, he said that is already used in all these other

01:25:36.060 --> 01:25:40.980
farms that are around. So this means they are going to be putting more solar farms around

01:25:40.980 --> 01:25:42.500
and the City of Freeport, right?

01:25:43.740 --> 01:25:45.060
Well, we have Mr. Mudge here.

01:25:45.060 --> 01:25:46.900
Maybe he can be a little more specific.

01:25:46.900 --> 01:25:48.900
Mr. Mudge, would you want to address that?

01:25:54.260 --> 01:25:55.100
Thank you.

01:25:55.100 --> 01:25:56.620
Thank you for the question.

01:25:57.780 --> 01:26:00.520
Basically, the state and the governor

01:26:00.520 --> 01:26:04.460
wants to promote clean power.

01:26:04.460 --> 01:26:08.340
And the subscriptions, when you subscribe on,

01:26:08.340 --> 01:26:13.020
it's going to be for new fields that are being developed right now are being

01:26:13.020 --> 01:26:22.220
developed in 2026 and they need subscribers. Will it continue on past 26 or 27?

01:26:22.220 --> 01:26:27.260
We really don't, we really don't know. It all depends on the incentives and things

01:26:27.260 --> 01:26:32.260
like that. Where they will be built and where they'll be placed is where it's

01:26:32.260 --> 01:26:37.260
is going to be economically beneficial to connect into the ComEd grid.

01:26:37.260 --> 01:26:45.260
So, I don't know if that's answering your specific question, Linda, Ms. Johnson,

01:26:45.260 --> 01:26:56.260
but wherever these are going to be built will be in approved locations through the Illinois Shines Program.

01:26:56.260 --> 01:27:02.140
and doesn't necessarily mean there's going to be a lot more here in Freeport or not.

01:27:02.140 --> 01:27:10.180
Probably nothing in our city, but most likely rural areas where the connection fees to comment

01:27:10.180 --> 01:27:11.180
are lower.

01:27:11.180 --> 01:27:13.340
Does that help?

01:27:13.340 --> 01:27:16.619
Go ahead.

01:27:16.619 --> 01:27:23.579
So chances are they would be in agriculture, farming areas, the new solar fields would

01:27:23.579 --> 01:27:28.859
Possibly because it would be cheaper to put them up in those areas. Is that what you're saying?

01:27:31.699 --> 01:27:33.699
For example, a

01:27:33.699 --> 01:27:39.100
Good solar project is like what's being built right here in the city of Freeport on the old landfill

01:27:39.659 --> 01:27:44.659
That's a perfect use for land that cannot be really used for anything else

01:27:45.420 --> 01:27:46.659
but

01:27:46.659 --> 01:27:52.579
There's more incentives for solar companies to go into like brown areas and

01:27:52.579 --> 01:27:58.579
and different things like that throughout and build them.

01:27:58.579 --> 01:28:02.579
Will it drew up more farmland? That's possible.

01:28:02.579 --> 01:28:06.579
But that's a farmer's choice or his opportunity.

01:28:06.579 --> 01:28:10.579
What we're looking at though for the specific city accounts

01:28:10.579 --> 01:28:14.579
is take advantage of the program that the states created

01:28:14.579 --> 01:28:19.579
to promote solar and we can do this now.

01:28:19.579 --> 01:28:27.859
Now, everyone, I mentioned last time, everyone in the combat area pays into the solar fund.

01:28:27.859 --> 01:28:34.420
So it's up to the council here whether or not you want to get some of that money that's

01:28:34.420 --> 01:28:48.800
being paid and leaving City Freeport back in for public works, accounts only.

01:28:48.800 --> 01:29:14.800
any further discussion Madam Clerk please take the roll. Sanders? No. Klemm? Aye. Johnson? No. Simmons? No. Parker? Aye. Stacy? No. And Shadle? Aye. I have three in favor, four against, and the resolution fails.

01:29:14.800 --> 01:29:22.800
Move on to item number 14, which is the adaption of resolution 2025-114. Could you please read this?

01:29:22.800 --> 01:29:36.800
Resolution approving an electrical aggregation agreement with, if we agree on our low bidder, that'll be that person, for the retail supply of electric for residential and small business customers in the city of Freeport.

01:29:36.800 --> 01:29:37.800
Manager Boyer?

01:29:37.800 --> 01:29:39.079
Manager, Boyer?

01:29:39.079 --> 01:29:40.079
Thank you, Your Honor.

01:29:40.079 --> 01:29:43.159
As we discussed at the Committee of the Whole last week,

01:29:43.159 --> 01:29:44.720
we received bids.

01:29:44.720 --> 01:29:47.400
I believe MC squared was a little better.

01:29:47.400 --> 01:29:50.600
And we've got it up on the screen here for you.

01:29:53.560 --> 01:29:58.440
So with that being said, staff would

01:29:58.440 --> 01:30:00.600
recommend moving forward with MC squared

01:30:00.600 --> 01:30:07.440
for the low kilowatt provider at two years.

01:30:07.440 --> 01:30:14.720
At what rate are we talking about? At 9.89 cents per kilowatt hour. 9.89? Yes.

01:30:14.720 --> 01:30:15.720
Okay.

01:30:15.720 --> 01:30:21.360
Council, are we picking a one or two year train? Yes.

01:30:21.360 --> 01:30:26.840
Is that your conclusion? Yes, staff recommends the two year, but obviously

01:30:26.840 --> 01:30:27.840
it's at council's discretion.

01:30:27.840 --> 01:30:28.840
So moved.

01:30:28.840 --> 01:30:29.840
Second.

01:30:29.840 --> 01:30:36.040
Motion made by Alderman Klemm, seconded by Alderman Shadle. Discussion on approving MC

01:30:36.039 --> 01:30:57.479
C-Squared. Alderman, Stacy? As Alderman Simmons stated earlier that last year when we did this,

01:30:57.479 --> 01:31:05.159
everybody was automatically changed. If you didn't want the change, you had to send in

01:31:05.159 --> 01:31:17.039
and the paper apting out, and then they couldn't even fulfill the need.

01:31:17.039 --> 01:31:24.319
And so why are we back here again?

01:31:24.319 --> 01:31:32.840
And being that we're back here again, I hope this time, if people choose to take it, that

01:31:32.840 --> 01:31:39.840
they have a choice and not that they're automatically changed and then now they've got to go and

01:31:40.600 --> 01:31:51.600
change back. So I don't know how that works, but to change everybody to this MC2, I think

01:31:52.119 --> 01:31:59.119
it should be optional. If they want MC2, they can call you. But to switch everybody automatically,

01:32:02.840 --> 01:32:15.340
Grammatically, no, we were clearly shown last year it did not work and now we're all back

01:32:15.340 --> 01:32:20.340
with comment.

01:32:20.340 --> 01:32:21.340
Manager Boyer.

01:32:21.340 --> 01:32:26.239
Mr. Mudge, I don't know if you can provide some clarity on this, but we've done this

01:32:26.239 --> 01:32:46.239
For many different times, people have saved thousands of dollars on their overall power bill, but could you explain why last year was different than the past years and why it's different than this year? And just based on those rates, how much do you think we'll end up saving based on ComEd's base rate right now?

01:32:46.239 --> 01:33:04.239
Sure. Last year Council did agree and we had a signed agreement with Nordic Energy. However, their cost, not to their fault, but it was a pass-through charge, increased the charges where they could not honor that contract.

01:33:04.239 --> 01:33:14.239
However, we decided to give it a rest and have everyone go back to ComEd. At that time we did not know what the ComEd rate was going to be.

01:33:14.239 --> 01:33:30.239
Now, we know what the ComEd rate is, and in actuality, this one, I looked at the new ComEd rate tariffs that came out for September through May, and the ComEd rate now is at 10.6 cents.

01:33:30.239 --> 01:33:40.239
The MC squared rate, whether you do a one-year or two-year contract, that's what it will be.

01:33:40.239 --> 01:33:45.979
Now the bottom line is the state set up the program where it would be an opt-out program.

01:33:45.979 --> 01:33:50.380
If you don't want to be in it, that is the customer's choice.

01:33:50.380 --> 01:33:58.819
But by not passing or adopting a contract, customers do not have a choice at all.

01:33:58.819 --> 01:34:06.899
They're just on ComEd or on a supplier of their own and they would have that choice.

01:34:06.900 --> 01:34:14.080
So, what difference does the difference between the one or the two year contract make?

01:34:14.080 --> 01:34:24.900
If there's a penny difference, and we have 3,000 customers in Freeport, then the average

01:34:24.900 --> 01:34:30.620
customer uses about 700, 730 kilowatt hours to comment on customers.

01:34:30.620 --> 01:34:36.660
So that's saving each customer $7, $7.50.

01:34:36.659 --> 01:34:43.039
if they want it. If they don't, they can stay on ComEd right now. So ComEd's rate is set.

01:34:43.039 --> 01:34:54.579
So by passing this, you're giving the customers a choice back that was really taken away from

01:34:54.579 --> 01:35:01.539
them when we all agreed we didn't know what the new ComEd rate was back in April or May

01:35:01.539 --> 01:35:04.659
when we had to replace that original contract.

01:35:04.659 --> 01:35:22.659
What's going to stop it from happening again? We can't say that it is or isn't going to happen again. It's out of your hands, too.

01:35:22.659 --> 01:35:33.659
The regulated rate that was passed on to Nordic Energy has now set for the next two years. The suppliers know what their costs are. They will hold that rate.

01:35:33.659 --> 01:35:41.019
but you told us that last year about when we did this last year we did not know

01:35:41.019 --> 01:35:49.619
what the federal pastoral costs were going to be and in the past in the past

01:35:49.619 --> 01:35:55.899
it was known it all has to do with the demand for power going up so so so much

01:35:55.899 --> 01:36:03.639
but to me I'm just simply saying if you want to give your residents and your

01:36:03.640 --> 01:36:21.039
Alderman Shadle You said the average homeowner would see a

01:36:21.039 --> 01:36:24.440
difference of roughly $7.50.

01:36:24.440 --> 01:36:32.860
What is the impact taking MC Squared's rate for the city contracts?

01:36:32.859 --> 01:36:36.139
If we look at 3,000 residents, which is low?

01:36:36.139 --> 01:36:37.139
No, the city.

01:36:37.139 --> 01:36:38.139
Oh, the city?

01:36:38.139 --> 01:36:39.139
Not the residents, the city.

01:36:39.139 --> 01:36:41.219
This has nothing to do with the city?

01:36:41.219 --> 01:36:46.019
No, on this contract, how much do we save as the city of Freeport?

01:36:46.019 --> 01:36:48.859
The city does not save any money at all?

01:36:48.859 --> 01:36:49.859
No.

01:36:49.859 --> 01:36:51.659
This is strictly for your residents?

01:36:51.659 --> 01:36:52.880
No, no, no.

01:36:52.880 --> 01:36:53.880
Not the city residents.

01:36:53.880 --> 01:36:59.299
I'm talking the city water department, the city sewer department, our billing, the city

01:36:59.299 --> 01:37:00.859
of Freeport billings.

01:37:00.859 --> 01:37:01.859
Billings.

01:37:01.859 --> 01:37:02.859
All right.

01:37:02.859 --> 01:37:03.859
I'll answer that.

01:37:03.859 --> 01:37:08.979
Our contract, decision to contract right now ends December 2026 for the City Water Accounts

01:37:08.979 --> 01:37:13.420
as I get the rate of 5.61 cents.

01:37:13.420 --> 01:37:14.420
And that's the public word.

01:37:14.420 --> 01:37:16.819
Attorney Zito can answer.

01:37:16.819 --> 01:37:22.139
If I'm understanding your question, it'll, electric aggregation, this particular contract

01:37:22.139 --> 01:37:28.920
is strictly for residential and small, small businesses.

01:37:28.920 --> 01:37:34.119
We have a separate contract for the City Accounts like our Wastewater Treatment Plant and etc.

01:37:34.119 --> 01:37:38.279
So that's a separate contract that we have each year for the City Accounts.

01:37:38.279 --> 01:37:39.279
Alderman Parker.

01:37:39.279 --> 01:37:45.079
Just a quick question.

01:37:45.079 --> 01:37:46.079
We approved this tonight.

01:37:46.079 --> 01:37:51.699
Do the people in the City have to do this or they can ignore it and stay with comment?

01:37:51.699 --> 01:37:54.239
People have two choices to opt out.

01:37:54.239 --> 01:37:55.239
Johnson.

01:37:55.239 --> 01:38:02.920
They'll get a letter under city letterhead from MC Squared if they were chosen to say

01:38:02.920 --> 01:38:06.239
here's what your rate will be starting in December.

01:38:06.239 --> 01:38:10.840
If you don't want to be part of this program, let us know.

01:38:10.840 --> 01:38:15.719
Secondly, a ComEd switch letter comes out, what was the state, the same thing in case

01:38:15.719 --> 01:38:16.880
somebody misses it.

01:38:16.880 --> 01:38:20.159
This is state statute how that's supposed to work.

01:38:20.159 --> 01:38:22.399
ComEd will send out a switch letter.

01:38:22.400 --> 01:38:28.480
and again if you do not want to be part of the program you can opt out. Anyone else that

01:38:28.480 --> 01:38:36.200
would be automatically in the program. One thought that I had I wanted to mention. What's

01:38:36.200 --> 01:38:42.640
the value of this to the city of Freeport if it's $7 a month times 3,000 residents

01:38:42.640 --> 01:38:49.160
that's $21,000 a month that stays in the city. Might not seem like a lot but to me

01:38:49.160 --> 01:38:50.160
every dollar counts.

01:38:50.159 --> 01:39:07.000
and

01:39:07.000 --> 01:39:15.239
Sanders. Yeah, I know exactly what you're doing, sir, with this Nordic thing and

01:39:15.239 --> 01:39:20.439
not trying to get it proposed to the city of Freeport or the residents of

01:39:20.439 --> 01:39:25.680
Freeport. The thing that I found out, and it's like you said, they had

01:39:25.680 --> 01:39:35.000
issues managing how they want to implement their program, what they fail.

01:39:35.000 --> 01:39:36.000
and others.

01:39:36.000 --> 01:39:41.119
They initially failed their program because I was part of that program and they had so

01:39:41.119 --> 01:39:43.340
much difficulties with it.

01:39:43.340 --> 01:39:50.079
In order for you to opt out of it, you have to not only go back to ComEd, but you have

01:39:50.079 --> 01:39:55.899
to go through another agency so they can enforce it.

01:39:55.899 --> 01:39:57.439
They have to enforce it.

01:39:57.439 --> 01:40:04.920
There's another agency that enforces it that keeps companies like Nordic and ComEd to be

01:40:04.920 --> 01:40:12.279
to impose upon residents to make, to opt them in when they don't want to be in there.

01:40:12.279 --> 01:40:17.619
If they don't, if they don't acknowledge it to, I forgot the name of the company, but

01:40:17.619 --> 01:40:26.819
there's another agency that they have to acknowledge it with them so they can inform ComEd.

01:40:26.819 --> 01:40:34.300
It's almost like another liaison that's working on behalf of these suppliers.

01:40:34.300 --> 01:40:40.300
and I ended up getting out of that program with Nordic, even though I did have to go

01:40:40.300 --> 01:40:47.380
through the procedures to get another agency to have come here to recognize that I want

01:40:47.380 --> 01:40:49.220
to be with another supplier.

01:40:49.220 --> 01:40:54.180
Now you're back here again trying to say that it's the state law.

01:40:54.180 --> 01:40:59.900
If it's the state law, then why am I with another supplier and Nordic was having all

01:40:59.900 --> 01:41:00.900
these issues?

01:41:00.900 --> 01:41:09.460
Black, is Nordic coming back in to the picture? Nordic is not. Nordic is MC2. MC2? Is it MC2?

01:41:09.460 --> 01:41:16.860
A different supply. Oh, okay. They just changed the name is what they did, huh? No. Oh, okay.

01:41:16.860 --> 01:41:26.540
But anyway, it's not something that I think, like one of the Aldermen says, that if he

01:41:26.539 --> 01:41:35.220
He doesn't comply or acknowledge to a certain agency, then they automatically back into

01:41:35.220 --> 01:41:40.819
whatever this is that you're talking about, this MC square.

01:41:40.819 --> 01:41:46.220
I don't think that should be something that the citizens of Freeport should be considering.

01:41:46.220 --> 01:41:53.619
If they have suppliers already in existence right now that they're using other than ComEd,

01:41:53.619 --> 01:41:54.619
and others.

01:41:54.619 --> 01:42:00.439
They should continue to use their supplier until they get one better and that should

01:42:00.439 --> 01:42:11.159
be their option and not the other suppliers or the state's enforcement as far as I'm

01:42:11.159 --> 01:42:12.159
concerned.

01:42:12.159 --> 01:42:18.319
But anyway, I know there's another agency in play that all residents have to acknowledge

01:42:18.319 --> 01:42:22.279
that they do or do not want to be part of this program.

01:42:22.279 --> 01:42:39.279
So I'm just saying that's just my observation on these matters and I think we should take these into consideration that what you're proposing, I don't know what really, does it have a clown mask on it or whatever, I don't know.

01:42:39.279 --> 01:42:41.279
Alderman Johnson.

01:42:41.279 --> 01:42:43.279
Customers do have three choices.

01:42:43.279 --> 01:42:44.279
Three now.

01:42:44.279 --> 01:42:46.279
There are three choices.

01:42:46.279 --> 01:42:49.279
One, stay uncommitted.

01:42:49.279 --> 01:43:01.279
Two, they could go back, or they could go under the City Program of D Squared and appreciate a better rate and save a few dollars on the rental fee bill.

01:43:01.279 --> 01:43:08.279
Three, you can go out like you probably did and choose your own supplier at your own risk.

01:43:08.279 --> 01:43:12.279
So that's the three choices that all customers have.

01:43:12.279 --> 01:43:27.279
and I think that you, I don't say you owe it to it, but you should think about giving your residents all three options so that they can make their choice.

01:43:27.279 --> 01:43:33.279
It's their choice. Once it leaves here, it's back to them and their choice.

01:43:33.279 --> 01:43:35.279
Alderman Johnson.

01:43:35.279 --> 01:43:41.239
So the majority of the residents in the city of Freeport are just on ComEd right now

01:43:41.840 --> 01:43:43.159
and

01:43:43.159 --> 01:43:48.000
According to this paper. It says that from September 25 to May 26

01:43:49.319 --> 01:43:56.159
It's ten point two two nine cents per kilowatt hour now. You're saying it's ten point six right now

01:43:56.159 --> 01:43:58.880
It's ten point six because the current change there

01:43:59.719 --> 01:44:01.239
it goes from

01:44:01.239 --> 01:44:15.639
September through May on the new rate... On the new rate of 10.6. Right. Right. The 10.2, that was like for the four summer months and blended to the winter, but now it's 10.6.

01:44:15.640 --> 01:44:45.640
So if we choose this contract, MC2, we choose the two year contract, we would be locked in at 9.89 cents per kilowatt hour for those two years which is less than what we're paying now with ComEd which is the current rate is 10.6 which could change at the end of May or in May 26 it could go up a lot higher than that but if we choose this for two years it would be 9.89 cents per kilowatt hour

01:44:45.640 --> 01:44:47.680
for those two years, correct?

01:44:47.680 --> 01:44:48.920
That is correct.

01:44:48.920 --> 01:44:49.420
Thank you.

01:44:53.240 --> 01:44:56.320
Madam Clerk, please take the roll.

01:44:56.320 --> 01:44:57.039
Sanders?

01:44:57.039 --> 01:44:58.039
No.

01:44:58.039 --> 01:44:58.720
Klemm?

01:44:58.720 --> 01:44:59.360
Aye.

01:44:59.360 --> 01:45:00.000
Johnson?

01:45:00.000 --> 01:45:01.079
Aye.

01:45:01.079 --> 01:45:02.000
Simmons?

01:45:02.000 --> 01:45:02.720
No.

01:45:02.720 --> 01:45:03.360
Parker?

01:45:03.360 --> 01:45:04.119
Aye.

01:45:04.119 --> 01:45:05.920
Stacy?

01:45:05.920 --> 01:45:07.160
No.

01:45:07.160 --> 01:45:07.920
Shadle?

01:45:07.920 --> 01:45:09.560
Aye.

01:45:09.560 --> 01:45:12.680
The resolution is adopted 5 to 2.

01:45:12.680 --> 01:45:14.039
No, that's not right.

01:45:14.039 --> 01:45:15.039
4-3.

01:45:15.039 --> 01:45:23.000
So, it's because half the council has voted, you would need to call the mayor, the mayor's

01:45:23.000 --> 01:45:24.000
vote.

01:45:24.000 --> 01:45:27.319
Say that again, sir.

01:45:27.319 --> 01:45:33.079
So when you have half of the council, four, vote in favor of an item, then you can call

01:45:33.079 --> 01:45:36.239
the mayor's, that's one of the situations where the mayor is entitled to vote.

01:45:36.239 --> 01:45:38.519
Oh, I heard you say that.

01:45:38.519 --> 01:45:40.800
Okay, I'm going to hold you to that.

01:45:40.800 --> 01:45:41.800
Okay.

01:45:41.800 --> 01:45:43.880
Okay, I'm going to hold you right there.

01:45:43.880 --> 01:45:46.199
This is a nonsense discussion.

01:45:46.199 --> 01:45:48.400
Mayor, what say you?

01:45:48.400 --> 01:45:52.359
I'm talking, I'm asking him a question.

01:45:52.359 --> 01:45:53.359
You're talking nonsense.

01:45:53.359 --> 01:45:55.359
The resolution is adopted 5-3.

01:45:55.359 --> 01:45:58.440
Item number 15 is the adoption of resolution 2025-115.

01:45:58.440 --> 01:46:01.960
Could you please read this for the record?

01:46:01.960 --> 01:46:03.880
That's the legal move.

01:46:03.880 --> 01:46:09.239
Resolution authorizing memorandum of understanding with AFSCME for street or forest reform and

01:46:09.239 --> 01:46:13.000
temporary assignment as Acting Street Superintendent.

01:46:13.000 --> 01:46:19.720
Manager, Boyer. Thank you, Your Honor. The city superintendent has a

01:46:19.720 --> 01:46:24.319
significant amount of personal time off due to his years of service. Additionally,

01:46:24.319 --> 01:46:27.479
his management leadership responsibilities require him to be on

01:46:27.479 --> 01:46:31.680
call a significant amount of the time due to the nature of his current public

01:46:31.680 --> 01:46:37.600
works role. To ensure our staff is fully supported and has adequate time off and

01:46:37.600 --> 01:46:41.439
receives appropriate rest and downtime, staff is requesting that a memorandum of

01:46:41.440 --> 01:46:46.920
of Understanding be approved by the City Council to allow for additional hourly pay for appointed

01:46:46.920 --> 01:46:52.040
foreman who takes on added responsibilities, thereby covering this time off.

01:46:52.040 --> 01:46:56.240
This MOU pay will be for approved and assigned coverage only.

01:46:56.240 --> 01:47:01.920
The MOU approval will allow our superintendent to take appropriate time off, ensuring that

01:47:01.920 --> 01:47:06.120
the quality of their time off by knowing that they have some experienced staff who can handle

01:47:06.120 --> 01:47:07.120
the calls.

01:47:07.119 --> 01:47:15.279
was also allowed for scheduling formal coverage with the foreman in advance of their PTO or

01:47:15.279 --> 01:47:20.920
weekend off. This increase in pay for the foreman will only be for the added responsibility

01:47:20.920 --> 01:47:26.800
as actual work time assigned during approved time off by the superintendent. This arrangement

01:47:26.800 --> 01:47:33.119
is similar to the MOU that was proposed for the water main break assignments in the utility.

01:47:33.119 --> 01:47:38.800
The MOU will provide $5 an hour increase in the appointed foreman hourly pay as approved

01:47:38.800 --> 01:47:44.079
only on hours of coverage that are physically worked and logged in the absence of the superintendent

01:47:44.079 --> 01:47:51.519
during time off and recommendation to move forward with this $5 an hour increase to the

01:47:51.519 --> 01:47:56.399
foreman to cover for the street superintendent's time off.

01:47:56.399 --> 01:47:57.640
Is there a motion to adopt?

01:47:57.640 --> 01:47:58.640
So moved.

01:47:58.640 --> 01:47:59.640
Second.

01:47:59.640 --> 01:48:08.140
The motion made by Alderman Shadle, seconded by Alderman Klemm. Discussion on the Resolution. Alderman Stacy?

01:48:09.140 --> 01:48:21.140
I don't understand how we can continue to move forward with increases when we're still waiting on a contract that's been

01:48:21.140 --> 01:48:38.500
not in action for three or four months. The ASME union continue to wait for a contract

01:48:39.780 --> 01:48:46.980
and we continue to want to make increases everywhere but with them.

01:48:47.860 --> 01:48:50.579
Manager Boyer. What do you mean by three or four months?

01:48:51.140 --> 01:48:55.940
you tell me no I don't know I don't know what you meant by that what was their

01:48:55.940 --> 01:49:00.980
contract up when did their contract in their contract is still in place and

01:49:00.980 --> 01:49:04.820
we're negotiating yes it's in place now until I believe you said something to the

01:49:04.820 --> 01:49:11.500
however but when did it in and and you were not prepared to move forward with

01:49:11.500 --> 01:49:17.420
it but you're prepared you're prepared to move forward with increases where you

01:49:17.420 --> 01:49:19.420
and

01:49:20.520 --> 01:49:24.520
I, and I'm going to say that we do want increases. Let's be fair

01:49:24.520 --> 01:49:29.520
across the board. They deserve a fair contract. Let's make it

01:49:29.520 --> 01:49:31.520
happen.

01:49:33.539 --> 01:49:35.539
This is providing an additional wages to a street

01:49:36.640 --> 01:49:39.640
superintendent to cover in between time. We've already

01:49:39.640 --> 01:49:45.640
discussed it with the union. It is acceptable to the unions

01:49:45.640 --> 01:49:53.640
and I will have our street superintendent time off and make sure that he gets to sign his duties during the time that he has weekend off.

01:49:53.640 --> 01:49:59.640
And what about our 9-1-1 people working 12 hour days?

01:49:59.640 --> 01:50:01.640
This has nothing to do with that.

01:50:01.640 --> 01:50:04.640
I know it has nothing to do with it because we don't want to discuss that.

01:50:04.640 --> 01:50:06.640
It's a different topic.

01:50:06.640 --> 01:50:11.640
And it's a topic that will never make the agenda because you're not going to put it on.

01:50:11.640 --> 01:50:18.720
Ask me negotiations is not going to be on the council floor. No, it will not but I'm just saying get them a contract

01:50:20.760 --> 01:50:24.800
Let's stay on task here. Is there any questions? Yep. Let's stay on task

01:50:26.520 --> 01:50:28.520
Please stop being disruptive

01:50:29.520 --> 01:50:32.079
Disruptive to me if there's no further discussion

01:50:33.039 --> 01:50:35.079
Madam Clerk, please take the role. Sanders

01:50:35.940 --> 01:50:39.240
No, Clem. Aye. Johnson. Aye.

01:50:39.239 --> 01:51:09.239
Aye. Simmons? Aye. Parker? Aye. Stacy? No. Shadle? Aye. The motion, the adoption, the resolution is adapted five to two. I'm sorry. Item number 16 is the adoption of resolution 2025-116. Could you please read this? Resolution approving an airport management agreement with Freeport Aviation for Albertus Airport. Thank you. Manager Boyer? Thank you, Your Honor. The city issued a request for quote or RFP

01:51:09.239 --> 01:51:16.159
F.Q. for the fixed-base operator airport manager contract for Albertus Airport on August 11th,

01:51:16.159 --> 01:51:23.479
2025. Initial meetings were held with four prospective applicants and three applicants

01:51:23.479 --> 01:51:30.439
submitted applications by the September 2nd deadline. The applications were opened on

01:51:30.439 --> 01:51:39.159
September 4th at City Hall and reviewed, opening by myself, the Mayor, Alderman Sellers, the

01:51:39.159 --> 01:51:44.920
Public Works Director, Darren Steekle, City Clerk, Dovie Anderson, and Attorney, Steve

01:51:44.920 --> 01:51:47.000
Cox were present.

01:51:47.000 --> 01:51:52.779
I am pleased to notify that all three applications received were excellent and all of them represented

01:51:52.779 --> 01:51:54.779
well qualified applicants.

01:51:54.779 --> 01:52:02.920
The lowest of the three responsible applicants was Jeff Monica Freeport, Illinois at $157,500

01:52:02.920 --> 01:52:03.920
per year.

01:52:03.920 --> 01:52:09.000
I am recommending the City Council authorize the negotiation and execution of an operator

01:52:09.000 --> 01:52:11.000
and

01:52:13.000 --> 01:52:15.000
John.

01:52:17.000 --> 01:52:19.000
I am looking at the contract and it says that the operator,

01:52:21.000 --> 01:52:23.000
airport operator should keep regular post-

01:52:25.000 --> 01:52:27.000
order contract in the form set forth in the RFQ with Jeff

01:52:29.000 --> 01:52:31.000
Modica and according to the terms set forth in his response to

01:52:31.000 --> 01:52:33.000
the RFQ.

01:52:35.000 --> 01:52:37.000
Is there a motion to adopt?

01:52:39.000 --> 01:52:40.840
Co,

01:52:40.840 --> 01:52:41.840
John,

01:52:41.840 --> 01:52:42.840
and

01:52:42.840 --> 01:52:43.840
David,

01:52:43.840 --> 01:52:44.840
and

01:52:44.840 --> 01:52:45.840
I

01:52:45.840 --> 01:52:46.840
want to

01:52:46.840 --> 01:52:47.840
start

01:52:47.840 --> 01:52:48.840
with

01:52:48.840 --> 01:52:49.840
the

01:52:49.840 --> 01:52:50.840
question

01:52:50.840 --> 01:52:51.840
of

01:52:51.840 --> 01:52:52.840
how

01:52:52.840 --> 01:52:53.840
do

01:52:53.840 --> 01:52:54.840
you

01:52:54.840 --> 01:52:55.840
cover

01:52:55.840 --> 01:52:56.840
the

01:52:56.840 --> 01:52:57.840
hours

01:52:57.840 --> 01:52:58.840
during

01:52:58.840 --> 01:52:59.840
the

01:52:59.840 --> 01:53:00.840
business

01:53:00.840 --> 01:53:01.840
hours?

01:53:01.840 --> 01:53:02.840
How do

01:53:02.840 --> 01:53:03.840
you

01:53:03.840 --> 01:53:04.840
cover

01:53:04.840 --> 01:53:05.840
those

01:53:05.840 --> 01:53:06.840
hours?

01:53:06.840 --> 01:53:19.880
Thank you. Alderman Stacy? Yes. Who's going to run the airport when this person is at his

01:53:19.880 --> 01:53:32.880
other job and what terms was this negotiated under? And is the contract for a year or 19

01:53:32.880 --> 01:53:39.720
I'll try to answer that. The operator is responsible to cover the hours that were specified in

01:53:39.720 --> 01:53:46.440
the agreement. So whether it's them sitting there or they have their alternate there.

01:53:46.440 --> 01:53:51.400
What does that mean? An alternate? We've never had an alternate before.

01:53:51.400 --> 01:53:58.480
Could you please allow him to finish the question? I'm just asking what is an alternate?

01:53:58.480 --> 01:54:01.800
Would you like me to finish the questions or go back to the alternate?

01:54:01.800 --> 01:54:08.480
question okay so that I understand would you please remind me of the last

01:54:08.480 --> 01:54:16.720
question yeah it is automatically renewed each year unless either the

01:54:16.720 --> 01:54:24.600
operator or the city is interested to open the contract and renegotiate it in

01:54:24.600 --> 01:54:30.239
which it will be a new request for quote be sent out in a similar fashion as this

01:54:30.239 --> 01:55:00.239
and Chris.

01:55:00.239 --> 01:55:05.239
and at the hour stated by him or an alternate.

01:55:05.960 --> 01:55:07.159
So what's an alternate?

01:55:07.159 --> 01:55:09.359
We've never had an alternate before.

01:55:09.359 --> 01:55:10.199
That's incorrect.

01:55:10.199 --> 01:55:14.079
We have someone, it is, if there is an employee

01:55:14.079 --> 01:55:19.079
of the operator that can carry the office hours.

01:55:19.199 --> 01:55:22.559
But the employee of the operator is not

01:55:22.559 --> 01:55:25.479
who got interviewed for the position.

01:55:25.479 --> 01:55:28.359
You know, I just think it's sad that

01:55:30.239 --> 01:56:00.239
This lady that spoke to us tonight, for 28 years, you know this is her life, this is her livelihood, for 28 years she has ran that airport and there is nobody in Miles that can touch her, they're not equipped, they don't know what they're doing because they haven't done it and shame on you to take

01:56:00.239 --> 01:56:05.239
and not even consider her for this position.

01:56:07.239 --> 01:56:08.239
Manager Boyer.

01:56:09.239 --> 01:56:14.239
I will say that the current operator has been operating the airport for five years.

01:56:16.239 --> 01:56:25.239
And this was an open process that accepted three qualified statements or quotes.

01:56:26.239 --> 01:56:29.239
The quotes were opened with a panel who reviewed them all

01:56:30.239 --> 01:56:38.880
the lowest quote was the one that was recommended for council to move forward with.

01:56:38.880 --> 01:56:39.880
Alderman Sanders?

01:56:39.880 --> 01:56:40.880
Yeah.

01:56:40.880 --> 01:56:51.439
This resolution that is being brought into our focus at this time, who is drafting this

01:56:51.439 --> 01:56:59.439
authorization of this resolution and how do we even come to the decision of establishing

01:56:59.440 --> 01:57:05.600
whether or not we should move forward with this resolution in terms of who introduced

01:57:05.600 --> 01:57:06.960
this resolution.

01:57:06.960 --> 01:57:16.800
I mean, who gives the authorization to move on an issue of this magnitude when it comes

01:57:16.800 --> 01:57:19.880
to contracts and things like that?

01:57:19.880 --> 01:57:28.640
I thought this was something that the council should be creating this type of resolution.

01:57:28.640 --> 01:57:34.160
it's not, it shouldn't be the City Manager who's creating this resolution of hiring and

01:57:34.160 --> 01:57:38.200
firing someone that's dealing with the contract.

01:57:38.200 --> 01:57:48.800
I mean just automatically spell out, had not spelled out the terms and things of this nature

01:57:48.800 --> 01:57:56.320
far as renewal and there's someone currently working there already and I feel that if council

01:57:56.319 --> 01:58:04.519
has not intervened in terms of the drafting of this resolution.

01:58:04.519 --> 01:58:12.479
I think this thing should be dismissed, thrown in the garbage until we come up with the right

01:58:12.479 --> 01:58:20.519
protocol on how we're going to conduct contracts with any management organization and system

01:58:20.519 --> 01:58:23.960
that we should be totally informed about it.

01:58:23.960 --> 01:58:30.359
and I feel that that is where we are at right now. We're not in a position to be doing resolution

01:58:30.359 --> 01:58:38.159
with the improper authorization of this particular resolution. And I feel that everyone here

01:58:38.159 --> 01:58:48.119
in council should really take a good look at this and see what is causing friction within

01:58:48.119 --> 01:58:58.159
in the city and eliminating a manager, a superintendent out at the airport, eliminating that job and

01:58:58.159 --> 01:59:04.880
opening it up for others to come in and look at that job without any scrutiny.

01:59:04.880 --> 01:59:13.000
I don't feel we should be conducting this type of thing and I think council has the

01:59:13.000 --> 01:59:20.039
to let us say so when it comes to the resolution of authorizing any memorandum, and I'm just

01:59:20.039 --> 01:59:29.560
saying that should be the procedure, unless you show me something else in writing that

01:59:29.560 --> 01:59:37.760
does not give the council the authorization to dismiss something that we have not even

01:59:37.760 --> 01:59:40.619
considered to authorize for a contract.

01:59:40.619 --> 01:59:49.659
So I think the council, not no administrative heads or city manager, mayor or attorney Zito

01:59:49.659 --> 01:59:55.979
or anyone like that injecting or imposing anything on this particular resolution matter.

01:59:55.979 --> 02:00:01.819
And I think this should come directly from the intelligent minds that sits here in our

02:00:01.819 --> 02:00:10.059
council to look at the overall picture of what we might be voting for unless we should

02:00:10.060 --> 02:00:11.060
and others.

02:00:11.060 --> 02:00:15.220
So, I think we should be dismissing this and coming back to it at another time so we can

02:00:15.220 --> 02:00:23.900
make sure that what we're accepting here is properly set, right, or we got the proper

02:00:23.900 --> 02:00:28.860
provisions to allow such an authorization to go through.

02:00:28.860 --> 02:00:33.020
I don't even think we should be even entertaining this matter at this time.

02:00:33.020 --> 02:00:41.400
So let us re-evaluate ourselves and look at this thing real strong.

02:00:41.400 --> 02:00:43.460
Your four minutes has expired, Alderman Sanders.

02:00:43.460 --> 02:00:46.860
Can I adopt another minute?

02:00:46.860 --> 02:00:47.860
No.

02:00:47.860 --> 02:00:51.860
And no one's fired.

02:00:51.860 --> 02:00:52.860
Every contract has an end date.

02:00:52.860 --> 02:00:53.860
Are you making a comment, Mayor?

02:00:53.860 --> 02:00:54.860
I can.

02:00:54.860 --> 02:00:55.860
You can?

02:00:55.860 --> 02:00:59.340
Would you please stop interrupting?

02:00:59.340 --> 02:01:01.380
Every contract has an end date.

02:01:01.380 --> 02:01:09.180
This is just an end date where, Alderman Sanders, please stop.

02:01:09.180 --> 02:01:12.180
Attorney Zito.

02:01:12.180 --> 02:01:19.760
Just for clarification, this contract is being presented to you, the council, to vote on.

02:01:19.760 --> 02:01:21.819
You can vote yes or no on it.

02:01:21.819 --> 02:01:27.779
You guys have the final say on whether or not to approve who the City Manager is recommending.

02:01:27.779 --> 02:01:29.659
It's just a recommendation.

02:01:29.659 --> 02:01:31.939
the Council has the final say on it.

02:01:31.939 --> 02:01:33.979
And that's what's before you guys tonight.

02:01:36.300 --> 02:01:37.300
And if you read the memo,

02:01:37.300 --> 02:01:39.819
it says that all three were qualified,

02:01:39.819 --> 02:01:42.699
the chosen with lowest amount.

02:01:42.699 --> 02:01:44.019
We're gonna see.

02:01:44.019 --> 02:01:46.979
Well, unless there's any further discussion.

02:01:46.979 --> 02:01:48.180
I want my second.

02:01:48.180 --> 02:01:49.420
You would like your second?

02:01:49.420 --> 02:01:50.460
Yeah, I like my second.

02:01:50.460 --> 02:01:51.619
Okay, go ahead.

02:01:51.619 --> 02:01:54.859
Yeah, yeah, Attorney Zito,

02:01:54.859 --> 02:01:57.619
you failed to mention the fact that

02:01:57.619 --> 02:02:11.140
The City Manager has the authority to place items on the agenda.

02:02:11.140 --> 02:02:12.939
Well, we didn't see that in the memo.

02:02:12.939 --> 02:02:18.220
There was no memo drafted on that matter.

02:02:18.220 --> 02:02:20.099
Because we have to go through the same protocol.

02:02:20.099 --> 02:02:25.340
That is an authority that the City Manager has to, I mean, all these other items are

02:02:25.340 --> 02:02:30.140
are on the agenda that the City Manager put on the agenda.

02:02:30.140 --> 02:02:31.860
Is there any other discussion on the resolution?

02:02:31.860 --> 02:02:34.980
Whether it's the right protocol or not is one of them.

02:02:34.980 --> 02:02:36.739
You should probably have a better understanding.

02:02:36.739 --> 02:02:37.739
Yeah.

02:02:37.739 --> 02:02:40.579
If there's nothing further, Madam Clerk, could you please take the roll?

02:02:40.579 --> 02:02:41.579
Sanders?

02:02:41.579 --> 02:02:42.579
No.

02:02:42.579 --> 02:02:43.579
Klemm?

02:02:43.579 --> 02:02:44.579
Aye.

02:02:44.579 --> 02:02:45.579
Johnson?

02:02:45.579 --> 02:02:46.579
Aye.

02:02:46.579 --> 02:02:47.579
Simmons?

02:02:47.579 --> 02:02:48.579
No.

02:02:48.579 --> 02:02:49.579
Parker?

02:02:49.579 --> 02:02:50.579
No.

02:02:50.579 --> 02:02:51.579
Stacy?

02:02:51.579 --> 02:02:52.579
No.

02:02:52.579 --> 02:02:53.579
Shadle?

02:02:53.579 --> 02:02:54.579
Aye.

02:02:54.579 --> 02:03:01.579
We have three in favor, four against. The resolution is not adopted. It fails.

02:03:01.579 --> 02:03:13.579
Please withhold. Such inappropriate tonight. It boggles my mind. Let's try to remain professional.

02:03:13.579 --> 02:03:17.579
Item number 17 is approval of a bid. Could you please read this?

02:03:17.579 --> 02:03:23.579
We had a bid opening on September 10th, 2025. Sewer lining for 2025.

02:03:23.579 --> 02:03:24.420
Manager, Boyer.

02:03:28.140 --> 02:03:32.359
The city of Freeport has nearly 130 miles of sanitary sewer

02:03:32.359 --> 02:03:36.500
during the annual project evaluation, cure and place lining.

02:03:36.500 --> 02:03:38.579
Locations are identified for rehab

02:03:38.579 --> 02:03:41.579
of the sanitary sewer piping that has cracks and defects,

02:03:41.579 --> 02:03:44.699
inflow and infiltration, or sags or settlement.

02:03:44.699 --> 02:03:46.939
Our IEPA mandatory CMOM,

02:03:46.939 --> 02:03:48.899
that's the Sewer Capacity Management Plan,

02:03:48.900 --> 02:03:56.140
of course, specify that the Freeport addresses annual sewer rehabilitations for our collection

02:03:56.140 --> 02:04:00.560
system, mainline piping for environmental concerns.

02:04:00.560 --> 02:04:08.200
Sewer lining is considered an industry accepted method of sewer main pipe rehabilitation and

02:04:08.200 --> 02:04:11.560
is more economical than open cut excavation methods.

02:04:11.560 --> 02:04:16.840
Sewer lining is over 10 times cheaper to install and industry standards estimate over 60 years

02:04:16.840 --> 02:04:20.840
of Sustainable Useful Life After Installation.

02:04:20.840 --> 02:04:24.600
On September 10th, 2025, Fehr Graham and city staff

02:04:24.600 --> 02:04:27.880
had a public bid for 10,813 linear feet

02:04:27.880 --> 02:04:29.819
of sanitary sewer lining.

02:04:29.819 --> 02:04:31.779
These sewer areas are identified

02:04:31.779 --> 02:04:34.560
as areas of street replacement.

02:04:34.560 --> 02:04:36.520
The city has four reputable bidders

02:04:36.520 --> 02:04:40.199
that specialize in sewer lining and submitted bids.

02:04:40.199 --> 02:04:45.199
National Power Rotting was the low bidder at $419,763.

02:04:45.199 --> 02:05:03.199
Under the Engineering Estimate, I might add. With approval, the installation should be completed by February 2026, and staff has budgeted this in the sewer budget. Staff recommends moving forward with that National Power Riding with the lowest responsive bid.

02:05:03.199 --> 02:05:05.199
Is there a motion to approve?

02:05:05.199 --> 02:05:09.199
So moved.

02:05:09.199 --> 02:05:11.199
Do we have a second?

02:05:11.199 --> 02:05:12.199
So moved.

02:05:12.199 --> 02:05:16.199
The motion is made by Alderman Shadle, seconded by Alderman Klemm. Discussion on the bid.

02:05:18.199 --> 02:05:20.199
Alderman Sanders.

02:05:20.199 --> 02:05:22.199
Is there anybody else?

02:05:22.199 --> 02:05:24.199
Alderman Sanders.

02:05:24.199 --> 02:05:26.199
Oh, okay.

02:05:26.199 --> 02:05:30.199
Manager Boyer, we had this conversation before, I believe,

02:05:30.199 --> 02:05:36.199
and we talked on some of the things that would take place

02:05:36.199 --> 02:05:45.199
to make sure that the residents are aware of the construction work that is going to take place.

02:05:45.199 --> 02:05:55.199
Will any of this interfere with their service as these guys begin to do their project lining program and everything?

02:05:55.199 --> 02:06:03.199
Will anything disrupt their service in the process of you guys taking care of those linings?

02:06:03.199 --> 02:06:05.199
and

02:06:06.279 --> 02:06:08.279
John.

02:06:10.920 --> 02:06:14.059
And you guys are doing what we call a video taping of each

02:06:14.059 --> 02:06:16.179
line before we do an installation that we can make

02:06:16.179 --> 02:06:18.380
sure that this is the appropriate thing to be doing

02:06:18.380 --> 02:06:20.380
for this particular area.

02:06:23.439 --> 02:06:26.159
I don't know how extensive our televising program is, and so I

02:06:26.159 --> 02:06:31.859
couldn't, I really can't make an observation to determine what it

02:06:31.860 --> 02:06:40.260
that is going on in that field, but I suspect you guys would keep us informed about the conditions

02:06:40.260 --> 02:06:44.140
of these lines and why we're investing into these projects.

02:06:44.140 --> 02:06:50.060
Yes, that's correct.

02:06:50.060 --> 02:06:51.060
Any further discussion?

02:06:51.060 --> 02:06:53.900
Madam Clerk, please take the roll.

02:06:53.900 --> 02:06:54.900
Sanders?

02:06:54.900 --> 02:06:55.900
Oh, yes.

02:06:55.900 --> 02:06:56.900
Klemm?

02:06:56.900 --> 02:06:57.900
Aye.

02:06:57.900 --> 02:06:58.900
Johnson?

02:06:58.900 --> 02:06:59.900
Aye.

02:06:59.900 --> 02:07:00.900
Simmons?

02:07:00.900 --> 02:07:12.100
Parker, Stacey, and Shadle. The motion passes 6-7 to 0. Item number 18, would you please

02:07:12.100 --> 02:07:17.660
read this discussion? Discussion regarding awarding contracts to a dissolved business

02:07:17.659 --> 02:07:35.819
entity, Alderman Simmons, I'll try to get through this as quickly as possible.

02:07:35.819 --> 02:07:41.019
Pursuant to my responsibilities as a duty, duly elected all the person I am formally requesting

02:07:41.019 --> 02:07:46.260
that the following might be placed on the agenda, which was just read by City Clerk

02:07:46.260 --> 02:08:16.260
Anderson, considering consideration and discussion regarding the city procurement practices in relation to the awarding of contracts to a business entity that was involuntarily dissolved by the Illinois Secretary of State in June 2025 it has come to my attention that a business whose corporate status was involuntarily dissolved under 805 ILCS 512.40 of the Illinois Business Corporation Act continues to be awarded bids and contracts for city projects

02:08:46.260 --> 02:08:50.140
and other entities without good corporate standing and discuss whether policy or procedural

02:08:50.140 --> 02:08:55.940
updates are necessary to ensure future compliance with applicable laws and protection of taxpayer

02:08:55.940 --> 02:08:56.940
funds.

02:08:56.940 --> 02:09:00.739
I respectfully request that this, oh, we don't need to do that, it's already on here.

02:09:00.739 --> 02:09:06.220
Thank you though.

02:09:06.220 --> 02:09:21.619
I would just like to read 805 ILCS 5-1240 of the Illinois Business Corporation Act outlines

02:09:21.619 --> 02:09:29.240
the procedure for the administrative dissolution of a corporation by the Secretary of State

02:09:29.239 --> 02:09:32.920
for failing to correct a default,

02:09:32.920 --> 02:09:37.920
such as failure to maintain a registered office

02:09:38.079 --> 02:09:42.279
or file required document.

02:09:42.279 --> 02:09:46.399
The secretary first sends a notice of delinquency

02:09:47.500 --> 02:09:49.840
to the corporation.

02:09:49.840 --> 02:09:54.840
If the default is not corrected within 90 days,

02:09:59.239 --> 02:10:14.239
For most defaults, 30 days for certain others, the secretary issues a certificate of dissolution, formally dissolving the corporation.

02:10:14.239 --> 02:10:25.239
And that's what has happened here with Albert and Son Earthworks LLC.

02:10:25.239 --> 02:10:55.219
and if you go back in August the 18th meeting they were awarded these demos however I believe it was June the 13th 2025 they were already in an involuntary dissolved situation.

02:10:55.239 --> 02:11:09.960
and John. They're not even listed as a company currently. And 90 days before that would have

02:11:09.960 --> 02:11:18.519
taken it three more months back. So we're probably looking at them not having a license

02:11:18.520 --> 02:11:31.520
are being affiliated in the state as a company back into March. However, we just gave them

02:11:31.520 --> 02:11:37.520
jobs totally almost a quarter million and they're not even registered in good standing.

02:11:37.520 --> 02:11:45.360
How does that happen? You know, we send out for these bids and we're supposed to trust

02:11:45.360 --> 02:11:47.360
and

02:11:49.360 --> 02:12:13.360
the other. We can't trust what you're bringing us. And time and time again, we're finding that we can't trust what you're bringing us. Because this should not be. This should not be coming to us if you're not in good standing.

02:12:15.360 --> 02:12:25.800
April, May, June, July, August is when you were granted these and whoever chose this,

02:12:25.800 --> 02:12:31.280
I know it was the lower bid, but who's looking at the people that's bidding for these jobs

02:12:31.280 --> 02:12:44.000
and why didn't you know that they were not adequately a business with the state?

02:12:44.000 --> 02:12:48.840
All of that is false. Go ahead, Director. No. See, this is what I talk about. You're telling

02:12:48.840 --> 02:12:52.439
me don't be disrespectful to you, but you, this is the third time. And you are putting

02:12:52.439 --> 02:12:57.119
out information that is not true. This is the third time you have. You are putting out information

02:12:57.119 --> 02:13:03.159
that is not true. No, it's not. I have it all right here. Please. Director Duckman,

02:13:03.159 --> 02:13:08.399
would you like to address those? No, I understand. I think that it's certainly something. I can

02:13:08.399 --> 02:13:12.960
see that you're upset. I understand. I'm not trying to talk. Go ahead. I'm sorry. No, I'm

02:13:12.960 --> 02:13:18.520
I'm just saying, she's telling me I'm rude and I'm interrupted and don't, but then she

02:13:18.520 --> 02:13:21.960
have fronted me three times tonight.

02:13:21.960 --> 02:13:25.199
All right.

02:13:25.199 --> 02:13:26.199
Go ahead Wayne.

02:13:26.199 --> 02:13:29.800
I was just going to say, let's start back with what we're talking about here and I'll

02:13:29.800 --> 02:13:35.640
start with a simple explanation as I can, and then I'll get into more of the details

02:13:35.640 --> 02:13:39.359
of the contract, etc.

02:13:39.360 --> 02:13:43.400
We're talking about here is when you have a company corporation the state of

02:13:43.400 --> 02:13:49.240
Illinois requires you to file the fee I do it every year I have a company and I

02:13:49.240 --> 02:13:54.440
believe it's right around seventy two dollars for corporation you file some

02:13:54.440 --> 02:14:01.600
paperwork it's usually about a page and every year you're required to file as a

02:14:01.600 --> 02:14:05.080
corporation in the state of Illinois that that's that's a rule so what we're

02:14:05.079 --> 02:14:35.079
We're talking about here is that Albert & Son, it has to do with when they filed their paperwork, I have been in contact with Albert & Son on this matter, they have, they have filed their paperwork, I've seen the receipts, I have them, I mean, I have no reason to be dishonest about that, they have filed their paperwork, my understanding is they filed their paperwork late, which is probably why

02:14:35.079 --> 02:14:39.920
is showing up as an involuntary dissolved organization.

02:14:39.920 --> 02:14:44.920
So if you file, I believe the deadline is August 1st, again, there's different types

02:14:44.920 --> 02:14:47.279
of corporations.

02:14:47.279 --> 02:14:51.220
When I filed my corporation in the state of Illinois, the deadline was August 1st.

02:14:51.220 --> 02:14:55.439
So if you don't file on August 2nd, you're going to be involuntarily dissolved by the

02:14:55.439 --> 02:14:56.439
state of Illinois.

02:14:56.439 --> 02:15:01.680
The state of Illinois will let you file your paperwork late, but until you do file that

02:15:31.680 --> 02:15:32.680
Thomas.

02:15:32.680 --> 02:15:42.079
Obviously, staff does everything they can to understand and to find any misuse of if

02:15:42.079 --> 02:15:44.200
somebody doesn't follow state or federal law.

02:15:44.200 --> 02:15:49.440
They're obviously long, there's many rules, but when we know about it, we will address

02:15:49.440 --> 02:15:54.360
it, which is why I had been in contact with Albert & Son to figure out what's the issue

02:15:54.360 --> 02:15:55.360
here.

02:15:55.360 --> 02:16:01.200
The remedy is when staff becomes aware of an issue, they have the right to bring it

02:16:01.199 --> 02:16:03.559
and back to counsel to terminate the contract.

02:16:03.559 --> 02:16:06.000
We are now aware of the issue.

02:16:06.000 --> 02:16:08.220
Alderman's son has filed the paperwork.

02:16:08.220 --> 02:16:09.639
They've showed me the receipts.

02:16:09.639 --> 02:16:12.639
I've seen the receipts.

02:16:12.639 --> 02:16:15.840
And now the next step would be counsel can either say,

02:16:15.840 --> 02:16:17.199
there was an issue.

02:16:17.199 --> 02:16:18.760
They fixed it.

02:16:18.760 --> 02:16:20.720
Or counsel can say, you know what?

02:16:20.720 --> 02:16:22.059
That's not good enough for us.

02:16:22.059 --> 02:16:24.239
We're going to move to terminate the contract.

02:16:24.239 --> 02:16:27.639
And there's really, I mean, those are your options.

02:16:27.639 --> 02:16:30.579
To be fair, I mean, if you think that filing

02:16:30.579 --> 02:17:00.579
I think you talk to counsel and see if that's something you want to talk about. If you're like, no, you know what? They made a mistake. They, you know, they were honest. They showed that they filed their paperwork late. We think that they've remedied the situation. Let's move this forward. I mean, that's a decision that you I believe you should make. I mean, if we want to talk about it more, I answer more questions about it. That's fair. I mean, I'm here to answer them.

02:17:00.579 --> 02:17:17.860
Alderman Sanders. Thank you. Director Duckman, I understand the

02:17:17.860 --> 02:17:24.379
in-compliance of the contract, but the fact of the matter, what came first, the horse

02:17:24.380 --> 02:17:25.380
and others.

02:17:25.380 --> 02:17:36.380
And the thing is, if the company or corporation was not in good standing with the state of

02:17:36.380 --> 02:17:46.820
Illinois, you cannot award or consider awarding any business entity, now let me finish, any

02:17:46.819 --> 02:17:58.940
Business, or Entity, with any acknowledgement of a potential contract, they're off the table.

02:17:58.940 --> 02:18:05.699
They're not part of the bidding, whatever, receiving of the awards and contracts and things

02:18:05.699 --> 02:18:07.979
like that.

02:18:07.979 --> 02:18:16.260
If there's others in line and one falls off that didn't come into compliance, then the

02:18:16.260 --> 02:18:26.380
and others move up, other corporations move into that slot until, like you say, they came

02:18:26.380 --> 02:18:35.280
in, they came in and came and got their company back on status and everything, but we're talking

02:18:35.280 --> 02:18:46.480
about time, dates, and when the state of Illinois gave them that status to do so.

02:18:46.480 --> 02:18:52.880
But until then, that contract is still in play, or contracts or awards are still in

02:18:52.880 --> 02:18:53.880
play.

02:18:53.880 --> 02:19:00.680
I don't know who the players are, but the fact of the matter is, the one that didn't

02:19:00.680 --> 02:19:05.020
come into compliance just can't jump back into the first line.

02:19:05.020 --> 02:19:35.020
they just can't do that, you know, they just can't, just because they fell off, they can't be the first who receives an award, contract award, they can't do that, that's not the proper way it's to be done, I don't know who else application was on file, but we need to know that, we need to know if there was other considerations that wanted, that could have been awarded those contracts and things of that nature, so until we understand

02:19:35.020 --> 02:19:56.020
and others. If you don't understand the timing and the dates of those contracts or the awarding, then there shouldn't be any awards out if there's only one person receiving the award or one company receiving the award. There shouldn't be any. We shouldn't even be entertaining it.

02:19:56.020 --> 02:19:58.020
and

02:19:59.140 --> 02:20:00.340
the city of

02:20:00.340 --> 02:20:02.340
Washington.

02:20:03.460 --> 02:20:05.420
And in fact, it should have came back to the council, so the

02:20:05.420 --> 02:20:08.380
council could reevaluate it and say whether or not we want to

02:20:08.380 --> 02:20:13.940
move forward or not. We can't just blanket, take it and say,

02:20:13.940 --> 02:20:17.659
well, we're going to wait until you come into compliance. Make

02:20:17.659 --> 02:20:21.920
sure your status come into compliance. We can't do that. We

02:20:21.920 --> 02:20:25.780
have to be able to have that discussion while it's out there

02:20:25.780 --> 02:20:55.780
and John.

02:20:55.780 --> 02:21:05.460
and I, and I apologize for misspeaking, but what I'm trying to say here is they are currently

02:21:05.460 --> 02:21:06.460
in compliance.

02:21:06.460 --> 02:21:09.020
I have the receipts of them being in compliance.

02:21:09.020 --> 02:21:13.300
So we're talking about this and we're talking about that.

02:21:13.300 --> 02:21:17.860
Our contract awards say that we require a person entering into the contract to follow

02:21:17.860 --> 02:21:20.159
federal, state, all laws.

02:21:20.159 --> 02:21:24.579
And when we know as staff that a law has been broken, that they are not in compliance with

02:21:24.579 --> 02:21:26.579
and

02:21:27.819 --> 02:21:31.479
the other two, and we're talking about it right now. But we also

02:21:31.479 --> 02:21:35.000
know that a remedy was made. They filed their paperwork. I have

02:21:35.000 --> 02:21:37.000
the receipts. They're now in compliance.

02:21:38.879 --> 02:21:40.879
»» This is not about a warning and a bid.

02:21:41.899 --> 02:21:44.039
»» We're not a warning and a bid. »» Alderman Simmons, did

02:21:44.039 --> 02:21:52.780
you have something? »» So, because as of June 2025, that

02:21:52.780 --> 02:21:58.380
that was state website that had not been resolved so I would like to know when

02:21:58.380 --> 02:22:05.860
also the bids we awarded we used grant funding knowing that they were or if not

02:22:05.860 --> 02:22:12.180
knowingly they were not compliant will that affect our future grants or put us

02:22:12.180 --> 02:22:15.060
from being able to get grants because we aren't doing what we're supposed to do

02:22:15.060 --> 02:22:21.040
no and and I would say no and I would confidently say no anytime a grant

02:22:21.040 --> 02:22:26.760
Grant Managers when you're working in a grant. They will always have comments, questions.

02:22:26.760 --> 02:22:31.480
We need you to file a certain way. We notice that you're missing this compliance here. Any

02:22:31.480 --> 02:22:38.340
time that you find an issue and you work to remedy the issue, they're not going to penalize

02:22:38.340 --> 02:22:42.620
you for that. It's the same with the state of Illinois. You missed your compliance date

02:22:42.620 --> 02:22:47.080
to register as a corporation, they'll still take your money and let you register as a

02:22:47.079 --> 02:22:49.579
and the Corporation.

02:22:49.579 --> 02:22:50.579
They will.

02:22:50.579 --> 02:22:54.479
People make mistakes, they don't see it, and then you look at it and you say, well, how

02:22:54.479 --> 02:22:56.039
do we remedy this situation?

02:22:56.039 --> 02:23:04.139
Are they willing to get into compliance or are they fighting the compliance?

02:23:04.139 --> 02:23:08.799
They are aware of the issue, we brought it up to them, they showed us that they're filed.

02:23:08.799 --> 02:23:12.840
I mean, that's the facts of the situation.

02:23:12.840 --> 02:23:16.620
there's a remedy that wants to be investigated or discussed with our legal

02:23:16.620 --> 02:23:24.799
counsel what remedies and options we have I maybe ask that question what's I'm

02:23:24.799 --> 02:23:34.440
sorry I I became aware of this probably early part of late last week is probably

02:23:34.440 --> 02:23:38.880
my guess is when I became aware of the that's when I became aware that they

02:23:38.880 --> 02:23:40.640
and I were in compliance with this.

02:23:40.640 --> 02:23:41.880
That's when I found out.

02:23:41.880 --> 02:23:44.360
I'm saying you said that they have done it.

02:23:44.360 --> 02:23:48.440
Yes, I have it on my phone.

02:23:48.440 --> 02:23:50.640
Give me a minute, I'll try to find it.

02:23:50.640 --> 02:23:51.360
But I do have it.

02:23:51.360 --> 02:23:54.360
It says receipts, filed the paperwork, paid the receipt.

02:23:54.360 --> 02:23:55.440
I have it.

02:23:55.440 --> 02:23:56.720
I have it in my phone.

02:23:56.720 --> 02:23:58.520
Without using my second time attorney,

02:23:58.520 --> 02:24:00.320
do you have anything to say to that?

02:24:00.320 --> 02:24:03.960
Because I know in most cases when you use grant funding,

02:24:03.960 --> 02:24:05.640
you are audited.

02:24:05.640 --> 02:24:08.400
And they come and they look at those things

02:24:08.399 --> 02:24:17.159
I don't know the specifics as whether or not this would create a problem for our

02:24:17.159 --> 02:24:21.159
grants I suppose that is a question ultimately for the grant administrators to

02:24:21.159 --> 02:24:26.399
say hey do you guys think this would cause a problem that at the time of the

02:24:26.399 --> 02:24:30.760
award they technically were not in good standing with the Secretary of State's

02:24:30.760 --> 02:24:34.639
office they have now remedied it what say you grant administrator does that

02:24:34.639 --> 02:25:04.639
Cronenberg, Mayor, Mayor, Mayor, Mayor, Mayor, Mayor, Mayor

02:25:04.639 --> 02:25:10.000
so and this one is a check dollars and cents regardless of what happens we're

02:25:10.000 --> 02:25:20.519
covered yeah yes then we will move on to item number 19 which is reports of

02:25:20.519 --> 02:25:28.260
department heads finance development nothing tonight madam mayor public

02:25:28.260 --> 02:25:31.300
Works.

02:25:31.300 --> 02:25:34.219
Two things quickly.

02:25:34.219 --> 02:25:35.940
We've had a significant amount of calls

02:25:35.940 --> 02:25:41.260
recently about sewer laterals or sewer services at homes

02:25:41.260 --> 02:25:43.700
that have root issues.

02:25:43.700 --> 02:25:46.659
Just a point of clarification for residents,

02:25:46.659 --> 02:25:49.100
sewer laterals or sewer services are

02:25:49.100 --> 02:25:52.020
owned by the homeowner from the house to the main.

02:25:52.020 --> 02:25:55.180
Those issues, while you can call the city

02:25:55.180 --> 02:25:57.380
and ask for assistance, those are

02:25:57.380 --> 02:26:02.460
and I have been financially borne by the residents themselves as part of our codes and ordinances.

02:26:02.460 --> 02:26:04.700
So that's one point I wanted to make.

02:26:04.700 --> 02:26:09.960
The second point I'd like to make tonight, and I've hinted on this a handful of times,

02:26:09.960 --> 02:26:17.000
but recently we've seen an uptick from really abusive behavior to our public works staff

02:26:17.000 --> 02:26:19.560
and our people that answer the phones.

02:26:19.560 --> 02:26:24.180
And I'm making it a point of clarification that we're not going to tolerate it at the

02:26:24.180 --> 02:26:26.280
public works department.

02:26:26.280 --> 02:26:30.520
We will politely end all calls that are made that are abusive.

02:26:30.520 --> 02:26:32.840
Our staff does not get paid to be abused.

02:26:32.840 --> 02:26:37.060
I realize people are having situations that they're upset about.

02:26:37.060 --> 02:26:41.900
That doesn't mean we get to scream, cuss, and yell and take it out on the city employees.

02:26:41.900 --> 02:26:44.239
We're here to help solve problems.

02:26:44.239 --> 02:26:49.940
And moving forward, we will politely end all calls that are not done in a professional

02:26:49.940 --> 02:26:51.960
manner with our department.

02:26:51.960 --> 02:26:53.280
Fire?

02:26:53.280 --> 02:27:02.079
nothing from fire this evening I just have two things first off on our on the

02:27:02.079 --> 02:27:05.600
Freeport Police Department Facebook page there is a flyer about the Civilian

02:27:05.600 --> 02:27:09.960
Police Academy so we do have openings we're looking for more people so if

02:27:09.960 --> 02:27:14.760
anyone's interested you can visit our Facebook page we're taking people

02:27:14.760 --> 02:27:20.360
until September 26th and planning on starting on October 2nd so all the

02:27:20.360 --> 02:27:21.360
and so on.

02:27:21.360 --> 02:27:22.360
So there's a lot of information on there.

02:27:22.360 --> 02:27:23.360
There's a flyer.

02:27:23.360 --> 02:27:32.880
Secondly, back in 2024, the Stevens County ETSB voted to switch report management systems.

02:27:32.880 --> 02:27:38.700
So currently, the Freeport Police Department, Stevens County Sheriff's Department and FIRE,

02:27:38.700 --> 02:27:42.640
we utilize a system called CIS.

02:27:42.640 --> 02:27:47.720
We've been with CIS probably since 2012, I'm guessing.

02:27:47.719 --> 02:27:48.719
and Chris.

02:27:48.719 --> 02:27:49.719
This is 2012.

02:27:49.719 --> 02:27:50.719
CIS hasn't evolved at all.

02:27:50.719 --> 02:27:54.399
It's just kind of remained stuck in the same form as what it was.

02:27:54.399 --> 02:28:00.119
And so we felt that there was a need for a change, so ETSB voted to switch to Central

02:28:00.119 --> 02:28:01.119
Square.

02:28:01.119 --> 02:28:03.279
This is a huge project.

02:28:03.279 --> 02:28:06.500
It's going to go live tomorrow at 8 o'clock.

02:28:06.500 --> 02:28:13.319
There has been training, obviously, but we're going to flip the switch tomorrow at 8 a.m.

02:28:13.319 --> 02:28:17.599
So please be patient because that's going to affect the way calls are generated.

02:28:17.600 --> 02:28:18.600
and many more.

02:28:18.600 --> 02:28:20.159
It's going to affect the way that we write reports.

02:28:20.159 --> 02:28:27.360
It's also going to, things that we've had available in certain parts of this program

02:28:27.360 --> 02:28:32.540
may not be available in Central Square, we'll figure that out, we'll work out the kinks

02:28:32.540 --> 02:28:33.540
on that.

02:28:33.540 --> 02:28:39.000
I know one of the things that's really popular is our police activity blotter that's posted.

02:28:39.000 --> 02:28:43.520
I believe that's like an algorithm or something correct, that's not anything we control,

02:28:43.520 --> 02:28:48.640
it was something that IT helped start as far as central square we have to

02:28:48.640 --> 02:28:52.300
determine if that's even possible right now I mean tomorrow is gonna be just the

02:28:52.300 --> 02:28:57.560
basics on how to operate it and then from there we will dig deeper in there

02:28:57.560 --> 02:29:00.800
and find out exactly you know all the stuff that it has it definitely has a

02:29:00.800 --> 02:29:04.640
lot of different options and opportunities for us but we're gonna

02:29:04.640 --> 02:29:12.760
have to learn it before we were able to showcase all that stuff library thank you

02:29:12.760 --> 02:29:19.280
I just wanted to make sure everybody here knows that the sculpture walk is having

02:29:19.280 --> 02:29:25.440
our big opening events this week. On Friday there is a ribbon cutting at 12

02:29:25.440 --> 02:29:33.360
p.m. which will be down by the Gateway area of the Arts Plaza and then the

02:29:33.360 --> 02:29:39.200
reception for the sculpture walk is from 5 to 7 p.m. at the library. It is open to

02:29:39.200 --> 02:29:42.659
Mohan, Sortie,

02:29:42.659 --> 02:29:46.240
Public, and you will be able to meet and greet with some of the artists of the sculptures.

02:29:46.240 --> 02:29:49.240
IT?

02:29:49.240 --> 02:29:52.420
City Manager?

02:29:52.420 --> 02:29:57.120
Yes, Madame Mayor, I have two items. The project that's going on at the intersection of

02:29:57.120 --> 02:30:00.920
Stevenson and Perk Boulevard has had an expected

02:30:00.920 --> 02:30:05.100
completion date of Friday September 19th,

02:30:05.100 --> 02:30:35.100
We understand the inconvenience this is causing to the community and we are excited to open this up area up with upgraded infrastructure as soon as possible. Thank you. And I appreciate your patience and understanding on that. In addition, for the better part of this, I want to say thank you to all of you for being here today. Thank you.

02:30:35.100 --> 02:30:49.100
We have been under attack by groups on social media that have gone even as far as making threats to the officer, those involved in their daily tasks.

02:30:49.100 --> 02:31:03.100
I find it necessary to stand up for all employees of the city, and specifically our Animal Control Officer who is doing an outstanding job in ensuring that the laws are followed, the job gets done, and most importantly, these animals are taken care of.

02:31:03.100 --> 02:31:14.500
To everyone making these misinformed and hateful posts, understand that these employees are members of our community who show up to work every day in order to serve the city in their capacity.

02:31:14.500 --> 02:31:23.260
We appreciate the community's input, but threats and hateful speech should not be aimed at our workers. Thank you.

02:31:23.260 --> 02:31:25.260
I have nothing new, Alderman Sanders?

02:31:25.260 --> 02:31:27.260
Oh

02:31:29.260 --> 02:31:31.260
No

02:31:31.260 --> 02:31:33.260
Alderman Parker?

02:31:33.260 --> 02:31:35.260
Sorry, Alderman Klemm, my apologies

02:31:35.260 --> 02:31:37.260
Nothing Madam Mayor

02:31:37.260 --> 02:31:39.260
Alderman Johnson?

02:31:39.260 --> 02:31:41.260
Yes, we have a Neighborhood Watch meeting

02:31:41.260 --> 02:31:43.260
this Thursday at 6.30

02:31:43.260 --> 02:31:45.260
at 3002 Farmedale Lane

02:31:45.260 --> 02:31:47.260
and also this Saturday

02:31:47.260 --> 02:31:49.260
is the Block Party

02:31:49.260 --> 02:31:51.260
at Franken State from 1 to 4

02:31:51.260 --> 02:31:56.540
4, and Church in the Streets from 1 to 2.30 on Sunday at Frankenstein.

02:31:56.540 --> 02:31:57.540
Alderman Simmons?

02:31:57.540 --> 02:31:59.540
No, I don't have anything.

02:31:59.540 --> 02:32:00.540
Thank you.

02:32:00.540 --> 02:32:01.540
Alderman Parker?

02:32:01.540 --> 02:32:05.540
Yes, the Civilian Police Academy that the Chief talked about is an excellent program

02:32:05.540 --> 02:32:07.940
and I highly recommend anybody who can't take it.

02:32:07.940 --> 02:32:11.300
Then the others, we have a Neighborhood Watch meeting next Monday night.

02:32:11.300 --> 02:32:12.300
Thank you.

02:32:12.300 --> 02:32:13.300
Alderman Stacey?

02:32:13.300 --> 02:32:20.100
Fifth Ward has a Neighborhood Watch meeting tomorrow.

02:32:20.100 --> 02:32:23.220
at 6 o'clock at the church on Carroll.

02:32:23.220 --> 02:32:24.399
Alderman Shadle?

02:32:24.399 --> 02:32:25.819
Nothing tonight.

02:32:25.819 --> 02:32:26.780
Public comments.

02:32:33.819 --> 02:32:35.899
Fortunately, my name is Cheryl Altman.

02:32:37.140 --> 02:32:39.440
And so Wayne, you admitted that you knew Albers

02:32:39.440 --> 02:32:43.840
didn't have the right, states filed out with states,

02:32:43.840 --> 02:32:46.239
but that you allowed them to tear down buildings.

02:32:46.239 --> 02:32:57.119
and also you Darren or Rob should have been out there. They did not follow EPA regulations

02:32:57.119 --> 02:33:03.559
at all. I've got pictures of it with dust flying everywhere. No fences surrounding stuff

02:33:03.559 --> 02:33:09.239
and that's on my property. Shh. And I'm sure they didn't follow it anymore because we've

02:33:09.239 --> 02:33:16.119
got pictures of this. Also, your tour down my house Wayne, you think you got a big win.

02:33:16.120 --> 02:33:18.680
Now that I found out tonight, you don't.

02:33:18.680 --> 02:33:23.200
Also, you took my driveway, my back lot, and my steps.

02:33:23.200 --> 02:33:24.280
Why?

02:33:24.280 --> 02:33:26.480
That driveway was not part of the building.

02:33:27.400 --> 02:33:29.760
And Rob, I've been on you for three weeks

02:33:29.760 --> 02:33:32.020
to get me the paperwork of all this.

02:33:33.200 --> 02:33:34.440
And you sit there like...

02:33:36.280 --> 02:33:37.720
And Mayor Miller, you don't like it

02:33:37.720 --> 02:33:39.640
when people come up here and talk about elders.

02:33:39.640 --> 02:33:40.860
It irritates you.

02:33:42.160 --> 02:33:46.040
It irritates you because, you know, they get things wrong.

02:33:46.040 --> 02:33:47.560
and I sure hope they pay for it soon

02:33:47.560 --> 02:33:50.760
because people are waking up and they've not followed it

02:33:50.760 --> 02:33:53.140
and thank God that this lady will be able

02:33:53.140 --> 02:33:56.120
to hopefully keep her job because people voted for that.

02:33:56.120 --> 02:33:59.840
It's wrong to kick her out when she's done a great job

02:33:59.840 --> 02:34:03.640
and devoted her life to that, it's wrong.

02:34:03.640 --> 02:34:06.200
You want to get to somebody in there that's crooked

02:34:06.200 --> 02:34:08.720
just like the rest of most of you city people.

02:34:08.720 --> 02:34:10.160
That's why you wanted her out.

02:34:11.500 --> 02:34:12.860
Any other public comments?

02:34:16.040 --> 02:34:18.040
and the next one.

02:34:28.720 --> 02:34:31.200
Hi, Sue Cook, Winchester Drive.

02:34:31.200 --> 02:34:37.080
And I noticed that we go for the lowest bid.

02:34:37.080 --> 02:34:39.620
I know you look to save the buck because that's

02:34:39.620 --> 02:34:40.440
what everybody does.

02:34:40.440 --> 02:34:42.240
They always go for the lowest bid.

02:34:42.240 --> 02:34:45.000
And we're a distressed city.

02:34:45.000 --> 02:34:54.139
and I hate that label, distressed city, Freeport isn't distressed. So maybe sometimes going

02:34:54.139 --> 02:35:03.639
for maybe not the lowest bid, maybe the next, maybe looking at everybody's qualifications

02:35:03.639 --> 02:35:07.680
and saying, yeah, they came with a low bid and they have all the qualifications we need

02:35:07.680 --> 02:35:14.920
but this person really knows the area. So I'm very happy that it didn't go through.

02:35:14.920 --> 02:35:26.139
So for the people that are on oxygen, when we're talking about this ComEd or MC Squared,

02:35:26.139 --> 02:35:30.520
if they're on oxygen with ComEd or if they're on a ventilator or if they're on any kind

02:35:30.520 --> 02:35:38.280
of home oxygen equipment or home medical equipment and the power goes out, you are on a list

02:35:38.280 --> 02:35:43.000
that immediately your area is worked on right away because some of these people, they cannot

02:35:43.000 --> 02:35:44.000
Fowler.

02:35:44.000 --> 02:35:47.219
They have generators, but the generators don't go that long.

02:35:47.219 --> 02:35:54.440
So ComEd immediately works on your property so that the oxygen comes back up and the ventilators

02:35:54.440 --> 02:35:55.440
come back on.

02:35:55.440 --> 02:35:59.280
And I know this is about disability rights, and I know this is about the ADA, and maybe

02:35:59.280 --> 02:36:04.120
that group should have been pulled in, but I don't know, Mr. Mudge, what would happen

02:36:04.120 --> 02:36:08.299
with MC Squared, because everybody, like I started out saying, everybody likes to save

02:36:08.299 --> 02:36:09.299
a buck.

02:36:09.300 --> 02:36:17.060
If MC Squared really does save the dollars, do they also have this list to be able to

02:36:17.060 --> 02:36:23.460
lift the people that are on oxygen, are on ventilators, are on home medical equipment,

02:36:23.460 --> 02:36:30.980
whether it's IV drips or whatever? Do they have that? That's something to look into.

02:36:30.980 --> 02:36:36.280
Maybe not the lowest bid. And if possible, allow us to have the choice without having

02:36:36.280 --> 02:36:42.239
to opt out, because sometimes opting out isn't really opting out. You have to jump hurdles

02:36:42.239 --> 02:36:46.920
to opt out. Thank you.

02:36:46.920 --> 02:36:48.920
Any other public comments?

02:36:48.920 --> 02:36:50.920
and Mr.

02:37:12.920 --> 02:37:14.920
Any other public comments?

02:37:18.920 --> 02:37:46.120
Miller, Councilmen and Women, and you my constituents.

02:37:46.120 --> 02:38:04.840
I take my position seriously and yeah, sometimes I too fall short and get upset because right

02:38:04.840 --> 02:38:09.320
is right and wrong is wrong.

02:38:09.319 --> 02:38:26.319
So I stand before you tonight apologizing for my shortcomings. I'm only human. For future

02:38:26.319 --> 02:38:41.959
Reference, Director Duckman, I just think it's only right that everybody be in good

02:38:41.959 --> 02:38:50.039
standings, that be it's on jobs and maybe that's something that can be added to the

02:38:50.040 --> 02:38:54.600
Ordinance or to the process or to the whatever,

02:38:54.600 --> 02:38:59.600
that they have to show that they are in right standing.

02:39:03.880 --> 02:39:06.940
I'm not trying to take nobody's life hood away.

02:39:11.280 --> 02:39:13.140
Right is right and wrong is wrong.

02:39:15.480 --> 02:39:17.240
And we have to come correct.

02:39:17.239 --> 02:39:29.239
We all have to come correct. It's not this can work for you and not for me. We're in this together.

02:39:29.239 --> 02:39:39.239
And with that being said, I just want to read Isaiah 40 and 8.

02:39:39.239 --> 02:39:50.239
The grass withers and the flowers fade, but the word of God stands forever.

02:39:50.239 --> 02:39:58.239
Father God, in the name of Jesus, we praise you and we thank you for being God all by yourself, Lord.

02:39:58.239 --> 02:40:04.239
Continue to look down upon us, your people, oh God.

02:40:04.239 --> 02:40:16.239
Continue to lead us and guide us, order our steps according to your word, for it's your word that cannot return void.

02:40:16.239 --> 02:40:29.239
Give us understanding, give her a greater knowledge and understanding of what we need to do for this year's city.

02:40:29.239 --> 02:40:47.920
for we stand in victory we walk by faith and not by sight we thank you for being

02:40:47.920 --> 02:40:57.799
in control in Jesus name we pray amen any other public comments this evening I'll

02:40:57.800 --> 02:41:03.320
I'll entertain a motion for adjournment. So moved. Second. We have a motion made by

02:41:03.320 --> 02:41:11.760
Shadle. Seconded. Seconded by Alderman Parker. All those in favor? Aye. Have a good evening.

